[ANN] profit switching auto-exchanging pool - www.middlecoin.com - page 117.

BombaUcigasa

legendary

Activity: 1442

Merit: 1005

Quote from: corsaro on February 03, 2014, 02:51:36 PM

But mined coins of amsterdam server, looks like different from mined coins of other us servers... sincerely I am a bit confused...

I hope h2o will come here to the forum, or on his twitter account, to explain us better his progresses in fixing server stability

Yes, this was known for a while. Instead of just waiting for h2o to do something that solves your lack of profitability, simply decide to mine on several servers at once. That way your risk and reward is shared across various servers, and if one falls the rest still provide work.

Or even better, do as I did, start monitoring which server works better and has better payouts and use that. You get to pick the most average or most profitable scenario, with h20 doing nothing to assist in that.

coins101

legendary

Activity: 1456

Merit: 1000

Quote from: jedimstr on February 03, 2014, 12:36:00 PM

Quote from: Thirtybird on February 03, 2014, 12:25:58 PM

Quote from: HumbleMiner on February 03, 2014, 11:53:28 AM

jedimstr,

Just a suggestion - you don't need to run your fans at 85% when your GPU temps are around 35C.

it's probably the only way to keep ice from forming on the fan tips Grin

Closer to the truth than you'd think Wink

I used to have them autofan... or at lower settings... found 85% kept them nice and stable temp wise, and have reduced spin-up/spin-down wear vs autofan.

Really? spin-up spin down wear? Dude, you couldn't have been running at max-hash Grin

Come on, it's hash-vegas, baby, run at full speed, 24/7 for those $$$$$ Wink

corsaro

legendary

Activity: 1400

Merit: 1000

Quote from: BombaUcigasa on February 03, 2014, 02:44:50 PM

Quote from: corsaro on February 03, 2014, 02:39:42 PM

Could we use "quota:" to distribute all our hashing power among different servers (eu, us)?

You don't need to set quota, if you add multiple balance pools they are automatically spread equally. But, yes, you can specify how. How do you know which server is the most profitable?

actually I am using "amsterdam" as first server, and all other servers are used as "failover-only" servers...

But mined coins of amsterdam server, looks like different from mined coins of other us servers... sincerely I am a bit confused...

I hope h2o will come here to the forum, or on his twitter account, to explain us better his progresses in fixing server stability

BombaUcigasa

legendary

Activity: 1442

Merit: 1005

Quote from: corsaro on February 03, 2014, 02:39:42 PM

Could we use "quota:" to distribute all our hashing power among different servers (eu, us)?

You don't need to set quota, if you add multiple balance pools they are automatically spread equally. But, yes, you can specify how. How do you know which server is the most profitable?

kalus

sr. member

Activity: 420

Merit: 263

let's make a deal.

if there is an issue with all of middlecoin mining small coins and unbalancing the hash rate, perhaps it's strategic that the different servers are mining different coins.

corsaro

legendary

Activity: 1400

Merit: 1000

Quote from: coin123123 on February 03, 2014, 02:33:02 PM

Quote from: corsaro on February 03, 2014, 02:28:12 PM

Quote from: BombaUcigasa on February 03, 2014, 01:48:10 PM

Different servers, different coins, different payout models, same hashing speed:

yes, it seems so.

Greatly appreciated if H2o could explain us better... what is happening...

eu servers are mining different coins then us servers? and asia server??

doubt we'll get h2o answer..

common sense he is testing different options to choose best one and make this setting to all servers,
but the problem is he is doing it for a month now and bad configured servers causing miners to loose profit.

Could we use "quota:" to distribute all our hashing power among different servers (eu, us)?

coin123123

sr. member

Activity: 252

Merit: 250

Quote from: corsaro on February 03, 2014, 02:28:12 PM

Quote from: BombaUcigasa on February 03, 2014, 01:48:10 PM

Different servers, different coins, different payout models, same hashing speed:

yes, it seems so.

Greatly appreciated if H2o could explain us better... what is happening...

eu servers are mining different coins then us servers? and asia server??

doubt we'll get h2o answer..

common sense he is testing different options to choose best one and make this setting to all servers,
but the problem is he is doing it for a month now and bad configured servers causing miners to loose profit.

corsaro

legendary

Activity: 1400

Merit: 1000

Quote from: BombaUcigasa on February 03, 2014, 01:48:10 PM

Different servers, different coins, different payout models, same hashing speed:

yes, it seems so.

Greatly appreciated if H2o could explain us better... what is happening...

eu servers are mining different coins then us servers? and asia server??

coins101

legendary

Activity: 1456

Merit: 1000

Quote from: gsrcrxsi on February 03, 2014, 11:38:36 AM

Quote from: jedimstr on February 03, 2014, 10:02:56 AM

SMOS 1.3 is not very good for the older 7950's. You're better off with SMOS 1.0 with the older CGMiner 3.2.1. SMOS 1.3 works better for the newer R9 series cards. In fact a lot of the newer updates like Kalroth's CGMiner fork and SGMiner tend to like the newer R9 280 and 290 cards. I'd stick with the ancient but working CGMiner versions for the 7950's.

I've got 4 MSI 7950's running between 680 and 710 on SMOS 1.0 with CGminer 3.2.1 using the undervolted .962 bios and Lantis' scrypt bin files:

1. what is SMOS?
2. how are your GPUs @ 40-50C?? how cold is it in that room? lol.

, like really cool.

I want your fans, or do you live in Alaska? Grin

BombaUcigasa

legendary

Activity: 1442

Merit: 1005

As you can see, the server you choose to mine on will affect your balances and payouts greatly. So what if you have 5% more rejects if the payout is 10% more?

BombaUcigasa

legendary

Activity: 1442

Merit: 1005

Different servers, different coins, different payout models, same hashing speed:

US east:

US west:

EU:

The Fat Miner

member

Activity: 84

Merit: 10

Please give me Bitcoins so I can buy more food

Quote from: SheepOnDrugs on February 03, 2014, 01:34:38 PM

Quote from: The Fat Miner on February 03, 2014, 01:33:01 PM

Just switched to the main pool server and I'm getting 20% rejects, Anybody else experiencing that ?

You could just read the thread.
Everyone's having problems atm.

Have been reading but not seen 20%

SheepOnDrugs

member

Activity: 112

Merit: 10

Quote from: The Fat Miner on February 03, 2014, 01:33:01 PM

Just switched to the main pool server and I'm getting 20% rejects, Anybody else experiencing that ?

You could just read the thread.
Everyone's having problems atm.

The Fat Miner

member

Activity: 84

Merit: 10

Please give me Bitcoins so I can buy more food

Just switched to the main pool server and I'm getting 20% rejects, Anybody else experiencing that ?

gsrcrxsi

sr. member

Activity: 294

Merit: 250

i wouldnt get worried until the 5 DAY AVERAGE starts dropping. the low days can be made up with the great days.

as of right now. my 5days average is still over 0.01/MH. and that will be my determination on if things are going good or bad.

FrankieSaysRelax

member

Activity: 98

Merit: 10

Quote from: mine2mind112 on February 03, 2014, 01:17:27 PM

I don't realy get why payout are low, unexchanged btc of the pool is high , my payout ,like my unexchanged ,are both very low.
If you try to compare different address payout vs unexchanged you can't find a logic....I know thast's middlecoin....anyway that's strange..

h20 often attempts to manually trade the alt coins to get a little bit of a better price. Sometimes it works and payouts are above what you would get in a pool that strictly auto-switches. Sometimes it's not. Just a risk associated with the pool.

Payouts the last few days have been poor but there was a large sell off of unexchaged coins a few days which gave a very high payout (about 1.5x the usual payout). You'll need to average it out over the long-term. Just keep in mind the pool is growing at an insanely rapid rate (it's nearly tripled in size in the last month) and the more people mining alt coins and auto-switching, the less each coin can sell for.

elpsycongro

full member

Activity: 307

Merit: 102

Quote from: gsrcrxsi on February 03, 2014, 01:09:18 PM

Quote from: elpsycongro on February 03, 2014, 01:07:53 PM

us east just went down Embarrassed

shouldnt matter so much since you will automatically failover to uswest, right? RIGHT? Wink

ture that ,still i like useast better Grin

mine2mind112

member

Activity: 73

Merit: 10

I don't realy get why payout are low, unexchanged btc of the pool is high , my payout ,like my unexchanged ,are both very low.
If you try to compare different address payout vs unexchanged you can't find a logic....I know thast's middlecoin....anyway that's strange..

gsrcrxsi

sr. member

Activity: 294

Merit: 250

Quote from: elpsycongro on February 03, 2014, 01:07:53 PM

us east just went down Embarrassed

shouldnt matter so much since you will automatically failover to uswest, right? RIGHT? Wink

elpsycongro

full member

Activity: 307

Merit: 102

us east just went down Embarrassed

Topic: [ANN] profit switching auto-exchanging pool - www.middlecoin.com - page 117. (Read 829908 times)