Topic: [ANN] Syscoin - Business on the Blockchain - LAUNCHED! - page 324. (Read 490241 times)

it's a business evaluation; nothing about market cap at all. total valuation looks at to see if the IPO asking price is fair, we are not talking about future market cap. we look at the 10,000 BTC at 100% to see if this is a fair asking price.

IT IS NOT A 6 million market cap right off the batt

I can't answer your questions about adoption, but I can tell you categorically that a contract does NOT have to be notarized to be legal.  A contract is simply an agreement between two or more parties.  It doesn't even have to be written, except in the case of real estate.

How do you make contract legal digitally? In real world, contracts are notarized by notary public to make it legal. Who notarizes Syscoin/

What are plans to increasing for adoption

1 month outlook

3 month outlook

6 month outlook

1 year outlook?

2. Someone said Moolah is 2 days old. Is that true? Can we trust them our money? Is it possible someone created the website to make IPO looks legit?

2. Someone said Moolah is 2 days old. Is that true? Can we trust them our money? Is it possible someone created the website to make IPO looks legit?

You may be right.

I've got two questions though.
1. What will happen to unsold coins.
2. Someone said Moolah is 2 days old. Is that true? Can we trust them our money? Is it possible someone created the website to make IPO looks legit?

Of course you think this, because it coincidentally makes you a LOT more money when Syscoin takes off and you dump, but we aren't doing it. While it may benefit YOU, it would harm the coin in the long term. Investors aren't publishing their wallets and promising to hold like the Syscoin Team. We are NOT DOING THIS. STOP ASKING. You get what you pay for, period. That has not changed, nor will it.

it's a business evaluation; nothing about market cap at all. total valuation looks at to see if the IPO asking price is fair, we are not talking about future market cap. we look at the 10,000 BTC at 100% to see if this is a fair asking price.

The problem here is that the price is already set, total coins to be distributed, and total BTC to be expected if all coins are sold.

It should be flexible, IPO like this should follow like what VIA did. Coin price is set by how coins are there to pre-sale divided by how many investors invested.

VIA is like: X / Y = unknown

while

Sys is like : X / Y = Z

All rules are set, no space for the market or people to suggest or what.

Just like Martial law, no democracy lol

I dont think uve been in markets long enough to understand.. its understandable.

that doesn't make any sense. you won't get 15% coins /300. but only 300 btc worth will be given out. u taking this risk and wont cry refund?

It actually makes sense. I guess everything depends on miners then. If they mine fast they might dump lower than IPO price. If they mine slowly they'll be selling higher.

how are people valuing this at 10,000 BTC market cap. multiply coins in circulation by price. 2 billion coins do not exist yet and they will not on launch either so why are people mutliplying max coins by price. im failing to understand. BTC has 21million coins max does that its market cap right now should be 16billion dollars.

the value of a coin can only be valued at coins in existence, how can you value a coin at 10,000btc when there will not be 2billion coins on launch. its is clearly there. mac btc on ipo is 1500btc. so on launch the value of our coin will be 1500btc or less. the rest will be mined over the years. if you can't do simple maths please do not post about market caps

dev i think you might need to start deleting people's post who claim we have 10,000btc market cap at launch as its just clogging up the thread of this school level simple maths. im looking at it at FUD and a pretty lame attempt at it too

You ought to have your calculator handy when you watch ABC’s Shark Tank, the TV show where wealthy angel investors make on-the-spot investments into small businesses.
Last night a middle-aged company owner was offered 3 deals in rapid succession.  For me, this was a simple math problem: Which offer gave the owner the best valuation?
The Offers
Every offer implies what the investor thinks your company is worth: your company’s valuation.  Valuation is not just the total amount of money an investor offers, but the total value of the company implied by that offer. (I’ll do the math for you in a second.)
So which would you chose?  The offers were as follows (you’d get what is bold, the investor receives the rest):
You get $500,000 – Investor takes 20% of the company and a 15% royalty until the investment is paid back
You get $1 million – Investor takes 30% of the company and a 10% royalty until the investment is paid back
You get $4 million  and a 10% royalty forever – Investor takes 100% of the company
The Math
To start, let’s keep the math simple.  If $500,000 is the offer for 20%, then the total valuation is $2,500,00.  That’s the cash paid divided by the percentage purchase, or $500,000 / 20% = $2,500.000.  Do this calculation with each offer, and you’ll see that the base valuations within these three offers are strikingly different:
The first values the total company at just $2.5 million.
The second, at $3.3 million.
The third … at well over the $4 million cash offer since continuing royalties could have netted him many millions more over his lifetime.  In fact, by my calculation, the third offer put the valuation at nearly $6 million.

I think the max price for 15% coins is 300 BTC. It means market cap/project valuation of Sys is 2000 BTC. There's still room for a good profit. I'd invest 1-2 btc in this case. And it's already is very risky. Everything over 300 BTC for 15% is super risky. And 1500 BTC for 15% is just pure madness.

Hmm...well since it looks like the idea is to only mine the amount that is sold during the presale, what will this mean for the mining structure? As in, say only 150 million of the 300 million are sold, will the reward structure stay the same and the same amount of coins be mined daily as if all 300 million were sold? If that's the case, then it definitely does seem to be in the investors' best interest to not see all presale coins sold, as it would give more room for growth due to the reduced market cap and coins available for sale. But then again...if all coins aren't sold, that would imply the price was too high and it would be unlikely that price would sustain at an exchange, right? Or maybe not; just thinking aloud here...