Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN] NiceHash.com - sell & buy hash rate cloud mining service / multipool - page 60. (Read 794380 times)

legendary
Activity: 1797
Merit: 1028
it is the amd on zcash the rest or fine

I MOSTLY AGREE--

But why would a large number of complaints occur with AMD rigs that were working perfectly well?  The same software/GPU combo, working well, does not mysteriously fail without a change in the server setup.  Blaming it on "Claymore blowing up" is plain nonsense.    There must have been a server-side change to affect so many miners.

Miners lost money.  I doubt Claymore's software, working well 2 days ago, mysteriously changed.  Claymore would loose a fortune if that were true.         --scryptr

It is not about what changed, because we changed nothing and claymore changed nothing, but what is happening on marketplace (that is the only change). We see some altcoins rising that use equihash. We cannot know how claymore protected his miner.

It is funny how you take closed source and havily protected miner by a completely annonymous entity as granted and all mighty.  Roll Eyes

NICEHASH ADDED SERVERS IN BRAZIL AND INDIA--

And software that was working well stopped working well.  There was no mysterious change in Claymore's software.  All I want is software that works, and most of the time Claymore products work well. 

I don't know why the rejects are happening.  Although I have studied computer science and networking, I am far from an expert.  You simply accused Claymore of being a "bomb".  Miners are getting a higher reject rate than normal, and loosing money.  I got rejects with NiceHashMiner, but to a lesser extent than with my few Claymore rigs.

Nobody likes rejects.  With all its servers and coders and miners, NiceHash is kinda mighty.  Don't throw Claymore under the bus to make the rejects go away, it won't work.       --scryptr
newbie
Activity: 20
Merit: 0
hero member
Activity: 588
Merit: 520
it is the amd on zcash the rest or fine

I MOSTLY AGREE--

But why would a large number of complaints occur with AMD rigs that were working perfectly well?  The same software/GPU combo, working well, does not mysteriously fail without a change in the server setup.  Blaming it on "Claymore blowing up" is plain nonsense.    There must have been a server-side change to affect so many miners.

Miners lost money.  I doubt Claymore's software, working well 2 days ago, mysteriously changed.  Claymore would loose a fortune if that were true.         --scryptr

It is not about what changed, because we changed nothing and claymore changed nothing, but what is happening on marketplace (that is the only change). We see some altcoins rising that use equihash. We cannot know how claymore protected his miner.

It is funny how you take closed source and havily protected miner by a completely annonymous entity as granted and all mighty.  Roll Eyes
newbie
Activity: 36
Merit: 0
Hello,

Are we able to mine Primecoin/XPM on nicehash? (cloud mining)

Pls provide a link to working pool, and which algortihm to use.

I did some search but could not find much info.

I found http://coinsforall.io/#!/coin/XPM and http://xpmforall.org/

but could not find proper settings to use.

Many Thanks.
legendary
Activity: 1797
Merit: 1028
it is the amd on zcash the rest or fine

I MOSTLY AGREE--

But why would a large number of complaints occur with AMD rigs that were working perfectly well?  The same software/GPU combo, working well, does not mysteriously fail without a change in the server setup.  Blaming it on "Claymore blowing up" is plain nonsense.    There must have been a server-side change to affect so many miners.

Miners lost money.  I doubt Claymore's software, working well 2 days ago, mysteriously changed.  Claymore would loose a fortune if that were true.         --scryptr
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 251
I don't know how I feel about the new site and mining directly to the new bitcoin address.

It is very confusing.

Do I have $54.56 (unpaid) + $62.64?






Also, I feel like I have to log in every 3 minutes, very annoying.


jr. member
Activity: 63
Merit: 4
it is the amd on zcash the rest or fine
legendary
Activity: 1797
Merit: 1028
I've had similar issues, but always in Claymore ZEC Miner, now nothing at all changed on my end, worked fine for ages and then suddenly all these issues, disconnects, periods of rejected shares etc.

We have no idea what is inside Claymore. It could be a time bomb, it could be a bug that got triggered due to some anti-cheating mechanisms... But the fact that every single other miner does not have any issues... can tell you something.

NICEHASHMINER ALSO GETS REJECTS-

I have a couple Win 7 x64 rigs mining with NHM.  They run nVidia cards, and also have problems.  Are your servers overloaded?  Seriuosly, no way of knowing how many new miners have been rigged since AMD cards are out-of-stock everywhere.

Suggesting that Claymore is a bomb seems unrealistic.       --scryptr

Show us problems with NVIDIA rigs. We got 0 reports about that. Also all our testing rigs work just perfect.

If there was an overload issue, then everybody would be getting rejects, not only few. We are closely monitoring all kind of server loads.

MY WIN 7 NHM RIGS WERE MUCH LESS AFFECTED--

And I did not take screenshots.    I thought it was important enough to remark on this thread because I lost a lot of hash power.  My payout date is set back.  Other miners have similar problems.

I switched one rig to Claymore Dual 9.4, it is doing well.  If I switch my big guns to Claymore Dual, it will pop the fuse.  There is a significantly higher electricity usage with Claymore Dual vs Claymore Zcash.

Blaming the problem on Claymore is not a solid defense, it seems poorly reasoned.       --scryptr
hero member
Activity: 588
Merit: 520
I've had similar issues, but always in Claymore ZEC Miner, now nothing at all changed on my end, worked fine for ages and then suddenly all these issues, disconnects, periods of rejected shares etc.

We have no idea what is inside Claymore. It could be a time bomb, it could be a bug that got triggered due to some anti-cheating mechanisms... But the fact that every single other miner does not have any issues... can tell you something.

NICEHASHMINER ALSO GETS REJECTS-

I have a couple Win 7 x64 rigs mining with NHM.  They run nVidia cards, and also have problems.  Are your servers overloaded?  Seriuosly, no way of knowing how many new miners have been rigged since AMD cards are out-of-stock everywhere.

Suggesting that Claymore is a bomb seems unrealistic.       --scryptr

Show us problems with NVIDIA rigs. We got 0 reports about that. Also all our testing rigs work just perfect.

If there was an overload issue, then everybody would be getting rejects, not only few. We are closely monitoring all kind of server loads.
legendary
Activity: 1453
Merit: 1011
Bitcoin Talks Bullshit Walks
I can also confirm high rejects. USA server. Took my rigs down and back to a pool yesterday morning. What was odd was is wasn't all rigs just a few. Seemed intermittent as well. Also notice on pool that I'm getting on my avg 750h/s more than what reported on nh over last months.  Going to stick on flypool for zec and see what a week will bring me and where my hash stabilizes. I know my ping to server is a ton better. Nh avg 150ms. Getting 30-50 ms straight to pool.  That is to be expected could be why I'm seeing slightly better avg tho.  Time will tell. 

BR
d57heinz
legendary
Activity: 1797
Merit: 1028
I've had similar issues, but always in Claymore ZEC Miner, now nothing at all changed on my end, worked fine for ages and then suddenly all these issues, disconnects, periods of rejected shares etc.

We have no idea what is inside Claymore. It could be a time bomb, it could be a bug that got triggered due to some anti-cheating mechanisms... But the fact that every single other miner does not have any issues... can tell you something.

NICEHASHMINER ALSO GETS REJECTS-

I have a couple Win 7 x64 rigs mining with NHM.  They run nVidia cards, and also have problems.  Are your servers overloaded?  Seriously, no way of knowing how many new miners have been rigged since AMD cards are out-of-stock everywhere.

Suggesting that Claymore is a bomb seems unrealistic.       --scryptr
hero member
Activity: 588
Merit: 520
I've had similar issues, but always in Claymore ZEC Miner, now nothing at all changed on my end, worked fine for ages and then suddenly all these issues, disconnects, periods of rejected shares etc.

We have no idea what is inside Claymore. It could be a time bomb, it could be a bug that got triggered due to some anti-cheating mechanisms... But the fact that every single other miner does not have any issues... can tell you something.
newbie
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
Seems Tahiti based rigs may be more susceptible. Just a quick observation, nothing concrete.

I run a Fury, 390 and a 280 rig and happened on every one.
legendary
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1000
Seems Tahiti based rigs may be more susceptible. Just a quick observation, nothing concrete.
newbie
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
I've had similar issues, but always in Claymore ZEC Miner, now nothing at all changed on my end, worked fine for ages and then suddenly all these issues, disconnects, periods of rejected shares etc.
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
Works great!!! Thanks alot for this awesome site!

The best cloud-mining site I've ever seen! Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1000
What kind of mining sw are you using? Is it claymore, is it latest? Try with latest. Also try with latest NHM.

MY RIGS ARE LINUX--

They were working well until the last 48-72 hours.  If you have NiceHashMiner for Linux, I may use it.  Currently I am mining Equihash with Claymore 12.5.

The indications are for a server-side problem.  High latency or overload of some sort.       --scryptr

We ruled server side issue out, since all other software besides claymore is working just fine.

Try upgrading claymore and see what happens then.

Just to be clear, you work for nicehash? Can't update claymore, 12.5 is the latest release.

Both 12.4 and 12.5 have this issue. 12.4 was working perfectly fine forever, so something changed on your end. The miner's code hasn't changed. I'd assume 12.5 would work perfectly fine as well if not for the issue on your end. I'll know that soon enough when I switch pools, currently fleshing out my options. I'm willing to bet claymore will work just fine on a regular pool.
legendary
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1000
What kind of mining sw are you using? Is it claymore, is it latest? Try with latest. Also try with latest NHM.

MY RIGS ARE LINUX--

They were working well until the last 48-72 hours.  If you have NiceHashMiner for Linux, I may use it.  Currently I am mining Equihash with Claymore 12.5.

The indications are for a server-side problem.  High latency or overload of some sort.       --scryptr

Yes, it's definitely a server side problem.

Chop chop, nicehash. Fix this so I can keep mining here.
hero member
Activity: 588
Merit: 520
What kind of mining sw are you using? Is it claymore, is it latest? Try with latest. Also try with latest NHM.

MY RIGS ARE LINUX--

They were working well until the last 48-72 hours.  If you have NiceHashMiner for Linux, I may use it.  Currently I am mining Equihash with Claymore 12.5.

The indications are for a server-side problem.  High latency or overload of some sort.       --scryptr

We ruled server side issue out, since all other software besides claymore is working just fine.

Try upgrading claymore and see what happens then.
legendary
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1000
Pages:
Jump to: