Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN] Quantumcoin (Read 3455 times)

member
Activity: 129
Merit: 12
July 24, 2013, 01:55:49 AM
#42
Officially dead?
member
Activity: 90
Merit: 10
June 05, 2013, 02:41:51 AM
#41
The difficulty is increasing fast. I hope that a pool will be available in the next days.
member
Activity: 90
Merit: 10
June 04, 2013, 06:37:13 AM
#40
A Windows binary is now also available at http://www.quantumcoin.org/files/quantumcoin.zip.
member
Activity: 90
Merit: 10
June 04, 2013, 12:25:19 AM
#39
This is a list of the block values until difficulty 20. The formula is rather simple: nSubsidy = ((0.2 * exp(nDifficulty / 250) / pow(nDifficulty, -0.25)) * 50), but working. The minimum block value is 10, the maximum block value is 50 (will be reached with difficulty 110).

0.000000 = 0.000000
1.000000 = 10.040080
2.000000 = 11.987589
3.000000 = 13.319620
4.000000 = 14.370230
5.000000 = 15.255568
6.000000 = 16.031010
7.000000 = 16.727643
8.000000 = 17.364805
9.000000 = 17.955406
10.000000 = 18.508524
11.000000 = 19.030804
12.000000 = 19.527266
13.000000 = 20.001803
14.000000 = 20.457497
15.000000 = 20.896834
16.000000 = 21.321848
17.000000 = 21.734230
18.000000 = 22.135398
19.000000 = 22.526555
20.000000 = 22.908732
member
Activity: 90
Merit: 10
June 04, 2013, 12:14:12 AM
#38
And sorry about the Windows binaries. But I think that's a problem of the community. I'm not a Windows user, I don't have testing systems. If there are really 90% users using Windows there should be enough users able to compile the sources on Windows (without an high effort). I think it's the fairest way to release only the sources.

Anyway, it doesn't matter in this case. The block chain was announced with a reasonable high difficulty and the block value increases with the difficulty. Also the target time span decreases with higher network hash rate and the retarget interval decreases with higher network hash rate. So there is no disadvantage when you mine this coin days, weeks or months after the announcement.
member
Activity: 90
Merit: 10
June 04, 2013, 12:09:23 AM
#37
Quote
Sure but OP made a crazy system where everything moves so I guess he wanted to see how that would really behave
Also, it looks like he wanted to put a high difficulty without a high difficulty for the genesis block

That's it. First I wanted to see if everything behaves like expected and second I don't wanted a high difficulty for the genesis block. Searching a genesis block with lower difficulty is much more fun. Really, I don't understand the problem. The first blocks were mined at the lowest block value only to increase the difficulty. The block value will soon increase.

When you set the starting difficulty too low everyone cries "the orphans, the orphans". But if you announce the block chain with a higher difficulty it is also not good.
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1280
May Bitcoin be touched by his Noodly Appendage
June 03, 2013, 01:16:45 PM
#36
To answer a few questions:

  * Why Quantum? Why not? It just liked the word.

  * What's new with QTC? First the block value is addicted to the difficulty. Higher difficulty results in higher block value. Second the target timespan and the retarget interval is addicted to the overall network hashrate.

  * Why no Windows binaries? I think a source release is sufficient. You can build windows binaries with the included Makefiles. Just install the MinGW Toolchain (including UPnP). I have to do that for every alternative coin because they usually don't ship Linux binaries.

  * Why are there premined blocks? Just to have a higher starting difficulty without mining a genesis block with a high difficulty. Sure, it's not the number of the blocks determining the difficulty, but the difficulty just adapts slowly over time.
You could have put a 0 (or ~0) reward until block 1000 or so
Otherwise I like this coin
It's not necessary to pre-mine to have a higher starting difficulty. We have access to the code, we can do virtually anything.
Sure but OP made a crazy system where everything moves so I guess he wanted to see how that would really behave
Also, it looks like he wanted to put a high difficulty without a high difficulty for the genesis block
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
June 03, 2013, 11:07:11 AM
#35
when release?
legendary
Activity: 1862
Merit: 1011
Reverse engineer from time to time
June 03, 2013, 11:03:07 AM
#34
To answer a few questions:

  * Why Quantum? Why not? It just liked the word.

  * What's new with QTC? First the block value is addicted to the difficulty. Higher difficulty results in higher block value. Second the target timespan and the retarget interval is addicted to the overall network hashrate.

  * Why no Windows binaries? I think a source release is sufficient. You can build windows binaries with the included Makefiles. Just install the MinGW Toolchain (including UPnP). I have to do that for every alternative coin because they usually don't ship Linux binaries.

  * Why are there premined blocks? Just to have a higher starting difficulty without mining a genesis block with a high difficulty. Sure, it's not the number of the blocks determining the difficulty, but the difficulty just adapts slowly over time.
You could have put a 0 (or ~0) reward until block 1000 or so
Otherwise I like this coin
It's not necessary to pre-mine to have a higher starting difficulty. We have access to the code, we can do virtually anything.
hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 531
Crypto is King.
June 03, 2013, 10:58:47 AM
#33
I need solid evidence of your coin's improvements over others to justify giving it some hash.
legendary
Activity: 2548
Merit: 1054
CPU Web Mining 🕸️ on webmining.io
June 03, 2013, 10:16:25 AM
#32
I don't understand the problem with the windows binaries, because I always compile the sources after having a look inside the code. Why can't any of the Windows users simply compile and upload the binaries? Unfortunately I'm not familiar with Windows and I don't have any testing systems for Windows. Will have a look at the MinGW tool chain.

Because, it takes some time to install mingw, takes a lot of drive space. Usually have troubles getting various releases to compile. its just a bit pain in the A**. That being said the same reasons you didnt feel the need to include the binary release it was just too big of pain in the A** for you too.  Thats pretty telling dude, if you dont care enough to include a windows binary for 80% of the users out here, Most of which know NOTHING of how mingw or how to use make.  

It tells us all that you have very little interest in making this coin go very far.



Nail, meet hammer
full member
Activity: 205
Merit: 100
Cheif Oompa Loompa.
June 03, 2013, 10:06:32 AM
#31
I don't understand the problem with the windows binaries, because I always compile the sources after having a look inside the code. Why can't any of the Windows users simply compile and upload the binaries? Unfortunately I'm not familiar with Windows and I don't have any testing systems for Windows. Will have a look at the MinGW tool chain.

Because, it takes some time to install mingw, takes a lot of drive space. Usually have troubles getting various releases to compile. its just a bit pain in the A**. That being said the same reasons you didnt feel the need to include the binary release it was just too big of pain in the A** for you too.  Thats pretty telling dude, if you dont care enough to include a windows binary for 80% of the users out here, Most of which know NOTHING of how mingw or how to use make.  

It tells us all that you have very little interest in making this coin go very far.

legendary
Activity: 2548
Merit: 1054
CPU Web Mining 🕸️ on webmining.io
June 03, 2013, 10:06:04 AM
#30
I don't understand the problem with the windows binaries, because I always compile the sources after having a look inside the code. Why can't any of the Windows users simply compile and upload the binaries? Unfortunately I'm not familiar with Windows and I don't have any testing systems for Windows. Will have a look at the MinGW tool chain.

Most of us can, but what's the point? If the noobs can't mine it, we have noone to sell it to
member
Activity: 90
Merit: 10
June 03, 2013, 09:58:39 AM
#29
I don't understand the problem with the windows binaries, because I always compile the sources after having a look inside the code. Why can't any of the Windows users simply compile and upload the binaries? Unfortunately I'm not familiar with Windows and I don't have any testing systems for Windows. Will have a look at the MinGW tool chain.
sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
June 03, 2013, 09:44:37 AM
#28
legendary
Activity: 2548
Merit: 1054
CPU Web Mining 🕸️ on webmining.io
June 03, 2013, 09:23:17 AM
#27
Why won't people learn that if you don't post binaries, your coin will be shit and go nowhere?
hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 1000
‘Try to be nice’
June 03, 2013, 08:47:38 AM
#26
What is the matter of this coin?

what he said.
hero member
Activity: 672
Merit: 501
June 03, 2013, 07:33:27 AM
#25
No one wants to mine it but diff 0.49 already lol !
most likely a few with a lot of fire power.

I would be fun to look but i cant figure out how to compile on windows so this is garbage to me lol...wont be worth shit to anyone cept maybe a few sense no one else can mine.

Of course, aint as bad as another coin today.... that one you dont even get connections.
hero member
Activity: 505
Merit: 500
June 03, 2013, 07:29:54 AM
#24
No one wants to mine it but diff 0.49 already lol !
sr. member
Activity: 412
Merit: 250
Bitcoin is the Future of currency
June 03, 2013, 06:34:02 AM
#23
With all this new coins all comes down to the coin name ... and the use of the coin ...
Pages:
Jump to: