Shit coin, shit devs. Just a fork of sugarchain.
Lets elaborate shall we?1) The main dev, Natasha Otomoski, also under the alias "al1ce" will censor any criticism of the coin, and ban those who disagree with al1ce. This shows that he/she does not support free speech to its extent
2) Since the dev is anonymous, it's hard trusting the project
3) Natasha Otomoski does not know how to code. The programmer she asked to help quit, and now she is contracting another one (for free)
4) This leads into my next point, the dev is cheap, and won't pay any out-of-pocket expenses to further the coin
5) It's just another shitcoin. It's essentially a sugarchain fork.
6) The exchanges? Oh wait, it's only listed on one exchange. BitSquare. Which means BitSquare controls 100% of the LightBit market, making the volume extremely centralized. It's a cheap exchange with a $50 listing fee.
6) It's also listen on Ex4ange.org but it's a generally crappy exchange with 0 volume, also not connected to CoinGecko.
7) Community is inactive and fairly dead
No initiative is being made to make a unique cryptocurrency. This in itself makes makes any project a piece of shit.
I urge the Al1ce to respond to this, and clarify anything. I'm disgusted this is on the front page, only two entries below ETHEREUM. To compare this project to Ethereum would like be comparing a Honda minivan to a Lamborghini Aventador. There's absolutely no comparison.
If anyone deserves the props it's the sugar devs for initializing the yespower algo.
