I left this comment:
"TrumpCoin has a new official Bitcointalk thread where the development team (as seen on trumpcoin.com) has been updating the community on very innovative developments for the project, which includes an exciting and solid roadmap for what’s to come!
You can find this new thread here:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-trump-trumpcoin-superpac-1558916Additionally, please keep in mind there were indeed growing pains as the project matured. Like any serious undertaking, this was bound to happen, especially considering the controversial (but many times necessary) nature of our candidate, Donald J. Trump!
The main allure of TrumpCoin is the fact that if you support Donald Trump’s campaign to become President of the United States, you can indirectly help him achieve this by investing in this unique and one-of-a-kind cryptoPAC! It does not matter where you live in the world; everyone can join in and help out!!
So what are you waiting for? Visit trumpcoin.com and let’s make not only America, but crypto great again!!!"
Hopefully it's high energy enough and gets approved.
It's good, but I was going for a simple, explanatory, straightforward one which lacks any advertising jist.
At the same time using a language that implies full control without being authoritarian.
I understand your point of view, but the diction in that article seems really biased toward aiding FUD and negativity towards this coin. It starts out good enough, but quickly spirals downward after the following sentence: "A browse through the TrumpCoin Bitcointalk thread however produces a feeling of foreboding."
The author obviously didn't do his due diligence in researching the project before writing his piece. I mean, I'm happy he wrote it and got the coin some more exposure, but he could have added more positive aspects of what has been going on lately, instead of dedicating over half of his article to things that occurred months ago.
As for advertising, I felt it was necessary in this situation to correct any misinformation (in this case, the Bitcoin talk thread).
Anyways, I'm surprised my comment got approved. Just hope it's decent enough to spark some interest, at the very least.
And this was just a grassroots contribution. I'm not on the team or anything; I'm just an avid supporter AND investor in TrumpCoin. Thanks.
Well, so am I. I don't even have much coins. But just doing my best, like you, for the cause.
Good job getting it approved. It will surely help.
Btw, really need some posts from devs. Been sometime.
