@ Bitsa
I did not come here to spread fud or destroy your hard work, I never even heard of root before yesterday. I'm sorry about the timing but appreciate the response. Since this thread is moderated please go back and erase every post mentioning my original post. You deserve that for providing a response. As I previously stated I dont know any of the players involved including yourself so personalizing your response directed back towards me is off the mark.
Seriously, think about it. If I knew of this and you prior to yesterday and had malicious intent would I have waited until the final hours of the ICO to try to derail the train?
IMHO as an "honest dev", in a sea of dirtbags, you should appreciate the community questioning the past, it gives you an opportunity to clear your good name.
Thanks for the response and congrats on the new coin, I hope it works out.
@the rest of you hammer heads that responded negatively:- Your reading comprehension could use a refresher
- Those were not not my words, this is why I provided a link to the original post.
- I never yelled "scam" or any other the other troll bullshit responses you see when "someone just wants to buy cheaper". I actually will now watch this coin and based upon your juvenile responses I know your weak hands will dump as soon as there is any hiccup. So thanks in advance for the cheap root.
I will not apologize for questioning a devs history. When someone is asking for your money or is running for office(again, involves your money) you should do a bit of research...it's called due diligence, look it up.
How bad off is crypto now when someone looking out for the little guy is flamed for asking people to research the past before they bet on the future? Don't be simpletons or sheep... This is the thinking that gets people taken to the cleaners and then they complain crypto is bullshit and cry about getting ripped off. That ends up hurting everyone and postponing the eventual mass adoption of crypto.
first of all thanks for coming back and clearing out things. i agree with you (on some points). But crypto itself didn't became a bad place. It's the majority of crypto-users and a lot of self-named "devs" who abuse it as a moneymachine. Those ppl became/are bad. Sad truth. But all who know me, also know that i am not that type of person. I am really trying to help the community and always have been a helping hand to others.
Check my post-history. You ll see that i ve always been a honest and straight person. Never stole or took something which didn't belong to me.
I had multiple chances to make hundreds of BTCs in an unhonest and fraudulent way but NEVER did.
I also got burned (ASIACOIN[25BTC], bter[6.5BTC], coinex[8BTC] - just to name a couple).. but in my eyes that was part of my "learning"-process and showed me the other side of crypto and that all that glistens is not gold.. i agree on this: i should ve been a lil more sceptical. lil research could ve probably safed me some grands.
regarding your posts and quotations in this thread: i am not going to delete them. i think a post-history is important for the community cause IMO investors (PoI-investors, miners, traders) have the right to read them. And like you said: Questioning a devs-history is a good method for basic riskmanagement/due dilligence. And riskminimization is an important sector in crypto if not the most important one.
and next time please make further research before posting any facts (which even weren't written by you).. cause it really looked like you just wanted to harm this project.
regards,
bitsta
