Author

Topic: [ANN] [TRST] WeTrust - For the People, By the People! - page 230. (Read 275520 times)

hero member
Activity: 658
Merit: 500
Do this team have a way of checking multiple registration i their bounty especially the social media bounty. 70% of those accounts are multiple/bots/fake accounts and the goal you want to achieved would be defected. The team need to see to this.
sr. member
Activity: 464
Merit: 250
I don't have a blog. but as you know that it is a nice article many sites and have unlimited reader
one example steemit
but it's up to you guys to sir want to be held or not.
I just make a suggestion if a lot of the writing about "we trust" would be better
Almost all ICO have a blog/news article bounty program. I believe that this is not a waste of money. From this there is a benefit.
There is a benefit when articles are in good quality and this is difficult to check when they are written in different languages. And what if some people will produce great ammount of articles on the very end of ICO? How this behavior can be benefit for the project? Such things took place in Iconomi ICO.
Articles are good but hard to manage.
full member
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
POPULOUS
I don't have a blog. but as you know that it is a nice article many sites and have unlimited reader
one example steemit
but it's up to you guys to sir want to be held or not.
I just make a suggestion if a lot of the writing about "we trust" would be better
Almost all ICO have a blog/news article bounty program. I believe that this is not a waste of money. From this there is a benefit.
full member
Activity: 289
Merit: 100
1500BTC minimum would be quite hard to achieve given the high rate of bitcoin.Also people like to diversify their investment portfolio so they do not put all their eggs in one basket.I think the minimum limit should be adjusted with high bitcoin price

@zahra4577: We think 1,500 BTC is fair and necessary to develop the features we're looking to build. It may be adjusted slightly if BTC takes a sharp turn upwards, but at this point, we will keep it at 1,500 BTC.

Yes 1,500 btc is a little bit suspicious. That is so much money. Sorry but I can't see how you can justify that. That is just crazy. You will never have to work ever again with that kind of money.

For major projects 1,500 BTC is not too big some projects ICO can collect 2,000 BTC in 2 days so why not
What is needed now is an optimistic look at how the market reaction to this project

Aim high, who knows the project will just get what it needs to proceed with the project. I would like to see as well what the team can deliver given they raise the minimum or if they get the maximum or somewhere in between.

our high aim will lead to us for good effort and this good effort lead to us our top..
I have a suggestion to the DEV to make bounty blog/review
because I think it will be more visitors viewed this project as seen from the large number who wrote about this project
It was very helpful to this project will be a success if it wants to be realized
I hope the team listen to this
and I am ready to participate. hehe

@dongajow: if we create a bounty for blog/review, where would you publish your article? do you have a blog? please describe in more detail how this would work, we can better evaluate whether or not we should create this bounty Smiley
I don't have a blog. but as you know that it is a nice article many sites and have unlimited reader
one example steemit
but it's up to you guys to sir want to be held or not.
I just make a suggestion if a lot of the writing about "we trust" would be better
legendary
Activity: 3178
Merit: 1054



investor's token and bounties are not safe until it gets released after the ICO. so lon as its not released and token isn't listed to some exchange, this will always end up like ark, decent and tokes token which can be just as a scam.
full member
Activity: 434
Merit: 100
Strategy & Operations at WeTrust
What will be on begining ICO price?

@sunce33: Final price of the coin will be determinant on the total amount raised.
legendary
Activity: 2394
Merit: 1049
Smart is not enough, there must be skills
limiting signups to Bitcointalk members with a rank of Jr. Member and above  Wink good
sr. member
Activity: 728
Merit: 250
Security and Privacy Features on the Blockchain
Remember the rules

Quote
we will be limiting signups to Bitcointalk members with a rank of Jr. Member and above.
hero member
Activity: 1974
Merit: 592
What will be on begining ICO price?
newbie
Activity: 40
Merit: 0
1500BTC minimum would be quite hard to achieve given the high rate of bitcoin.Also people like to diversify their investment portfolio so they do not put all their eggs in one basket.I think the minimum limit should be adjusted with high bitcoin price

@zahra4577: We think 1,500 BTC is fair and necessary to develop the features we're looking to build. It may be adjusted slightly if BTC takes a sharp turn upwards, but at this point, we will keep it at 1,500 BTC.

Yes 1,500 btc is a little bit suspicious. That is so much money. Sorry but I can't see how you can justify that. That is just crazy. You will never have to work ever again with that kind of money.

For major projects 1,500 BTC is not too big some projects ICO can collect 2,000 BTC in 2 days so why not
What is needed now is an optimistic look at how the market reaction to this project

Aim high, who knows the project will just get what it needs to proceed with the project. I would like to see as well what the team can deliver given they raise the minimum or if they get the maximum or somewhere in between.

our high aim will lead to us for good effort and this good effort lead to us our top..
I have a suggestion to the DEV to make bounty blog/review
because I think it will be more visitors viewed this project as seen from the large number who wrote about this project
It was very helpful to this project will be a success if it wants to be realized
I hope the team listen to this
and I am ready to participate. hehe

@dongajow: if we create a bounty for blog/review, where would you publish your article? do you have a blog? please describe in more detail how this would work, we can better evaluate whether or not we should create this bounty Smiley
sr. member
Activity: 457
Merit: 250
Generation Blockchain.
1500BTC minimum would be quite hard to achieve given the high rate of bitcoin.Also people like to diversify their investment portfolio so they do not put all their eggs in one basket.I think the minimum limit should be adjusted with high bitcoin price

@zahra4577: We think 1,500 BTC is fair and necessary to develop the features we're looking to build. It may be adjusted slightly if BTC takes a sharp turn upwards, but at this point, we will keep it at 1,500 BTC.

Yes 1,500 btc is a little bit suspicious. That is so much money. Sorry but I can't see how you can justify that. That is just crazy. You will never have to work ever again with that kind of money.

For major projects 1,500 BTC is not too big some projects ICO can collect 2,000 BTC in 2 days so why not
What is needed now is an optimistic look at how the market reaction to this project

Aim high, who knows the project will just get what it needs to proceed with the project. I would like to see as well what the team can deliver given they raise the minimum or if they get the maximum or somewhere in between.

@menace.bit: The more we raise the longer we will have funding for and will implement more features on our roadmap. 1,500 BTC will sustain our team for about a year and after that, funding will probably run out.


So if you only raise the minimum, that mean you will only deliver up to Q1 2018 Credit Score? And when funding runs out, what will happen? Abandon project or you will try to raise more funds thru another ICO or you sell (or dump) the 10 million allocated to the team to continue further with development?

@menace.bit: We will try our best to meet as many milestones as we can given the funds we get from the crowdsale. When funds run out, we will encourage the community to take over if the team can no longer work full time on the project. We may revert to part time work.

Most likely, there will no additional token sale because we are selling 80% of the total tokens.

it's really dangerious idea , you mean your team just Part-time job but wanna get full pay,once you can not get pay any more ,you all will leave away. dont forget you all get over 1500 BTC , that's not salary but responsibility ,your promise . but now you told us everything .

Look my mouth : you can not be trusted.




with the many members of the team, funds can easily run out. how many of the team members that are known and listed will be working on the project as their full time work? in case fund runs out who will get kicked out first?

with your statement, the outlook on this is not for long term holding.
sr. member
Activity: 854
Merit: 398
@PolyPanto: There was a filter left in the spreadsheet that hid some rows. It is fixed now. I doubled checked and you're showing in the spreadsheet now. Don't worry Twitter has a history and for those who did the work, they will be rewarded. Spreadsheets can be fixed easily.
Hello, I see, what to do we all do mistakes. A lot of people got negative emotions even despite the fact that now it is fixed. Let's hope this won't happen again. Good luck.
full member
Activity: 289
Merit: 100
1500BTC minimum would be quite hard to achieve given the high rate of bitcoin.Also people like to diversify their investment portfolio so they do not put all their eggs in one basket.I think the minimum limit should be adjusted with high bitcoin price

@zahra4577: We think 1,500 BTC is fair and necessary to develop the features we're looking to build. It may be adjusted slightly if BTC takes a sharp turn upwards, but at this point, we will keep it at 1,500 BTC.

Yes 1,500 btc is a little bit suspicious. That is so much money. Sorry but I can't see how you can justify that. That is just crazy. You will never have to work ever again with that kind of money.

For major projects 1,500 BTC is not too big some projects ICO can collect 2,000 BTC in 2 days so why not
What is needed now is an optimistic look at how the market reaction to this project

Aim high, who knows the project will just get what it needs to proceed with the project. I would like to see as well what the team can deliver given they raise the minimum or if they get the maximum or somewhere in between.

our high aim will lead to us for good effort and this good effort lead to us our top..
I have a suggestion to the DEV to make bounty blog/review
because I think it will be more visitors viewed this project as seen from the large number who wrote about this project
It was very helpful to this project will be a success if it wants to be realized
I hope the team listen to this
and I am ready to participate. hehe
full member
Activity: 434
Merit: 100
Strategy & Operations at WeTrust
@PolyPanto: We will be working on it today and hope to update everything for Week 1. You can join our Slack and pose a question in #support if you have any questions. Bitcointalk thread also works, but it can get lost in the jumble.

Hello, this is quite interesting, first there was confusion with the translations and now the same thing with the social media campaigns. I applied to twitter campaign and when it was announced who is approved, I checked and I was in the list, now when I wanted to check the number of stakes I received, I didn't find myself in the list. So based on comments I understood that participants with 1000+ followers mostly excluded. Could you please clarify based on what params people are excluded. Thank you.

@PolyPanto: There was a filter left in the spreadsheet that hid some rows. It is fixed now. I doubled checked and you're showing in the spreadsheet now. Don't worry Twitter has a history and for those who did the work, they will be rewarded. Spreadsheets can be fixed easily.

What started? Like normal talked, but now removed from Twitter bounties list. Why?

@miayama: It is now updated. Please recheck the spreadsheet. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1kGrf4WVLddS8Gni2oD7flc7BFnJv5wAJq21os2PxI98/edit#gid=0

All accounts in Twitter bounties list, who has more than 1000 followers were removed. What is the reason? Do you consider yourself then a professionals and sane team? This will cause distrust of the ICO and to the entire team.

@DISPERADO: It is now updated. Please recheck the spreadsheet. There was a filter we accidentally left on that hid some of the data in the spreadsheet. Everybody's bounties are safe not to worry. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1kGrf4WVLddS8Gni2oD7flc7BFnJv5wAJq21os2PxI98/edit#gid=0

newbie
Activity: 70
Merit: 0
1500BTC minimum would be quite hard to achieve given the high rate of bitcoin.Also people like to diversify their investment portfolio so they do not put all their eggs in one basket.I think the minimum limit should be adjusted with high bitcoin price

@zahra4577: We think 1,500 BTC is fair and necessary to develop the features we're looking to build. It may be adjusted slightly if BTC takes a sharp turn upwards, but at this point, we will keep it at 1,500 BTC.

Yes 1,500 btc is a little bit suspicious. That is so much money. Sorry but I can't see how you can justify that. That is just crazy. You will never have to work ever again with that kind of money.

For major projects 1,500 BTC is not too big some projects ICO can collect 2,000 BTC in 2 days so why not
What is needed now is an optimistic look at how the market reaction to this project

Aim high, who knows the project will just get what it needs to proceed with the project. I would like to see as well what the team can deliver given they raise the minimum or if they get the maximum or somewhere in between.

our high aim will lead to us for good effort and this good effort lead to us our top..
sr. member
Activity: 360
Merit: 250
Nice launch for an insurance platform! I hope all is well with this one  Cheesy
hero member
Activity: 686
Merit: 503
DATABLOCKCHAIN.IO SALE IS LIVE | MVP @ DBC.IO
All accounts in Twitter bounties list, who has more than 1000 followers were removed. What is the reason? Do you consider yourself then a professionals and sane team? This will cause distrust of the ICO and to the entire team.
sr. member
Activity: 358
Merit: 250
What started? Like normal talked, but now removed from Twitter bounties list. Why?
full member
Activity: 289
Merit: 100
1500BTC minimum would be quite hard to achieve given the high rate of bitcoin.Also people like to diversify their investment portfolio so they do not put all their eggs in one basket.I think the minimum limit should be adjusted with high bitcoin price

@zahra4577: We think 1,500 BTC is fair and necessary to develop the features we're looking to build. It may be adjusted slightly if BTC takes a sharp turn upwards, but at this point, we will keep it at 1,500 BTC.

Yes 1,500 btc is a little bit suspicious. That is so much money. Sorry but I can't see how you can justify that. That is just crazy. You will never have to work ever again with that kind of money.

For major projects 1,500 BTC is not too big some projects ICO can collect 2,000 BTC in 2 days so why not
What is needed now is an optimistic look at how the market reaction to this project

Aim high, who knows the project will just get what it needs to proceed with the project. I would like to see as well what the team can deliver given they raise the minimum or if they get the maximum or somewhere in between.

@menace.bit: The more we raise the longer we will have funding for and will implement more features on our roadmap. 1,500 BTC will sustain our team for about a year and after that, funding will probably run out.


So if you only raise the minimum, that mean you will only deliver up to Q1 2018 Credit Score? And when funding runs out, what will happen? Abandon project or you will try to raise more funds thru another ICO or you sell (or dump) the 10 million allocated to the team to continue further with development?

@menace.bit: We will try our best to meet as many milestones as we can given the funds we get from the crowdsale. When funds run out, we will encourage the community to take over if the team can no longer work full time on the project. We may revert to part time work.

Most likely, there will no additional token sale because we are selling 80% of the total tokens.

it's really dangerious idea , you mean your team just Part-time job but wanna get full pay,once you can not get pay any more ,you all will leave away. dont forget you all get over 1500 BTC , that's not salary but responsibility ,your promise . but now you told us everything .

Look my mouth : you can not be trusted.

The funds we raised will be used for the development and growth of the platform. The more we raise, the more fuel we will have to accomplish the milestones. There will be open communication and the community will get frequent updates on our progress.
I hope you don't give false hope
I have always supported the project altcoin
do not underestimate this support sir,
I would like to ask how the Fund "we trust" now?
sr. member
Activity: 972
Merit: 255
Bear season or just the beginning
The coin looks very promosing, but actually the threshold is a bit overvalued and overestimated, you have confidence which is a good thing, but you need to be realistic, 200-500 BTC can be successful, you wanna raise 1500 BTC? Not likely.

It is not too big barrier, particularly as it collected last ICO of such level.

If they have the Chinese whales backing them, then 1500 btc is realizable. And I think most of WeTrust team is composed of Chinese.
Jump to: