Pyrin down for maintenance on TO wonder what that is about....
The problem was only short-term, it's been working again since yesterday
Topic: [ANN] PYRIN (PYI) - GPU PoW - ghostDAG - blockDAG (Read 6970 times)
The problem was only short-term, it's been working again since yesterday
What a surprise. I mean if you haven't jumped off the ship once the owners minted themselves free coins via a hardfork, I guess deserved outcome.
Once you mess with tokenomics of any project post launch that instantly a point of it's over.
Once you mess with tokenomics of any project post launch that instantly a point of it's over.
So we have ASIC friendly kaspa, gpu friendly karlsen, and cpu friendly Spectre. I am just not sure where copy cat pyrin fits in. Indutsry veterans and influencers have started calling pyrin a scam.
https://x.com/MiningRabid/status/1795166933299404893
https://x.com/MiningRabid/status/1795166933299404893
you just jump on every accusation
What did Pyrin take from Karlsen? Besides, Pyrin is not called a scam -> you are lying again and distorting every statement
sick boy
Hahahaha.. What happened to your pet project you motherfucking piece of shit? How much did you make by robbing thousands of investors?
Pyrine discord has been deleted. Pyrine wake is being held at :
https://discord.gg/WqJ9QrbS
pyrin dead
https://pyrin.network/lander closed
https://explorer.pyrin.network/ closed
https://x.com/pyrin_network closed
fraud again
again empty works
If we continue with this mentality, the crypto market will die.
Issuing and launching crypto has to be subject to certain conditions.
https://pyrin.network/lander closed
https://explorer.pyrin.network/ closed
https://x.com/pyrin_network closed
fraud again
again empty works
If we continue with this mentality, the crypto market will die.
Issuing and launching crypto has to be subject to certain conditions.
STOP THE STEAL!! STOP THE STEAL!!
https://x.com/DesheShai/status/1829467850702008538
Shai totally destroyed the incompetent and malicious pyrin "devs".
https://x.com/DesheShai/status/1829467850702008538
Shai totally destroyed the incompetent and malicious pyrin "devs".
So we have ASIC friendly kaspa, gpu friendly karlsen, and cpu friendly Spectre. I am just not sure where copy cat pyrin fits in. Indutsry veterans and influencers have started calling pyrin a scam.
https://x.com/MiningRabid/status/1795166933299404893
https://x.com/MiningRabid/status/1795166933299404893
Wen rug-pull?
gg ! project dead
It was pretty much dead after their first failed hard fork last year, but dumb culties and some smart marketing has kept it alive.
The devs copied Kaspa's 10bps code, and rolled it into production without testing. The 10bps chain is halted, people are mining and dumping on the old 1bps chain. Uyrin chillers need to hire competent devs.
DAA score = blue score + redblocks
Blue score = number of blue blocks
Spectre:
"virtualDaaScore": "3076607"
"blueScore": 3057922
3076607-260890=18.685 -> 0.607% redblocks
Karlsen:
"virtualDaaScore": "18242249"
"blueScore": 18179490
18242249-18179490=62.759 -> 0.344% redblocks
Pyrin:
"virtualDaaScore": "16615358"
"blueScore": "15094915"
16615358-15094915=1.520.443 -> 9.15% redblocks
Blue blocks are part of the main chain, while red blocks are not directly included in the main chain and are often referred to as 'orphans' or 'uncles'. Why does yrin sucks at every thing? They can't even ape properly
Blue score = number of blue blocks
Spectre:
"virtualDaaScore": "3076607"
"blueScore": 3057922
3076607-260890=18.685 -> 0.607% redblocks
Karlsen:
"virtualDaaScore": "18242249"
"blueScore": 18179490
18242249-18179490=62.759 -> 0.344% redblocks
Pyrin:
"virtualDaaScore": "16615358"
"blueScore": "15094915"
16615358-15094915=1.520.443 -> 9.15% redblocks
Blue blocks are part of the main chain, while red blocks are not directly included in the main chain and are often referred to as 'orphans' or 'uncles'. Why does yrin sucks at every thing? They can't even ape properly
And you keep defending a scam coin.
Stupid and ignorant boy!
Stupid and ignorant boy!
So we have ASIC friendly kaspa, gpu friendly karlsen, and cpu friendly Spectre. I am just not sure where copy cat pyrin fits in. Indutsry veterans and influencers have started calling pyrin a scam.
https://x.com/MiningRabid/status/1795166933299404893
https://x.com/MiningRabid/status/1795166933299404893
you just jump on every accusation
What did Pyrin take from Karlsen? Besides, Pyrin is not called a scam -> you are lying again and distorting every statement
sick boy
So we have ASIC friendly kaspa, gpu friendly karlsen, and cpu friendly Spectre. I am just not sure where copy cat pyrin fits in. Indutsry veterans and influencers have started calling pyrin a scam.
https://x.com/MiningRabid/status/1795166933299404893
https://x.com/MiningRabid/status/1795166933299404893
Pyrin down for maintenance on TO wonder what that is about....
I agree with you on your first 5 words.
It's unbelievable how lost you are right now. Where do you get the information for your accusations? Anyone who watches the cryptospace (especially the Kaspa forks) knows full well that Pyrin is where most of the FUD is spread. Why? I think because he's the only one to be taken seriously and you just have a problem with that. That's why you're spreading lies and lies again and you can't handle it.
I really have a problem with dishonest people, and pyrin is anything but honest. They stole the Kaspa Rust code and call it as their invention. They copied the KarlsenHash, changed one step and called it pyrinhash. Other than the web design is there any innovation? Probably website design is also stolen from somewhere. They wholesale banned people for bringing up ASICS. Why?
It's unbelievable how lost you are right now. Where do you get the information for your accusations? Anyone who watches the cryptospace (especially the Kaspa forks) knows full well that Pyrin is where most of the FUD is spread. Why? I think because he's the only one to be taken seriously and you just have a problem with that. That's why you're spreading lies and lies again and you can't handle it.
Dear Pyrin community members and investors,
The recent proposal regarding a hard fork of the Pyrin blockchain to allocate 30,000,000 PYI tokens raises many questions, especially about the impact and relevance of such measures for our project. I wish to express my reservations and explain why this strategy might prove to be counterproductive.
**Regarding listing on the top 10 exchanges:** The argument that being listed on major exchanges would increase credibility is highly debatable. Many decentralized projects, such as Kaspa, Tao, and Ergo, have proven that it's possible to achieve significant visibility and ensure liquidity without resorting to costly listings. These projects have innovated with community approaches, like crowdfunds, showing that there are viable alternatives more in line with the spirit of decentralization.
**On expanding the research and development team:** It's surprising to note that, despite numerous offers of help from the community, these proposals remain unanswered. Opening GitHub to community contributions would be a logical step, thus facilitating development through a collective and transparent effort, in line with the principles of open source.
**Regarding marketing:** It's questionable whether a decentralized and fair launch project, which has successfully developed without pre-mining, suddenly needs to compromise its values to gain notoriety. Marketing should not take precedence over the fundamental principles of transparency and fair community participation.
**Regarding the increase in liquidity:** The argument that increasing the circulating supply would increase liquidity is fundamentally flawed. Liquidity depends on how easily assets can be bought and sold without affecting their price, not on the total number of tokens in circulation. Moreover, increasing the supply tends to dilute the value of existing holdings, contrary to the claim that this would benefit the community.
**Additional point on the increase in supply:** Introducing new tokens through minting, especially after the team gained an initial advantage due to the absence of mining or a reduced number of miners, raises questions of fairness and value for long-standing participants.
In conclusion, while the intention to fund the development and growth of the Pyrin project is understandable, the proposed methods seem to stray from the principles of decentralization and equity at the heart of cryptocurrency. It is crucial to reconsider this proposal, taking into account the fundamental values of our community and exploring alternatives that do not compromise the integrity or value of our project.
Sincerely,
So, whether you agree with me or not, please go vote #voting
https://discord.com/channels/1125779071448653928/1227354505444855868/1227905750706163743
I only have bitcoin talk to express myself because if you express your disagreement thoughtfully on telegram or Discord as I currently do, the moderators ban.
The recent proposal regarding a hard fork of the Pyrin blockchain to allocate 30,000,000 PYI tokens raises many questions, especially about the impact and relevance of such measures for our project. I wish to express my reservations and explain why this strategy might prove to be counterproductive.
**Regarding listing on the top 10 exchanges:** The argument that being listed on major exchanges would increase credibility is highly debatable. Many decentralized projects, such as Kaspa, Tao, and Ergo, have proven that it's possible to achieve significant visibility and ensure liquidity without resorting to costly listings. These projects have innovated with community approaches, like crowdfunds, showing that there are viable alternatives more in line with the spirit of decentralization.
**On expanding the research and development team:** It's surprising to note that, despite numerous offers of help from the community, these proposals remain unanswered. Opening GitHub to community contributions would be a logical step, thus facilitating development through a collective and transparent effort, in line with the principles of open source.
**Regarding marketing:** It's questionable whether a decentralized and fair launch project, which has successfully developed without pre-mining, suddenly needs to compromise its values to gain notoriety. Marketing should not take precedence over the fundamental principles of transparency and fair community participation.
**Regarding the increase in liquidity:** The argument that increasing the circulating supply would increase liquidity is fundamentally flawed. Liquidity depends on how easily assets can be bought and sold without affecting their price, not on the total number of tokens in circulation. Moreover, increasing the supply tends to dilute the value of existing holdings, contrary to the claim that this would benefit the community.
**Additional point on the increase in supply:** Introducing new tokens through minting, especially after the team gained an initial advantage due to the absence of mining or a reduced number of miners, raises questions of fairness and value for long-standing participants.
In conclusion, while the intention to fund the development and growth of the Pyrin project is understandable, the proposed methods seem to stray from the principles of decentralization and equity at the heart of cryptocurrency. It is crucial to reconsider this proposal, taking into account the fundamental values of our community and exploring alternatives that do not compromise the integrity or value of our project.
Sincerely,
So, whether you agree with me or not, please go vote #voting
https://discord.com/channels/1125779071448653928/1227354505444855868/1227905750706163743
I only have bitcoin talk to express myself because if you express your disagreement thoughtfully on telegram or Discord as I currently do, the moderators ban.
the hard fork was decided by the community. you can read more details about it here.
https://medium.com/pyrin/pyrin-grows-and-expands-3e1183106afe
as far as I know, people only get banned for spreading FUD, there are no consequences for normal discussion.
LOL. It was decided by the bots. Pyrin devs have hundreds of alt accounts which they use to spread fud about the other forks. Just ask the two retards -- TheCold and The Pacman-85.
Dear Pyrin community members and investors,
The recent proposal regarding a hard fork of the Pyrin blockchain to allocate 30,000,000 PYI tokens raises many questions, especially about the impact and relevance of such measures for our project. I wish to express my reservations and explain why this strategy might prove to be counterproductive.
**Regarding listing on the top 10 exchanges:** The argument that being listed on major exchanges would increase credibility is highly debatable. Many decentralized projects, such as Kaspa, Tao, and Ergo, have proven that it's possible to achieve significant visibility and ensure liquidity without resorting to costly listings. These projects have innovated with community approaches, like crowdfunds, showing that there are viable alternatives more in line with the spirit of decentralization.
**On expanding the research and development team:** It's surprising to note that, despite numerous offers of help from the community, these proposals remain unanswered. Opening GitHub to community contributions would be a logical step, thus facilitating development through a collective and transparent effort, in line with the principles of open source.
**Regarding marketing:** It's questionable whether a decentralized and fair launch project, which has successfully developed without pre-mining, suddenly needs to compromise its values to gain notoriety. Marketing should not take precedence over the fundamental principles of transparency and fair community participation.
**Regarding the increase in liquidity:** The argument that increasing the circulating supply would increase liquidity is fundamentally flawed. Liquidity depends on how easily assets can be bought and sold without affecting their price, not on the total number of tokens in circulation. Moreover, increasing the supply tends to dilute the value of existing holdings, contrary to the claim that this would benefit the community.
**Additional point on the increase in supply:** Introducing new tokens through minting, especially after the team gained an initial advantage due to the absence of mining or a reduced number of miners, raises questions of fairness and value for long-standing participants.
In conclusion, while the intention to fund the development and growth of the Pyrin project is understandable, the proposed methods seem to stray from the principles of decentralization and equity at the heart of cryptocurrency. It is crucial to reconsider this proposal, taking into account the fundamental values of our community and exploring alternatives that do not compromise the integrity or value of our project.
Sincerely,
So, whether you agree with me or not, please go vote #voting
https://discord.com/channels/1125779071448653928/1227354505444855868/1227905750706163743
I only have bitcoin talk to express myself because if you express your disagreement thoughtfully on telegram or Discord as I currently do, the moderators ban.
The recent proposal regarding a hard fork of the Pyrin blockchain to allocate 30,000,000 PYI tokens raises many questions, especially about the impact and relevance of such measures for our project. I wish to express my reservations and explain why this strategy might prove to be counterproductive.
**Regarding listing on the top 10 exchanges:** The argument that being listed on major exchanges would increase credibility is highly debatable. Many decentralized projects, such as Kaspa, Tao, and Ergo, have proven that it's possible to achieve significant visibility and ensure liquidity without resorting to costly listings. These projects have innovated with community approaches, like crowdfunds, showing that there are viable alternatives more in line with the spirit of decentralization.
**On expanding the research and development team:** It's surprising to note that, despite numerous offers of help from the community, these proposals remain unanswered. Opening GitHub to community contributions would be a logical step, thus facilitating development through a collective and transparent effort, in line with the principles of open source.
**Regarding marketing:** It's questionable whether a decentralized and fair launch project, which has successfully developed without pre-mining, suddenly needs to compromise its values to gain notoriety. Marketing should not take precedence over the fundamental principles of transparency and fair community participation.
**Regarding the increase in liquidity:** The argument that increasing the circulating supply would increase liquidity is fundamentally flawed. Liquidity depends on how easily assets can be bought and sold without affecting their price, not on the total number of tokens in circulation. Moreover, increasing the supply tends to dilute the value of existing holdings, contrary to the claim that this would benefit the community.
**Additional point on the increase in supply:** Introducing new tokens through minting, especially after the team gained an initial advantage due to the absence of mining or a reduced number of miners, raises questions of fairness and value for long-standing participants.
In conclusion, while the intention to fund the development and growth of the Pyrin project is understandable, the proposed methods seem to stray from the principles of decentralization and equity at the heart of cryptocurrency. It is crucial to reconsider this proposal, taking into account the fundamental values of our community and exploring alternatives that do not compromise the integrity or value of our project.
Sincerely,
So, whether you agree with me or not, please go vote #voting
https://discord.com/channels/1125779071448653928/1227354505444855868/1227905750706163743
I only have bitcoin talk to express myself because if you express your disagreement thoughtfully on telegram or Discord as I currently do, the moderators ban.
While I agree with your conclusion, I do not agree with all your reasons. Pyrin is not a fair launch project devs have mined close to two weeks of supply using better GPU miners and ASICs. It looks like they were successfull in dumping all the premine, and looking for one last hurray before a rug pull.
Jump to: