Btw I did want to ask anyone figure out how to get p2pool to work yet?
p2pool has crashed my computer everytime i ever tried getting on prolly strickly for tech wizard$,,thanks
Topic: [ANN] ** NEW SITE bitgem.pw ** BTG BitGem 0.4.9.ALPHA1 | COLORED COINS | FAUCET - page 37. (Read 147748 times)
June 28, 2013, 03:05:44 PM
p2pool has crashed my computer everytime i ever tried getting on prolly strickly for tech wizard$,,thanks
June 28, 2013, 03:01:50 PM
Btw I did want to ask anyone figure out how to get p2pool to work yet?
p2pool has crashed my computer everytime i ever tried getting on prolly strickly for tech wizard$,,thanks
June 28, 2013, 02:54:46 PM
ok guys any reason why i don't see the gem part in my wallet i compiled the QT part on linux i know mineral said he was woring on it but the front page does say linux gem wallet anything i need to do to get this to work ?
June 28, 2013, 11:18:16 AM
The 0.4.1.5 fix for stake reward on small amounts looks good, mineral!
Hopefully we have caught all the stake-mining credit issues now, and BitGem is becoming one of the best stake coins.
I will test again when the protocol update becomes active on July15.
By the way, I see you also picked up the change I had mentioned they did for BitBar in wallet.cpp, which it turns out is not needed - it's only cosmetic, but shouldn't hurt. I'll send you a PM about it. (and note for any Bitbar users: BitBar is still broken for small stake amounts. I'll try to followup with the developers of BTB and other stake-mining coins to get them fixed as time permits)
Hopefully we have caught all the stake-mining credit issues now, and BitGem is becoming one of the best stake coins.
I will test again when the protocol update becomes active on July15.
By the way, I see you also picked up the change I had mentioned they did for BitBar in wallet.cpp, which it turns out is not needed - it's only cosmetic, but shouldn't hurt. I'll send you a PM about it. (and note for any Bitbar users: BitBar is still broken for small stake amounts. I'll try to followup with the developers of BTB and other stake-mining coins to get them fixed as time permits)
June 28, 2013, 11:10:54 AM
Btw I did want to ask anyone figure out how to get p2pool to work yet?
June 28, 2013, 11:09:51 AM
Hey mineral you got the gem wallet to work now for linux ?
June 28, 2013, 06:22:41 AM
gnm1kszeEuzTFK3zWWSAvAx7hAr9FPcDJy
Thanks.
-Branzig.
Thanks.
-Branzig.
June 28, 2013, 04:45:07 AM
Will, p2pool the networks.py file, how do I configure join it?
June 28, 2013, 03:44:28 AM
What's diff at can you solo mine right now or no?
June 28, 2013, 03:38:23 AM
People sellin so cheap. If this currency survives, which I think it will due to the support and dev behind it, now is the time to buy. I can mine around 2.5-3.5 coins per day, and if I were to value this coin off what I can make mining litecoin or BTC, that should put each gem at .03-.04 per.
Buy buy buy.
Buy buy buy.
June 27, 2013, 10:15:24 PM
I'm using the new update. I just d/led it from github, for the first time, about 2 hours ago.
edit: Ok ya bitgemd is showing the version as 0.4.1-nvc....
So have the gui windows wallet bins been updated, but not the linux bitgemd ? That's disappointing if true. Thanks for any help...
edit 2: erased all earlier files. i might have gimped something. re/dling block chain seeing if this will work one more time...
edit 3: ok no more error message now, could be good. Does 11419 blocks sound about right?
edit: Ok ya bitgemd is showing the version as 0.4.1-nvc....
So have the gui windows wallet bins been updated, but not the linux bitgemd ? That's disappointing if true. Thanks for any help...
edit 2: erased all earlier files. i might have gimped something. re/dling block chain seeing if this will work one more time...
edit 3: ok no more error message now, could be good. Does 11419 blocks sound about right?
Yep sounds right. Im showing 11420 now
June 27, 2013, 07:50:08 PM
I'm using the new update. I just d/led it from github, for the first time, about 2 hours ago.
edit: Ok ya bitgemd is showing the version as 0.4.1-nvc....
So have the gui windows wallet bins been updated, but not the linux bitgemd ? That's disappointing if true. Thanks for any help...
edit 2: erased all earlier files. i might have gimped something. re/dling block chain seeing if this will work one more time...
edit 3: ok no more error message now, could be good. Does 11419 blocks sound about right?
edit: Ok ya bitgemd is showing the version as 0.4.1-nvc....
So have the gui windows wallet bins been updated, but not the linux bitgemd ? That's disappointing if true. Thanks for any help...
edit 2: erased all earlier files. i might have gimped something. re/dling block chain seeing if this will work one more time...
edit 3: ok no more error message now, could be good. Does 11419 blocks sound about right?
June 27, 2013, 07:25:33 PM
Kinda bored thought I'd try this co..err..gem out today.
The block explorer is down though. Is this coin working ok currently?
I'm getting a "checkpoint is too old. wait for block chain to download or notify developers" in my bitgemd.
So I guess I'm notifying the developers currently. Does anyone know if 11417 blocks sounds right for the network? I can't download anymore...
The block explorer is down though. Is this coin working ok currently?
I'm getting a "checkpoint is too old. wait for block chain to download or notify developers" in my bitgemd.
So I guess I'm notifying the developers currently. Does anyone know if 11417 blocks sounds right for the network? I can't download anymore...
Read the page before this one he released a update
June 27, 2013, 07:15:10 PM
Kinda bored thought I'd try this co..err..gem out today.
The block explorer is down though. Is this coin working ok currently?
I'm getting a "checkpoint is too old. wait for block chain to download or notify developers" in my bitgemd.
So I guess I'm notifying the developers currently. Does anyone know if 11417 blocks sounds right for the network? I can't download anymore...
The block explorer is down though. Is this coin working ok currently?
I'm getting a "checkpoint is too old. wait for block chain to download or notify developers" in my bitgemd.
So I guess I'm notifying the developers currently. Does anyone know if 11417 blocks sounds right for the network? I can't download anymore...
June 27, 2013, 06:19:29 PM
This shit has to be a joke. GemWallet? 
why i think it's a great idea something no-one else has tried at allI have been on your side hazard. If this were another litecoin copy paste clone sure. But the developer is trying something. Not going on a marketing campaign to attract value to something that takes 5 mins to create based off of other peoples work. I believe your comment about what crypto needs in a little hypocritical. Did we really need Weedcoin?
As you have shown they can be produced in minutes
And a developer actually developing should not be discouraged June 27, 2013, 02:48:00 PM
anyone want to trade so gems for 30k of zenithcoin?
June 27, 2013, 01:03:55 PM
This shit has to be a joke. GemWallet?
why i think it's a great idea something no-one else has tried at all
June 27, 2013, 01:01:47 PM
This shit has to be a joke. GemWallet?
why i think it's a great idea something no-one else has tried at all June 27, 2013, 01:00:23 PM
whats about difficulty?
its very high now - with low hashrate...
should the diff not be retargeted after every block?
I was just going to ask that it's not moving its very high now - with low hashrate...
should the diff not be retargeted after every block?
June 27, 2013, 12:46:04 PM
whats about difficulty?
its very high now - with low hashrate...
should the diff not be retargeted after every block?
its very high now - with low hashrate...
should the diff not be retargeted after every block?
Jump to: