I don't get it... There are a total of 2 billion coins and the IPO price is 518 satoshi??? So, market cap is over 10,000 BTC even before launch???
I see some really good features but is it not too much to start with???
Topic: [ANN] Syscoin - Business on the Blockchain - LAUNCHED! - page 278. (Read 490241 times)
it is almost 8.15,people are panic buying!
I messed up my preorder buy by .0002
How can I fix this?
How can I fix this?
you will need to send .0002 to that address.. sounds like u missed the .0002 that bittrex takes
I messed up my preorder buy by .0002
How can I fix this?
How can I fix this?
Buying is accelerating.. won't be long now
Why don't you guys go for listing on other exchanges since the community wants it? I know you guys have a partnership with Moolah.io, but you can ask the others to add which makes it more likely they will.
What's the point about the whales and such ? IPO is capped at 25 BTC per emails and what not ? There barely is any 25 BTC action and the IPO is coming to an end. Are we expecting someone to dump 100's of BTC in order to cause panic or what ?
FUD incoming already?
FUD incoming already?
i bought more of the presale but my btc i sent went across an orphaned block. it has been 2 hours so far and my btc has not confirmed yet as its fixing itself before it goes through another block.. is my order now messed up?
Nice job on the ann thread, it looks great!
Before investing more, I'd like something clarified:
The only coins that seem to die or go < IPO price nowadays are coins that weren't put on a proper (high volume and that people are comfortable with) exchange at launch.
Now initially I was super pumped because Moolah.io bought mintpal, so surely we'd see the kickoff to high volume great mintpal days of old and SYS would kick it off. Now it is my understanding the coin will only be available on Moolah.io's exchange at launch. I have checked their exchange and as of this writing, Moolah.io literally has 0 btc volume on their exchange. Imagine the btc needed to keep this coin at or above ipo price, now why would we accept this? Also, this exchange requires an SMS # for 2FA, many of us in the crypto world are uncomfortable with that since we use authy/google.
I mean, I get it, they want to force btc volume to their own exchange and see this as an opportunity, but this is not ok for me as an investor. How much money is enough? I'm asking that this be re-analyzed and addressed and hope others in the community think about this and demand the same.
The only coins that seem to die or go < IPO price nowadays are coins that weren't put on a proper (high volume and that people are comfortable with) exchange at launch.
Now initially I was super pumped because Moolah.io bought mintpal, so surely we'd see the kickoff to high volume great mintpal days of old and SYS would kick it off. Now it is my understanding the coin will only be available on Moolah.io's exchange at launch. I have checked their exchange and as of this writing, Moolah.io literally has 0 btc volume on their exchange. Imagine the btc needed to keep this coin at or above ipo price, now why would we accept this? Also, this exchange requires an SMS # for 2FA, many of us in the crypto world are uncomfortable with that since we use authy/google.
I mean, I get it, they want to force btc volume to their own exchange and see this as an opportunity, but this is not ok for me as an investor. How much money is enough? I'm asking that this be re-analyzed and addressed and hope others in the community think about this and demand the same.
Very valid point you bring up
This is a very valid quote
what do u think this coin will go for?
To clarify something: Syscoin IPO investors will be importing our private key from Moolah to an existing BTC wallet, correct?
On Saturday we will be able to download the Syscoin wallet (probably password protected). Then moolah e-mails everyone and we can get the wallet.dat or keypair.
The password will be released and we can access the wallet and get to our coins.
To clarify something: Syscoin IPO investors will be importing our private key from Moolah to an existing BTC wallet, correct?
I’ve been watching this thread for only a week now, wow a lot of development work has gone into this coin. Always good to see Dev’s willing to name themselves and just love the idea that anyone can become a certificate issuer, but this project will take time to build and must therefore be seen as a long term investment. Sure; you will always get some investors dumping if just to get a certain % of their initial investment back depending to what formula they are working with, but the market will correct this IN TIME. I missed the earlier announcement (I’ve yet to find an alt coin calendar that I can bloody rely on)
So I missed the “Early Bird Price”, but have been impressed with what I have seen and can see the potential that this coin has, so am happy at even paying the “Regular Price” of 0.00000518BTC/SYS. This to me is still a bargin.As for myself, I will be holding
That question has actually has been posed to the devs a couple of times. It's even alluded to in the OP (italics mine):
Q: What do you mean when you say Moolah will be the exclusive exchange? Will Syscoin not be on other exchanges?
A: We have a partnership with Moolah and will be coordinating with them to get Syscoin on all of their platforms [including exchange] at launch as part of this partnership. This doesn't mean other exchanges can't add us. We're just working directly with Moolah in a much larger sense to try to make Syscoin's capabilities more accessible to the masses so their's will be the first exchange we are listed on.
I'm fairly certain that other exchanges such as Bittrex and Cryptsy will pick up Syscoin almost immediately after launch. Bittrex adds everything it seems!
And I think that we as a community can drop some emails or make some votes just to make the whole process faster.
Q: What do you mean when you say Moolah will be the exclusive exchange? Will Syscoin not be on other exchanges?
A: We have a partnership with Moolah and will be coordinating with them to get Syscoin on all of their platforms [including exchange] at launch as part of this partnership. This doesn't mean other exchanges can't add us. We're just working directly with Moolah in a much larger sense to try to make Syscoin's capabilities more accessible to the masses so their's will be the first exchange we are listed on.
I'm fairly certain that other exchanges such as Bittrex and Cryptsy will pick up Syscoin almost immediately after launch. Bittrex adds everything it seems!
And I think that we as a community can drop some emails or make some votes just to make the whole process faster. Before investing more, I'd like something clarified:
The only coins that seem to die or go < IPO price nowadays are coins that weren't put on a proper (high volume and that people are comfortable with) exchange at launch.
Now initially I was super pumped because Moolah.io bought mintpal, so surely we'd see the kickoff to high volume great mintpal days of old and SYS would kick it off. Now it is my understanding the coin will only be available on Moolah.io's exchange at launch. I have checked their exchange and as of this writing, Moolah.io literally has 0 btc volume on their exchange. Imagine the btc needed to keep this coin at or above ipo price, now why would we accept this? Also, this exchange requires an SMS # for 2FA, many of us in the crypto world are uncomfortable with that since we use authy/google.
I mean, I get it, they want to force btc volume to their own exchange and see this as an opportunity, but this is not ok for me as an investor. How much money is enough? I'm asking that this be re-analyzed and addressed and hope others in the community think about this and demand the same.
The only coins that seem to die or go < IPO price nowadays are coins that weren't put on a proper (high volume and that people are comfortable with) exchange at launch.
Now initially I was super pumped because Moolah.io bought mintpal, so surely we'd see the kickoff to high volume great mintpal days of old and SYS would kick it off. Now it is my understanding the coin will only be available on Moolah.io's exchange at launch. I have checked their exchange and as of this writing, Moolah.io literally has 0 btc volume on their exchange. Imagine the btc needed to keep this coin at or above ipo price, now why would we accept this? Also, this exchange requires an SMS # for 2FA, many of us in the crypto world are uncomfortable with that since we use authy/google.
I mean, I get it, they want to force btc volume to their own exchange and see this as an opportunity, but this is not ok for me as an investor. How much money is enough? I'm asking that this be re-analyzed and addressed and hope others in the community think about this and demand the same.
I agree and believe liquidity & being on a high volume exchange cannot be overlooked.
Would like to see an effort being made to reach out to the exchanges which do have volume and BTC on.
+1 Dev team should srsly consider this, contact some other exchanges like bittrex, poloniex or even MintPal before launch, let them list SYS right after launch, I'm 100% sure they won't want to miss high volume SYS will bring to them.(BUT dev team has to reach them first) Ofc it's important to focus tech developments before launch, but I think getting listed by proper exchanges is huge for a new coin too.
Before investing more, I'd like something clarified:
The only coins that seem to die or go < IPO price nowadays are coins that weren't put on a proper (high volume and that people are comfortable with) exchange at launch.
Now initially I was super pumped because Moolah.io bought mintpal, so surely we'd see the kickoff to high volume great mintpal days of old and SYS would kick it off. Now it is my understanding the coin will only be available on Moolah.io's exchange at launch. I have checked their exchange and as of this writing, Moolah.io literally has 0 btc volume on their exchange. Imagine the btc needed to keep this coin at or above ipo price, now why would we accept this? Also, this exchange requires an SMS # for 2FA, many of us in the crypto world are uncomfortable with that since we use authy/google.
I mean, I get it, they want to force btc volume to their own exchange and see this as an opportunity, but this is not ok for me as an investor. How much money is enough? I'm asking that this be re-analyzed and addressed and hope others in the community think about this and demand the same.
The only coins that seem to die or go < IPO price nowadays are coins that weren't put on a proper (high volume and that people are comfortable with) exchange at launch.
Now initially I was super pumped because Moolah.io bought mintpal, so surely we'd see the kickoff to high volume great mintpal days of old and SYS would kick it off. Now it is my understanding the coin will only be available on Moolah.io's exchange at launch. I have checked their exchange and as of this writing, Moolah.io literally has 0 btc volume on their exchange. Imagine the btc needed to keep this coin at or above ipo price, now why would we accept this? Also, this exchange requires an SMS # for 2FA, many of us in the crypto world are uncomfortable with that since we use authy/google.
I mean, I get it, they want to force btc volume to their own exchange and see this as an opportunity, but this is not ok for me as an investor. How much money is enough? I'm asking that this be re-analyzed and addressed and hope others in the community think about this and demand the same.
I agree and believe liquidity & being on a high volume exchange soon after launch cannot be overlooked.
Would like to see an effort being made to reach out to exchanges which do have high volume and BTC on.
Before investing more, I'd like something clarified:
The only coins that seem to die or go < IPO price nowadays are coins that weren't put on a proper (high volume and that people are comfortable with) exchange at launch.
Now initially I was super pumped because Moolah.io bought mintpal, so surely we'd see the kickoff to high volume great mintpal days of old and SYS would kick it off. Now it is my understanding the coin will only be available on Moolah.io's exchange at launch. I have checked their exchange and as of this writing, Moolah.io literally has 0 btc volume on their exchange. Imagine the btc needed to keep this coin at or above ipo price, now why would we accept this? Also, this exchange requires an SMS # for 2FA, many of us in the crypto world are uncomfortable with that since we use authy/google.
I mean, I get it, they want to force btc volume to their own exchange and see this as an opportunity, but this is not ok for me as an investor. How much money is enough? I'm asking that this be re-analyzed and addressed and hope others in the community think about this and demand the same.
The only coins that seem to die or go < IPO price nowadays are coins that weren't put on a proper (high volume and that people are comfortable with) exchange at launch.
Now initially I was super pumped because Moolah.io bought mintpal, so surely we'd see the kickoff to high volume great mintpal days of old and SYS would kick it off. Now it is my understanding the coin will only be available on Moolah.io's exchange at launch. I have checked their exchange and as of this writing, Moolah.io literally has 0 btc volume on their exchange. Imagine the btc needed to keep this coin at or above ipo price, now why would we accept this? Also, this exchange requires an SMS # for 2FA, many of us in the crypto world are uncomfortable with that since we use authy/google.
I mean, I get it, they want to force btc volume to their own exchange and see this as an opportunity, but this is not ok for me as an investor. How much money is enough? I'm asking that this be re-analyzed and addressed and hope others in the community think about this and demand the same.
easy answer - don't trade your coins there - the coin will be picked up quickly by cryptsy, poloniex, mintapal or bittrex - I personally could care less what their volume is. It aint my life savings here ya'know?
never risk what you're not prepared to lose.
Before investing more, I'd like something clarified:
The only coins that seem to die or go < IPO price nowadays are coins that weren't put on a proper (high volume and that people are comfortable with) exchange at launch.
Now initially I was super pumped because Moolah.io bought mintpal, so surely we'd see the kickoff to high volume great mintpal days of old and SYS would kick it off. Now it is my understanding the coin will only be available on Moolah.io's exchange at launch. I have checked their exchange and as of this writing, Moolah.io literally has 0 btc volume on their exchange. Imagine the btc needed to keep this coin at or above ipo price, now why would we accept this? Also, this exchange requires an SMS # for 2FA, many of us in the crypto world are uncomfortable with that since we use authy/google.
I mean, I get it, they want to force btc volume to their own exchange and see this as an opportunity, but this is not ok for me as an investor. How much money is enough? I'm asking that this be re-analyzed and addressed and hope others in the community think about this and demand the same.
The only coins that seem to die or go < IPO price nowadays are coins that weren't put on a proper (high volume and that people are comfortable with) exchange at launch.
Now initially I was super pumped because Moolah.io bought mintpal, so surely we'd see the kickoff to high volume great mintpal days of old and SYS would kick it off. Now it is my understanding the coin will only be available on Moolah.io's exchange at launch. I have checked their exchange and as of this writing, Moolah.io literally has 0 btc volume on their exchange. Imagine the btc needed to keep this coin at or above ipo price, now why would we accept this? Also, this exchange requires an SMS # for 2FA, many of us in the crypto world are uncomfortable with that since we use authy/google.
I mean, I get it, they want to force btc volume to their own exchange and see this as an opportunity, but this is not ok for me as an investor. How much money is enough? I'm asking that this be re-analyzed and addressed and hope others in the community think about this and demand the same.
Very valid point you bring up
Before investing more, I'd like something clarified:
The only coins that seem to die or go < IPO price nowadays are coins that weren't put on a proper (high volume and that people are comfortable with) exchange at launch.
Now initially I was super pumped because Moolah.io bought mintpal, so surely we'd see the kickoff to high volume great mintpal days of old and SYS would kick it off. Now it is my understanding the coin will only be available on Moolah.io's exchange at launch. I have checked their exchange and as of this writing, Moolah.io literally has 0 btc volume on their exchange. Imagine the btc needed to keep this coin at or above ipo price, now why would we accept this? Also, this exchange requires an SMS # for 2FA, many of us in the crypto world are uncomfortable with that since we use authy/google.
I mean, I get it, they want to force btc volume to their own exchange and see this as an opportunity, but this is not ok for me as an investor. How much money is enough? I'm asking that this be re-analyzed and addressed and hope others in the community think about this and demand the same.
The only coins that seem to die or go < IPO price nowadays are coins that weren't put on a proper (high volume and that people are comfortable with) exchange at launch.
Now initially I was super pumped because Moolah.io bought mintpal, so surely we'd see the kickoff to high volume great mintpal days of old and SYS would kick it off. Now it is my understanding the coin will only be available on Moolah.io's exchange at launch. I have checked their exchange and as of this writing, Moolah.io literally has 0 btc volume on their exchange. Imagine the btc needed to keep this coin at or above ipo price, now why would we accept this? Also, this exchange requires an SMS # for 2FA, many of us in the crypto world are uncomfortable with that since we use authy/google.
I mean, I get it, they want to force btc volume to their own exchange and see this as an opportunity, but this is not ok for me as an investor. How much money is enough? I'm asking that this be re-analyzed and addressed and hope others in the community think about this and demand the same.
Jump to: