Topic: [ANN] TeamRedMiner v0.10.10 - Ironfish/Kaspa/ZIL/Kawpow/Etchash and More - page 139. (Read 211762 times)

You’ve been unlucky, both with a few more rejected shares than expected and not found as many shares as expected. NiceHash _will_ give you more rejects than direct mining though, I have written about this earlier in the thread, see https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.47525720.

The combination of the pool diff and the time you have been mining gives us a ballpark feeling for if you’re ok and you still need more time, esp if we look at individual gpus, many with only 2-3 shares found at this point.

Do you suggest that I should mine to two different pools/wallet?
One for my 1x vega and one for my 3x 7870 ?

Thanks!

Sorry, not at this time. We will probably pull in OpenSSL at some point. For the time being, a simple xmrig-proxy setup would give you the necessary wire security, then point the miner to the proxy instead. I understand if this feels messy though.

[2018-11-04 19:40:01] Stats GPU 0 - cnv8: 911.8 h/s, avg 907.8 h/s, pool 1.009kh/s 9/0
[2018-11-04 19:40:01] Stats GPU 1 - cnv8: 909.8 h/s, avg 908.1 h/s, pool 740.1 h/s 5/0
[2018-11-04 19:40:01] Stats GPU 2 - cnv8: 802.8 h/s, avg 803.1 h/s, pool 235.5 h/s 3/3
[2018-11-04 19:40:01] Stats GPU 3 - cnv8: 944.8 h/s, avg 942.0 h/s, pool 134.5 h/s 2/0
[2018-11-04 19:40:01] Stats GPU 4 - cnv8: 417.4 h/s, avg 420.4 h/s, pool 403.7 h/s 2/0
[2018-11-04 19:40:01] Stats GPU 5 - cnv8: 410.5 h/s, avg 418.8 h/s, pool 168.2 h/s 4/0
[2018-11-04 19:40:01] Stats GPU 6 - cnv8: 421.5 h/s, avg 420.4 h/s, pool 201.8 h/s 2/0
[2018-11-04 19:40:01] Stats GPU 7 - cnv8: 944.9 h/s, avg 944.4 h/s, pool 874.5 h/s 7/0
[2018-11-04 19:40:01] Stats GPU 8 - cnv8: 911.7 h/s, avg 909.3 h/s, pool 740.0 h/s 8/1
[2018-11-04 19:40:01] Stats GPU 9 - cnv8: 2.021kh/s, avg 2.017kh/s, pool 1.547kh/s 18/0
[2018-11-04 19:40:01] Stats GPU10 - cnv8: 2.031kh/s, avg 2.032kh/s, pool 2.422kh/s 24/0
[2018-11-04 19:40:01] Stats Total - cnv8: 10.73kh/s, avg 10.72kh/s, pool 8.477kh/s

Yeah they are still hashing. Every cards have found shares now. But should the total pool hashrate be that low? Around 8200-8500 H/s average.

The cards seem to be hashing just fine! The poolside hashrate displayed here is based on the accepted shares found per gpu. Don’t know how long you ran before snapping the hashrates, but your Vegas have found 8 vs 7 shares, not that many. The found shares have probably bumped your pool diff as well, making it even more difficult for the smaller cards to find shares at this point.

I’m guessing that when I’m writing this most gpus have found shares?

Hi I have just tested out TeamRedMiner and it gets a little better hashrates than all other Cryptonight-miners out there! Even a little bit less power draw as well.

I'm currently mining to NiceHash and are getting these posts, is it normal not to report hashrate to some cards at pool? Or is it just NiceHash that reports wrong?

[2018-11-04 18:56:59] Stats GPU 0 - cnv8: 906.4 h/s, avg 901.3 h/s, pool 2.557kh/s 6/0
[2018-11-04 18:56:59] Stats GPU 1 - cnv8: 905.5 h/s, avg 900.6 h/s, pool   0.0 h/s 0/0
[2018-11-04 18:56:59] Stats GPU 2 - cnv8: 809.1 h/s, avg 797.9 h/s, pool 255.7 h/s 1/2
[2018-11-04 18:56:59] Stats GPU 3 - cnv8: 944.9 h/s, avg 924.2 h/s, pool   0.0 h/s 0/0
[2018-11-04 18:56:59] Stats GPU 4 - cnv8: 423.5 h/s, avg 418.9 h/s, pool   0.0 h/s 0/0
[2018-11-04 18:56:59] Stats GPU 5 - cnv8: 418.1 h/s, avg 413.7 h/s, pool 767.0 h/s 3/0
[2018-11-04 18:56:59] Stats GPU 6 - cnv8: 422.2 h/s, avg 417.6 h/s, pool   0.0 h/s 0/0
[2018-11-04 18:56:59] Stats GPU 7 - cnv8: 945.0 h/s, avg 939.9 h/s, pool   0.0 h/s 0/0
[2018-11-04 18:56:59] Stats GPU 8 - cnv8: 903.8 h/s, avg 903.3 h/s, pool 1.534kh/s 3/0
[2018-11-04 18:56:59] Stats GPU 9 - cnv8: 2.013kh/s, avg 2.007kh/s, pool 2.557kh/s 8/0
[2018-11-04 18:56:59] Stats GPU10 - cnv8: 2.030kh/s, avg 2.023kh/s, pool 2.557kh/s 7/0
[2018-11-04 18:56:59] Stats Total - cnv8: 10.72kh/s, avg 10.65kh/s, pool 10.23kh/s

Btw,
GPU 0,1,2,8 is Sapphire RX 570 4GB,
GPU 3,7 is Sapphire RX 580 8GB
GPU 4,5,6 is Sapphire RX 560 4GB
GPU 9, 10 is Gigabyte Vega 56

Thanks!

Hi! Is there a ssl tls support? I can't find how to write it in start_cnv8.bat
Thanks!

If you have pasted straps from 1500 to the higher ones, i would say its bad straps. Try running it on 1 card, which you have flashed the stock BIOS before that.

18.6.1

I'll start running tests tonight for these 0 h/s init issues. May I ask what driver you're using?

Yes, with X.
I tried. It did'nt help.

Also, i get 0 h/s for most of the cards.
Only 1 or 2  cards from each start mining.

I tried to run the miner with stock clocks and voltages, with config 2+2...  Nothing helps.
Strange thing is that i can mine on my rigs without any problems ethash or Cryptonight v7, but have problems with v8.
SRB crashes out in 1-2 hours, TRM gives 0 h/s on almost all cards.

it is still working, tho i have quite high lost shares - lie 2-3% will test supportxmr pool then.

on point. anyway, still the best miner out there. please keep improving. thanks

It's always unfair when honest users are effected and have done nothing wrong, fully agree there! Our uptime on the dev fee mechanism has been > 99.9% since the inception of this miner (as a lyra2z miner only, called tdxminer), the last week has been out of the ordinary...

The problem is that it's impossible to separate the case of our server being down from someone blocking us on purpose anywhere in the network layer. Hence, the crude mechanism.

You can make sure our incentives are aligned in having as close to zero downtime as possible though. The user loses a little bit of hashrate, but at the same time, we're losing all our dev fee, -100%, across all coins. The fluctuations you're mentioning seem way too high, need to test it.

Again, sincerest apologies to all miners!

This is so annoying. You would expect a pool like nanopool to have a better stratum implementation. The reason you include the "id" in each message is to support an asynchronous flow where the miner can send multiple messages quickly with different ids, then map each response received to the corresponding message sent using the id in each response.

But, Nanopool doesn't support multiple outstanding messages, they always send the id of the last received message. So, I'm guessing what happened was that you sent two shares in quick succession, id 3 and 4. Nanopool sends two replies, both with id 4, which is a broken implementation. We can't map the second reply, because we've already seen a reply for id 4, and fail to process the message.

We will fix this in the next 1-2 days. Supportxmr works fine.

Just so I understand, is the miner still mining ok with this error message, or it doesn't work at all? As long as its for shares only, we will lose track of a few shares, and our poolside hashrate in the miner will be a little lower, but everything is otherwise working ok.

Hey peteris-apse and all other miners!

We had some issues with our dev fee mechanism both last night and the last ~60 mins. Different reasons, and the last one was outside of our control although we need to handle it better. I daresay it's very rare and you should not be expecting it.

The power consumption has been documented and described earlier in the thread, I don't want to repeat it here. See my response to pbfarmer earlier for an explanation. It will be addressed for sure. We might do a poor mans solution first and release within 1-2 days, pending tests to verify it addresses the issue in a decent way.

also I am having this error
anything I can do about it?

yeah, seems dev pool has problem. isnt it a little unfair if miner reduced where the reason is out of our control?

Have this error all the time. Is it messing with my hashrate?
I dont want to block anything. I am mining on nanopool with hiveos. Can we fix this? For me it seems that miner trys to connect to dev pool all the time therefore is messing with hashrate. It is fluctuating from 6 to 11mhs one rig.

edit: Also same errors at same time on Windows rig with vega. With the hashrate also power consumption is also fluctuating for all rigs mining monero at same time.

Am I right or is this considered to be normal?

All cards are 4GB.

Cards in order are:

RX 570 Gigabyte Aorus
RX 580 Red Dragon
RX 580 MSI Gaming X
RX 580 MSI Gaming X

I am core bottlenecked at around 1280-1300Mhz for all 4 cards.

The straps are not public.

Also, more on the Dev Pool connection.

After even restarting the rig, issue persists, along with new message.