That's the story of the whole alt scene mate...
It is a pity if that is the case because it is not doing the alt scene any good.
Topic: [ANN] [SWIFT] BitSwift |https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=922982.msg101316 - page 92. (Read 268399 times)
October 07, 2014, 03:37:00 PM
It is a pity if that is the case because it is not doing the alt scene any good.
October 07, 2014, 03:36:11 PM
Not natural at all mate, I've been in on some of these things. Not sure as if I believe the zemerovka fellow although he describes a boilerroom penny stock pit quite perfectly. Things are odd. I'm taking screen shots here, have a feeling these posts will do a disappearing act in favor of more happy munchkins or whatever those are at the top of the page.
What concerns me is an analysis of the sell side on Bittrex. The top 50 sells are mostly the following amounts 11.25011144, 17.31611584, 22.87033684 and 32.87033684. There is nothing like a straight line in nature. What I mean with this is the sell side is a manipulation of small amounts, probably bait to take the price up. I don't have a good gut feel about this. There must at least be several other amounts mixed in-between to make it more natural (hint-hint to whoever is doing the manipulation). The buy side on the other hand is more natural with many mixed amounts, meaning it the people buying are not manipulating.
I know this is hypothetical, but what if a large portion of the ICO was bought by one person with lots of BTC lets say 200+/320 of the ICO, explaining the quick sellout. If this person withholds his sell orders (explaining the low sells) but puts little bait amounts of the increments mentioned above until the buy side is loaded with buy orders to the total of his investment of lets say 200 BTC at amounts >8000 sats. I just get a gut feeling that someone is sitting with a finger on the trigger but no-one know when the trigger will be pulled. I really hope I am wrong, but that sell side just does not look natural.
I know this is hypothetical, but what if a large portion of the ICO was bought by one person with lots of BTC lets say 200+/320 of the ICO, explaining the quick sellout. If this person withholds his sell orders (explaining the low sells) but puts little bait amounts of the increments mentioned above until the buy side is loaded with buy orders to the total of his investment of lets say 200 BTC at amounts >8000 sats. I just get a gut feeling that someone is sitting with a finger on the trigger but no-one know when the trigger will be pulled. I really hope I am wrong, but that sell side just does not look natural.
October 07, 2014, 03:34:40 PM
What concerns me is an analysis of the sell side on Bittrex. The top 50 sells are mostly the following amounts 11.25011144, 17.31611584, 22.87033684 and 32.87033684. There is nothing like a straight line in nature. What I mean with this is the sell side is a manipulation of small amounts, probably bait to take the price up. I don't have a good gut feel about this. There must at least be several other amounts mixed in-between to make it more natural (hint-hint to whoever is doing the manipulation). The buy side on the other hand is more natural with many mixed amounts, meaning it the people buying are not manipulating.
I know this is hypothetical, but what if a large portion of the ICO was bought by one person with lots of BTC lets say 200+/320 of the ICO, explaining the quick sellout. If this person withholds his sell orders (explaining the low sells) but puts little bait amounts of the increments mentioned above until the buy side is loaded with buy orders to the total of his investment of lets say 200 BTC at amounts >8000 sats. I just get a gut feeling that someone is sitting with a finger on the trigger but no-one know when the trigger will be pulled. I really hope I am wrong, but that sell side just does not look natural.
Maybe the guy doing the manipulation should just stop doing that so that the good gut feeling can come back.
I know this is hypothetical, but what if a large portion of the ICO was bought by one person with lots of BTC lets say 200+/320 of the ICO, explaining the quick sellout. If this person withholds his sell orders (explaining the low sells) but puts little bait amounts of the increments mentioned above until the buy side is loaded with buy orders to the total of his investment of lets say 200 BTC at amounts >8000 sats. I just get a gut feeling that someone is sitting with a finger on the trigger but no-one know when the trigger will be pulled. I really hope I am wrong, but that sell side just does not look natural.
Maybe the guy doing the manipulation should just stop doing that so that the good gut feeling can come back.
That's the story of the whole alt scene mate...
October 07, 2014, 03:29:55 PM
What concerns me is an analysis of the sell side on Bittrex. The top 50 sells are mostly the following amounts 11.25011144, 17.31611584, 22.87033684 and 32.87033684. There is nothing like a straight line in nature. What I mean with this is the sell side is a manipulation of small amounts, probably bait to take the price up. I don't have a good gut feel about this. There must at least be several other amounts mixed in-between to make it more natural (hint-hint to whoever is doing the manipulation). The buy side on the other hand is more natural with many mixed amounts, meaning it the people buying are not manipulating.
I know this is hypothetical, but what if a large portion of the ICO was bought by one person with lots of BTC lets say 200+/320 of the ICO, explaining the quick sellout. If this person withholds his sell orders (explaining the low sells) but puts little bait amounts of the increments mentioned above until the buy side is loaded with buy orders to the total of his investment of lets say 200 BTC at amounts >8000 sats. I just get a gut feeling that someone is sitting with a finger on the trigger but no-one know when the trigger will be pulled. I really hope I am wrong, but that sell side just does not look natural.
Maybe the guy doing the manipulation should just stop doing that so that the good gut feeling can come back.
I know this is hypothetical, but what if a large portion of the ICO was bought by one person with lots of BTC lets say 200+/320 of the ICO, explaining the quick sellout. If this person withholds his sell orders (explaining the low sells) but puts little bait amounts of the increments mentioned above until the buy side is loaded with buy orders to the total of his investment of lets say 200 BTC at amounts >8000 sats. I just get a gut feeling that someone is sitting with a finger on the trigger but no-one know when the trigger will be pulled. I really hope I am wrong, but that sell side just does not look natural.
Maybe the guy doing the manipulation should just stop doing that so that the good gut feeling can come back.
October 07, 2014, 03:26:07 PM
I've been known to toss some FUD but this fellow takes the grand prize. Bloody creative writing. All those buys for 11.25011144 are a little odd ... who chooses that number over and over again? 17.31611584 is also a strange number to randomly come up with ...
We all know there are bots buying... Bittrex has a major bot problem. Outside of the bots, when a coin is just that good, it really doesn't matter... Look at Stealthcoin buying history as an example...
October 07, 2014, 03:19:02 PM
The FUD... Ohh my... I think we are seeing a new kind of FUD attempt...
All it's doing is pushing the price higher!!!
All it's doing is pushing the price higher!!!
October 07, 2014, 03:14:22 PM
you have to much time on your hands 
October 07, 2014, 02:51:05 PM
Gimme 3 reasons why I should HODL (and dont mention PoD)
1.Because there is no downtrend, so selling means you are out or buy back higher
2.There is no good reason to sell right now with all the updates and good news
3.You should sell if you want to make some buyer happy
October 07, 2014, 02:39:58 PM
Gimme 3 reasons why I should HODL (and dont mention PoD)
October 07, 2014, 02:35:23 PM
My face when looking at the Bitswift price every couple of hours
October 07, 2014, 02:25:19 PM
October 07, 2014, 01:49:22 PM
Rumors are out there that the chinese market is on to this coin. If this is true, do not expect 'normal' chart behaviors. To a certain extent, this may explain what we are already seeing.
October 07, 2014, 01:40:22 PM
I think there is a direct correlation between the amount of Taylor Swift pics in this ANN and the coin price.
Moar Taylor. Moar legs plz.
Moar Taylor. Moar legs plz.
October 07, 2014, 01:31:23 PM
Well, those 21k market buys from a few hrs ago are already paying off. 
30k soon?
30k soon?
October 07, 2014, 01:27:37 PM
good devs and good features comes.
Like every other coin out there
October 07, 2014, 01:23:38 PM
Bob told his group to dump it at 30. get ready for the free fall. You have been warned.
October 07, 2014, 01:13:14 PM
good devs and good features comes.
Like every other coin out there
October 07, 2014, 01:05:20 PM
This will attract moor investors!!
October 07, 2014, 12:46:36 PM
Jump to: