From 2014-06-25 12:00:00 UTC through 2014-07-03 12:00:00 UTC
 | There were 8,001 blocks total. 2,828 (35.31%) were PoW 1,047 (13.07%) were PoB 4,134 (51.62%) were PoS | |
 | The average network hash rate was 3,649khash/s. The average hash rate at slimcoinpool was 1,180khash/s or ~32%. The average hash rate at block quarry was 260khash/s or ~7%. During the time primer- mined there, his average hash rate there was 277khash/s. The graph shows where he switched back to slimcoinpool and when somebody took the same account name and dripped back into block quarry. Note that in the graph, the network hash rate is as estimated by the slimcoin code (getnetworkghps), while pool hash rates are estimated at the pools according to shares. | |
 | Variability may be too high to say anything meaningful about the pools' luck after 8 days. slimcoinpool laid claim to 1,076 (38%) of the blocks, block quarry laid claim to 199 (7%) of the blocks, leaving the majority of the blocks - 1,553 (55%) - as being mined solo or at other pools. If going by the estimated hash rates, slimcoinpool's luck would be ~118%, while block quarry's would be ~99%. If going by the relative hash rates, block quarry's hash rate was ~22% of slimcoinpool's hash rate, block quarry's number of blocks was ~18% of slimconpool's number of blocks, giving a luck of ~84%. |
Sources:
block quarry hash rate, workers and blocks found: https://slm.blockquarry.com/index.php?page=statistics&action=pool
slimcoinpool hash rate, workers and blocks found: http://www.slimcoinpool.com/tbs
network hash rate: getnetworkghps, https://slm.blockquarry.com/index.php?page=api&action=public
block PoW/PoB/PoS data: slimcoin blockchain
Like this post? Donate Slimcoin: STDpqwvEC6banMNzfNYDTuZy8xspHpGuNj
) Such dumpers. 
