I think Cryptohunters' idea of radical changes to Quark will only serve to damage Quark. Quark algo etc is good as it is. Quark just needs marketing and usage and a community that isn't pulling in 3 different directions.
1. Damage how? and through what process. What radical changes do you mean exactly. Explain the radical change and the process through which it would damage qrk. I'm yet to hear one person justify this damage they assume would take place. I mean is -95% value already not reasonable damage?
2. are we going to start a new thread so we can block out people that just throw insults with no real reason or logic behind them.
3. QRK just needs...... Marketing and usage?? that is the same for EVERY coin out there. How will you motivate people to market it, how will you motivate people to use it above and beyond the other 500 alts?
"Just needs" means nothing. All coins " just need" people to buy and use it.
Only QRKfx seemed able to think through the stages and logically lay them out as some kind of coherent thought pattern that people could follow and understand. QRk tbh is probably screwed unless some decent leadership rises up takes the lead and give some direction. I have seen ZERO solutions to problems qrks has right now from anyone.
The ROI projects are the only way forward without making some radical changes. We will need leadership and organisation to get those going.
Hi Crypto,
Really like your devotion! And agree on many points with you.
The insults hurts/frustrates but I know who it is saying. Personally I will not lose hope just by one person. That would be too easy. I will be the last person who sell my Quark (to be honest I bought my original Quark back after I had first sold it in an impulse few weeks back)
When I speak for myself, some wounds need to be healed, and that takes time.
For me it is like when your wife/husband cheated on you, and the next day he/she says: "come on, nothing happened we continue with our relationship just like before"
I think each one of us will process what has happened on its own way.
Before we continue (as you described) we need to clarify certain aspects first (in my opinion).
- The role of Max. He indicated that he will only maintain the protocol. Is that sufficient? Or do we need other developers? (George?)
- The seed nodes. What I understood is that it is rented for one year. What will happen after that? (Didn't James-z take care of that)? Mining with the wallet is related to the 4 seed nodes.
If that is clarified then an inventory is needed who want to help with promotion and how etc (different Quark devoted people need to be united again here (in a moderated thread) or at reddit or at the quarktalk forum or somewhere else.
- Clarification about the shaq-fu perks. (which are hold by Victor).
- A structured foundation and a leader needs to be placed (who will step forward as a leader? maok? coinmama? you? I think there is still enough potential to build something nice :-) ).