Author

Topic: [ANN] NiceHash.com - sell & buy hash rate cloud mining service / multipool - page 204. (Read 794394 times)

sr. member
Activity: 481
Merit: 250
The web site is down. I'm seeing error 524 (timeout) from CloudFlare.

Hashes are successfully being submitted, so I hope that mining is still working.

Thought i was the only one with the issue

Same here, hope they fix it soon.
crk
full member
Activity: 184
Merit: 100
The web site is down. I'm seeing error 524 (timeout) from CloudFlare.

Hashes are successfully being submitted, so I hope that mining is still working.

Thought i was the only one with the issue
legendary
Activity: 1150
Merit: 1004
The web site is down. I'm seeing error 524 (timeout) from CloudFlare.

Hashes are successfully being submitted, so I hope that mining is still working.
sr. member
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
because you cannot rent any hash power without the Bots or whatever driving up the price....its a damn shame and i am about ready to bail on NiceHash...only problem is now my BTC will not be released for 24 hours so I can use them on a FAIR site ....the anti Bot crap doesn't work---

We don't have anti bot rules, we actually support them, that is why there is API available. We just don't support market manipulation in any dishonest way.

Everyone may use the bot placing and managing orders as long as intentions are fair - to compete with other orders in a fair manner - that is - if you pay more, you get more.

A quick look at the scrypt market on westhash shows 95 active orders, and what appears to be 1 person holding 75 of them (consecutive order numbers and/or all the same or very similar price)

There isn't anything that can be done about it though, any way you can think of to stop it is soon defeated, eg limit on number of orders just use multiple accounts. IP Limit, switching ip's is very easy.

You are right, I also do not see any solution, but maybe some other have good idea. Actually the point is not to restrict someone, point is to give a possibility for others to mine.

True, that is why we are working on several possible solutions - two of them already mentioned and will be integrated in the system in following days/weeks and there is also a third one. We will provide a basic bot software, including source code, for everyone to use, for free. Those with some little coding knowledge will be able to easily extend and modify it to suit own needs (such as linking with wallets, exchanges and so on to get mining profitability data and be able to adjust maximal price for orders).

You are right, I also do not see any solution, but maybe some other have good idea. Actually the point is not to restrict someone, point is to give a possibility for others to mine.
legendary
Activity: 980
Merit: 1001
aka "whocares"
Actually it's worse now than before.... same guy has like 30 accounts running on Sha256....Fu$%ing Joke...

PLEASE release my BTC so I can rent somewhere else---
legendary
Activity: 980
Merit: 1001
aka "whocares"
because you cannot rent any hash power without the Bots or whatever driving up the price....its a damn shame and i am about ready to bail on NiceHash...only problem is now my BTC will not be released for 24 hours so I can use them on a FAIR site ....the anti Bot crap doesn't work---
sr. member
Activity: 840
Merit: 251
legendary
Activity: 3808
Merit: 1723
Any idea why all of a sudden the SHA256 rates went up?

Any new alt coins out there that are SHA256 ?
hero member
Activity: 742
Merit: 500
A quick look at the scrypt market on westhash shows 95 active orders, and what appears to be 1 person holding 75 of them (consecutive order numbers and/or all the same or very similar price)

There isn't anything that can be done about it though, any way you can think of to stop it is soon defeated, eg limit on number of orders just use multiple accounts. IP Limit, switching ip's is very easy.

You are right, I also do not see any solution, but maybe some other have good idea. Actually the point is not to restrict someone, point is to give a possibility for others to mine.
legendary
Activity: 1098
Merit: 1000
A quick look at the scrypt market on westhash shows 95 active orders, and what appears to be 1 person holding 75 of them (consecutive order numbers and/or all the same or very similar price)

There isn't anything that can be done about it though, any way you can think of to stop it is soon defeated, eg limit on number of orders just use multiple accounts. IP Limit, switching ip's is very easy.
hero member
Activity: 742
Merit: 500
I am using nicehash since it is launched and will keep using it.

There is so much positive I can say about nicehash, but this post is to say where I would like to see some improvement.

There are so many people outside who do not want to share any hashrate with others, which makes new users to overpay because they get trapped into this.
How to save new users from loss and raise nicehash's popularity?

Users on nicehash use several techniques like multiorders and setting the lowest one to unlimited backed by enough btc's to extend the order.

So what can be done to improve this? I think bandwith should be differently distributed. Unlimited max hashrate can be limited in some way.
Maybe an order should get max. hashrate based on like (available hashrate/orders)+???some value based on Order/Value???.

Another solution would be restricting user to an amount of orders per alg, but I do not know how your users would react to such change.

Maybe there is another solution by fixed payment/rent, but this would turn nicehash into just a normal renting site which could turn as step back.

Thanks again for great service.
legendary
Activity: 885
Merit: 1006
NiceHash.com
I'm using the Jan 7th firmware on the S5.
When I append #xnsub to the end of the connect URL, and only have p=0.0121 in password, it will connect to the Nicehash pool but won't fail over to my secondary when the price isn't met, even after 30 minutes.
Stays alive on nicehash, and does 0.00GH

This must be an issue with the cgminer version that Bitmain put into this particular firmware. Please report this issue to Bitmain - they should use this patch of extranonce.subscribe: https://github.com/nicehash/cgminer-ckolivas/commit/4e9c7ce68ed91ec9189d83c35b2237aca65f2b7f (this is the patch that we recommended to them, but not sure which one they actually implemented).
hero member
Activity: 979
Merit: 510
If using the extranonce subscribe for an S5 or SP20, is it normal for the miner to not fall back to the top priority pool when nicehash price drops below thresh-hold ?
On both systems, when I get a green checkmark for EN, it will stay on nicehash no matter the price, and when it falls below the required price, simply stops hashing.
Removing EN fixes this problem, but is not ideal.
Maybe you can't have the best of both worlds with EN Tongue

This should work as designed.

You should set settings like this:

primary pool: stratum.nicehash.com:3334#xnsub (or stratum.westhash.com:3334#xnsub)
worker: your-btc-address
pass: p=0.01

secondary pool: whatever...

If you are using #xnsub you can't use more then one parameter in pass, for example, you can't use p=0.01;d=512 but don't worry about this because NiceHash will set difficulty correctly, simply use only p= parameter. It will switch to your secondary pool when paying price is below threshold and switch back to NiceHash/WestHash when price is reached again.

I'm using the Jan 7th firmware on the S5.
When I append #xnsub to the end of the connect URL, and only have p=0.0121 in password, it will connect to the Nicehash pool but won't fail over to my secondary when the price isn't met, even after 30 minutes.
Stays alive on nicehash, and does 0.00GH
hero member
Activity: 503
Merit: 500
If using the extranonce subscribe for an S5 or SP20, is it normal for the miner to not fall back to the top priority pool when nicehash price drops below thresh-hold ?
On both systems, when I get a green checkmark for EN, it will stay on nicehash no matter the price, and when it falls below the required price, simply stops hashing.
Removing EN fixes this problem, but is not ideal.
Maybe you can't have the best of both worlds with EN Tongue

Sounds like you might have the idlebug. I had the problem for a while with S3, you have to upgrade with the firmware found on the Nicehash site. Don't know anything about the S5.
hero member
Activity: 968
Merit: 624
Still a manic miner
One of our customers is looking for 1 month (or more) private rent of large AMD GPU farm (at least 500 AMD Radeon 7x or R9 series GPUs). If you have such a farm or know someone that does, please let us know to [email protected]. Thanks.

bullish!!!  Cool
hero member
Activity: 630
Merit: 504

All I can say is THANK YOU! Nicehash for implementing the anti-bot measures.  These bots have been annoying and originally caused me to choose another company for hash power (even though it was typically 20% more expensive).

Now -- I can see the difference and Nicehash will be my go to for reliable hashing.


legendary
Activity: 885
Merit: 1006
NiceHash.com
One of our customers is looking for 1 month (or more) private rent of large AMD GPU farm (at least 100 AMD Radeon 7x or R9 series GPUs, but can be even more then 500). If you have such a farm or know someone that does, please let us know to [email protected]. Thanks.
legendary
Activity: 885
Merit: 1006
NiceHash.com
If using the extranonce subscribe for an S5 or SP20, is it normal for the miner to not fall back to the top priority pool when nicehash price drops below thresh-hold ?
On both systems, when I get a green checkmark for EN, it will stay on nicehash no matter the price, and when it falls below the required price, simply stops hashing.
Removing EN fixes this problem, but is not ideal.
Maybe you can't have the best of both worlds with EN Tongue

This should work as designed.

You should set settings like this:

primary pool: stratum.nicehash.com:3334#xnsub (or stratum.westhash.com:3334#xnsub)
worker: your-btc-address
pass: p=0.01

secondary pool: whatever...

If you are using #xnsub you can't use more then one parameter in pass, for example, you can't use p=0.01;d=512 but don't worry about this because NiceHash will set difficulty correctly, simply use only p= parameter. It will switch to your secondary pool when paying price is below threshold and switch back to NiceHash/WestHash when price is reached again.
hero member
Activity: 979
Merit: 510
If using the extranonce subscribe for an S5 or SP20, is it normal for the miner to not fall back to the top priority pool when nicehash price drops below thresh-hold ?
On both systems, when I get a green checkmark for EN, it will stay on nicehash no matter the price, and when it falls below the required price, simply stops hashing.
Removing EN fixes this problem, but is not ideal.
Maybe you can't have the best of both worlds with EN Tongue
sr. member
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
After filling wallet I ordered for the first time and was surprised to see the rent was automatically cancelled after 1 hr.Mind explaining what is going on?

Orders are never cancelled after 1h by us. What is said for order status when you check it under order history?

same thing for me.I don't understand why nicehash keeps this new development even after users keep on complaining.
Cancelled - placeholder order - even though I'm real and orders are real and placed few mins before.

Write to support your order number or send me PM and I will take a look into it. It could be a bug we need to fix.
Jump to: