It seems like we have a lot of non-issues here.
The coin has done exactly what it was supposed to. It is not supposed to distribute any more coins after its initial distribution. We don't want an infinitely distributing coin (i.e. bitcoin will distribute for 100 years+). At some point it has to stop distributing to people for free.
It has achieved value now and that is the reward for holding on to it.
When we received PMC from initial distribution it was worthless.
If you give people a worthless amount of PMC today (i.e. 7 PMC) they cry and whine like that spyro bitch. "Your initial stake is now worth X dollars! Give me X dollars worth of PMC!" I'm sorry but thats not how the world works. That would be unsustainable. You weren't there at the initial distribution which was free and open to everyone and that is something that you will have to deal with. You don't go up to bitcoin millionaires and say "you mined thousands of BTC with your laptop! Give me some of those bitcoins!!", or maybe spyro is the kind of person to do that?
No one else is complaining about PMC distribution. You are validating his irrational concerns.
So with that being said, it does seem that the PMC distribution was too sudden. I will agree with this point.
PMC could have dragged out the distribution process. Better yet would have been to innovate or add something that people would use the coin for. If no one is sending pmc then no one can mine PMC. I don't believe creating a PMC2 is a good idea because it implies there is a problem with the original, when in fact it is functioning exactly as it was designed to.
Should we remake bitcoin into bitcoin2 so as to redistribute the coins more evenly? of course not.
Making fees mandatory is a great start. Creating some gambling sites would help. The multipool is proactive.
We need more ideas like this.
I feel that if we keep both PMC and PMC2 alive, it doesn't give off that appearance. PMC2 would simply be a branch off of the PMC ecosystem to include more things. Currently PMC is limited to only showing BTCs future in its current iteration. My proposal was to create a second coin, that does not replace PMC, but builds off the concept, that will focuses on the possible changes BTC could make; it'd be a trial run for any future forks, bug fixes, or newly integrated features of BTC or any other coin. Creating PMC2 as a PMC Proof of Burn IPO would encourage people to buy PMC, and would also encourage people to hold more PMC since the total amount of coin is decreasing, which should mean an increase in value.
So we are left with a better distributed, more valuable PMC, and a new 2nd coin, unique in that it promises to always have the latest and greatest ideas implemented into it (pmc2), which by design also promises multiple forks over the course of even a single year. This is very unique, I don't know of any other coin that promises from the start to fork every few weeks to implement a new technology. I'm sure it'll drive some exchanges crazy, having to constantly update, but at the same time theres some definate value in promising to never be behind the curve in features.
TO be clear, I am not proposing we remake PMC. I am proposing we create a 2nd coin that enhances PMC's current situation while building off of the fundamentals of PMC, exploring what btc, and now other coins, will look like in the future.
