I think maybe you have problem with 2 gangs, but who owns what? CWXT, CWX? Original development is not in development, now, so 2nd gang is the real development?
It is not clear to me, and people said it would be a swap on Novaexchange, but what is swapped? Who is in charge, not the original man, so it must be the other gang you do not like.
I can see original code is on Github.com, but where is new code?
Also original code is SHA256D, it is not so modern, and like any coin clone. So you make me think that you are just ready to be here to say bad things about gang 2 or why say to people it was a great code and fast, if it is just copied?
Maybe you bring the original man back, and he can work with the new people and everyone is happy?
It is not so hard if you want the best.
Original man who made the CWXT is only quiet, so maybe this means he is happy anyway or maybe he is just good to not get in fights with people.
I do not believe much from this bitcointalk discussion and the other one is not much better. You just seem to hate each other.
Try to work together or abandon project because it is not going to work with all the hate you have.
How this was initially pitched was that the devs were going to do a 3:1 swap of the CWXT chain to masternodes. Then, they linked to a (manipulated) block explorer and said they were not wanting to do a swap because the amount of coins in the original dev's address was too high.
The new team has even gone so far as to state that they never planned on having actual masternodes, but that they would have masternode-like features on the Ethereum blockchain -- token ticker CWX. This is contrary to numerous statements made in the past and even this paid for press-release :
https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/crypto-world-x-masternodes-taking/In order to save face, they want to collect your personal information in order to "give" everyone in the community 35000 CWX. This is in addition to running their scammy ICO.
Anyway, it's clear that they lack the simple understanding of the economic incentive structure as to why someone would actually run masternodes and be rewarded in the underlying coin to do so, i.e. providing network security and being compensated in the network's base currency.
What's not to understand? Inflation for doing nothing for the network makes no sense economically. On the other hand, inflation through rewards for providing services to increase the value of a network makes sense.
There's your Economics 101 lesson for the day folks. I suggest you read Chapters 2, 4, and 5 and answer the first 10 questions in Chapters 3 and 7 for homework. These topics will be on the final.
I think most clear is you belong to gang number 1. You make many points but even if some are true you only say statements. When they have Block Explorer, it says on the other bitcointalk thread there is an identical number of tokenz with Yobit, but both gangs say it is 47 million. I think when it is higher as yobit reports, yobit is not lying.
I find no wallet links, so why? I make one for myself should I?
You are telling people your funny joke on Economics 101 well the funny joke is you have a token without a wallet, you have more tokenz than is said and you do not even make Block Explorer, so how can you be a reliable person to take instruction from?
You talk my friend, but say just nothing that is about important things.
This is political speak without any intent to be open. "Blame them, they are bad, this was bad, you are stupid, here is economics 101".
You are not of value except to make it worse and you do it on purpose.
I make jokes all the time and I said in other discussion I will make CWXX, new honest and no ICO but premine for victims if possible, then I make some more jokes but they are not so important. You can not make this token work and do not care and gang two is saying things but quiet suddenly, maybe you bully them to submit., I think so.
I can make this token I have been to Github.com to see code and wallet but found only code there.
It is very easy token to make.
Maybe I make number 3 version and then start to say look you are bad.
If nobody is responsible for anything then why waste time here you produce nothing.
If you still acting like a big crying baby in 1 week I will make number 3 on better code with better way to make it fair.
You piss me off with your Economics 101, you are nothing.
I can assure you that I am not involved with either gang. I bought CWXT earlier this month because of the original promise of masternodes and think this new team is precisely what you said, the same as the original team. So they announce a 3:1 swap to Masternodes, sell to people on the pump, and then "change" their mind after they dump and exit because the main dev wallet has too much coins in it and instead announce their SCAMMY ICO. I am with you 100% that these guys are scammers. But you have no reason to associate me with them nor do I know why you would.
As for the free economics lesson, you can ignore it or not -- in fact it wasn't directed at you, despite what you may think (probably because I quoted your post in its entirety). It was for the new dev team mainly.
There is normally a good reason why coins have inflation -- and it almost always has to do with providing some type of VALUE to the underlying network. When there is no reason, that's just bad economic policy. If you want to talk about people not having value, look no further than the two gangs you refer to.
And who said I was wasting time? Maybe I'm trying to find enough people who want to fork the large wallet of its remaining coins and not participate in the new scammy dev ICO?
Don't you understand that you need to have enough coins that are staking in order to do that plus community support?
So are you saying you are going to fork this coin, get rid of the pre-mine and put in masternodes like the "new" team said they would? I'm looking for people who want to help with something like that.