[ANN ][SCORE][POW][Scrypt] - page 20.

Fadayko

newbie

Activity: 21

Merit: 0

Quote from: Spekske on September 22, 2017, 01:57:17 PM

Quote from: Fadayko on September 22, 2017, 01:54:36 PM

Quote

According to the blockexplorer and the daemon behind coincave the current height is 132382. I have no idea where those blocks beyond that height are coming from. All I know is that an experimental code has been online for a few days which might be screwing up things if people downloaded it and are using it. I find multiple entries in the debug.log where the blockchain is altered.

I agree. In my transaction log I have already discovered block 132382 and now I am reworking the block. And with coincave requiring 120 confirmations there is no guarantee that even the current block wont be deemed and orphan for the second time.

Those 120 confirmations are a temporary setting as long as there are these kind of issues. Once the code is updated and fully errorfree confirmations will be changed to match those in the coinsource.

So in theory all the orphaned blocks are altered to a confirmed status and I receive the shares for the completed block?

Spekske

hero member

Activity: 673

Merit: 506

Quote from: Fadayko on September 22, 2017, 01:54:36 PM

Quote

According to the blockexplorer and the daemon behind coincave the current height is 132382. I have no idea where those blocks beyond that height are coming from. All I know is that an experimental code has been online for a few days which might be screwing up things if people downloaded it and are using it. I find multiple entries in the debug.log where the blockchain is altered.

I agree. In my transaction log I have already discovered block 132382 and now I am reworking the block. And with coincave requiring 120 confirmations there is no guarantee that even the current block wont be deemed and orphan for the second time.

Those 120 confirmations are a temporary setting as long as there are these kind of issues. Once the code is updated and fully errorfree confirmations will be changed to match those in the coinsource.

Fadayko

newbie

Activity: 21

Merit: 0

Quote

According to the blockexplorer and the daemon behind coincave the current height is 132382. I have no idea where those blocks beyond that height are coming from. All I know is that an experimental code has been online for a few days which might be screwing up things if people downloaded it and are using it. I find multiple entries in the debug.log where the blockchain is altered.

I agree. In my transaction log I have already discovered block 132382 and now I am reworking the block. And with coincave requiring 120 confirmations there is no guarantee that even the current block wont be deemed and orphan for the second time.

Spekske

hero member

Activity: 673

Merit: 506

Quote from: Fadayko on September 22, 2017, 01:39:10 PM

We have an issue on the coincave.nl mining pool where we are discovering blocks that have already been found. This is then forcing the unconfirmed shares of the original block to be orphaned. Please fix this as we have spent time and energy to discover these blocks and now we are working back through the blockchain for the second time. This occured in a series of 54 blocks.

Thank you,

According to the blockexplorer and the daemon behind coincave the current height is 132382. I have no idea where those blocks beyond that height are coming from. All I know is that an experimental code has been online for a few days which might be screwing up things if people downloaded it and are using it. I find multiple entries in the debug.log where the blockchain is altered. I also find a weird entry in the nodes list that keeps connected all the time, anyone has an idea what this might be ?

ip address: 40.71.81.210:34772 protocol version 70004 Satoshi:0.8.88.84

Fadayko

newbie

Activity: 21

Merit: 0

We have an issue on the coincave.nl mining pool where we are discovering blocks that have already been found. This is then forcing the unconfirmed shares of the original block to be orphaned. Please fix this as we have spent time and energy to discover these blocks and now we are working back through the blockchain for the second time. This occured in a series of 54 blocks.

Thank you,

Shankar94

full member

Activity: 140

Merit: 100

DeepOnion ♡

HODL for the masternodes ! I think Mark will release them soon .. Buy the Dip mate !

Grin

If master nodes are implemented , then u cant get score for this price .. I think his next plan is to mix score coins with gaming platforms

~Money~

hero member

Activity: 1132

Merit: 536

score is one of my favt coin infect i keep buy @ every dip Grin

... if dev can bring score on bittrex then it will be on moon

kurbeks

sr. member

Activity: 1078

Merit: 255

Quote from: bobitza202 on September 21, 2017, 01:56:12 PM

What do Scorecoin holders need to do when the hard fork comes? will there be a swap?of just a wallet update?

Should be wallet update

silklich

full member

Activity: 394

Merit: 100

i like Phore

Quote from: Yukin on September 21, 2017, 09:50:28 AM

Quote from: silklich on September 21, 2017, 09:26:57 AM

my wallet dont connect network....
Is there any working node??

addnode=107.191.55.64:10809
addnode=198.12.70.154:10809
addnode=88.99.173.100:10809
addnode=91.121.82.70:10809
addnode=157.161.128.61:10809
addnode=66.228.57.25:10809
addnode=83.169.7.202:10809
addnode=138.68.108.250:10809

https://www.cryptopia.co.nz/CoinInfo/?coin=SCORE

enjoy!

WoW!!!
it's working!!
thanks bro! Wink

bobitza202

sr. member

Activity: 489

Merit: 253

What do Scorecoin holders need to do when the hard fork comes? will there be a swap?of just a wallet update?

suprnurd

member

Activity: 250

Merit: 12

Support Guru

hey Mark how goes development?

mrhans

full member

Activity: 280

Merit: 100

@mark

have you ever considered simply merging both coins? Wouldn't that make more sense then two coins with the exact same features? Easier for a wider adoption

LycheeBit

full member

Activity: 378

Merit: 105

Hello

Here is a new mining pool for mining Scorecoin.
It's based on YiiMP, no registration is needed :

Stratum : lycheebit.com:3433
User : YOUR_SCORE_ADDRESS
Password : c=SCORE

Website : http://www.lycheebit.com/
Fee : 1.00 %

Exemple of CCMiner command line :

Code:

ccminer.exe -a scrypt -o stratum+tcp://lycheebit.com:3433 -u SZQZBCDEQnEzsYqzeZD5ZNmB8qDJWfoNg6 -p c=SCORE

Happy mining

Yukin

member

Activity: 84

Merit: 10

Quote from: silklich on September 21, 2017, 09:26:57 AM

my wallet dont connect network....
Is there any working node??

addnode=107.191.55.64:10809
addnode=198.12.70.154:10809
addnode=88.99.173.100:10809
addnode=91.121.82.70:10809
addnode=157.161.128.61:10809
addnode=66.228.57.25:10809
addnode=83.169.7.202:10809
addnode=138.68.108.250:10809

https://www.cryptopia.co.nz/CoinInfo/?coin=SCORE

enjoy!

silklich

full member

Activity: 394

Merit: 100

i like Phore

my wallet dont connect network....
Is there any working node??

seejack

newbie

Activity: 20

Merit: 0

Although the project does not have a variety of patterns, but it is very rich content, the project now has APP applications can experience it?

Noitev

hero member

Activity: 812

Merit: 505

The Last NXT Founder

Quote from: Shankar94 on September 19, 2017, 11:20:46 PM

GPU miners will get some coins .. But thats not gonna be profit in scrypt . Because of ASICs ..

if u have free Electricity , go for it

Not talking against SCORE, but doesn't it mostly make sense to simply mine the most profitable coin with free electricity?

Yukin

member

Activity: 84

Merit: 10

http://score.coincave.nl more hash power please !! Cry

A62662

member

Activity: 318

Merit: 16

Quote from: Janus101 on September 19, 2017, 11:18:28 PM

Is SCORE GPU mining with Scrypt profitable? Sorry, I'm a newbie here and only hear many GPU miners tell to stay away from algo with ASIC mining like Scrypt.

It would have been in 2013. But today, forget about it.

kurbeks

sr. member

Activity: 1078

Merit: 255

think it was 50/50. But i might have forgotten it. Better ask Mark.

Topic: [ANN ][SCORE][POW][Scrypt] - page 20. (Read 21035 times)