Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN] [QRK] Quark | Core 0.10 upgrade - page 88. (Read 1031025 times)

sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
August 25, 2014, 05:56:08 PM
@silvermetal, You were here at the beginning, right ? Why wasn't the logo with "the elementary currency" adopted instead of `money reinvented` ? You took a vote or ? Its just that the latter fits more for Bitcoin because Bitcoin reinvented how we see and use money, while Quark creator transformed it into a day-to-day currency by adding security,speed,zero fees,etc therefore `the elementary currency` would have fitted much better IMHO.
legendary
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1167
MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG
August 25, 2014, 03:14:28 PM
I think Cryptohunters' idea of radical changes to Quark will only serve to damage Quark.  Quark algo etc is good as it is.  Quark just needs marketing and usage and a community that isn't pulling in 3 different directions.


1. Damage how? and through what process. What radical changes do you mean exactly. Explain the radical change and the process through which it would damage  qrk. I'm yet to hear one person justify this damage they assume would take place. I mean is -95% value already not reasonable damage?

2. are we going to start a new thread so we can block out people that just throw insults with no real reason or logic behind them.

3. QRK just needs...... Marketing and usage??  that is the same for EVERY coin out there. How will you motivate people to market it, how will you motivate people to use it above and beyond the other 500 alts?

"Just needs" means nothing. All coins " just need" people to buy and use it.


Only QRKfx seemed able to think through the stages and logically lay them out as some kind of coherent thought pattern that people could follow and understand. QRk tbh is probably screwed unless some decent leadership rises up takes the lead and give some direction.  I have seen ZERO solutions to problems qrks has right now from anyone.


The ROI projects are the only way forward without making some radical changes. We will need leadership and organisation to get those going.





Hi Crypto,

Really like your devotion! And agree on many points with you.

The insults hurts but I know who it is saying. Personally I will not lose hope just by one person. That would be too easy. I will be the last person who sell my Quark (to be honest I bought my original Quark back after I had first sold it in an impulse few weeks back) Cheesy

When I speak for myself, some wounds need to be healed, and that takes time.
For me it is like when your wife/husband cheated on you, and the next day he/she says: "come on, nothing happened we continue with our relationship just like before"
I think each one of us will process what has happened on its own way.

Before we continue (as you described) we need to clarify certain aspects first (in my opinion).

- The role of Max. He indicated that he will only maintain the protocol. Is that sufficient? Or do we need other developers? (George?)
- The seed nodes. What I understood is that it is rented for one year. What will happen after that? (Didn't James-z take care of that)? Mining with the wallet is related to the 4 seed nodes.

If that is clarified then an inventory is needed who want to help with promotion and how etc (different Quark devoted people need to be united again here (in a moderated thread) or at reddit or at the quarktalk forum or somewhere else.
- Clarification about the shaq-fu perks. (with are hold by Victor).
- A structured foundation and a leader needs to be placed (who will step forward as a leader? maok? coinmama? you? I think there is still enough potential to build something nice :-) ).





Fully agree with you.

Yes, Max will only maintain the protocol. I think this is enough for now IF we are not going to make any radical changes and rather push to first unite the community behind one large and worthwhile ROI project, with possible strong returns and a large incentive for project managers to get involved.

Also where is VIC is he still on board with qrk??. I have spoken to VIC before in the past and always thought he was a nice guy who had put a lot of effort into qrk for very little recognition by most of the community. VIc was always pro to get some development funding set up since many of his ideas and work was held back by lack of funding and this was obviously a very frustrating position for him. The ROI project could deliver this funding without the development superblock or POB/qrk only ipo coin.

The leadership is essential now. Let's get the leadership in place, get a new moderated thread set up on here and get some ideas flowing for some good ROI projects. There is no reason to sit around waiting for some large companies to decide to implement qrk as a currency they will use. We should start creating some services that are actually useful and attractive for people to use. Perhaps when qrk is the only accepted currency on a few well know services then other companies may show an interest.

Coinmama come on say you will take the lead here. I would support this fully and other core members have also said this. Since max is not interested in leading we need someone at the helm with a great support group around them.

I would hope QRKfx would come back if this one taken care of in short order.



Yes, Vic is still on board. I received an e-mail of him 2-3 days back where he asked support to answer some questions for an article. I am not sure whether somebody is helping with that. But he is for the next couple of years working 80 hours a week...therefore I don't think he wants to take the leadership. But I agree, it would be nice if he indicates and shares with all of us his current vision for Quark.

ROI projects are essential. Quark can't rely on donations only. We need to re-group first.

Quarkfx is always welcome to help us or to come back, but we should respect his choice to move on. I can't blame his choice. Maybe in the future we can cooperate with him one way or another.



great news that VIC is still on board. 80 hours per week? seriously i hope he is on 250k per year or more. With funding and spending 80hours per week someone like vic could help get qrk to the top 5 again. Shame we didn't have the funding in place to make all of his hard work pay off for him so he didn't have to work so hard. Perhaps if we can get qrk back on it's feet it can finance people like vic to work on qrk projects.

Yes i do agree we must respect QRKfx's decision to leave. However, under the correct conditions i am hopeful we could get him back on the qrk team.

Donations don't work. With the exception of doge i have not really seen donations amount to much. ROI is the only way without taking radical measures to get things moving.




hero member
Activity: 487
Merit: 500
August 25, 2014, 02:59:40 PM
I think Cryptohunters' idea of radical changes to Quark will only serve to damage Quark.  Quark algo etc is good as it is.  Quark just needs marketing and usage and a community that isn't pulling in 3 different directions.


1. Damage how? and through what process. What radical changes do you mean exactly. Explain the radical change and the process through which it would damage  qrk. I'm yet to hear one person justify this damage they assume would take place. I mean is -95% value already not reasonable damage?

2. are we going to start a new thread so we can block out people that just throw insults with no real reason or logic behind them.

3. QRK just needs...... Marketing and usage??  that is the same for EVERY coin out there. How will you motivate people to market it, how will you motivate people to use it above and beyond the other 500 alts?

"Just needs" means nothing. All coins " just need" people to buy and use it.


Only QRKfx seemed able to think through the stages and logically lay them out as some kind of coherent thought pattern that people could follow and understand. QRk tbh is probably screwed unless some decent leadership rises up takes the lead and give some direction.  I have seen ZERO solutions to problems qrks has right now from anyone.


The ROI projects are the only way forward without making some radical changes. We will need leadership and organisation to get those going.





Hi Crypto,

Really like your devotion! And agree on many points with you.

The insults hurts but I know who it is saying. Personally I will not lose hope just by one person. That would be too easy. I will be the last person who sell my Quark (to be honest I bought my original Quark back after I had first sold it in an impulse few weeks back) Cheesy

When I speak for myself, some wounds need to be healed, and that takes time.
For me it is like when your wife/husband cheated on you, and the next day he/she says: "come on, nothing happened we continue with our relationship just like before"
I think each one of us will process what has happened on its own way.

Before we continue (as you described) we need to clarify certain aspects first (in my opinion).

- The role of Max. He indicated that he will only maintain the protocol. Is that sufficient? Or do we need other developers? (George?)
- The seed nodes. What I understood is that it is rented for one year. What will happen after that? (Didn't James-z take care of that)? Mining with the wallet is related to the 4 seed nodes.

If that is clarified then an inventory is needed who want to help with promotion and how etc (different Quark devoted people need to be united again here (in a moderated thread) or at reddit or at the quarktalk forum or somewhere else.
- Clarification about the shaq-fu perks. (with are hold by Victor).
- A structured foundation and a leader needs to be placed (who will step forward as a leader? maok? coinmama? you? I think there is still enough potential to build something nice :-) ).





Fully agree with you.

Yes, Max will only maintain the protocol. I think this is enough for now IF we are not going to make any radical changes and rather push to first unite the community behind one large and worthwhile ROI project, with possible strong returns and a large incentive for project managers to get involved.

Also where is VIC is he still on board with qrk??. I have spoken to VIC before in the past and always thought he was a nice guy who had put a lot of effort into qrk for very little recognition by most of the community. VIc was always pro to get some development funding set up since many of his ideas and work was held back by lack of funding and this was obviously a very frustrating position for him. The ROI project could deliver this funding without the development superblock or POB/qrk only ipo coin.

The leadership is essential now. Let's get the leadership in place, get a new moderated thread set up on here and get some ideas flowing for some good ROI projects. There is no reason to sit around waiting for some large companies to decide to implement qrk as a currency they will use. We should start creating some services that are actually useful and attractive for people to use. Perhaps when qrk is the only accepted currency on a few well know services then other companies may show an interest.

Coinmama come on say you will take the lead here. I would support this fully and other core members have also said this. Since max is not interested in leading we need someone at the helm with a great support group around them.

I would hope QRKfx would come back if this one taken care of in short order.



Yes, Vic is still on board. I received an e-mail of him 2-3 days back where he asked support to answer some questions for an article. I am not sure whether somebody is helping with that. But he is for the next couple of years working 80 hours a week...therefore I don't think he wants to take the leadership. But I agree, it would be nice if he indicates and shares with all of us his current vision for Quark.

ROI projects are essential. Quark can't rely on donations only. We need to re-group first.

Quarkfx is always welcome to help us or to come back, but we should respect his choice to move on. I can't blame his choice. Maybe in the future we can cooperate with him one way or another.

sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
August 25, 2014, 02:54:25 PM
After starting a reddit campaign on unrelated with crypto subreddits, new people are joining quarktalk which basically get to know Quark as their first crypto currency. I will also launch a google campaign and I think there will be many more who will hear about Quark for the first time so I hope some of you old quarkers join in and try to help/advice them. If anyone has the time to become a moderator and wants to help let me know. For Quark projects there are plenty of options and if anyone wants to share their projects and raise bounties etc you have full support on there. Good luck
legendary
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1167
MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG
August 25, 2014, 01:51:00 PM
I think Cryptohunters' idea of radical changes to Quark will only serve to damage Quark.  Quark algo etc is good as it is.  Quark just needs marketing and usage and a community that isn't pulling in 3 different directions.


1. Damage how? and through what process. What radical changes do you mean exactly. Explain the radical change and the process through which it would damage  qrk. I'm yet to hear one person justify this damage they assume would take place. I mean is -95% value already not reasonable damage?

2. are we going to start a new thread so we can block out people that just throw insults with no real reason or logic behind them.

3. QRK just needs...... Marketing and usage??  that is the same for EVERY coin out there. How will you motivate people to market it, how will you motivate people to use it above and beyond the other 500 alts?

"Just needs" means nothing. All coins " just need" people to buy and use it.


Only QRKfx seemed able to think through the stages and logically lay them out as some kind of coherent thought pattern that people could follow and understand. QRk tbh is probably screwed unless some decent leadership rises up takes the lead and give some direction.  I have seen ZERO solutions to problems qrks has right now from anyone.


The ROI projects are the only way forward without making some radical changes. We will need leadership and organisation to get those going.





Hi Crypto,

Really like your devotion! And agree on many points with you.

The insults hurts but I know who it is saying. Personally I will not lose hope just by one person. That would be too easy. I will be the last person who sell my Quark (to be honest I bought my original Quark back after I had first sold it in an impulse few weeks back) Cheesy

When I speak for myself, some wounds need to be healed, and that takes time.
For me it is like when your wife/husband cheated on you, and the next day he/she says: "come on, nothing happened we continue with our relationship just like before"
I think each one of us will process what has happened on its own way.

Before we continue (as you described) we need to clarify certain aspects first (in my opinion).

- The role of Max. He indicated that he will only maintain the protocol. Is that sufficient? Or do we need other developers? (George?)
- The seed nodes. What I understood is that it is rented for one year. What will happen after that? (Didn't James-z take care of that)? Mining with the wallet is related to the 4 seed nodes.

If that is clarified then an inventory is needed who want to help with promotion and how etc (different Quark devoted people need to be united again here (in a moderated thread) or at reddit or at the quarktalk forum or somewhere else.
- Clarification about the shaq-fu perks. (with are hold by Victor).
- A structured foundation and a leader needs to be placed (who will step forward as a leader? maok? coinmama? you? I think there is still enough potential to build something nice :-) ).





Fully agree with you.

Yes, Max will only maintain the protocol. I think this is enough for now IF we are not going to make any radical changes and rather push to first unite the community behind one large and worthwhile ROI project, with possible strong returns and a large incentive for project managers to get involved.

Also where is VIC is he still on board with qrk??. I have spoken to VIC before in the past and always thought he was a nice guy who had put a lot of effort into qrk for very little recognition by most of the community. VIc was always pro to get some development funding set up since many of his ideas and work was held back by lack of funding and this was obviously a very frustrating position for him. The ROI project could deliver this funding without the development superblock or POB/qrk only ipo coin.

The leadership is essential now. Let's get the leadership in place, get a new moderated thread set up on here and get some ideas flowing for some good ROI projects. There is no reason to sit around waiting for some large companies to decide to implement qrk as a currency they will use. We should start creating some services that are actually useful and attractive for people to use. Perhaps when qrk is the only accepted currency on a few well know services then other companies may show an interest.

Coinmama come on say you will take the lead here. I would support this fully and other core members have also said this. Since max is not interested in leading we need someone at the helm with a great support group around them.

I would hope QRKfx would come back if this one taken care of in short order.



hero member
Activity: 487
Merit: 500
August 25, 2014, 01:14:23 PM
I think Cryptohunters' idea of radical changes to Quark will only serve to damage Quark.  Quark algo etc is good as it is.  Quark just needs marketing and usage and a community that isn't pulling in 3 different directions.


1. Damage how? and through what process. What radical changes do you mean exactly. Explain the radical change and the process through which it would damage  qrk. I'm yet to hear one person justify this damage they assume would take place. I mean is -95% value already not reasonable damage?

2. are we going to start a new thread so we can block out people that just throw insults with no real reason or logic behind them.

3. QRK just needs...... Marketing and usage??  that is the same for EVERY coin out there. How will you motivate people to market it, how will you motivate people to use it above and beyond the other 500 alts?

"Just needs" means nothing. All coins " just need" people to buy and use it.


Only QRKfx seemed able to think through the stages and logically lay them out as some kind of coherent thought pattern that people could follow and understand. QRk tbh is probably screwed unless some decent leadership rises up takes the lead and give some direction.  I have seen ZERO solutions to problems qrks has right now from anyone.


The ROI projects are the only way forward without making some radical changes. We will need leadership and organisation to get those going.





Hi Crypto,

Really like your devotion! And agree on many points with you.

The insults hurts/frustrates but I know who it is saying. Personally I will not lose hope just by one person. That would be too easy. I will be the last person who sell my Quark (to be honest I bought my original Quark back after I had first sold it in an impulse few weeks back) Cheesy

When I speak for myself, some wounds need to be healed, and that takes time.
For me it is like when your wife/husband cheated on you, and the next day he/she says: "come on, nothing happened we continue with our relationship just like before"
I think each one of us will process what has happened on its own way.

Before we continue (as you described) we need to clarify certain aspects first (in my opinion).

- The role of Max. He indicated that he will only maintain the protocol. Is that sufficient? Or do we need other developers? (George?)
- The seed nodes. What I understood is that it is rented for one year. What will happen after that? (Didn't James-z take care of that)? Mining with the wallet is related to the 4 seed nodes.

If that is clarified then an inventory is needed who want to help with promotion and how etc (different Quark devoted people need to be united again here (in a moderated thread) or at reddit or at the quarktalk forum or somewhere else.
- Clarification about the shaq-fu perks. (which are hold by Victor).
- A structured foundation and a leader needs to be placed (who will step forward as a leader? maok? coinmama? you? I think there is still enough potential to build something nice :-) ).



legendary
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1167
MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG
August 25, 2014, 09:20:07 AM
I think Cryptohunters' idea of radical changes to Quark will only serve to damage Quark.  Quark algo etc is good as it is.  Quark just needs marketing and usage and a community that isn't pulling in 3 different directions.


1. Damage how? and through what process. What radical changes do you mean exactly. Explain the radical change and the process through which it would damage  qrk. I'm yet to hear one person justify this damage they assume would take place. I mean is -95% value already not reasonable damage?

2. are we going to start a new thread so we can block out people that just throw insults with no real reason or logic behind them.

3. QRK just needs...... Marketing and usage??  that is the same for EVERY coin out there. How will you motivate people to market it, how will you motivate people to use it above and beyond the other 500 alts?

"Just needs" means nothing. All coins " just need" people to buy and use it.


Only QRKfx seemed able to think through the stages and logically lay them out as some kind of coherent thought pattern that people could follow and understand. QRk tbh is probably screwed unless some decent leadership rises up takes the lead and give some direction.  I have seen ZERO solutions to problems qrks has right now from anyone.


The ROI projects are the only way forward without making some radical changes. We will need leadership and organisation to get those going.



sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
August 25, 2014, 06:50:35 AM
@digitalindustry

You and your investors are some poor trolls and you don't have the buying power of a street beggar. Trying to divide quarkers with your trash talk has worked, congratulations!! But remember I know your schemes, I was made aware of all your scams attempts and if I see a similar one be sure I'll jump in to expose your dumb ass.

I suggest you stay in your bench and stop accusing others of what you already are and do. Don't you realize and see that everywhere you go people see through your false claims? We promote crpyo currencies because we want to exchange them with other people by being honest and legit with them, your strategy looks more like you want to exchange the coins with yourself aka your shill accounts. Trust me, if you continue this way bashing everyone around, you'll be the only one left using Quark.


@Vlad2Vlad

stiu ca nu ai treaba cu tampitul ala dar trebuie sa intelegi ca daca ai interes ca Quark sa creasca te rog sa nu-i mai dai apa la moara pentru ca el se foloseste de tine ca sa isi legitimizeze conturile false create, crede-ma are multe pe alte retele, d'aia te-au si acuzat multi de asta.
legendary
Activity: 3052
Merit: 1534
www.ixcoin.net
August 25, 2014, 12:19:36 AM
Hi Guys,

I am selling quarkdice.com dice game along with several domains that I own.
quarkcasino.net
quarkdice.info
quarkdice.net
quarkdice.org
quarkdice.com

Please send me your offers. I can customize the dice game also.

Thanks

Dang, you cornered that market.  lol, good foresight.  I did the same for iXCoin.

Now much are you expecting to get, I'm just curious.

If quark blows up in the next few months you'll get way more money as people will have quark profits to spend. 

Good luck!
hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 1000
‘Try to be nice’
August 24, 2014, 10:15:33 PM
I haven't checked here in a while, my God what has happened to this thread. Nothing but insults, intrigue, and people putting their faith in snake oil salesmen.

Is there anything in terms of product development still going on?

That is the way of nearly all coins. It is a well trodden path, and there is no escape unless development and innovation is continuous.

It happens much more quickly with younger coins (QRK is an 'old' coin,and took some time to get to this state), and a price decline is often the trigger. Possibly there will be a new initiative from some talented developers, but I don't see it yet.


Cooperation between communities is the future (probably merge-mining the same hashes).

If you are using "bitcointalk" as your main source of sediment, you are not well diversified.,

Diversification is my middle name.

There sure is plenty of sediment on Bitcointalk.

yes there is - but most of it relates to a scum pool of useless cheerleaders and trolls -

there are key innovators that still frequent the site.

as a "market" goes its a backwater., its the production engine of chaos, so its still very useful.

but you have to separate  your market segments.
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
August 24, 2014, 08:38:31 PM


Interesting read (reddit piece).

I'm gonna PM you with a question right now since it's not related to quark but I definitely wanna add some quark too after reading all that.  Thanks once again, brother!

TSsss, this is the same way currency traders and fund managers talk about themselves. Yet, over 90% only lose money. I have no faith in this guy.


This guy Digital or this guy me?

Whoever the guy is boasting about how smart he is in picking altcoins, anyone should see right through that nonsense
legendary
Activity: 2534
Merit: 1129
August 24, 2014, 08:37:28 PM
I haven't checked here in a while, my God what has happened to this thread. Nothing but insults, intrigue, and people putting their faith in snake oil salesmen.

Is there anything in terms of product development still going on?

That is the way of nearly all coins. It is a well trodden path, and there is no escape unless development and innovation is continuous.

It happens much more quickly with younger coins (QRK is an 'old' coin,and took some time to get to this state), and a price decline is often the trigger. Possibly there will be a new initiative from some talented developers, but I don't see it yet.


Cooperation between communities is the future (probably merge-mining the same hashes).

If you are using "bitcointalk" as your main source of sediment, you are not well diversified.,

Diversification is my middle name.

There sure is plenty of sediment on Bitcointalk.
hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 1000
‘Try to be nice’
August 24, 2014, 08:27:50 PM
I haven't checked here in a while, my God what has happened to this thread. Nothing but insults, intrigue, and people putting their faith in snake oil salesmen.

Is there anything in terms of product development still going on?

That is the way of nearly all coins. It is a well trodden path, and there is no escape unless development and innovation is continuous.

It happens much more quickly with younger coins (QRK is an 'old' coin,and took some time to get to this state), and a price decline is often the trigger. Possibly there will be a new initiative from some talented developers, but I don't see it yet.


Cooperation between communities is the future (probably merge-mining the same hashes).

If you are using "bitcointalk" as your main source of sediment, you are not well diversified.,
legendary
Activity: 2534
Merit: 1129
August 24, 2014, 07:37:22 PM
I haven't checked here in a while, my God what has happened to this thread. Nothing but insults, intrigue, and people putting their faith in snake oil salesmen.

Is there anything in terms of product development still going on?

That is the way of nearly all coins. It is a well trodden path, and there is no escape unless development and innovation is continuous.

It happens much more quickly with younger coins (QRK is an 'old' coin,and took some time to get to this state), and a price decline is often the trigger. Possibly there will be a new initiative from some talented developers, but I don't see it yet.


Cooperation between communities is the future (probably merge-mining the same hashes).
hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 1000
‘Try to be nice’
August 24, 2014, 05:01:25 PM


Interesting read (reddit piece).

I'm gonna PM you with a question right now since it's not related to quark but I definitely wanna add some quark too after reading all that.  Thanks once again, brother!

TSsss, this is the same way currency traders and fund managers talk about themselves. Yet, over 90% only lose money. I have no faith in this guy.


This guy Digital or this guy me?

the trolls are panicking, so they made some new user log ins, ??

amazing innovation.

ha ha ha .
legendary
Activity: 3052
Merit: 1534
www.ixcoin.net
August 24, 2014, 04:19:25 PM


Interesting read (reddit piece).

I'm gonna PM you with a question right now since it's not related to quark but I definitely wanna add some quark too after reading all that.  Thanks once again, brother!

TSsss, this is the same way currency traders and fund managers talk about themselves. Yet, over 90% only lose money. I have no faith in this guy.


This guy Digital or this guy me?
legendary
Activity: 1473
Merit: 1086
August 24, 2014, 02:57:29 PM
I haven't checked here in a while, my God what has happened to this thread. Nothing but insults, intrigue, and people putting their faith in snake oil salesmen.

Is there anything in terms of product development still going on?

Well what else do you expect if the price goes down this way, and most of the people lose a lot of money. The same thing happened to vertcoin and now everyone is angry.  Embarrassed
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
August 24, 2014, 02:43:43 PM
I haven't checked here in a while, my God what has happened to this thread. Nothing but insults, intrigue, and people putting their faith in snake oil salesmen.

Is there anything in terms of product development still going on?
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
August 24, 2014, 02:42:22 PM


Interesting read (reddit piece).

I'm gonna PM you with a question right now since it's not related to quark but I definitely wanna add some quark too after reading all that.  Thanks once again, brother!

TSsss, this is the same way currency traders and fund managers talk about themselves. Yet, over 90% only lose money. I have no faith in this guy.
KJO
full member
Activity: 173
Merit: 100
August 24, 2014, 02:34:35 PM


Wow, QuarkFX gone? That speaks volumes about this crumbling community.

I sold off 90% of my qrk holdings because of psycho-tard way back when. Now that I hear quarkFX is gone, I am selling the last 10% now.

Quark's future was to be driven by community activity but now that all the talent has left the room, there is nothing left.

QRK volume today....$368....ouch.

First step to quark recovery is the immediate banishment of the mentally-ill psycho-tard vampire. Do it or you wont survive, period.

He is a cancer.






i am cancer - and I'm going to give you cancer.

we can all have cancer.


Yep, that is congruent with the extent of your limited mental capacity.

I can't say I'll miss your fumbling bumbling incoherent verbal diarrhea on those bill still vids or the comical kindergarten grammar...everywhere else.

I feel really sorry for you. Something must have gone really wrong in your life to end up this way.

I will pray for you.








pray all you like.

praying won't kill crypto currency or change reality.

Quark is just a small number in a growing list.



I see you can't even understand basic reading comprehension Kolin. The prayer is for your dark sick evil soul, not cryptos. lol.

You know nothing about reality Kolin, you are totally delusional and mentally sick. Very sick.

I feel really bad for the many good folks who worked their asses off for quark only to watch you sabotage it with your garbage leadership, delusions of grandeur, and mental illness.

You have no credibility, no education, no ability to communicate, no tact, no intelligence, just more of the same lack of character that has led qrk into the toilet.

You are by far the lowest form of scum in crypto and some of us wont support it even at a loss.

Quark is dead. It's not dead because of market fundamentals but because the real fundamentals have all walked out the door.




Pages:
Jump to: