Topic: [ANN] Securecoin / Quark CPU miner by Spoetnik (Read 10335 times)

funny to see ppl get scammed by prop. software...

scamers dont care about licenses

i never advertised i guaranteed you would make double your money .

what did i advertise ? care to quote me ?

and by the way i have been working on my miner for a long looooooong time
and mining and testing on about 6/7 pools and i can tell you one thing..
since src.coinmin.pl has being getting more and more overloaded last couple weeks i have been making less and less almost daily.
two weeks ago i was getting up to 25 coins per 24hr/s and it went to 20 then 10 for a while and last 3/4 days i am getting like 5 now.

the simple fact of the matter is this is complicated stuff with a lot of variables and few people know how to test a miner properly
my 4/5 month of beta tester sure as hell does.. i don't have to explain shit to him for hours on end.. he just simply knows.

you have read what you wanted to hear and not what i said.. that is not my problem

and this is why i have not posted any of my miners before.. donation or not you people are not worth the hassle
no amount of money is worth dealing with this bullshit !

and no i will not refund fuck all either that is retarded..
you were on chat bitching at me you wish you held what you gave me (before you even tested it pretty much)
..because the price is going up
then surprise surprise your here demanding your coins back.. even though i gave you a key that is good for unlimited computers for your botnet.

piece of advice.. verify what you are buying before you buy.
had you asked me and confirmed you would only buy if i guaranteed you would double your earnings i would have said hell no of course not..

and my miner is slower ? gimme a break lol
what part of i tested this shit for 5 months don't you understand ?

consider it a life lesson and read the fine print next time (or ask)

Miner is closed................
you people are a headache and i would rather just make my own and use it privately.. all this stupid bs is not worth it

edit:
oh and 1 more thing..
if you had ask and not acted like a complete prick i would have gladly given you the full source code
so you can see exactly what i did.

I simply asked you to help me make the miner work like you said it did, 100% faster. Thats what I paid for. Thats what you advertised. Yes, I wanted to make more money thats why were all here. You as well I'm sure. Anyway, I didn't badmouth you. I simply asked for help or some of my coins back. I haven't threatened or anything, as you can see by my posts. I'm not angry and I realize that I have lost my coins. Easy come, easy go. Lesson learned.

By the way, its you who do not deserve them. You failed to provide what you were advertising.

fuck off.. i'm bad and i don't care.. sue me
i eat software licenses for breakfast i am a cracker

and i'm not sharing it anymore you can all kiss my ass ungrateful jerks

gimme a fucking god damn break

i have said far more than enough and you know i can't refund you buddy because you get to bitch n moan now and keep the keys.
and yeah i could refund you 100x over again but it's not about the money.. you don;t DESERVE to get it back so no i am not giving it back.

the problem is you expecting to run your botnet at 30 mh/s and your pissed off your not doing 60mh/s now ..simple as that
read the fine print i never guaranteed anyone they would make double the money.

Lets make this even more clear (even though i already did in the included text files)
The beta access is an experimental set of features to improve hash rates and share submits. results vary based on variables (common sense)

and this guy told me on chat he regretted give me the coins because they were going up in value now he want his back and to keep my miner.

thanks for bad mouthing and trying to rip ME off !
and thanks fro trying to contact me instead of just throwing a fit on the forum..
you know damn well you could have emailed me or pm me or got me on chat
and instead you post this shit ? seriously ?


edit:

and..

LINKS REMOVED BECAUSE OF COMPLAINTS

I have been doing more testing and I'm telling you this is not faster!!  I paid good quarks and securecoins for this and its actually slower. It reports higher hash rates yet submits less shares. Help me get this working like you said it did or give me back my quarks, you can keep the securecoins.  QgqQYdTk68kMCpz4HSojAwN1riKvTLB7na

Well, I said I would post the results so here they are.

Quark_V2x64 miner (I don't know who's this one is)

Confirmed:226.25820373
Unconfirmed:25.21069005

spoetnik 3.9.0.9

Confirmed:235.58128235
Unconfirmed:29.91134995

6 identical PCS mining in parallel to 2 different accounts. 3 to each. So these numbers should be accurate no?

Spoetnik, do you have any suggestions for tweaking the submission rate? The hashes are awesome but it doesn't seem to be finding the shares or its not submitting them.

If it is a modification of a GPL program then your code is GPL'd.

lol thx

i was sharing it via word of mouth for ages.. just wanted to post it publicly as is for now

Spoetnik, congratulations with your miner!

Quark kernel is going to be open-sourced, but I want to finish next kernel first.

anywhere ya want.. use --help commandline

compare to someones else's miner too

PS:
as i stated numerous time I ALREADY TESTED this with other people so i don't care what you all say been working on this for a good 4 months lol
and my beta tester and i are more qualified to test it than anyone else

gpl

and mine don't work ?

NM real dumb question

where does the Securecoin deposit?

Okay guys, I am running a test. I created 2 new accounts on qrk.coinmine.pl. Six identical PCS, three with the beta miner on one account and the other three on the other account. Tomorrow morning we'll see the coins mined for each new account. I will post the results in 14 hours or so.

Why would someone nag smolen about his program smelter?  It works like a hot damn...mined hundreds of thousands of QRK with it. 

If your paid software is really as much faster as claimed then noone should nag you for asking for a payment either...nothing wrong with getting paid for making a miner that at the end of the day is used by someone trying to make money.  It's like a gold miner complaining they have to pay for their pickaxe...go mine with your hands then...

i think 1 was helping the most for some reason and i got the idea from my old beta tester who told me to try it..

i think it dopes matter because i debugged it and watched what difficulty the hashes found and submitted were
and they changed based on scantime.. but hey tryout what you want


edit:

also if someone can offer help for linux that would great and i will open source right now if you want me to remove the beta stuff

I am getting a speed increase on the pool there is no question about that. Does what scan time I put matter at all? I am newer to mining.