Author

Topic: [ANN] profit switching auto-exchanging pool - www.middlecoin.com - page 517. (Read 829908 times)

member
Activity: 81
Merit: 10
I feel that the pool is finally stable and working as it should. I'm going to be increasing the fee to 3%, effective right after the next payout, at 7:30 PM PST tomorrow (~21 hours from now). The fee is applied during mining, not paying out, so anything mined until then has a 2% fee.

The reason for the increased fee is:
- To cover server costs. I've had to upgrade my server, and put an additional support server online. Also in the plan is an EU server, and possibly others.
- To cover unexpected transaction fees in some of the coins. Most don't cost anything to send money, but a few do.
- Because I feel that the pool is worth it.


TODO, in order of priority:

- Increase database performance. This will prevent the random disconnects that last around 10 seconds. The last such disconnect was maybe 8 hours ago. This may also reduce the rejected rate
- Add some reporting.
  - Pool Profit graph, with litecoin comparison
  - Pool hashrate graph, with reject graph.
  - Per-user page with profit graph
  - JSON API
  - Alerts that email (or text for a fee?) miners when their miner stops submitting blocks. Along with this, I may add workers, so you can log in with .1 with one rig, and .2 with your other rig.
  - Alerts that text me when there is a problem.
- Do a more advanced stale/reject calculation, not based on what the miners are reporting, but try to infer their actual hashrate.
- Do a lower difficulty test, to see if it increases hashrate.
- Add an EU server. This will take some time, since I probably want it to interface with the same database as my US server. Once this server is up, I'll look at a global map of our hashrates and pings, and possibly put more servers up, because it will be easy after the EU one.
- Make the coin transitions seamless, and only occur when a block is found. This will reduce the rejected rate, and increase the hash rate slightly.


If you feel any of those items are high priority, let me know.

Sounds good. Your pool is probably less than 5% efficiency from more than doubling in size, (likely even without efficiency increase)  also assuming the increase in fees.

 At what point will exchange volume factor into this potential growth? This question was posed by another earlier in this thread I believe. I could speculate that the LTC market will diversify holdings and hash in the coming days/weeks and it could serve to help balance the market.
legendary
Activity: 1708
Merit: 1000
Reality is stranger than fiction
we would like to have an eu pool.. Cool Cool Cool
legendary
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1011
Can anyone tell me their ratio of stale to rejected shares? I.e. The SS figure in cgminer, and the R figure. And over what time period.

Also, if anyone is using --no-submit-stales, can you tell me your address?

My 7850 running for 10 hours

Code:
 cgminer version 3.3.1 - Started: [2013-07-27 00:47:42]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 (5s):293.5K (avg):312.7Kh/s | A:340  R:10  HW:0  U:0.6/m  WU:305.0/m
 ST: 1  SS: 0  NB: 1320  LW: 15798  GF: 49  RF: 0
 Connected to middlecoin.com diff 512 with stratum as user
 Block: 21e7210bb862a6f0...  Diff:63K  Started: [10:35:44]  Best share: 231K
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 [P]ool management [G]PU management [S]ettings [D]isplay options [Q]uit
 GPU 0:  72.0C  58%    | 311.5K/312.7Kh/s | A:340 R:10 HW:0 U:0.58/m I:12

newbie
Activity: 19
Merit: 0
Can anyone tell me their ratio of stale to rejected shares? I.e. The SS figure in cgminer, and the R figure. And over what time period.

Also, if anyone is using --no-submit-stales, can you tell me your address?

My 7950 running for exactly 10 hours:

Code:
 cgminer version 2.11.4 - Started: [2013-07-26 23:27:00]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 (5s):617.4K (avg):582.7Kh/s | A:638  R:19  HW:0  U:1.1/m  WU:561.0/m
 ST: 2  SS: 0  NB: 1401  LW: 6457  GF: 50  RF: 0
 Connected to middlecoin.com diff 512 with stratum as user 1D1GeuuFSPCubgkUKZmch
 Block: e42a0e32139c79e4...  Diff:46.3K  Started: [09:26:29]  Best share: 1.7M
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 [P]ool management [G]PU management [S]ettings [D]isplay options [Q]uit
 GPU 0:  77.0C 3026RPM | 611.9K/582.7Kh/s | A:638 R:19 HW:0 U:1.06/m I:18
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
legendary
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1011
I'm trying the pool... Thanks  Wink
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 119
I feel that the pool is finally stable and working as it should. I'm going to be increasing the fee to 3%, effective right after the next payout, at 7:30 PM PST tomorrow (~21 hours from now). The fee is applied during mining, not paying out, so anything mined until then has a 2% fee.

The reason for the increased fee is:
- To cover server costs. I've had to upgrade my server, and put an additional support server online. Also in the plan is an EU server, and possibly others.
- To cover unexpected transaction fees in some of the coins. Most don't cost anything to send money, but a few do.
- Because I feel that the pool is worth it.


TODO, in order of priority:

- Increase database performance. This will prevent the random disconnects that last around 10 seconds. The last such disconnect was maybe 8 hours ago. This may also reduce the rejected rate
- Add some reporting.
  - Pool Profit graph, with litecoin comparison
  - Pool hashrate graph, with reject graph.
  - Per-user page with profit graph
  - JSON API
  - Alerts that email (or text for a fee?) miners when their miner stops submitting blocks. Along with this, I may add workers, so you can log in with .1 with one rig, and .2 with your other rig.
  - Alerts that text me when there is a problem.
- Do a more advanced stale/reject calculation, not based on what the miners are reporting, but try to infer their actual hashrate.
- Do a lower difficulty test, to see if it increases hashrate.
- Add an EU server. This will take some time, since I probably want it to interface with the same database as my US server. Once this server is up, I'll look at a global map of our hashrates and pings, and possibly put more servers up, because it will be easy after the EU one.
- Make the coin transitions seamless, and only occur when a block is found. This will reduce the rejected rate, and increase the hash rate slightly.


If you feel any of those items are high priority, let me know.
STT
legendary
Activity: 4102
Merit: 1454
If I put CG on load balance it skips middlecoin mostly.  I get about 10% rejects, I think the fastest coins leave it doing nothing much


Less then 1 share a minute, is really bad?
full member
Activity: 120
Merit: 100
Can anyone tell me their ratio of stale to rejected shares? I.e. The SS figure in cgminer, and the R figure. And over what time period.

Also, if anyone is using --no-submit-stales, can you tell me your address?

Code:
 cgminer version 3.3.1 - Started: [2013-07-22 00:23:36]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 (5s):1.264M (avg):1.266Mh/s | A:7784322  R:492465  HW:0  WU:1154.1/m
 ST: 2  SS: 225  NB: 22956  LW: 191071  GF: 663  RF: 19
 Connected to middlecoin.com diff 512 with stratum as user 1NeYUgzFoU7XtCFKo5yYJptxU8k1WSvzzu
 Block: 4c1f87b4ba5a09c3...  Diff:160K  Started: [01:05:25]  Best share: 62.6M
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 [P]ool management [G]PU management [S]ettings [D]isplay options [Q]uit
 GPU 0:  74.0C 4201RPM | 304.1K/297.4Kh/s | A:1805506 R:127758 HW:0 WU: 269.1/m I:18
 GPU 1:  80.0C 4382RPM | 304.1K/297.3Kh/s | A:1801873 R:130845 HW:0 WU: 272.3/m I:18
 GPU 2:  74.0C 2515RPM | 343.9K/336.1Kh/s | A:2064247 R:119491 HW:0 WU: 302.9/m I:18
 GPU 3:  74.5C 2804RPM | 344.0K/336.2Kh/s | A:2112696 R:114371 HW:0 WU: 309.8/m I:18

Middlecoin is my main pool, have only one failover pool. It's a rig with 4x5850s. cgminer has been up for quite a long time as you can see. I am not using --no-submit-stales.
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
H20 I have the same Rig as you...  2 7970's.   If I can be of any help or you need me to try anything just let me know...   Here to help..



Been hashing here for about 36 hours, seeing earnings at or slightly above LTC mining.

Rejects from 8%-12%. My rigs are 4x7950 per box and my ping to the pool is 35ms.

Any suggestions h2odysee?

I wish I had an answer.

My rig is 2 7970s. I never really go above 3% rejects + stales. My ping is 45 ms.

This probably doesn't help any, but here are my 7970 settings:

"auto-fan" : true,
"gpu-fan" : "0-75",
"temp-target" : "72",
"intensity" : "13",
"gpu-threads" : "2",
"gpu-engine" : "1090",
"gpu-memclock" : "1500",
"thread-concurrency" : "8192"

I do have plans to lower server load, and do more seamless coin switching. And I may do a lower difficulty test.
newbie
Activity: 4
Merit: 0

0.6Mhz rig:

(5s):629.9K (avg):612.9Kh/s | A:1434944  R:87616  HW:0  WU:551.0/m
SS: 21
GPU 0:  76.5C 3987RPM | 321.7K/313.1Kh/s | A:746336 R:40992 HW:0 WU: 283.5/m I:17
GPU 1:  76.5C 2841RPM | 307.9K/299.8Kh/s | A:688096 R:46624 HW:0 WU: 267.5/m I:18

Other 0.7 mhz rig:  ( just running couple of minutes)

 (5s):701.4K (avg):678.1Kh/s | A:1536  R:512  HW:0  WU:625.2/m

SS:0
 GPU 0:  74.0C 3892RPM | 236.4K/233.9Kh/s | A:   0 R:  0 HW:0 WU: 204.2/m I:12
 GPU 1:  74.0C 3524RPM | 453.4K/448.2Kh/s | A:3072 R:512 HW:0 WU: 503.4/m I:17


Indeed seems to me that the 512 diff is to high for my box'es.

There come by a lot of new blocks before my box gets one accepted Sad


[2013-07-26 23:57:55] Stratum from pool 0 detected new block
 [2013-07-26 23:58:12] Network diff set to 103K
 [2013-07-26 23:58:12] Stratum from pool 0 detected new block
 [2013-07-26 23:58:19] Network diff set to 104K
 [2013-07-26 23:58:19] Stratum from pool 0 detected new block
 [2013-07-26 23:58:33] Network diff set to 105K
 [2013-07-26 23:58:33] Stratum from pool 0 detected new block
 [2013-07-26 23:58:42] Network diff set to 106K
 [2013-07-26 23:58:42] Stratum from pool 0 detected new block
 [2013-07-26 23:58:48] Accepted c2166fbb Diff 1.37K/512 GPU 1 pool 0
 [2013-07-26 23:58:50] Accepted c0aeeb37 Diff 8.45K/512 GPU 1 pool 0
 [2013-07-26 23:58:55] Accepted 190dc44b Diff 574/512 GPU 1 pool 0
 [2013-07-26 23:59:16] Network diff set to 106K
 [2013-07-26 23:59:16] Stratum from pool 0 detected new block
 [2013-07-26 23:59:30] Network diff set to 107K
 [2013-07-26 23:59:30] Stratum from pool 0 detected new block


Please lets run a test with a lower diff for a day or so?!?!
 
full member
Activity: 322
Merit: 113
Sinbad Mixer: Mix Your BTC Quickly
Can anyone tell me their ratio of stale to rejected shares? I.e. The SS figure in cgminer, and the R figure. And over what time period.

Also, if anyone is using --no-submit-stales, can you tell me your address?
1PSt9bDdGJBkrR7CAGTRA9azp96uLU8hge
Have been using that for a long time. ~3-4% rejects.
legendary
Activity: 1988
Merit: 1007
Can anyone tell me their ratio of stale to rejected shares? I.e. The SS figure in cgminer, and the R figure. And over what time period.

Also, if anyone is using --no-submit-stales, can you tell me your address?

Off a 3MH/s rig:

A: 4109
R: 590
SS: 29

Time period: 15.5 hours
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 119
Can anyone tell me their ratio of stale to rejected shares? I.e. The SS figure in cgminer, and the R figure. And over what time period.

Also, if anyone is using --no-submit-stales, can you tell me your address?
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 119
Been hashing here for about 36 hours, seeing earnings at or slightly above LTC mining.

Rejects from 8%-12%. My rigs are 4x7950 per box and my ping to the pool is 35ms.

Any suggestions h2odysee?

I wish I had an answer.

My rig is 2 7970s. I never really go above 3% rejects + stales. My ping is 45 ms.

This probably doesn't help any, but here are my 7970 settings:

"auto-fan" : true,
"gpu-fan" : "0-75",
"temp-target" : "72",
"intensity" : "13",
"gpu-threads" : "2",
"gpu-engine" : "1090",
"gpu-memclock" : "1500",
"thread-concurrency" : "8192"

I do have plans to lower server load, and do more seamless coin switching. And I may do a lower difficulty test.
newbie
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
Been hashing here for about 36 hours, seeing earnings at or slightly above LTC mining.

Rejects from 8%-12%. My rigs are 4x7950 per box and my ping to the pool is 35ms.

Any suggestions h2odysee?
legendary
Activity: 1708
Merit: 1000
Reality is stranger than fiction
Im very interested to see how this goes
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 119
I just noticed that everyone was disconnecting for about 15 seconds when I do a certain database update. Database updates have been throttled, and it looks ok now.

Edit: Its not ok. Just saw another disconnect. working on it.

Edit2: Should be ok now.
full member
Activity: 137
Merit: 100
Does not seem to be working properly.  I get no better profit than I do mining LTC.  Should theoretically be 20-30% more profitable
rough patches in the beginning.. seems to have smoothed out now.
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 119
h2odysee, have you read the PM?  Smiley

Yes. I corrected the issue right after your PM.
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
h2odysee, have you read the PM?  Smiley

He only seems to get on here 1 or 2 hrs a day..  I am sure he will see it next time he is on..

We appreciate you helping him Balthazar...   Smiley
Jump to: