Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN] [SAFE] Safecoin - Community Edition of Solana - page 46. (Read 60085 times)

newbie
Activity: 63
Merit: 0
Is this still okay to invest in?

SAFECOIN is stiil at infancy, just look at the hashrate for such a young coin.
All the hooplas you see here, it's because some morally bankrupt 'crypto terrorists' trying hard to FUD SAFECOIN because they feel threatened.
You be the judge of that.
hero member
Activity: 1092
Merit: 552
Retired IRCX God
Is this still okay to invest in?
Only if you like investing in broken chains that ignore their own consensus rules and run everything in private, closed to the public, centralized, "backroom" discord "votes", where the chain might roll back at any minute leaving your wallet both broken and empty.
newbie
Activity: 126
Merit: 0
Is this still okay to invest in?
newbie
Activity: 33
Merit: 0
...You don't think people would notice that there's a negative tx fee... which ends up getting added to the output?...
Which part of
"those aren't the transactions I'm talking about"
doesn't translate into your native language?


P.S. - It's only a "negative" fee because insight was never programmed for interest, there's no such thing as a "negative" fee.

those lies are stacking up really fast, impressive how you managed to not choke on them already  Grin
hero member
Activity: 1092
Merit: 552
Retired IRCX God
...But you're right. They're all legitimate transactions for your "pool"....
OK, tell me what's not a legitimate pool mined block about this tx:
https://explorer.safecoin.org/tx/b9a482678f0e6a6f9ee4ce76b92c13c028d7bab2b83ae76c57ec26c2cc765030
....
You can't because you're on a tangent about something else entirely.
hero member
Activity: 1092
Merit: 552
Retired IRCX God
...You don't think people would notice that there's a negative tx fee... which ends up getting added to the output?...
Which part of
"those aren't the transactions I'm talking about"
doesn't translate into your native language?


P.S. - It's only a "negative" fee because insight was never programmed for interest, there's no such thing as a "negative" fee.
full member
Activity: 216
Merit: 100
https://equipool.1ds.us
... Search for those transaction ids. You'll find that your address is all over there...
Yes, and when you look at the transactions that I'm talking about, you can't come up with a single "invalid" thing about them, because the banned transactions were mined by the members of my pool. Apples aren't oranges.

How dumb do you think people are?



You don't think people would notice that there's a negative tx fee... which ends up getting added to the output?

Left side:
1088533.52285826 + 51942.02341894 = 1140475.5462772

Right side:
54420.56411691 + 1140475.5462272 = 1194896.11034411

Transaction fee of -54420.56406691

If you subtract the left side from the right, you can see that 54420.56406691 coins were created.. Oh wow, that's what the negative transaction fee is! Wait a minute... 5% of 1088533.52285826 is 54426.676142913 .. looks awful close to the negative tx fee.

But you're right. They're all legitimate transactions for your "pool". Your "pool" needed to move 140,313,176.53209892 (140 million+) safe. Yes, very legitimate. Especially when my pool who has mined nearly 40k of the 80k blocks has only needed to move 5,090,851.16944073 coins.

Do you breathe lies? Would you start choking and need to go to the hospital if you told the truth? People like you literally make me sick.

I'm happy to say, KMD is no longer on Equipool. I hope other pools see KMD for what it is and stop supporting it.
hero member
Activity: 1092
Merit: 552
Retired IRCX God
Anyone can say anything they want about who did what to who when and why. None of that has any relation to the fact that the banned txids were legitimately mined by anyone's definition and not allowing the miners to have what is rightfully theirs (earned with legitimate GPU hashpower by any definition) is actual stealing of currency (not just metaphorical).
...[some more stuff that proves KMD hacked SafeCoin]....

The coins I am referring to in the banned txids are not from any "exploit", you silly fekwit.

Right, name calling - very mature. That really strengthens your argument. And more bold text - it must be the truth!

If it wasn't an exploit then you are claiming that it wasn't a bug either - and yet the KMD lead developer (who orchestrated the whole thing) offered to help patch the code. If it wasn't a bug, why would a patch be needed? So it was a bug, and therefore it was an exploit. QED. Maybe I should make some of that bold...

Time to stop feeding the trolls I think. I have no affiliation to Safe. I'm not even mining it at the moment, but I will hodl what I do have because it looks like a strong project and a good team. Fortunately I dumped all my KMD for a decent price in December.
I call you a fekwit because you're being a fekwit. I'm talking about something completely different than that. There was no bug, patch, notaries, interest, or whatever fekwit shit you're on about, involved in the transactions I'm talking about.
newbie
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
Anyone can say anything they want about who did what to who when and why. None of that has any relation to the fact that the banned txids were legitimately mined by anyone's definition and not allowing the miners to have what is rightfully theirs (earned with legitimate GPU hashpower by any definition) is actual stealing of currency (not just metaphorical).
...[some more stuff that proves KMD hacked SafeCoin]....

The coins I am referring to in the banned txids are not from any "exploit", you silly fekwit.

Right, name calling - very mature. That really strengthens your argument. And more bold text - it must be the truth!

If it wasn't an exploit then you are claiming that it wasn't a bug either - and yet the KMD lead developer (who orchestrated the whole thing) offered to help patch the code. If it wasn't a bug, why would a patch be needed? So it was a bug, and therefore it was an exploit. QED. Maybe I should make some of that bold...

Time to stop feeding the trolls I think. I have no affiliation to Safe. I'm not even mining it at the moment, but I will hodl what I do have because it looks like a strong project and a good team. Fortunately I dumped all my KMD for a decent price in December.
full member
Activity: 294
Merit: 103
....i havent seen more transperent dev team...
True, having "votes" about the protocol (while abandoning protocol consensus) on a private discord channel while the channel is blocking anyone that isn't already a member is most transparency any dev team has ever had.  Roll Eyes
I was one of those who voted for rollback the chain so atacker doesnt get anything...For a coin that a lot of people spam that is bad there is a lot of people trying to get coins one way or another Undecided One would think that kmd crew already have more then enough money for blow and lambos Grin
newbie
Activity: 33
Merit: 0
... Search for those transaction ids. You'll find that your address is all over there...
Yes, and when you look at the transactions that I'm talking about, you can't come up with a single "invalid" thing about them, because the banned transactions were mined by the members of my pool. Apples aren't oranges.

seems like you are responsible for the loss of your "members" coins then  Grin Grin Grin Grin
  Roll Eyes I'm sensing another pot/kettle moment here....

I'm sensing that you keep repeating yourself buddy, your lies are getting more ridiculous  Grin
hero member
Activity: 1092
Merit: 552
Retired IRCX God
... Search for those transaction ids. You'll find that your address is all over there...
Yes, and when you look at the transactions that I'm talking about, you can't come up with a single "invalid" thing about them, because the banned transactions were mined by the members of my pool. Apples aren't oranges.

seems like you are responsible for the loss of your "members" coins then  Grin Grin Grin Grin
   Roll Eyes I'm sensing another pot/kettle moment here....
newbie
Activity: 33
Merit: 0
... Search for those transaction ids. You'll find that your address is all over there...
Yes, and when you look at the transactions that I'm talking about, you can't come up with a single "invalid" thing about them, because the banned transactions were mined by the members of my pool. Apples aren't oranges.

seems like you are responsible for the loss of your "members" coins then  Grin Grin Grin Grin
hero member
Activity: 1092
Merit: 552
Retired IRCX God
... Search for those transaction ids. You'll find that your address is all over there...
Yes, and when you look at the transactions that I'm talking about, you can't come up with a single "invalid" thing about them, because the banned transactions were mined by the members of my pool. Apples aren't oranges.
full member
Activity: 216
Merit: 100
https://equipool.1ds.us
Anyone can say anything they want about who did what to who when and why. None of that has any relation to the fact that the banned txids were legitimately mined by anyone's definition and not allowing the miners to have what is rightfully theirs (earned with legitimate GPU hashpower by any definition) is actual stealing of currency (not just metaphorical).
...[some more dumb shit]....

The coins I am referring to in the banned txids are not from any "exploit", you silly fekwit.

You know what's sad? Time and time again you get caught with your pants down. Pick your pants up and walk away, please.

http://evidenceonly.safenodes.org/address/RnKrSdo6g8qtA9RtJsLy7uXg5RrWu6HhB5 that's your address. Search for those transaction ids. You'll find that your address is all over there Wink

"Oh crap! They kept evidence! People can see that I'm lying!" yeah, go away.
newbie
Activity: 33
Merit: 0
Anyone can say anything they want about who did what to who when and why. None of that has any relation to the fact that the banned txids were legitimately mined by anyone's definition and not allowing the miners to have what is rightfully theirs (earned with legitimate GPU hashpower by any definition) is actual stealing of currency (not just metaphorical).
...[some more dumb shit]....

The coins I am referring to in the banned txids are not from any "exploit", you silly fekwit.

..., pathological lying has been defined as "falsification entirely disproportionate to any discernible end in view, may be extensive and very complicated, and may manifest over a period of years or even a lifetime."
   
"The stories told tend toward presenting the liar favorably. The liar "decorates their own person" by telling stories that present them as the hero or the victim. For example, the person might be presented as being fantastically brave, as knowing or being related to many famous people, or as having great power, position, or wealth."

 Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin
hero member
Activity: 1092
Merit: 552
Retired IRCX God
Anyone can say anything they want about who did what to who when and why. None of that has any relation to the fact that the banned txids were legitimately mined by anyone's definition and not allowing the miners to have what is rightfully theirs (earned with legitimate GPU hashpower by any definition) is actual stealing of currency (not just metaphorical).
...[some more dumb shit]....

The coins I am referring to in the banned txids are not from any "exploit", you silly fekwit.
newbie
Activity: 33
Merit: 0
Anyone can say anything they want about who did what to who when and why. None of that has any relation to the fact that the banned txids were legitimately mined by anyone's definition and not allowing the miners to have what is rightfully theirs (earned with legitimate GPU hashpower by any definition) is actual stealing of currency (not just metaphorical).

Please remember - just because you type something in bold, it doesn't make it true!

The Earth is flat!
Adolf Hitler was not a mass-murdering fuck-head!

See what I mean?

Those coins were not "legitimately mined by anyone's definition". In fact, the only people claiming they were legitimately mined are people from the KMD community. It was a bug - are you still trying to claim that it wasn't a bug, and was therefore desired behaviour? It was exploited for personal gain - are you still trying to claim that these actions were morally and ethically the "right" thing to do?

I am amazed (and more than a little disappointed) that almost 3 weeks after the original attack, these people are still trying to defend their actions.

For those of you not familiar with the terminology of programming (from Wikipedia): "A software bug is an error, flaw, failure or fault in a computer program or system that causes it to produce an incorrect or unexpected result, or to behave in unintended ways". Will you admit that both (attacks | hacks | legitimate mining activities) exploited a bug in the SafeCoin code?

He won't, he is a paid shill and has a big bag of KMD laying around, the only thing that is legit, is his fear to lose money, that's why he is posting in this thread.

Also check what he is writing, he is repeating himself over and over again, clearly that dude insane or he's is just afraid that his actions will affect the KMD project as it already did.

He doesn't understand that he is hurting them even more by stating such ridiculous statements, just another troll, but a really bad one if you ask me.
newbie
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
Anyone can say anything they want about who did what to who when and why. None of that has any relation to the fact that the banned txids were legitimately mined by anyone's definition and not allowing the miners to have what is rightfully theirs (earned with legitimate GPU hashpower by any definition) is actual stealing of currency (not just metaphorical).

Please remember - just because you type something in bold, it doesn't make it true!

The Earth is flat!
Adolf Hitler was not a mass-murdering fuck-head!

See what I mean?

Those coins were not "legitimately mined by anyone's definition". In fact, the only people claiming they were legitimately mined are people from the KMD community. It was a bug - are you still trying to claim that it wasn't a bug, and was therefore desired behaviour? It was exploited for personal gain - are you still trying to claim that these actions were morally and ethically the "right" thing to do?

I am amazed (and more than a little disappointed) that almost 3 weeks after the original attack, these people are still trying to defend their actions.

For those of you not familiar with the terminology of programming (from Wikipedia): "A software bug is an error, flaw, failure or fault in a computer program or system that causes it to produce an incorrect or unexpected result, or to behave in unintended ways". Will you admit that both (attacks | hacks | legitimate mining activities) exploited a bug in the SafeCoin code?
newbie
Activity: 33
Merit: 0
Anyone can say anything they want about who did what to who when and why. None of that has any relation to the fact that the banned txids were legitimately mined by anyone's definition and not allowing the miners to have what is rightfully theirs (earned with legitimate GPU hashpower by any definition) is actual stealing of currency (not just metaphorical).

"earned with legitimate GPU hashpower", so we are calling GPUs ASICs now  Grin Grin Grin

Pages:
Jump to: