This would be perfect solution, buying photos from hobby photographers and paying symbolic price to them, for example $1 up to $10 and they would be happy and I wouldn't need to worry that someone will sue me for unauthorised use of his photos.
I have one more question, because I'm not a Instagram user. So when you upload a photo there, Instagram probably shrinks it, lowers the resolution, right? What about if a buyer wants a full resolution photo, how would this be possible thru your Picax platform?
Te eliminate the need to pay every time you need an image, we will be working on subscription basis that will be around $30. If you need at least 3 photos per month, it will be right there at your desired price point. For a social media marketer who needs 1-2 photos on daily basis for social posts, the price-per-photo is comparable to that of a chocolate bar.
You're absolutely right. As of today, Instagram allows photos to be fetched of up to 1080x1080px in size. This is enough for most needs in daily content creation like blogposts, newsletters, Facebook or... Instagram.
For some tasks like print materials, the resolution is not sufficient. We address it with two action points:
1. Phase 2 of the roadmap includes integrations with cloud photo storage services that don't set such limit.
2. For the time being, our customer service will help you with ad-hoc needs like this one.
And it's only reasonable to expect that Instagram's API will support higher resolutions in near future. Their API is growing in popularity and last year they also added the long-awaited pinch-to-zoom feature that is handicapped by the resolution cap in the first place. Meanwhile, bandwidth and data is getting cheaper and faster, with 5G expected to gain momentum by 2020.