Its not done....i have two devs now who are looking into it...one is a well know dev.
So are we about to see the birth of XVC CLASSIC?
You guys going to stick a massive fork up John Connor's Crazy Ass?
Topic: [ANN] The XVC take over! ICO. Collect BTC for expensive devs. - page 5. (Read 8494 times)
December 01, 2016, 10:46:48 AM
So are we about to see the birth of XVC CLASSIC?
You guys going to stick a massive fork up John Connor's Crazy Ass?
December 01, 2016, 10:32:28 AM
Its not done....i have two devs now who are looking into it...one is a well know dev.
December 01, 2016, 08:53:43 AM
oh damn VCASH VANILA COIN is dead, lucky i sold long time ago,lol
Smart guy. I hold some but I think its done. December 01, 2016, 08:01:49 AM
please do something to revive this coin, start some promotion, give-aways and anything that will help for the exposure of this reinvented coin,
it's life is still on your hands.
it's life is still on your hands.
December 01, 2016, 07:08:23 AM
oh damn VCASH VANILA COIN is dead, lucky i sold long time ago,lol
December 01, 2016, 07:03:48 AM
I have found a dev who is going to look at it. Also another one has knocked at my door. Lets fork this shit
If it that easy to fork it then I'm sure it would have been done by now. Is that what wbb have done because I notice their features are similar or are they using a different approach?
Either way I hope they can revive this coin a bit lots of people put their faith in this coin and must be pretty damaged financially about now. I don't think JC can come back from this.
WBB?
Did they fork Vcash?
errrmm WUT?
December 01, 2016, 07:00:18 AM
I Hope , but I think this shit is done.
December 01, 2016, 06:04:00 AM
We dont need JC. He is to fragile and should take his meds
December 01, 2016, 05:55:43 AM
I have found a dev who is going to look at it. Also another one has knocked at my door. Lets fork this shit
If it that easy to fork it then I'm sure it would have been done by now. Is that what wbb have done because I notice their features are similar or are they using a different approach?
Either way I hope they can revive this coin a bit lots of people put their faith in this coin and must be pretty damaged financially about now. I don't think JC can come back from this.
December 01, 2016, 05:37:41 AM
I have found a dev who is going to look at it. Also another one has knocked at my door. Lets fork this shit
December 01, 2016, 05:24:08 AM
How about just create a new genesis block and call it chocolatecoin?
Won't work, all his backdoors / tricks are still in the code - the code can't be trusted in its current state.
lol you are fast.. lurking in slack? if you cannot protect your pool dont come here bashing with fud like a ctr shill
if you can point us to 1 backdoor you can earn some respect back
Oh sorry I missed who you are
Obviously he was able to fork off pools/miners from "his" chain without even having more than 51% of the network, if that is not evidence enough.. Well..
And no, it wasn't only my pool
What do you mean by "protecting a pool" ? I'm running pools for years and I know very well how to "protect" them, or was anything hacked ? He forked off and banned the node(s) of my pool three times, invalidating blocks on the pool even while the pool had a lot more than 50 % of the network.
He was claiming the pool's p2p node was "open" - well.. A p2p port is designed to be open, isn't it ?
The RPC port is the port which needs to be protected and XVC doesn't even have password authentication for the RPC port neither does it have host-based access restrictions.. Every bitcoin based wallet has that since the very first version.. (rpcallowip... rpcusername/password etc) ... So the only way of protecting a XVC wallet is by making it listen on 127.0.0.1 only and having iptables rules in place. December 01, 2016, 05:22:12 AM
Scumbag bagholder with no vision, that bought at 40k, wants to initiate a community take over, and an ICO on top of that. I mean, what could go wrong ?
Who are you referring to?
December 01, 2016, 05:08:32 AM
Totally Rekt!
December 01, 2016, 04:57:06 AM
Scumbag bagholder with no vision that bought at 40k wants to initiate a community take over, and an ICO on top of that. I mean, what could go wrong ?
November 30, 2016, 11:15:34 PM
Someone tell me all the coins the dev John Connor has been involved in before, i am sure there has been several.
He was behind NUD: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/nud-new-universal-dollar-bcrypt-0-pre-mine-first-anonymous-crypto-640933
November 30, 2016, 11:07:01 PM
Someone tell me all the coins the dev John Connor has been involved in before, i am sure there has been several.
November 30, 2016, 09:24:11 PM
How about just create a new genesis block and call it chocolatecoin?
Won't work, all his backdoors / tricks are still in the code - the code can't be trusted in its current state.
lol you are fast.. lurking in slack? if you cannot protect your pool dont come here bashing with fud like a ctr shill
if you can point us to 1 backdoor you can earn some respect back
November 30, 2016, 08:58:42 PM
I think it's best to wait a bit, let's wait another 1 week, I think it's best to delete this topic, if JC read can give a lot of shit
November 30, 2016, 08:54:22 PM
i do recall hearing john talk of modifying the code in such a way that it could note be cloned, im sure there would be backdoors or traps involve, would be rather risky without an intense full code audit.
November 30, 2016, 08:49:42 PM
I've thought about this, but it would be necessary to fork away from "his" code into a trusted coinbase setup as he simply could have coded too many "backdoors" into his code.. It was him obviously very easy possible to fork off pools and bigger miners from "his" chain and make "his" chain the valid one, even if the "bad pool" had much more power than him, this should never be possible for any coin.. not with > 51% of the power of the net and of course not with less..
I see lots of problems with the current code.
I see lots of problems with the current code.
What problems in the current code?
Jump to: