Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN] Sativacoin | STV | X-13 | POS - page 16. (Read 54023 times)

member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
September 22, 2014, 06:47:29 PM
legendary
Activity: 1522
Merit: 1000
www.bitkong.com
September 22, 2014, 06:46:30 PM
CANN clone?
full member
Activity: 194
Merit: 100
September 22, 2014, 06:43:24 PM


this noob is funny
Why is it funny? You are being doxxed because it is believed you are behind many other scams.

This thread is moderated to hell. I keep seeing post disappear like crazy.

ive deleted 3 posts since start Smiley

EDIT. not 3 anymore
BECAUSE I KEPT SCREENSHOTTING EVIDENCE OF ABOUT 15 DELETED POSTS OF MINE YOU'VE EDITED THIS POST TO TRY AND PRETEND YOU ARE BEING HONEST ABOUT HOW MANY POSTS YOU ARE DELETING

newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
September 22, 2014, 06:42:01 PM
http://i.imgur.com/VZynBCU.png

this noob is funny
legendary
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1004
September 22, 2014, 06:37:08 PM
This was a ninja launch not an instamine.
sr. member
Activity: 416
Merit: 250
September 22, 2014, 06:35:11 PM
There wasn't any substantial instamine. Let's be realistic, 9 blocks just does not matter at all, and the first blocks on a coin will always be mined in less than a few seconds. Even if the developer is using even a single GPU to start the blockchain, that's what you'll see. That's not an "instamine" by any stretch of the imagination though.

For reference, I saw the announcement thread and had the wallet compiled by block 93, with the first block found on our pool at block 110. (All blocks for every coin are viewable on my pool, if you're curious to see the early blocks we mined. Just check https://www.ipominer.com/stats?curr=stv and click "All Blocks Found - STV" at the bottom of the block list, then go to the last page.)

(Which, if you don't read code, says that all blocks under block 7200 have the same reward of 927 STV.)

Thanks..I saw the info in the wallet and I can read the code. I agree that 9 blocks isn't substantial...it is weird tho and I'm just trying to understand what happened here and why there were blocks mined before this ann was posted.

and i explained it to you

Well...I dont have a full explanation at all...seems like the first thread was posted at 3:19 PM forum time and removed by 3:21 PM...then first 9 blocks mined starting at 4:09 PM forum time and then this ann post at 4:40 PM forum time. Now I agree that 9 blocks isnt a lot, but I still dont understand what took place here.

BTW I did see the post just now that was deleted (It was a post by demoniality showing multiple deleted messages).
newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
September 22, 2014, 06:20:18 PM
#99
There wasn't any substantial instamine. Let's be realistic, 9 blocks just does not matter at all, and the first blocks on a coin will always be mined in less than a few seconds. Even if the developer is using even a single GPU to start the blockchain, that's what you'll see. That's not an "instamine" by any stretch of the imagination though.

For reference, I saw the announcement thread and had the wallet compiled by block 93, with the first block found on our pool at block 110. (All blocks for every coin are viewable on my pool, if you're curious to see the early blocks we mined. Just check https://www.ipominer.com/stats?curr=stv and click "All Blocks Found - STV" at the bottom of the block list, then go to the last page.)

(Which, if you don't read code, says that all blocks under block 7200 have the same reward of 927 STV.)

Thanks..I saw the info in the wallet and I can read the code. I agree that 9 blocks isn't substantial...it is weird tho and I'm just trying to understand what happened here and why there were blocks mined before this ann was posted.

and i explained it to you
legendary
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1004
September 22, 2014, 06:19:07 PM
#98
Is this a marijuana coin?
sr. member
Activity: 416
Merit: 250
September 22, 2014, 06:15:01 PM
#97
There wasn't any substantial instamine. Let's be realistic, 9 blocks just does not matter at all, and the first blocks on a coin will always be mined in less than a few seconds. Even if the developer is using even a single GPU to start the blockchain, that's what you'll see. That's not an "instamine" by any stretch of the imagination though.

For reference, I saw the announcement thread and had the wallet compiled by block 93, with the first block found on our pool at block 110. (All blocks for every coin are viewable on my pool, if you're curious to see the early blocks we mined. Just check https://www.ipominer.com/stats?curr=stv and click "All Blocks Found - STV" at the bottom of the block list, then go to the last page.)

(Which, if you don't read code, says that all blocks under block 7200 have the same reward of 927 STV.)

Thanks..I saw the info in the wallet and I can read the code. I agree that 9 blocks isn't substantial...it is weird tho and I'm just trying to understand what happened here and why there were blocks mined before this ann was posted.
sr. member
Activity: 416
Merit: 250
September 22, 2014, 06:12:41 PM
#96
Can anyone view the first block here? http://176.31.30.94/block/0000002e04d5be12da7c8cd3adac44793b48f9e335e72a3a9d24fda72c8fb055

It gives me a server error when I try to view it. What time was it mined?

use the wallet there you see it

Thanks...I see that now and seems block 1 was mined just before block 2 as expected.

It's a great looking wallet, nice job on that and good luck with your project.
sr. member
Activity: 416
Merit: 250
September 22, 2014, 06:09:56 PM
#95
This thread is moderated to hell. I keep seeing post disappear like crazy.

My questions are still there though.
newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
September 22, 2014, 06:03:09 PM
#94
This thread is moderated to hell. I keep seeing post disappear like crazy.

ive deleted 3 posts since start Smiley

EDIT. not 3 anymore
legendary
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
Mine the hottest new coins at ipoMiner.com
September 22, 2014, 05:56:00 PM
#93
There wasn't any substantial instamine. Let's be realistic, 9 blocks just does not matter at all, and the first blocks on a coin will always be mined in less than a few seconds. Even if the developer is using even a single GPU to start the blockchain, that's what you'll see. That's not an "instamine" by any stretch of the imagination though.

For reference, I saw the announcement thread and had the wallet compiled by block 93, with the first block found on our pool at block 110. (All blocks for every coin are viewable on my pool, if you're curious to see the early blocks we mined. Just check https://www.ipominer.com/stats?curr=stv and click "All Blocks Found - STV" at the bottom of the block list, then go to the last page.)


Can anyone view the first block here? http://176.31.30.94/block/0000002e04d5be12da7c8cd3adac44793b48f9e335e72a3a9d24fda72c8fb055

It gives me a server error when I try to view it. What time was it mined?

use the wallet there you see it

Here's the block 1 data from the commandline wallet:

# sativacoind getblockhash 1
0000002e04d5be12da7c8cd3adac44793b48f9e335e72a3a9d24fda72c8fb055

# sativacoind getblock 0000002e04d5be12da7c8cd3adac44793b48f9e335e72a3a9d24fda72c8fb055
{
    "hash" : "0000002e04d5be12da7c8cd3adac44793b48f9e335e72a3a9d24fda72c8fb055",
    "confirmations" : 1832,
    "size" : 210,
    "height" : 1,
    "version" : 6,
    "merkleroot" : "611ab8866ef986d942565201f9ce1397174e24158d017fca647ccaced9a568ed",
    "mint" : 972.00000000,
    "time" : 1411315797,
    "nonce" : 258575,
    "bits" : "1e0fffff",
    "difficulty" : 0.00024414,
    "blocktrust" : "100001",
    "chaintrust" : "200002",
    "previousblockhash" : "000006f40075bafa504d64ac179d47dc09faae31f35209431a5d2398f88de3e2",
    "nextblockhash" : "000000318d19a035c7e74492c50e94da821c5da262f522771a13b6dfd3ccda5c",
    "flags" : "proof-of-work",
    "proofhash" : "0000002e04d5be12da7c8cd3adac44793b48f9e335e72a3a9d24fda72c8fb055",
    "entropybit" : 1,
    "modifier" : "0000000000000000",
    "modifierchecksum" : "d322d8c6",
    "tx" : [
        "611ab8866ef986d942565201f9ce1397174e24158d017fca647ccaced9a568ed"
    ]
}


And then here's the transaction that's included in block 1:

# sativacoind gettransaction 611ab8866ef986d942565201f9ce1397174e24158d017fca647ccaced9a568ed
{
    "txid" : "611ab8866ef986d942565201f9ce1397174e24158d017fca647ccaced9a568ed",
    "version" : 1,
    "time" : 1411315797,
    "locktime" : 0,
    "vin" : [
        {
            "coinbase" : "510455f81e540817fffffd2c0000000d2f6e6f64655374726174756d2f",
            "sequence" : 0
        }
    ],
    "vout" : [
        {
            "value" : 972.00000000,
            "n" : 0,
            "scriptPubKey" : {
                "asm" : "0219a9d6b9fdb241068478deb62d52b9b64182ab2c53526322c1fd748ec21438a5 OP_CHECKSIG",
                "reqSigs" : 1,
                "type" : "pubkey",
                "addresses" : [
                    "SdUxjjx6UuMEV5468jLfvDse4hn34UHsn3"
                ]
            }
        }
    ],
    "blockhash" : "0000002e04d5be12da7c8cd3adac44793b48f9e335e72a3a9d24fda72c8fb055",
    "confirmations" : 1832
}

And, I've confirmed the proof of work reward schedule in the code does match the announcement post:

// miner's coin base reward
int64_t GetProofOfWorkReward(int64_t nFees)
{
    int64_t nSubsidy = 972 * COIN;
    if(pindexBest->nHeight <= 7200)
    {
                nSubsidy = 972 * COIN;
    }
               
    if (fDebug && GetBoolArg("-printcreation"))
        printf("GetProofOfWorkReward() : create=%s nSubsidy=%"PRId64"\n", FormatMoney(nSubsidy).c_str(), nSubsidy);
       
    return nSubsidy + nFees;
}

(Which, if you don't read code, says that all blocks under block 7200 have the same reward of 927 STV.)
newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
September 22, 2014, 05:54:47 PM
#92
Can anyone view the first block here? http://176.31.30.94/block/0000002e04d5be12da7c8cd3adac44793b48f9e335e72a3a9d24fda72c8fb055

It gives me a server error when I try to view it. What time was it mined?

use the wallet there you see it
sr. member
Activity: 416
Merit: 250
September 22, 2014, 05:44:30 PM
#91
Can anyone view the first block here? http://176.31.30.94/block/0000002e04d5be12da7c8cd3adac44793b48f9e335e72a3a9d24fda72c8fb055

It gives me a server error when I try to view it. What time was it mined?
sr. member
Activity: 416
Merit: 250
September 22, 2014, 05:28:49 PM
#90
i remember yesterday 2nd or 3post was posted by a user who copied the getmininginfo and i dont know but it was less than 10 blocks after users join in

wasnt instamined



I have to take your word, since I did not see the original thread yesterday...but if you look at that thread, there is no getmininginfo...did that poster delete it?

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--791197

EDIT you mean this current thread? I see the getinfo in this thread..and it matches with the block explorer. Its a bit weird since 8 blocks were mined within a minute, then the next one was 30 mins later.

EDIT2..It's almost like the person mining stopped after mining the first 9 blocks then waited for this ann to be posted to continue mining.

oh it was the current thread my fail sorry

but where is the problem..9 blocks instamine??i saw some on twitter but i dont know whats going on right now

Just trying to figure out why there were blocks mined before the posting of this thread.

EDIT... Can anyone see the first block using the block explorer? If so what time was the first block? I get a server error message when I try to view it.
legendary
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1001
September 22, 2014, 05:23:29 PM
#89
i remember yesterday 2nd or 3post was posted by a user who copied the getmininginfo and i dont know but it was less than 10 blocks after users join in

wasnt instamined



I have to take your word, since I did not see the original thread yesterday...but if you look at that thread, there is no getmininginfo...did that poster delete it?

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--791197

EDIT you mean this current thread? I see the getinfo in this thread..and it matches with the block explorer. Its a bit weird since 8 blocks were mined within a minute, then the next one was 30 mins later.

EDIT2..It's almost like the person mining stopped after mining the first 9 blocks then waited for this ann to be posted to continue mining.

oh it was the current thread my fail sorry

but where is the problem..9 blocks instamine??i saw some on twitter but i dont know whats going on right now
newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
September 22, 2014, 05:23:13 PM
#88
Does anybody have problems with withdraw STV from coinbroker.io? Their withdraw page showes 'Server Error (500)'.
Support doesn't reply.

i have seen that other had this problem today i will try to contact them regarding this problem
hero member
Activity: 635
Merit: 500
September 22, 2014, 05:12:12 PM
#87
Does anybody have problems with withdraw STV from coinbroker.io? Their withdraw page showes 'Server Error (500)'.
Support doesn't reply.
sr. member
Activity: 416
Merit: 250
September 22, 2014, 05:10:39 PM
#86
i remember yesterday 2nd or 3post was posted by a user who copied the getmininginfo and i dont know but it was less than 10 blocks after users join in

wasnt instamined



I have to take your word, since I did not see the original thread yesterday...but if you look at that thread, there is no getmininginfo...did that poster delete it?

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--791197

EDIT you mean this current thread? I see the getinfo in this thread..and it matches with the block explorer. Its a bit weird since 8 blocks were mined within a minute, then the next one was 30 mins later.

EDIT2..It's almost like the person mining stopped after mining the first 9 blocks then waited for this ann to be posted to continue mining.
Pages:
Jump to: