I used to respect you on here, but this is just going deep south crazytown.
Dogie doesnt need to prove shit to you, or spondoolies. He just has to prove it in court (which bitcointalk clearly is not). The fact he removed 3 words from a post is you grasping at straws to somehow discredit him when theres a huge amount of proof that spondoolies owes him and others money for referrals/commissions. (again, spondoolies-tech must have been drunk when they throught 5,10,15% commission tiers were a smart idea, because that probably was the entire profit margin (or more) on producing the SP3x/SP20 product line)
I mean, who the fuck cares if dogie pays his lawyer up front? What do you have to gain by him proving it, and what does he have to gain by proving it? If anyting, it just provides spondoolies more ammunition to fight his claim in court, and witholding sensitive information is a smart move.
The main point about this is that dogie lied and that nobody seems to care that much. He doesn't need to prove anything to me or to the forum and he should resolve his SP-Tech issues using the legal way, not whining and throwing bullshit in all directions, but the thing is that he insisted in trying to prove something
which turned to be a lie! If he did it in the past or if he will do it again we don't know, but he should be treated accordingly. For example
I am sure that none of the HF customers will believe anything that cypherdoc says now about ASIC chips and about technology start-ups! Why should we still believe what dogie has to say from now on once he was caught lying? Especially about something that could be solved by a legal third party in his favor or against him. Is it safe to assume that even if he wins anything maybe some details will not fully correspond with what dogie related? What if he exaggerated some stuff about this issue?
I think I should start lying about any company since it seems that if you have any kind of respect here people will not question whatever you are stating!It should be noted that I don't have any details, as some of you may thing, I am just extrapolating something about a shady character.
We do know that he refuses to show any tangible proof so that makes it a lie in my eyes. By the same judgement he can say that he is being owned $1000 or $1M!
Are you kidding? hes not trying to sell you something, he has no need to prove shit to you. Unlike SP-Tech, who maintained for months that an SP50 was in the works, and used that lie to bolster the BTCS share price by nearly 30% before they sold off and declared bankruptcy (royally screwing over BTCS and shareholders in the process).
[/quote]
Do you know for a fact that another chip wasn't in the works?
I think he sold the RoadStress account to one of the many trolls on here. Tupsu was always outlandish but RoadStress was at least trustworthy at one point.
Least trustworthy for asking some questions? Ok. I can live with that. The same way you are living with your lies and with your bullshit!
And this account is not for sale! Unless Satoshi wants to dump his 1M
BTC stash for it
Indeed! A whole 0.12 BTC to shut him up ROFL! Really??!! It's amazing that forum readers are accepting your retard arguments. Well done! You managed to hypnotize everyone!
Tupsu gets it
