Topic: [ANN] SATOSHI - anonymous payments in the network Ethereum! - page 29. (Read 36713 times)
It looks like an interesting project. I am wishing you all the best. DEV looks like a cool guy.
Address not match is written against my application in the spreadsheet. What does this mean? The spreadsheet address and my location address are the same.
This means that at the time of verification your address was not listed in your profile.
Now everything is correct. Your address is included in the list for distribution.
Address not match is written against my application in the spreadsheet. What does this mean? The spreadsheet address and my location address are the same.
When thia token will hit and exchange? I mean officially and other exchange?.
It must be bought now. To then have more anonymous tokens than received when distributing
When thia token will hit and exchange? I mean officially and other exchange?.
This token does not make sense to be listed on the stock exchange officially. It will cease to exist when exchanging anonymous SATOSHI token
https://etherdelta.com/#0xc01b78e62a4d1fdce58d364193ee1218832919fd-ETH
When thia token will hit and exchange? I mean officially and other exchange?.
Everything is interesting and promising, we are waiting for the next distribution and bounty program.
Thank you for doing airdrop. Good luck devs team
You have a decent plan to enhance impression to the individuals from the string, and that is great
I think you have to give information of your token by give us guide and whitepaper.
I think you have to give information of your token by give us guide and whitepaper.
Hi DEV,
I dont receive any token. my information is correct.
Please check this...
im 1055. in spreadsheet...
I dont receive any token. my information is correct.
Please check this...
im 1055. in spreadsheet...
The information has been updated. The delay in issuing tokens is related to network congestion.
i have two account entry #3519 and #5183 can you delete no 3519
now im junior member in bitcointalk, thanks for attention dev
now im junior member in bitcointalk, thanks for attention dev
The information has been updated, updated to the one indicated on the profile.
Where and when will Bounty take place? Since AIRDROP has not received tokens, I can participate in Bounty.
Bounty will be later. While about you. You will receive a token in the next address packet for distribution.
My line in airdrop spreadshit is 1244, profile not valid. As I understood, I sould have inserted my forum profile link instead my nickname. Can your or I change anything?
Information in the table is updated. You will receive tokens in the next address packet for distribution.
My line in airdrop spreadshit is 1244, profile not valid. As I understood, I sould have inserted my forum profile link instead my nickname. Can your or I change anything?
So we looking at only erc20 tokens alone..... Still not a bad idea... But for any of such to happen there has to be some trust between both users of the escrow service and the immediator the escrow service..... Do you plan on revealing your identity any time soon and as well registering a company for this function... Pple won't seek escrow from whom they dont have any information on or legal data
We have theorists, there are programmers, there are designers, etc. who work to solve this problem. But I unite them all together, and spend my money on paying their labor. As soon as a smart contract is launched, I will communicate my name to the community)))
So we looking at only erc20 tokens alone..... Still not a bad idea... But for any of such to happen there has to be some trust between both users of the escrow service and the immediator the escrow service..... Do you plan on revealing your identity any time soon and as well registering a company for this function... Pple won't seek escrow from whom they dont have any information on or legal data
There is an idea to use one more function of a smart contract, which allows you to return tokens in case you are deceived. What are your opinions?
Do you mean something like an escrow service devYes it is. This is a lot of problems, but they are solved.
The idea was prompted by one of the community members. Somewhere there was a project that set itself the task of issuing a token with protection from scammers. The function is simple. I see no reason not to use it in our project.
I do not think that without good financing, which means holding an ICO, we can realize the multicurrency function.
There is an idea to use one more function of a smart contract, which allows you to return tokens in case you are deceived. What are your opinions?
Do you mean something like an escrow service devYes it is. This is a lot of problems, but they are solved.
The idea was prompted by one of the community members. Somewhere there was a project that set itself the task of issuing a token with protection from scammers. The function is simple. I see no reason not to use it in our project.
Unclear. You say that the function is simple, but at the same time write that there are many problems?
Problems in the maintenance of this function. How to understand which of the users is right? )))
There is an idea to use one more function of a smart contract, which allows you to return tokens in case you are deceived. What are your opinions?
Do you mean something like an escrow service devYes it is. This is a lot of problems, but they are solved.
The idea was prompted by one of the community members. Somewhere there was a project that set itself the task of issuing a token with protection from scammers. The function is simple. I see no reason not to use it in our project.
There is an idea to use one more function of a smart contract, which allows you to return tokens in case you are deceived. What are your opinions?
Do you mean something like an escrow service devYes it is. This is a lot of problems, but they are solved.
The idea was prompted by one of the community members. Somewhere there was a project that set itself the task of issuing a token with protection from scammers. The function is simple. I see no reason not to use it in our project.
Unclear. You say that the function is simple, but at the same time write that there are many problems?
There is an idea to use one more function of a smart contract, which allows you to return tokens in case you are deceived. What are your opinions?
Do you mean something like an escrow service devYes it is. This is a lot of problems, but they are solved.
The idea was prompted by one of the community members. Somewhere there was a project that set itself the task of issuing a token with protection from scammers. The function is simple. I see no reason not to use it in our project.
Jump to: