Hasn't this coin applied for Microsoft Azure
Once accepted polo will come
i hadnt looked into azure yet, but am doing so today. i noticed that the bizspark startup services looked good, but that every announcemnt from new currencies signing up are canned form letters, and that the "partnership" with microsoft that some are claiming is somewhat misrepresented. the bizsparks program allows $120,000 in Azure usage over 1 year, not as some currencies have claimed, that microsoft contributes these funds for software and services is given directly to the projects in question. after the first year, server costs will come into play, as well as software licensing costs.
microsoft is also known for its data collection techniques, the BizSparks EULA allows provisions for bandwidth control, keylogging, browser histories.. each "startup" that applies to use biszparks grants a limited license for microsoft to use the startup's trademarks, logos, and other business identifiers as well as grants MS the right to publish, use, reference and display the startup's name (SOILcoin, for example), including quotes, pictures, names etc. related to the startup.
the whole question is... where we exist in a decentralized atmosphere, with pseudonymous protection and strong blockchain security... how much of that is given up in order to have Microsoft provide exposure for a blockchain? theyve already stated that "microsoft's services can serve as an arbiter in cryptographic key storage" which says a lot... do your private-keys cease having the protection of exclusively being end-user controlled and stored?
ive opened a personal azure account to look around the system, and as a developer, its a great resource. ive started the process of application for bizspark as well, to see what its all about under the gift wrapping. its definitely something to look into, but my biggest concern is that we eventually give up autonomy to having everything run thru centralized (owned by microsoft) servers rather than produce the sorts of decentralized applications that provide the same services (such as storj for decentralized storage, or something like bitmessage for cryptographically secure messaging) sure, its EASIER to leverage these sorts of services and applications thru microsoft, but isnt the whole point of cryptocurrency to remain decentralized and not under control (however tenuous, its still spelled out in the user agreements) of a megacorp?
i dont know if there are enough answers supplied or services easy to find with azure yet, but i dont have the experience necessary, with the platform, to make an empirical judgement call. i know that having signed up with azure, personally, i cant find any of the "Blockchain as a Service" platforms easily. i guess its a "six of one, half dozen of the other" sorta thing. it comes down to how much PRIVACY do we give away as an independent blockchain and cryptocurrency to have the convenience of a microsoft run and supported development environment?