Topic: [ANN] QCHAIN: PRE-RELEASE IS OUT!💥Native Sponsored Content Sales Platform💥 - page 30. (Read 13023 times)

Shivas will be those who are now participating in Qchain ICO, exactly they will grab all money, taking into account how successful the project is

This will be a natural part of making payouts not have to go through initial deposit and giving of control to a central man-in-the-middle (MITM) agent. This will naturally move bargaining power to advertisers and publishers, as money and bargaining power are very closely tied together.

I often meet the opinion that it is better not to participate in a ICO, but buy tokens on the stock exchange. Indeed, many of them are becoming cheaper relative to the price of a ICO.
However, the Qchain - it seems to me is not at this case. I can justify my position as it is already accepted here on points  

To begin, I'll list the parameters by which many are interested in the Qchain:

1. High degree of readiness. The demo version is already in the public domain and anyone can test it. Projects that could boast of this almost was not. Everyone was asked to invest in simple promises from a WP, and then they gave news once a month that they were still working on the project and the price was smoothly rolling down.

2. Competent detailed-worked business model. It is very important. What the Qchain offers is not just a good idea, this is so natural process of development of the advertising market, that I will boldly call his child of competitive market  )). After all, this idea came to mind later or earlier, but the Qchain was the first who suggested it. This is th same thing that Steve Jobs did once with the phone, Qchain will do in the advertising business.

3. Have you noticed this fact? Command of the Qchain is so cool and so confident that they do not even spend money on advertising!

You exclaim "WHAT? They are crazy? How did they intend to attract an investor? "



And I will answer you, they are so effective that they are advertised for free:

- Nem
- BitcoinMagazine
- Nasdaq

Why do they write about their enthusiastic reviews about the Qchain? Yes, everything is simple! For the last months this is the most thought out project at the start. He stands out against the background of his working idea. I want here again to refer to item number 2.And in a team with Lon Wong himself!

OK. I went through KYC specifically to invest in the Qchain. Yes, ask me if I sell you my tokens below the ICO price? ))))))) I find it funny.

And that is not all. In mid-November in California, as we know, a conference will be held where usually the business angels come together. According to the team's reports in the telegram, it is absolutely clear that the Qchain is preparing a large presentation. And I think that after it, the Qchain will early collect the necessary capitalization and close the ICO.

PS
"Projects that could not boast of this practically were not." - I'm sorry, I just think that I tried to mislead a reader. Yes! Such a project was relatively recently. And I also participated in it. It was called COSS. And there was a working beta version. And if you still doubt that such projects to enter a exchange market tokens are becoming more expensive, here is a graph:



Despite the fact that recently the price has decreased, like all tokens, it was never priced below at ICO. And I managed to fix the triple profit not expecting a long time.

It is difficult, to develop a project in two blockrooms at once.

You need eight hands! )))

Perhaps Shiva himself works in the project team? )))

I saw that you dont have the ANN for Filipino would you mind if I make it?

Here already answered this question. I choose for you a quote:


With regard to this:


This is a very important point in the WP thanks to this, the whale can not monopolize the entire QChain platform

Good point, but still it means that most of all assets are in hands of minority, thus they can shake market especially at the very first stages of product establishment. But what you've written above really make sense and sound good bro.

In white paper it is written that the token holder does not participate in making corporate decisions and choosing strategies. No matter how many tokens he has. But on the whole I agree, the presence of a large investor - an important stage for the project.

Its okay to not be associated with fiats. Crypto stay inside crypto. And bitcoin.

Generally speaking, I agree with you. Anyway, in my opinion the more money collected, the faster Qchain will come to market with a finished product, in principle exactly what we need.

Nice longread, rocketron, you must start new topic in Speculation branch with this post.

Crimea is blocked because of US sanctions right now. 

I agree. whales have always been on the market and will always be, they have a big impact on the market. It's a fact, I think there's no need to worry about it

Wally Xie in telegram says:

"There are complaints about changes in price between XQC and EQC. We were encouraged by our legal team to not peg our token values to fiat for various reasons. As XQC is cheaper now then, perhaps now is a good time to take advantage of that and buy XQC.

If we pegged to fiat, there would be other complaints, I imagine. Then, there could be complaints about XQC costing too much in XEM, for example."

Why do you have uncertainty in this question?

A appearance of whales guarantees investors that the project has a high value and good prospects for development. Whales are business angels project their availability is extremely important.

To understand this, one must understand the logic of the whale-why he invests in the project. I will explain by the points:

First, the appearance of the whale guarantees us that the project will collect the necessary capitalization to start implementing the plans specified in a WP.

Secondly, such a large investor will not invest in some kind of incomprehensible product. After all, the project itself can not guarantee return of investments. The project does not, for example, have large collateral in the form of real estate or any other objects of value. Accordingly, how can a large investor return money? Yes, practically neither as. Therefore, before making a serious investment, the whale will study the project much better than either of us will be able to do it. The whale will know all the insides that are generally possible and not known in the wide circles. And only after he is confident in the project he will give money.
Why can we believe that the whale is not mistaken in its calculations? The answer is simple - big money does not come to the hands of stupid people.

Thirdly, the whale can afford to finance the project at any time if it is required and if this money is really critical for the continuation of the project.

Fourthly, the whale invests in the project for profit. He will not extract his investments (sell tokens) in the early stages of growth. The rate of return of large investors is so high that it will take years before it is achieved. So the whale will never be a seller until the project is implemented. This is very important for a stable price increase, because the whale has a really large share in the project. It is possible that the whale will never send its tokens to the market at all, but will receive profit within the project.

Fifth, whales actively participate in the management of the invested companies. In addition to finance, they bring to the company the most valuable contribution - their experience and managerial skills, which is usually not enough for companies in the initial stages, as well as their connections. Many entrepreneurs say that the knowledge and experience of business angels are more important to them than their money.

Therefore, from the foregoing, if will appear a large investor at Qchain, it will be a very good thing for minority investors.

I saw it in this thread

Where is this information about the conference? I missed that. Where will be held conference?

Some whales can flow their cash I suppose after this conference, btw still don't know
Whether whales good or bad for any project? My opinion that it's not essential and healthy for any product but who knows.

Anyway really great result

Yeah. Your arguments are true. It will be interesting to hear what they will present at the conference which will be passed on Friday, November 17th