Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN] (QTUM) - A Scalable Smart Contract Platform w/ Proof of Stake - page 19. (Read 525472 times)

member
Activity: 189
Merit: 12
did you know Qtum have a hard fork?

you need update your wallet to the new version?
how do you want to sync the network if you are using the old version wallet?

i think you are new to this industry.....

https://github.com/qtumproject/qtum/releases/tag/mainnet-ignition-v0.18.1

Yes, I knew about the hard fork and I had an up-to-date wallet. Qtum NEVER said we needed to update the Electrum wallet. I found out later that they updated it ON THE DAY. Instead of properly informing others ahead of the hard fork, they did nothing. Worse, they knew I had problems, and instead of helping me, blocked me from posting to their channel. So, up yours, Qtum!

I sold all my Qtum and moved into NEO, which has now skyrockted in price! Grin
hero member
Activity: 1708
Merit: 606
Buy The F*cking Dip
A very useful article has been published about Qtum and it is targeted to those people who don't know what this coin is all about. If you have the time, take a look at it.  Wink

What is QTUM? [The Most Comprehensive Guide] - Blockgeeks


Code: (REFERENCE)
blockgeeks.com/guide/what-is-qtum-must-read-guide-blockgeeks/
newbie
Activity: 12
Merit: 0
QTUM Trading Competition, $120,000 in QTUM to Give Away!
https://www.binance.com/en/support/articles/360035844031
hero member
Activity: 952
Merit: 501
======
BEWARE!
======

Qtum upgraded their system recently and over 1500 nodes have gone offline since. My Electrum Wallet would NOT sync, so I checked Qtum's forum. When this happened before, Qtum didn't reply to anyone who needed help - people were left in the lurch for over two weeks!

https://forum.qtum.org/topic/520/my-desktop-wallet-does-not-sync-to-the-qtum-network/13

COMMENT: "Can we expect any answer from the team please?"


No one replied!

COMMENT: "Check the other posts. You have to wait for weeks to get an answer. Doesn't make sense for me. Sold my coins. No working wallet, no coins. Very simple for me.

I left comments on their Twitter account and now they've BLOCKED ME. Censored me like I'm living in China, but then Qtum is from Singapore, AN AUTHORITARIAN REGIME.

Qtum still have made no comment on why so many nodes have gone offline, and singularly failed to inform people of an update to their Electrum Wallet to fix the syncing problems.


The Qtum team just does NOT care about their community - they don't communicate with anyone!

They've taken millions of dollars off others, and now they're putting their feet up quaffing champagne instead of earning that wealth.

I'd heard rumours about Patrick Dai stealing bitcoins - something now to take VERY seriously!

https://coins.newbium.com/post/7049-qtum-scandal-in-the-world-cryptocurrency

Because they treat their investors with UTTER CONTEMPT.

Such behaviour does NOT bode well for the future of this project. When there are problems, and people raise those problems with Qtum, they put up a huge wall of silence, mirroring how China deals with voices it doesn't want heard.

They couldn't even spell "LightNing Network" properly, spelling it "Lighting" - I had to email them to correct that. But, again, no reply to say thanks.

Jordan Earls replied to one unrelated comment on Twitter, so maybe he's behind my ban.

SHIT AMATEURISH TEAM. Lost all faith in Qtum.


did you know Qtum have a hard fork?

you need update your wallet to the new version?
how do you want to sync the network if you are using the old version wallet?

i think you are new to this industry.....

https://github.com/qtumproject/qtum/releases/tag/mainnet-ignition-v0.18.1
hero member
Activity: 1708
Merit: 606
Buy The F*cking Dip
Check out last week's development report regarding Qtum. Here are some of their updates:

  • Qtum Android Wallet released on Google PlayStore
  • Qtum base image updated to v0.18.1 on AWS
  • Qtum base image updated to v0.18.1 on Google cloud


Source: qtum.org/en/post/development-updates-october-21-27
member
Activity: 189
Merit: 12
Updated my Firefox browser and there are a number of very serious bugs with it - can't log in to YouTube or eBay, for example. Reported the problem to Firefox, and the Firefox team responded within 24 hours - now that's professionalism! Cheesy

Now been given a temporary fix until the programmers find time to work on the problem.
member
Activity: 189
Merit: 12
Someone said that Qtum is NEO's retarded little brother. Someone else said that this was a childish comparison. But I think it's pretty accurate! Your wallet doesn't sync; you leave a post on Qtum's twitter page about this; they ignore you; you post a solution to get it syncing again; you're banned! WTF? If that isn't severely mentally retarded, what is?

They've taken millions of dollars from others - directly and indirectly! - yet they think they're not obligated to anyone. Criminally-minded behaviour!

Also discovered some other guy linked to Qtum was involved in a scam. So that's two very dodgy people involved in this project. Dodgy founders, dodgy behaviour! Sold all my Qtum. A big weight off my mind.
member
Activity: 189
Merit: 12
======
BEWARE!
======

Qtum upgraded their system recently and over 1500 nodes have gone offline since. My Electrum Wallet would NOT sync, so I checked Qtum's forum. When this happened before, Qtum didn't reply to anyone who needed help - people were left in the lurch for over two weeks!

https://forum.qtum.org/topic/520/my-desktop-wallet-does-not-sync-to-the-qtum-network/13

COMMENT: "Can we expect any answer from the team please?"


No one replied!

COMMENT: "Check the other posts. You have to wait for weeks to get an answer. Doesn't make sense for me. Sold my coins. No working wallet, no coins. Very simple for me.

I left comments on their Twitter account and now they've BLOCKED ME. Censored me like I'm living in China, but then Qtum is from Singapore, AN AUTHORITARIAN REGIME.

Qtum still have made no comment on why so many nodes have gone offline, and singularly failed to inform people of an update to their Electrum Wallet to fix the syncing problems.


The Qtum team just does NOT care about their community - they don't communicate with anyone!

They've taken millions of dollars off others, and now they're putting their feet up quaffing champagne instead of earning that wealth.

I'd heard rumours about Patrick Dai stealing bitcoins - something now to take VERY seriously!

https://coins.newbium.com/post/7049-qtum-scandal-in-the-world-cryptocurrency

Because they treat their investors with UTTER CONTEMPT.

Such behaviour does NOT bode well for the future of this project. When there are problems, and people raise those problems with Qtum, they put up a huge wall of silence, mirroring how China deals with voices it doesn't want heard.

They couldn't even spell "LightNing Network" properly, spelling it "Lighting" - I had to email them to correct that. But, again, no reply to say thanks.

Jordan Earls replied to one unrelated comment on Twitter, so maybe he's behind my ban.

SHIT AMATEURISH TEAM. Lost all faith in Qtum.
hero member
Activity: 952
Merit: 501
https://github.com/qtumproject/qtum-electrum/releases/tag/v0.18.16

About Qtum Electrum
QRC20-Token support
multisignature support
segwit support
hardware wallet support
What's new
logs can now also optionally be written to disk.
fix mobile and qt core support
QIP9 difficulty adjustment algorithm change

Notes
Trezor uses bitcoin mode for now, it shows bitcoin type address when signing transactions.
full member
Activity: 792
Merit: 176
Bitcoin Artist and Fashion Designer
newbie
Activity: 26
Merit: 1
well dai did a 'great' job in februrar 2018 on the https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WZ8RYG_zISM conference (ATH) dump on all the plebs
hero member
Activity: 952
Merit: 501
https://blog.qtum.org/the-road-to-qtum-2-0-the-first-fork-a1291155a9c8

The Road to Qtum 2.0 — The First Fork
Background
Qtum has been focused on developing the underlying infrastructure of our blockchain, while we continue to stay updated with the latest technical iterations based on Bitcoin and the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM). Since September 2017, the Qtum Mainnet has been running stably. In the process, a subtle imperfection in our Proof-of-Stake consensus algorithm has been discovered and repaired along with some smart contract opcode additions that have been proposed and added to improve smart contract functionality.
To adapt to the ever-changing application scenarios of blockchain technology, Qtum will gradually upgrade the underlying protocol and launch Qtum 2.0. The hard fork described in this article will be the first upgrade related to Qtum 2.0.
About QIP (Qtum Improvement Proposals)
Qtum Improvement Proposals (QIP) are a series of specific recommendations from Qtum developers and community members on the underlying Qtum technology upgrade. All proposals are posted on GitHub (https://github.com/qtumproject/qips/issues), and everyone can discuss the proposal publicly. Widely accepted proposals will be implemented by the Qtum development team.
Purpose and Motivation
This will be the first hard fork since the launch of Qtum Mainnet. It includes four consensus-related QIP upgrades:
QIP-5: Add signature verification to the output script of the contract transaction;
QIP-6: Add btc_ecrecover precompiled contract to the Qtum EVM;
QIP-7: Upgrade the Qtum EVM to the latest Ethereum EVM Constantinople;
QIP-9: Modify the difficulty adjustment algorithm to make the block time more stable.
Among them, QIP-5 and QIP-7 add several new features to Qtum to adapt to the complex application scenarios of smart contracts, and are also the technical basis for subsequent upgrades (such as private assets); QIP-6 eases the development of smart contracts while reducing the cost of usage; and QIP-9 further improves the stability of the Qtum network.
Why Do We Need a “Hard Fork” Update?
Qtum is a decentralized network, where each node runs a separate node/wallet program. Only individual users can control the version of the program running on their node, while all nodes can reach an agreement on all transactions and blocks on the Qtum network through uniform consensus rules. If some nodes adopt different consensus rules from other nodes, they will fork into two chains.
Common updates do not modify any consensus rules. Even if some nodes do not complete the upgrade, the network will not fork because the software update is backward compatible with older versions. However, since the changes involved in this update modify the consensus rules, updated nodes and the non-upgraded nodes will not be compatible, leading to a hard fork.
Please note that this hard fork is accepted and desired by the community so most nodes will be updated to support the hard fork. Any nodes or wallets that miss the update will be automatically disconnected from the network and stuck on a dying split chain unable to complete transactions and potentially staking their coins to the split chain, which are very difficult to recover. To save problems it is strongly recommended to update for the hard fork.
Hard Fork Related QIP Overview
QIP-5
Description
Signature verification is added to the output script of the contract transaction to prove ownership and invoke the contract without having any QTUM in the address.
Motivation
Calling any smart contract in Qtum requires a gas fee for smart contract execution. For every contract invocation, a balance is required in the address that calls the contract (even if the balance is very small). For example, the transfer of QRC20 tokens is the most common contract invocation. Suppose there are 1000 QC tokens (a QRC20 stable coin launched on Qtum) tied to address A. To send these 1000 QC, a certain amount of QTUM is required in address A to pay gas for the token transfer (typically 0.04 to 0.10 QTUM). If address A does not have any QTUM balance, it cannot pay the gas fee, and the 1000 QC cannot be sent to a new address.
The only solution currently is to transfer some QTUM to address A and then send the QC tokens. However, this not only wastes valuable UTXO dataset resources on the chain but also greatly affects the user experience. At the same time, for more complex application scenarios of smart contracts (such as forecasting market applications, decentralized exchanges, etc.), this limitation significantly increases the threshold for users to use blockchain applications.
Benefits
By adding the OP_SENDER opcode, QIP-5 provides a mechanism to prove the ownership of the contract invocation address, which can offer proof without any QTUM in the address and then invoke the smart contract. Although little change has been made to the original system, it has brought about major changes to the existing smart contract ecosystem:
Addresses can invoke smart contracts (such as sending and receiving QRC20 tokens) without any QTUM, improving the token transfer experience for ordinary users. Note: This does not mean that the contract can be invoked free of charge, but can be paid by other addresses;
More diversified services will emerge. Service providers will pay the fee, while users only need to use the service, which is closer to the actual application scenario;
It allows multiple addresses to invoke multiple contracts in a transaction, increasing the flexibility of contract invocation;
Save the UTXO dataset resources on the chain.
Possible Risks
QIP-5 adds additional consensus rules but remains compatible with the original rules, so there is no security risk in theory. But it will have some impact on the existing infrastructure:
Additional RPC commands need to be developed to properly use this function, and service providers need to synchronize infrastructure upgrades;
Due to the additional scripts, service providers will need to perform extra validation on scripts, otherwise, they will not be able to identify such transactions.
For the specific implementation of QIP-5, please refer to this document.
QIP-6
Description
Add a btc_ecrecover precompiled contract to Qtum EVM for direct invocation of common contracts.
Motivation
In Solidity, theecrecover function can restore an elliptic curve signature to the corresponding public key address. The msg.sender in Qtum’s smart contract uses a P2PKH address similar to Bitcoin, while the address format returned by the ecrecover function is the same as that of Ethereum, so the two cannot be directly compared. For developers, this will make some logical decisions in the contract cumbersome. At present, the common way to solve this problem is to invoke additional library contracts, but that will consume more gas, increasing the cost of using smart contracts.
Benefits
QIP-6 implements a function called btc_recover by precompiling contracts. The new function, while compatible with all interfaces of the original function, can bring the following benefits:
The address type returned by btc_recover is identical with the address format of msg.sender, which allows direct comparison and simplifies the logical decision in the contract development process.
Precompiled contracts can greatly save gas consumption and reduce the cost of using smart contracts.
Possible Risks
QIP-6 does not make any changes to the original system, and the new function is fully compatible with the original function interface, so there is no risk in theory.
For the specific implementation of QIP-6, please refer to this document.
QIP-7
Description
Upgrade the Qtum EVM to the latest Ethereum’s Constantinople.
Motivation
Currently, Qtum uses an earlier version of the EVM. After the launch of Qtum MainNet, the EVM has been upgraded to the Byzantine and Constantinople. Many new developer-friendly features have been added to the new version of the virtual machine, such as returning variable-length data and invoking static contracts. More and more developers need to rely on these new features for contract and application development.
Benefits
QIP-7 includes all the new features of EVM Byzantine and Constantinople versions, enabling more complex smart contracts and applications. For example, Qtum plans to support private assets in QIP-19, where the related smart contracts rely on the new features provided in the new EVM. Also, after the upgrade, all the smart contracts and applications on Ethereum can theoretically be transplanted to Qtum while obtaining the unique security and stability of the underlying UTXO model.
Possible Risks
Both the EVM Byzantine and Constantinople have been activated on the Ethereum Mainnet, of which the stability has been verified, and they are fully forward compatible with low risk. However, the Qtum bottom layer adopts the UTXO model, which is inconsistent with EVM’s account model. Developers need to pay attention to the characteristics of Qtum EVM when transplanting existing contracts.
For the specific implementation of QIP-7, please refer to this document.
QIP-9
Description
QIP-9 actually two updates:
Modify the difficulty adjustment algorithm for Qtum Proof-of-Stake to make the block time more stable and lower the average block timing to 128 seconds as given in the original design.
Modify the Network Weight estimation algorithm to make it closer to the real value (not related to consensus).
Motivation
Qtum was designed for a block interval of 128 seconds. In Qtum’s decentralized Proof-of-Stake process, the timing of actual blocks should show random variation around 128 seconds, and the difficulty adjustment algorithm will adjust the difficulty up or down to maintain this average. Unfortunately, a subtle bug in the difficulty adjustment algorithm has caused two problems, 1) some excessive long intervals for blocks, and 2) an average block interval of 144 seconds. This higher average interval means the blockchain is running a little slower than design, and that transactions per second are 12.5% low and staking block rewards are 12.5% low.
Network Weight is an estimate of the total coins staking on the Qtum network and is used to calculate the expected returns for staking (expected time to a block reward). Since Qtum is a completely decentralized network, the weight of the entire network can only be estimated by the difficulty of staking. However, the existing Network Weight calculation fluctuates greatly and does not accurately reflect the current status of the network.
Benefits
QIP-9 provides an improved difficulty adjustment algorithm adjusting for difficulty based on an exponential moving average of block intervals. This improved algorithm has the benefits of eliminating the very long block intervals and providing an average block interval of 128 seconds. This faster average block interval means network transactions per second and block rewards for staking wallets will increase by 12.5%.
QIP-9 improves the Network Weight estimate by changing the calculation to use a fixed divisor for the 128-second interval. Compared with the original Network Weight approach, the variance between the new Network Weight and the real weight is smaller, and the fluctuation is smaller, which means a more accurate estimate of the current network status.
Possible Risks
The difficulty adjustment algorithm involved in QIP-9 has no security risks.
Although the Network Weight estimate calculation gives relatively smooth values, it cannot reflect the change of Network Weight if the actual weight fluctuates sharply, so there is still room for improvement. However, the Network Weight update does not involve the consensus mechanism, so it can be modified again in subsequent common updates.
For the specific implementation of QIP-9, please refer to this document.
The Hard Fork Release Plan
The code for this hard fork has been fully developed and tested for nearly half a year and has been running successfully on private testnets. It has already been activated on Qtum Testnet at block height #446,320. After a period of stable operation on Testnet, it will be officially activated on Qtum Mainnet.
The update automatically activated at the pre-set block height, on Testnet at block 446,320 on September 20, 2019, and it will on Mainnet at block 466,600 on October 17, 2019. It is recommended that users keep the running wallet as the latest official release version so that the wallets will update smoothly.
The update only applies to the Qtum Core wallet and full nodes using the Qtum Core wallet. There is no change required for users of other QTUM wallets, such as Electrum, Ledger or the Qtum Web wallet.
Impact of Not Updating
When the block height is reached to activate the hard fork, the updated wallets will disconnect any peers that have not been updated. This means the older version nodes and wallets that have not updated will not be able to conduct transactions or stake onto the main chain. Instead, their transactions and staking will take place on a forked split chain that will gradually die out as those nodes are updated. Nodes on the split chain will see a very low Network Weight, and staking wallets may see a large number of block rewards as they stake onto the split chain. Since these staking transactions are committed to the split chain, at that point even after updating the wallet and resyncing the blockchain, the stakes will be missing, which means more advanced wallet recovery techniques will be needed.
Preparations
Qtum will notify all exchanges, service providers (wallets, explorers), stakers, and ordinary users to complete the update in advance of hard fork activation to ensure a smooth update.
The Qtum development team has carried out successful internal testing for half a year before the release. The update will be activated on Testnet a month before Mainnet, to further validate operations and verify the expected changes.
All users should keep their Qtum Core wallets/nodes updated to the latest version and be aware of the symptoms for problems described above (low network weight, excessive staking) if their wallets are not updated in advance.
Will There be a Hard Forks in the Future?
As long as the update is related to consensus, it may require a hard fork. At that time, users will be notified of the update through a similar process. The subsequent x86 virtual machine, private assets, and smart contract staking features that Qtum plans to release may require hard forks. Qtum development team will merge updates that require forks to minimize hard fork updates.
What Do Users Need To Do?
For continued operations and to avoid staking onto the split chain, all users running Qtum Core nodes/wallets need to update to the latest version of the wallet before the hard fork activation block height. Please keep an eye on https://github.com/qtumproject/qtum/releases/ or https://qtumeco.io/wallet for the wallet release information and update to the latest version as soon as possible.
For different participants in the network, it is recommended to be fully prepared for the upgrade:
Exchanges & Wallets
Before and after the hard fork activation, please pay attention to deposit and withdrawal records of QTUM and QRC20 tokens, and confirm the transfer after the transaction has collected enough confirmations on Mainnet;
For the withdrawal of QRC20 tokens, it is possible to upgrade the supporting program (QIP-5 related) in advance so that the new features can be used to pay gas fees.
Service Providers (such as Explorers)
It is recommended to develop QIP-5 related support in advance to avoid being unable to identify the transaction output with OP_SENDER after the hard fork activation.
Stakers (mining pools, personal stakers)
Before and after the update is activated, please pay close attention to the Network Weight and block rewards. Block rewards will increase as the average block interval drops to 128 seconds (600 blocks per day vs. 675 blocks per day currently).
Developers
Contracts and applications with new features can be developed on Testnet first and then deployed on Mainnet when the main network is activated. (QIP-7).
Consider more scenarios based on QIP-5.
Every User
Always backup your wallets!
legendary
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1007
My friend Ibai worked at Qtum and also confirmed they would fake funding. Then they fired him simply because they found out he was my friend.

You see, if Qtum says it raises X million dollars but didn't really raise that much they get free coins. Then when they wash trade they dump it on the market. They get very, very rich off that and they had not done any work to deserve that. Even if they work after the fact it does not change how they stabbed people in the back to get it.


Strong accusations there, David. I don't disagree with you about Dai being a shady character. Hell, many people here will stab you in the back for money. It is the wild west of crypto. But from an unbiased, neutral view of a trader/investor who is willing to take a risk, QTUM looks good on paper.
member
Activity: 68
Merit: 24
in need of pool or explorer or gui work?
legendary
Activity: 2412
Merit: 1044
I like to say that QTUM turned out to be not a scam. Why? After suffering a very long price decline along with other coins and tokens, the QTUM dev team is still here updating the wallet and the network protocols. I guess Patrick Dai is exonerated from the Bitbay fiasco.

Except for the fact that Patrick and his friends got almost 100% of the coins, lied about how much Qtum funded and spent a couple years dumping the coins and wash trading. When he started BAY he lied about 50% of the funding and got free coins and assisted Bobsurplus and his group who simply stole from the project and when I exposed it the others left the project and Patrick said he would stay but he left with Bitcoins he didn't work for. Even when I gave him a chance to redeem himself, he pretended to be part of the project while he was dumping his coins while we were working. I stayed for 5 years and coded everything promised including completing the dynamic peg. Even when Bob and the others came by our thread to kick us when we were down(and Bob bragged about stealing from the project). Despite that I worked and BitBay went to .5 billion marketcap from a few hundred grand. Then things crashed however the peg will change that. My friend Ibai worked at Qtum and also confirmed they would fake funding. Then they fired him simply because they found out he was my friend.

You see, if Qtum says it raises X million dollars but didn't really raise that much they get free coins. Then when they wash trade they dump it on the market. They get very, very rich off that and they had not done any work to deserve that. Even if they work after the fact it does not change how they stabbed people in the back to get it.

So even if they are doing coding, promoting and going to events, that does not change the fact that this project didn't raise what was claimed and wash traded to lure in naive traders. And add to that coinmarketcap posts a -73% ROI since project launch and down almost a hundred times from it's peak. That is simply because they dumped coins they got for free. They didn't pay to get a majority portion of their own ICO and gave you all a false impression of marketcap. This effects you all as investors. So if that's who you want to invest in go ahead but don't say you weren't warned.

It doesn't matter what Earlz or the team codes because they are enriching a guy who is dishonest. It's precisely altcoins that get dumped because they didn't work for the money that is the cause of the bear market. I am glad that Dai is committed at least to the project but until he shows remorse and acknowledges this then the project will not be able to move past it.

My number one reason for the altcoin crash is that there are projects that are secretly premines and the founders get rewarded for not working and more importantly, investors are lied to because they think more funds were raised that actually were. And checking the blockchain won't help because they have the Bitcoins available to do it and give themselves the free coins at your expense.
hero member
Activity: 2464
Merit: 594
Scam?
The project is already listed Binance, Kraken and Huobide. We can say that the project is in good condition for the general progress. But the stake rewards are a little low for me. There are hundreds of projects on the market that offer much better stake rewards.
"QIP - 9, part of the upcoming #Qtum hard fork, will smooth out the Network Weight estimation for #staking - resulting in a ~13% increase in staking rewards per day.

Remember to upgrade to v0.18.1 or above to enjoy the better yield!

https://t.co/nIhGXFmSDG "

Source: https://twitter.com/QtumOfficial/status/1178995521748393985

Is that what you are waiting for? Look there would be higher rewards in staking soon.
newbie
Activity: 44
Merit: 0
I like to say that QTUM turned out to be not a scam. Why? After suffering a very long price decline along with other coins and tokens, the QTUM dev team is still here updating the wallet and the network protocols. I guess Patrick Dai is exonerated from the Bitbay fiasco.

Scam?
The project is already listed Binance, Kraken and Huobide. We can say that the project is in good condition for the general progress. But the stake rewards are a little low for me. There are hundreds of projects on the market that offer much better stake rewards.

I think that he said "turned out to be NOT a scam"
hero member
Activity: 952
Merit: 501
I like to say that QTUM turned out to be not a scam. Why? After suffering a very long price decline along with other coins and tokens, the QTUM dev team is still here updating the wallet and the network protocols. I guess Patrick Dai is exonerated from the Bitbay fiasco.

Scam?
The project is already listed Binance, Kraken and Huobide. We can say that the project is in good condition for the general progress. But the stake rewards are a little low for me. There are hundreds of projects on the market that offer much better stake rewards.

Multiple exchange listing does not guarantee a coin is not a fraud. The best indicator for this authenticity is the hard work of the coin's developers. In QTUM case, I am much impressed by their continuing pursuit of refining QTUM's protocols.

check all the updates
https://github.com/qtumproject/qtum/releases
legendary
Activity: 1876
Merit: 1003
I like to say that QTUM turned out to be not a scam. Why? After suffering a very long price decline along with other coins and tokens, the QTUM dev team is still here updating the wallet and the network protocols. I guess Patrick Dai is exonerated from the Bitbay fiasco.

Scam?
The project is already listed Binance, Kraken and Huobide. We can say that the project is in good condition for the general progress. But the stake rewards are a little low for me. There are hundreds of projects on the market that offer much better stake rewards.

Multiple exchange listing does not guarantee a coin is not a fraud. The best indicator for this authenticity is the hard work of the coin's developers. In QTUM case, I am much impressed by their continuing pursuit of refining QTUM's protocols.

Indeed this is most important factor for any project which make it really promising and safe choice for the long investment. Qtum is moving forward really wonderful and it will move to the next level in future as like the support is growing.
legendary
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1007
I like to say that QTUM turned out to be not a scam. Why? After suffering a very long price decline along with other coins and tokens, the QTUM dev team is still here updating the wallet and the network protocols. I guess Patrick Dai is exonerated from the Bitbay fiasco.

Scam?
The project is already listed Binance, Kraken and Huobide. We can say that the project is in good condition for the general progress. But the stake rewards are a little low for me. There are hundreds of projects on the market that offer much better stake rewards.

Multiple exchange listing does not guarantee a coin is not a fraud. The best indicator for this authenticity is the hard work of the coin's developers. In QTUM case, I am much impressed by their continuing pursuit of refining QTUM's protocols.
Pages:
Jump to: