Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN] [POW] [MSR] Masari - simple, scalable, and secure cryptocurrency - page 76. (Read 85417 times)

newbie
Activity: 49
Merit: 0
Hi
At https://masari.superpools.net/#getting_started I have added port 8888 for NiceHash Mining due to the high demand for Masari hashrate !!
legendary
Activity: 2744
Merit: 1387
Ukrainians will resist
Number P2P , RPC-port ?

You'll see it as default in the command line options: mainnet P2P port 38080, RPC port 38081
Code:
./masarid --rpc-bind-ip=0.0.0.0 --rpc-bind-port=38081 --seed-node 91.204.109.187:51314 --seed-node 34.234.145.76:38080

Code:
2017-10-11 06:15:19.293     7ff23cc1b780        ERROR   daemon  src/daemon/main.cpp:287Exception in main! Failed to initialize core rpc server.

Port 38080 same.
member
Activity: 134
Merit: 11
Number P2P , RPC-port ?

You'll see it as default in the command line options: mainnet P2P port 38080, RPC port 38081
legendary
Activity: 2744
Merit: 1387
Ukrainians will resist
Number P2P , RPC-port ?

P2P-0
RPC-1

check code or read print out when you run daemon.
people. . &*&*&*^*!
Incorrect answer. Does not specify.
sr. member
Activity: 273
Merit: 250
Number P2P , RPC-port ?

P2P-0
RPC-1

check code or read print out when you run daemon.
people. . &*&*&*^*!
legendary
Activity: 2744
Merit: 1387
Ukrainians will resist
Number P2P , RPC-port ?
member
Activity: 134
Merit: 11
Protocol upgrade for v0.1.2.0 has been successful! Please update if you haven't already done so.
https://github.com/masari-project/masari/releases/tag/v0.1.2.0

Linux - https://github.com/masari-project/masari/releases/download/v0.1.2.0/masari-linux-x64-v0.1.2.0.tar.gz
sha256sum 2d01c137bf1c0f8abc15bd898d7a4e755e2c77ea53d3a90bc206b5aa842c0044

Windows: https://github.com/masari-project/masari/releases/download/v0.1.2.0/masari-win-x64-v0.1.2.0.zip
sha256sum: 79b2efaa996ab58479c08d1b5e7839026100bdf39a4a85c7a7252883e388b0cb

MacOS: https://github.com/masari-project/masari/releases/download/v0.1.2.0/masari-mac-x64-v0.1.2.0.tar.gz
sha256sum: 0941b70a98f2ae614a5b7401405e8d6baacfb2e4a4811514aa0da3db11e6380a
full member
Activity: 445
Merit: 100
Yes I spoke with Dev and he said he will try after the hard fork but as you know it's not that easy to get listed in good exchanges with volumes.

I am sure we should hit another exchange in couple of months.
newbie
Activity: 174
Merit: 0
Premine is not a crime.
I see you are putting a lot of effort on your project.
Do you plan to add your coin to other exchanges?
member
Activity: 134
Merit: 11
Mac binaries for v0.1.2.0 are now available! https://github.com/masari-project/masari/releases/download/v0.1.2.0/masari-mac-x64-v0.1.2.0.tar.gz

For reference, list of supported binaries:

Linux - https://github.com/masari-project/masari/releases/download/v0.1.2.0/masari-linux-x64-v0.1.2.0.tar.gz
sha256sum 2d01c137bf1c0f8abc15bd898d7a4e755e2c77ea53d3a90bc206b5aa842c0044

Windows: https://github.com/masari-project/masari/releases/download/v0.1.2.0/masari-win-x64-v0.1.2.0.zip
sha256sum: 79b2efaa996ab58479c08d1b5e7839026100bdf39a4a85c7a7252883e388b0cb

MacOS: https://github.com/masari-project/masari/releases/download/v0.1.2.0/masari-mac-x64-v0.1.2.0.tar.gz
sha256sum: 0941b70a98f2ae614a5b7401405e8d6baacfb2e4a4811514aa0da3db11e6380a
full member
Activity: 294
Merit: 102
Im in, this looks promising.
Monero isnt the best at the whole anonymity aspects, hopefully there can be some innovation here!
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10

I am preparing a pool update (https://masari.superpools.net/) with:
* See the pending mature for account

I see it up - nice

Now if there was just a gui wallet.....  Smiley
full member
Activity: 307
Merit: 101

I am preparing a pool update (https://masari.superpools.net/) with:
* See the pending mature for account
* Different variable difficulty setting per port
* Maximum hasrate limit in the pool? This is not whether or not you like the community and that's why I ask. And what value would you put? 10kH / s, 50kH / s?

If you have any more ideas, please comment.

I will create a pool of tests, I will ask one of you to change the pool to test these changes (there will be multiple micro-cuts) in exchange for 0% fee and some compensation.

Soon more news, thank you all

Your pool increased the share difficulty even faster than masaripool. 2000H, 12000H, 72000H, then 200007H and remained there.
This is like a DOS attack on the connected miners because they can hardly submit any share before the next block starts and their work stales.
Six hours ago during the recent hashrate surge I guess the attacker got all shares for all blocks while all other miners running at 200007H produced only heat for their owners  Grin

Your auto-diff must adjust the share difficulty in such a way that shares get submitted more or less every X seconds. For a 120s blocktime I'd recommend X to be around 12s.
When blocks get faster, it should get lowered. Other pools with other coins typically have one port for auto-diff and other ports for fixed diff.
Flypool allows you to set a fixed diff in the password field.

I think blocking users based on their hashrate is censorship and not acceptable at all. Some pools however block botnets.
When there are many workers mining with the same payment address but from many different IPs, it can only be a botnet or the dev fee for Claymore.
Claymore or any other dev will however contact the pools so their address gets whitelisted.
newbie
Activity: 49
Merit: 0

I am preparing a pool update (https://masari.superpools.net/) with:
* See the pending mature for account
* Different variable difficulty setting per port
* Maximum hasrate limit in the pool? This is not whether or not you like the community and that's why I ask. And what value would you put? 10kH / s, 50kH / s?

If you have any more ideas, please comment.

I will create a pool of tests, I will ask one of you to change the pool to test these changes (there will be multiple micro-cuts) in exchange for 0% fee and some compensation.

Soon more news, thank you all
newbie
Activity: 49
Merit: 0
You need last versión >= v9.7 and add "-allpools 1"

NsGpuCNMiner -a cryptonight -allpools 1 -o stratum+tcp://masari.superpools.net:5555 -u YOUR_WALLET_ADDRESS.5000 -p x

I use this program with AMD and it works without problems

v10.2 is the latest version.
Those parameters you are using are not valid anymore.
It is xpool, xval and so on.
No, it doesn't work adding anything behind the address.

Still the pool shouldn't ramp the share difficulty up to 10000 when port 3333 or 5555 are used, when Claymore doesn't submit a fixed diff.

True, it is September 30 and I had not seen it.
I try it
newbie
Activity: 10
Merit: 0
if you want to build it on ubuntu 16.04 (thats what im using) here are the steps:

Code:
sudo apt-get install build-essential cmake pkg-config libboost-all-dev libssl-dev libunbound-dev libminiupnpc-dev libunwind8-dev liblzma-dev libldns-dev libexpat1-dev doxygen graphviz

sudo apt-get install libgtest-dev && cd /usr/src/gtest && sudo cmake . && sudo make && sudo mv libg* /usr/lib/

git clone https://github.com/masari-project/masari.git

cd masari

make

to run the node you need to:

Code:
cd build/release/bin/

./masarid

i usually use "screen" to run various nodes so instead of doing the "./masarid" , you do

Code:
screen -S "msrnode" ./masarid

then you run the wallet (same way)

Code:
screen -S "msrwallet" ./masari-wallet-cli

and you create your wallet


... hope that helps a bit



Cant get this to make. I am stuck at

Code:
[ 34%] Building CXX object src/rpc/CMakeFiles/obj_rpc.dir/core_rpc_server.cpp.o

Any one having same issue. Installing on ubuntu instance.
Bчepa ycтaнoвил нa Mint 18.2 бeз пpoблeм
member
Activity: 186
Merit: 10
Hello miners.

We have been the Masari Pool upgraded.

You may join us at http://msr.pools.e-scavo.net.ar at only 0.5%

Thanks Dev for your quick reaction.

full member
Activity: 307
Merit: 101
You need last versión >= v9.7 and add "-allpools 1"

NsGpuCNMiner -a cryptonight -allpools 1 -o stratum+tcp://masari.superpools.net:5555 -u YOUR_WALLET_ADDRESS.5000 -p x

I use this program with AMD and it works without problems

There is no such thing as -a cryptonight in Claymore v9.7
Here is what the readme.txt says.

Quote
-a   Select algorithm:
"-a 0" (default) means autoselection.
"-a 1" fastest mining mode for 290/290x and 270/270x cards.
"-a 2" low power consumption mode for 290/290x cards. A bit less speed (1%) but less power consumption (10-15%).
"-a 3" fastest mining for old cards (6xxx and 5xxx).
"-a 4" fastest mining for recent cards (280x, 270/270x etc).

As for putting the diff behind the address in the -u parameter, it results in the following error in the console: Error parsing line 2 of config.txt
That's the line with -u address.5000

I assume your -a cryptonight for Claymore is a copy-paste error from your CPU miner instructions on your getting started page because it makes no sense for Claymore.
Did you ever actually try the -u address.diff in Claymore v9.7 or later versions and observe if it really works? Keep an eye on the console right after start.
Is there the parsing error I mentioned, in red color? If it is there, it means Claymore is not sending the diff to the server and the server will auto-diff.
full member
Activity: 307
Merit: 101
Both pools adjust the difficulty up to 10000H no matter which port is being used, which is bad.

Correction. After connecting on 7777 the diff gets ramped up like this: 10000H, 20000H, 40000H, 80000H, 100001H.
This is where it remains and it is much too high. Maybe nice because low server load. But very inefficient mining.

If you are using auto-diff it must be such that shares get submitted every few seconds.
At 100001H literally minutes pass without a share getting submitted, then a new round starts and all the work was wasted.
Next round eventually the same or with some luck one of those ultra high diff shares is found.
Mostly it isn't and the work expires.

When connecting on 3333 it starts at 100H, then 200H, 400H, 800H, 1600H, 3200H, 6400H, 12800H, 25600H, 51200H and then goes to the famous 100001H and remains there.
It seems this auto-diff is not able to adjust down. It only goes up to the max.

I remember that until yesterday this wasn't the case. It went only to 10000H and remained there, which was good for my setup.
Mining at 100001H makes no sense. Not with high-end GPUs and even less so with CPUs.
member
Activity: 120
Merit: 10
Good. Perhaps you know a thing or two.  Smiley

Dev don't know shit.
Some guy on slack had to spoon-feed this bloody noob for days until he got it.
Instead of acknowledging the problem and working on a solution dev got cocky like a triggered snowflake.


I have to join slack.

You should give the developer time to react. It will not be a right away solution but definitely a something must be done and he did.
If someone spoon-fed him, well, thank you to that someone. May be dev can say thank you as well to finish this non-sense.

My view about it, The dev wants to do it right away but hesitating until he found a good solution done by others(or spoon-fed by others).
Hope this fix address the inability of cryptonote algorithm to adjust to sudden big hash.

Good luck to your coin
Pages:
Jump to: