[ANN] Peerplays - First Ever Blockchain-Based Gaming Platform - page 75.

twostepsally

sr. member

Activity: 630

Merit: 253

Quote from: Soul_eater_123 on June 05, 2016, 01:47:51 PM

Quote from: coinhugger on June 05, 2016, 01:42:03 PM

I wonder what the feedback/negative comments were on the proposal. I read it and thought it was quite good.

It was a great marketing angle yo get the word out.

It wasn't really a normal business proposal. It was asking the DAO to buy a heap of Peerplays tokens at the $3 rate and hold on to them. Something that probably isn't good for either Peerplay token holders (as a huge amount would be in control of the DAO) or for DAO holders as they would be liquidating a whole lot of ether to build another network out.

Soul_eater_123

legendary

Activity: 952

Merit: 1000

Quote from: cryptodv on June 05, 2016, 02:10:06 PM

This is an awesome project, it needs more traction. Don't know why more people are not investing. Maybe everyone is ICO'd out! This project has a lot of upside.

That's what I've been saying. It needs more promotion. Everyone has seen how big gambling is these days. I think you have a point about ICO fatigue though.

cryptodv

hero member

Activity: 1092

Merit: 507

btcstakes.com

This is an awesome project, it needs more traction. Don't know why more people are not investing. Maybe everyone is ICO'd out! This project has a lot of upside.

Soul_eater_123

legendary

Activity: 952

Merit: 1000

Quote from: coinhugger on June 05, 2016, 02:03:17 PM

Ah ok, I see your point, that makes sense. Thanks for explaining.

Yeah I think the DAO would hold such a huge portion of the tokens that it just wouldn't be good for all the rest of us - what if they decided to dump. I hold both and I think at this stage probably less risky to keep them separate. Anyway let's see what the new proposal is.

coinhugger

hero member

Activity: 728

Merit: 500

Quote from: Soul_eater_123 on June 05, 2016, 01:47:51 PM

Quote from: coinhugger on June 05, 2016, 01:42:03 PM

I wonder what the feedback/negative comments were on the proposal. I read it and thought it was quite good.

It wasn't really a normal business proposal. It was asking the DAO to buy a heap of Peerplays tokens at the $3 rate and hold on to them. Something that probably isn't good for either Peerplay token holders (as a huge amount would be in control of the DAO) or for DAO holders as they would be liquidating a whole lot of ether to build another network out.

Ah ok, I see your point, that makes sense. Thanks for explaining.

Soul_eater_123

legendary

Activity: 952

Merit: 1000

Quote from: coinhugger on June 05, 2016, 01:42:03 PM

I wonder what the feedback/negative comments were on the proposal. I read it and thought it was quite good.

It wasn't really a normal business proposal. It was asking the DAO to buy a heap of Peerplays tokens at the $3 rate and hold on to them. Something that probably isn't good for either Peerplay token holders (as a huge amount would be in control of the DAO) or for DAO holders as they would be liquidating a whole lot of ether to build another network out.

coinhugger

hero member

Activity: 728

Merit: 500

Quote from: Soul_eater_123 on June 05, 2016, 01:33:29 PM

Quote from: 4theLOVEofCrypto on June 05, 2016, 01:08:40 PM

By the way, is there an update on the status of the DAO proposal? Is it being voted on and how long before something is known?

No and it didn't get a very favourable reception either. They said they would come back with a better proposal.

I wonder what the feedback/negative comments were on the proposal. I read it and thought it was quite good.

Soul_eater_123

legendary

Activity: 952

Merit: 1000

Quote from: 4theLOVEofCrypto on June 05, 2016, 01:08:40 PM

By the way, is there an update on the status of the DAO proposal? Is it being voted on and how long before something is known?

No and it didn't get a very favourable reception either. They said they would come back with a better proposal.

MickyCOB

full member

Activity: 252

Merit: 100

Looking good, I will keep my eyes on this one.

HomoHenning

hero member

Activity: 784

Merit: 500

where can I see my amount of tokens I bought?

4theLOVEofCrypto

sr. member

Activity: 387

Merit: 250

By the way, is there an update on the status of the DAO proposal? Is it being voted on and how long before something is known?

4theLOVEofCrypto

sr. member

Activity: 387

Merit: 250

Quote from: twostepsally on June 05, 2016, 12:49:02 PM

Community hug.

Now lets capitalize on this great concept and help those that need help.

Hugs

. I am game for that.

twostepsally

sr. member

Activity: 630

Merit: 253

Community hug.

Now lets capitalize on this great concept and help those that need help.

Altprince

member

Activity: 68

Merit: 10

Stay calm. The prince is here.

Quote from: 4theLOVEofCrypto on June 05, 2016, 12:28:30 PM

Ok, my bad. I was going by the number displayed on the peerplays site instead of the correct freedom ledger number. He could have pointed that out instead of saying just "not true" then following that up with "can u read", thus the hostility.

Oh, that explains it. But very true, he should have done that

4theLOVEofCrypto

sr. member

Activity: 387

Merit: 250

Quote from: Altprince on June 05, 2016, 12:10:46 PM

Quote from: 4theLOVEofCrypto on June 05, 2016, 11:54:44 AM

Motherfucker....it was true at the time of posting. It's that some of the orders expired because of non-payment. So now it's at 17k. But at the time it was true, so stfu.

https://secure.freedomledger.com/#/asset/PEERPLAYS

Current supply: 71,180.
That's nearly 30k left.

So I guess that's the reason for him to say "not true".
We both probably have missed some information, but what's with the hostility?
And if we have missed something, can you elaborate?

Ok, my bad. I was going by the number displayed on the peerplays site instead of the correct freedom ledger number. He could have pointed that out instead of saying just "not true" then following that up with "can u read", thus the hostility.

Altprince

member

Activity: 68

Merit: 10

Stay calm. The prince is here.

Quote from: 4theLOVEofCrypto on June 05, 2016, 11:54:44 AM

Motherfucker....it was true at the time of posting. It's that some of the orders expired because of non-payment. So now it's at 17k. But at the time it was true, so stfu.

https://secure.freedomledger.com/#/asset/PEERPLAYS

Current supply: 71,180.
That's nearly 30k left.

So I guess that's the reason for him to say "not true".
We both probably have missed some information, but what's with the hostility?
And if we have missed something, can you elaborate?

Acidx

sr. member

Activity: 356

Merit: 250

Got my peerplays really quick, thanks!

So now we just wait for ICO to end and the tokens to be generated?

4theLOVEofCrypto

sr. member

Activity: 387

Merit: 250

Quote from: HomoHenning on June 05, 2016, 11:26:47 AM

statement before my post. can u read?

Motherfucker....it was true at the time of posting. It's that some of the orders expired because of non-payment. So now it's at 17k. But at the time it was true, so stfu.

HomoHenning

hero member

Activity: 784

Merit: 500

there are more than 14k tokens left...

modcom

full member

Activity: 236

Merit: 100

Quote from: HomoHenning on June 05, 2016, 11:26:47 AM

statement before my post. can u read?

Maybe just reiterate what is not true. None of us are understanding you...

Topic: [ANN] Peerplays - First Ever Blockchain-Based Gaming Platform - page 75. (Read 1144140 times)