I MOSTLY AGREE--
But why would a large number of complaints occur with AMD rigs that were working perfectly well? The same software/GPU combo, working well, does not mysteriously fail without a change in the server setup. Blaming it on "Claymore blowing up" is plain nonsense. There must have been a server-side change to affect so many miners.
Miners lost money. I doubt Claymore's software, working well 2 days ago, mysteriously changed. Claymore would loose a fortune if that were true. --scryptr
It is not about what changed, because we changed nothing and claymore changed nothing, but what is happening on marketplace (that is the only change). We see some altcoins rising that use equihash. We cannot know how claymore protected his miner.
It is funny how you take closed source and havily protected miner by a completely annonymous entity as granted and all mighty.
NICEHASH ADDED SERVERS IN BRAZIL AND INDIA--
And software that was working well stopped working well. There was no mysterious change in Claymore's software. All I want is software that works, and most of the time Claymore products work well.
I don't know why the rejects are happening. Although I have studied computer science and networking, I am far from an expert. You simply accused Claymore of being a "bomb". Miners are getting a higher reject rate than normal, and loosing money. I got rejects with NiceHashMiner, but to a lesser extent than with my few Claymore rigs.
Nobody likes rejects. With all its servers and coders and miners, NiceHash is kinda mighty. Don't throw Claymore under the bus to make the rejects go away, it won't work. --scryptr