Topic: [ANN] [pre-ICO] Clapeyron Robotics (Read 1022 times)

units in pictures below: mm

just watched video. manipulator will be a great thing if he manage to deliver me coffee in the morning. BTW, what is its length ? Arguably  I should consider myself as a buyer.

May be, but our robot is not a toy. This is a quite serious instrument.

The main (but not sole!) feature is a telepresence with the ability to influence the surrounding objects. The reason for such price is the manipulator itself (~1/2 robot cost). To make it cheaper means to reduce the possibilities of the manipulator (or make it useless).

But I can say that $5000 is the top estimate of the retail price. We are planning to develop our robot in the direction of autonomous artificial intelligence after release (via free software updates). It means, he can bring you a beer from the fridge, for example.

Also $5000 is still lower than the price of existing home robots (for example, NAO or Pepper), despite the fact that Clapeyron is much more useful.

More use cases you can find in our whitepaper. Now we are refactoring wp and site to make the information more clear and demonstrative. New update is coming soon:)

Great concept btw.

As a newbie, I don't have enough experiences.But I think that this ICO is not so bad.But most of the senior members are blaming that this ICO is totally a Scam.I'm in a great confusion.Whatever following.......:

I can see it's getting personal. I'm not gonna respond in that manner. You asked what we think about your project, I answered as honestly as I could.
I agree, it was harsh, but it was necessary. You probably weren't ready for that, that's all.
When researching ICO, I always check following things:
how credible the team is;
is there solid, easy to understand whitepaper;
how is the coin supply going to be divided;
how consistent and realistic the roadmap (timeline of development) is;
is there a use case or (even better) a working product or a service already;
how is the team communicating with prospective investors and marketing the ICO;
As you can see, in my opinion you failed at first hurdle. But you still can improve. Whatever I stated was wrong about you in my previous posts, work on it. Good luck. I hope youre still here in Q3 2020.

It's not even a criticism, just unreasonable butthurt.

and we definitely not heard such harsh statements like yours.

this is just an asset selling ico..no coins no blockchain involved into their project...so it is just money begging  

Should we ingeniously change "ICO" to "mining coins"?)

wow, $5000 is quite a price. What is the purpose of this robotic device, solely communication?

Price is <=$5000

was always waiting for such personal hand in my house. Any thoughts on price for  off-the-shelf product?

I am still not convinced. I know what I can see with my eyes. I still don't like the roadmap, still don't like the whitepaper, still don't like the bounty campaign, and any words from self-proclaimed "development team" can't change that. I admit that there is more info about them now, but it started popping up after my first post, so it's irrelevant. But it may not be an intended scam. Doing an ICO is just an easy way of rising funds without giving investors any assurance, and they know that they may get away with it, when their project fails. At best they just may be a bunch of kids with heads full of dreams, and those dreams will be shattered, when they clash with reality. Good luck to them and to investors, who, against my advice, decide to invest into that questionable project.

do you really think this project scam? 

Here is that important bit from your bounty campaign announcement:

"There is a reward for participation in the bounty program. It will be distributed immediately after the pre-ICO and immediately after the ICO.
If more than $ 265,000 will be collected during the pre-ICO, the participants of the bounty program will be able to choose how to get their reward: in PCLP tokens or in ether (equivalent to the pre-ICO pricing). Dollar equivalent of the total award will not exceed 5% of the amount collected.
If from $ 250,000 to $ 265,000 will be collected during pre-ICO, 5% of the sold PCLP tokens will be issued and distributed among the participants of the bounty program.
Account is crucial for bounty-program participants; it also can be used by investors to track their investments. For bounty participants, the size of reward is proportional to the number of followings the participant's personal referral link. If the pre-ICO's minimal funding limit will not be reached, we will save your bounty progress (from your account) and this progress will be restored in the next trial of pre-ICO. If no pre-ICO will take place, no reward will be given to the bounty-program participants."

In order to earn the bounty participants must get investors to buy your tokens. That's a f***ing pyramid scheme. and there is no guarantee to earn any bounty.
When pre-ICO fails, there will be another pre-ICO, and so on...
Lack of info abot team? Yeah, you got it right, Ilya Gridniev's Facebook Profile:
https://www.facebook.com/ilya.gridnev.7587 - one picture posted two days ago (same as in whitepaper!), two friends and that's all - does this person even exist?
Not much more about the rest of the team.
Your product is supposed to have all bells and whistles, beating the existing and future competition at the fraction of the price. How you gonna do that?
Token buyback at a higher price - where is the money for that coming from?
Roadmap - in less than two years you are going to have not just working prototype, but ready to use product. That is impossible. Or you much further with the development than you claim you are, and you need funding for things not related to it - cars, apartments, holidays etc.