Topic: [ANN] Peerplays - First Ever Blockchain-Based Gaming Platform - page 53. (Read 1144140 times)
If you need a Spanish translator tell me!
It doesnt matter anyway, Peerplays is build on the Bitshares Blockchain it has nothing to do with bitshares on its own
You guys keep humming your song, but all I have to if Bitshares wasn't garbage, it's value wouldn't just be a constantly decline tell yourself whatever you want to hear to make yourselves feel better about your investment 
It's funny you guys even mention cryptofresh, some no name Ruby developer made a block explorer better then / before the official team even made one that's worth using... what a joke.
It's funny you guys even mention cryptofresh, some no name Ruby developer made a block explorer better then / before the official team even made one that's worth using... what a joke.
Man, bishares didnt run away with peoples money wasnt hacked even, this in 3 years.....what survives in crypto soace 3 years n remains strong like a rock? Almost none....
Price is not there? Right, it happens in all market, the good thing its a bargain right now in crypto space for the size, reputation, tech, expertise, experience, community, network effect, volume, china users
Just my 2bts
You guys keep humming your song, but all I have to if Bitshares wasn't garbage, it's value wouldn't just be a constantly decline tell yourself whatever you want to hear to make yourselves feel better about your investment
It's funny you guys even mention cryptofresh, some no name Ruby developer made a block explorer better then / before the official team even made one that's worth using... what a joke.
It's funny you guys even mention cryptofresh, some no name Ruby developer made a block explorer better then / before the official team even made one that's worth using... what a joke.
Just for clarification,
Dan Larimer left Bitshares? Dan is working for steemit to pay his bills, n from steemit bitshares can got improvments that can be developed. Bitshares keep working on maintenance n development with Dan guys, just take a look cryptofresh.com/workers we keep pushing to keep leading
Bitshares has what it takes, it has funds for more than 5 years of continuously development as you can see in cryptofresh.com
People just need to get used to freedomledger n openledger....this is the future, when next bitcoin bubble pop we will see massive exchanges closing down n stolen user funds, there people will start thinking with themselves why they werent using a decentrilised exchange like openledger, its fucking safe, no kyc, no signup no risk of been stolen, easy backup no software need, what more do we need?
Just my 2bts
Dan Larimer left Bitshares? Dan is working for steemit to pay his bills, n from steemit bitshares can got improvments that can be developed. Bitshares keep working on maintenance n development with Dan guys, just take a look cryptofresh.com/workers we keep pushing to keep leading
Bitshares has what it takes, it has funds for more than 5 years of continuously development as you can see in cryptofresh.com
People just need to get used to freedomledger n openledger....this is the future, when next bitcoin bubble pop we will see massive exchanges closing down n stolen user funds, there people will start thinking with themselves why they werent using a decentrilised exchange like openledger, its fucking safe, no kyc, no signup no risk of been stolen, easy backup no software need, what more do we need?
Just my 2bts
Peerplays team were smart to select graphene.
Given the negative connotations around Bitshares I'm not sure how true that is...
and where do you see "negative coonotations"? tech is great and stable since launch...
If it's as great as you say it is, why does the price not reflect it? I've had my own experiences with Bitshares and personally I think it's not user friendly at all. It's no wonder there's a lack of support for it. Didn't Dan practically abandon Bitshares as well? So... contrary to what the Bitshares believers say, this is not what a good investment looks like folks
It doesn't matter what the price of BitShares is. Peerplays is using Graphene and the ecosystem, which was developed by BitShares. Peerplays will be a standalone app, if I interpret correctly, that interacts with it and potentially will interact with Ethereum once a side chain is created (though The DAO won't be funding it since it is dissolving).
The tech is the most usable for what Peerplays is aiming for.
Peerplays team were smart to select graphene.
Given the negative connotations around Bitshares I'm not sure how true that is...
and where do you see "negative coonotations"? tech is great and stable since launch...
If it's as great as you say it is, why does the price not reflect it? I've had my own experiences with Bitshares and personally I think it's not user friendly at all. It's no wonder there's a lack of support for it. Didn't Dan practically abandon Bitshares as well? So... contrary to what the Bitshares believers say, this is not what a good investment looks like folks
assuming peer plays taking a hit due to this DAO mess
Doubt it. Peerplays has nothing to do with the DAO other than the proposal. It has already raised its first rounds of crowdfunding, and development wilk continue as planned. The drop has everything to do with the BTC rally. Either way, i don't care. Holding for the long haul.
Price will not be going higher until this hits a proper exchange. There are not enough buyers on freedomledger.
Yes that would be good. Most people don't even know what Freedomledger is.
assuming peer plays taking a hit due to this DAO mess
Doubt it. Peerplays has nothing to do with the DAO other than the proposal. It has already raised its first rounds of crowdfunding, and development wilk continue as planned. The drop has everything to do with the BTC rally. Either way, i don't care. Holding for the long haul.
Price will not be going higher until this hits a proper exchange. There are not enough buyers on freedomledger.
assuming peer plays taking a hit due to this DAO mess
Doubt it. Peerplays has nothing to do with the DAO other than the proposal. It has already raised its first rounds of crowdfunding, and development wilk continue as planned. The drop has everything to do with the BTC rally. Either way, i don't care. Holding for the long haul.
assuming peer plays taking a hit due to this DAO mess
Hi, devs. Can you perhaps make a comparisson between Peerplays and BreakoutCoin and let us know what is similar and what is different?
I was trying to figure that out a few days ago and asked in their thread. Pages 18 and 19 have two posts affirming that they are a centralized poker project that isn't hosted on a blockchain - it's centralized. The relevance of that per the success of either project is not something that I really know.
I have been thinking about the DAO circus though. It was essentially a bug in the smart contract that allowed this to happen (on a side note, I think it sucks that a DAO failure could end up bringing Ethereum down with it).
Vitalik tweeted a link to this reddit thread eight hours ago, https://www.reddit.com/r/ethereum/comments/4omdlf/to_kickstart_the_building_safer_smart_contracts/. It is essentially a look at failed smart contract projects and I thought that it might be relevant for the devs here, since they are going to be using smart contracts and one of the projects was an ETH casino.
At the very least, it could provide an opportunity to collaborate with others in the field and provide for stronger collaboration and code in the future...or I could just be naive. Granted, this is highlighting ETH code and not Graphene/Bitshares but...
Hi, devs. Can you perhaps make a comparisson between Peerplays and BreakoutCoin and let us know what is similar and what is different?
Good project, I have in.
Peerplays team were smart to select graphene.
Given the negative connotations around Bitshares I'm not sure how true that is...
and where do you see "negative coonotations"? tech is great and stable since launch...
Peerplays team were smart to select graphene.
Given the negative connotations around Bitshares I'm not sure how true that is...
I am not exactly sure where the negative connotation comes from. It is one of, if not the, most advanced crypto projects around. It has a decentralized exchange (Waves just raised over $10 million to make one amongst other things), it is essentially already scaled, is fast, cheap.
Peerplays team were smart to select graphene.
Given the negative connotations around Bitshares I'm not sure how true that is...
Peerplays team were smart to select graphene.
Why is that?
Peerplays team were smart to select graphene.
Jump to: