Retardée, it is shown into blockchain that it is not doing mixing, laundry or whatever.
This poor guy sent 10000685.379729 from Ef1iTBw3sceL1FmcN1AT1be2QRCEFeozk8 to ERRGDnouHgZCGYnahkX6fyEhRKK1LKBp6H with "anonymi" check, with the aim of an true anonymous tx.
If you have got functional eyes and a medium size brain of standard chimp, you can see that coins are sent directly from "from" address Ef1iTBw3sceL1FmcN1AT1be2QRCEFeozk8 to "to" address ERRGDnouHgZCGYnahkX6fyEhRKK1LKBp6H ; no mixing is done at all.
26f66790cd8fb01690ac72493008d5467baf0719456d319ac8ebb798df8025d7
Simply this feature does not exist yet, invisibel just ribbed us.
Sounds like that poor guy forgot to make sure the box was checked, because if it was then the coins would only be sent to a mixer, unless there are none available where it'll give the user an error message.This poor guy sent 10000685.379729 from Ef1iTBw3sceL1FmcN1AT1be2QRCEFeozk8 to ERRGDnouHgZCGYnahkX6fyEhRKK1LKBp6H with "anonymi" check, with the aim of an true anonymous tx.
If you have got functional eyes and a medium size brain of standard chimp, you can see that coins are sent directly from "from" address Ef1iTBw3sceL1FmcN1AT1be2QRCEFeozk8 to "to" address ERRGDnouHgZCGYnahkX6fyEhRKK1LKBp6H ; no mixing is done at all.
26f66790cd8fb01690ac72493008d5467baf0719456d319ac8ebb798df8025d7
Simply this feature does not exist yet, invisibel just ribbed us.
I wonder who people will believe, the coin developer and source code, or that one guy who keeps trying to shit up the thread? You could have at least made a new sockpuppet account...
Anyway sorry for the absence guys, away visiting family right now, I'll look over everything that's been posted once I get back.
Edit: actually johnny I just looked that that link, it looks like he only sent 10.2 coins through the mixer, with the 10000685 coins being sent back to the sender as change. 1/10 made me respond.
Edit 2:
By the way, I'm offering a 5 million TiPS bounty to whoever can design the best thread starter OP (see https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-tips-kimotos-gravity-well-world-first-coin-anonymizer-launched-391192) since IMO we need to make it look a bit more professional.
Just post it up as a regular reply here. Bounty ends when I get back (monday/tuesday), whoever gets the most votes from people here wins!
Colleague, you are in denial
REally I was interested in TIPS, but at first I found an account with 2.5 b. being transferred. Ok, it was an 4chan scam.
Next, I have checked out the output of supposed "anonym" tx and according to blockchain, it is not done any mixing or laundering feature at all. tx 26f66790cd8fb01690ac72493008d5467baf0719456d319ac8ebb798df8025d7 http://chain.fedoraco.in/tx/26f66790cd8fb01690ac72493008d5467baf0719456d319ac8ebb798df8025d7 transfers 10000675.379729 TIPS from Ef1iTBw3sceL1FmcN1AT1be2QRCEFeozk8 to ERRGDnouHgZCGYnahkX6fyEhRKK1LKBp6H ... where is the mixing here?
I have analyzed the source code at github and it seems it is implemented info param and so. RPC methods lacks fully of implementation. Check RPC sendto method:
Code:
Value sendtoaddress(const Array& params, const CRPCContext& ctx, bool fHelp)
{ if (fHelp || params.size() < 2 || params.size() > 4)
throw runtime_error(
"sendtoaddress[:mixed] [comment] [comment-to]\n"
"is a real and is rounded to the nearest 0.00000001\n"
"coins can be mixed by appending :mixed to the destination address, which will conceal the address you sent them from."
+ HelpRequiringPassphrase(ctx));
string strAddress = params[0].get_str();
size_t iSeperator = strAddress.find_last_of(":");
bool bMixCoins = false;
if (iSeperator != std::string::npos)
{
string action = strAddress.substr(iSeperator+1);
strAddress = strAddress.substr(0, iSeperator);
bMixCoins = boost::iequals(action, "mixed");
}
CBitcoinAddress address(strAddress);
if (!address.IsValid())
throw JSONRPCError(RPC_INVALID_ADDRESS_OR_KEY, "Invalid FedoraCoin address");
// Amount
uint64 nAmount = AmountFromValue(params[1]);
// Wallet comments
CWalletTx wtx;
if (params.size() > 2 && params[2].type() != null_type && !params[2].get_str().empty())
wtx.mapValue["comment"] = params[2].get_str();
if (params.size() > 3 && params[3].type() != null_type && !params[3].get_str().empty())
wtx.mapValue["to"] = params[3].get_str();
if (ctx.wallet->IsLocked())
throw JSONRPCError(RPC_WALLET_UNLOCK_NEEDED, "Error: Please enter the wallet passphrase with walletpassphrase first.");
string strError = ctx.wallet->SendMoneyToDestination(address.Get(), nAmount, wtx, bMixCoins);
if (strError != "")
throw JSONRPCError(RPC_WALLET_ERROR, strError);
return wtx.GetHash().GetHex();
}
Lines 598-638 https://github.com/fedoracoin/fedoracoin/blob/master/src/rpcwallet.cpp#L598-L638
If you analize the code, it checks the trailing mixing param, updates bMixCoins ... and that is all
REally, invisbel, I am very very disappointed. I did a bit of investment and now I am really disappointed by your delusional and deceptive attitude.
I hope this misunderstanding be solved as soon as posible.
Regards
