Well, I'm agreed it is smart to use cryptocurrencies, for example, stable coins, for remittance? But this idea is nt new. So why not to use existing tokens/coins, that are more popular and more trusted?
It is not possible to use existing coins because they already have their own purpose or function. Some of these coins work as a utility token for the mainnet or platform of each project. It is better to use ROKS because it will be a "medium of exchange", which means it can be used to buy anything. Remittance is our "go to market", meaning it is an initial use case. There will be many uses cases. will be a "medium of exchange", which means it can be used to buy anything. Remittance is our "go to market", meaning it is an initial use case. There will be many uses cases.
Roks is better:
1. Very simple stability mechanism;
2. Pegged to USD but does not promise continued 1 to 1 redeemability;
3. Has its own payment system to allow it to flourish outside of exchanges; and
4. Accept-side, value trust transference strategy aims to get network effects started faster than others.