Topic: [ANN] [U] UCoin丨X15 PoW&PoS | ICO丨Web, iOS and Android wallets丨More features - page 2. (Read 25974 times)
November 08, 2014, 11:35:33 PM
This is one of the more obvious scams
November 08, 2014, 04:02:35 PM
F.A.Q.:
F: What about PoD?
Q: I would like to keep the partial anonymity. Release post will be published under my real bitcointalk account. So I will post my real email, twitter, skype and jabber. Also, I'll pass PoD(after ICO), until I do it, C-CEX not give me bitcoins collected at ICO.
F: What about Roadmap?
Q: Roadmap will be announced on last day of the ICO.
F: Are there any features announced before UCoin release?
Q: Yes, tomorrow we will announce something.
F: What will be released after the release of the coin?
Q:
F: What about PoD?
Q: I would like to keep the partial anonymity. Release post will be published under my real bitcointalk account. So I will post my real email, twitter, skype and jabber. Also, I'll pass PoD(after ICO), until I do it, C-CEX not give me bitcoins collected at ICO.
F: What about Roadmap?
Q: Roadmap will be announced on last day of the ICO.
F: Are there any features announced before UCoin release?
Q: Yes, tomorrow we will announce something.
F: What will be released after the release of the coin?
Q:
- QtWallets for Windows and Linux
- Web Wallet
- UWallet for iOS, Android and Mac
- Sources of coin and UWallets
November 08, 2014, 03:50:27 PM
UWallet for Mac is ready:
November 07, 2014, 07:33:49 PM
Why not post the video you submitted to C-CEX?
Quote
Create a short video introducing yourself and your coin and explain the basic ideas behind it and why it could be successful (optional if POD or CS verification done or in progress).
HUGE RED FLAG
This was literally just changed on the C-CEX website. Pride had told everyone that ICOs MUST submit a video. Now we find out you DID NOT submit a video and the C-CEX rules have changed.
Is C-CEX that is running this ICO? C-CEX has just lost a lot of respect IMO. I will be withdrawing my funds. C-CEX has lied to us and that's a fact.
Don't get equinoxed by an anonymous ICO guys.
Why do you think people will invest in an anomymous ICO? You have got to be crazy.
We felt it was redundant to force all devs when hosting an ICO to do the video if PoD/Coinsource was already in progress, it is not a conspiracy I can assure you.
Hi Pride,
I thought you were a good guy but none of this makes sense to me.
How is it redundant to requires devs to make a video? Did you know coinsource doesn't even have videos of the developers they "verify"? After the equinox ICO disaster coin source released all the information they had. What they gave us was a fake id with a picture of a person that is not the dev. In what way does this replace a video of the developer talking about their coin?
Fact: C-Cex hosts Ucoin on their exchange with the ICO rule that they must provide a video. Dev is questioned about this and asked to post this video. Then C-CEX changes their ICO rules because no video was supplied even though the ICO was already taking place on C-CEX.
Based on this fact, you lied to everyone on your exchange.
You are talking about a coin that I have near zero knowledge of, if you feel like I lied to you then please contact me as my info is public and we can discuss it before tossing out baseless accusations. I was still under the impression that PoD and/or Coinsource was something people looked at for credibility, if this has changed how does that relate to lying? We didn't change the policy due to "Ucoin" we changed it because it was already an internal policy that we needed to make public after reviewing redundancies in work flow. If you want to speak of this further you are welcome to contact me on skype @ Pride C-CEX. This forum is no longer a place for sane dialogues.
I will try to make this very clear for you:
You told everyone a video is required to add an ICO to C-CEX. Ucoin ICO was launched on your exchange with these rules in place. It is only after the developer is questioned about this, do you change the rules on your exchange. In what way did you not lie to your users?
November 07, 2014, 05:44:17 PM
Why not post the video you submitted to C-CEX?
Quote
Create a short video introducing yourself and your coin and explain the basic ideas behind it and why it could be successful (optional if POD or CS verification done or in progress).
HUGE RED FLAG
This was literally just changed on the C-CEX website. Pride had told everyone that ICOs MUST submit a video. Now we find out you DID NOT submit a video and the C-CEX rules have changed.
Is C-CEX that is running this ICO? C-CEX has just lost a lot of respect IMO. I will be withdrawing my funds. C-CEX has lied to us and that's a fact.
Don't get equinoxed by an anonymous ICO guys.
Why do you think people will invest in an anomymous ICO? You have got to be crazy.
We felt it was redundant to force all devs when hosting an ICO to do the video if PoD/Coinsource was already in progress, it is not a conspiracy I can assure you.
Hi Pride,
I thought you were a good guy but none of this makes sense to me.
How is it redundant to requires devs to make a video? Did you know coinsource doesn't even have videos of the developers they "verify"? After the equinox ICO disaster coin source released all the information they had. What they gave us was a fake id with a picture of a person that is not the dev. In what way does this replace a video of the developer talking about their coin?
Fact: C-Cex hosts Ucoin on their exchange with the ICO rule that they must provide a video. Dev is questioned about this and asked to post this video. Then C-CEX changes their ICO rules because no video was supplied even though the ICO was already taking place on C-CEX.
Based on this fact, you lied to everyone on your exchange.
You are talking about a coin that I have near zero knowledge of, if you feel like I lied to you then please contact me as my info is public and we can discuss it before tossing out baseless accusations. I was still under the impression that PoD and/or Coinsource was something people looked at for credibility, if this has changed how does that relate to lying? We didn't change the policy due to "Ucoin" we changed it because it was already an internal policy that we needed to make public after reviewing redundancies in work flow. If you want to speak of this further you are welcome to contact me on skype @ Pride C-CEX. This forum is no longer a place for sane dialogues.
November 07, 2014, 05:14:51 PM
Why not post the video you submitted to C-CEX?
Quote
Create a short video introducing yourself and your coin and explain the basic ideas behind it and why it could be successful (optional if POD or CS verification done or in progress).
HUGE RED FLAG
This was literally just changed on the C-CEX website. Pride had told everyone that ICOs MUST submit a video. Now we find out you DID NOT submit a video and the C-CEX rules have changed.
Is C-CEX that is running this ICO? C-CEX has just lost a lot of respect IMO. I will be withdrawing my funds. C-CEX has lied to us and that's a fact.
Don't get equinoxed by an anonymous ICO guys.
Why do you think people will invest in an anomymous ICO? You have got to be crazy.
We felt it was redundant to force all devs when hosting an ICO to do the video if PoD/Coinsource was already in progress, it is not a conspiracy I can assure you.
Hi Pride,
I thought you were a good guy but none of this makes sense to me.
How is it redundant to requires devs to make a video? Did you know coinsource doesn't even have videos of the developers they "verify"? After the equinox ICO disaster coin source released all the information they had. What they gave us was a fake id with a picture of a person that is not the dev. In what way does this replace a video of the developer talking about their coin?
Fact: C-Cex hosts Ucoin on their exchange with the ICO rule that they must provide a video. Dev is questioned about this and asked to post this video. Then C-CEX changes their ICO rules because no video was supplied even though the ICO was already taking place on C-CEX.
Based on this fact, you lied to everyone on your exchange.
November 07, 2014, 04:06:44 PM
[DEL]
November 07, 2014, 03:34:24 PM
Why not post the video you submitted to C-CEX?
Quote
Create a short video introducing yourself and your coin and explain the basic ideas behind it and why it could be successful (optional if POD or CS verification done or in progress).
HUGE RED FLAG
This was literally just changed on the C-CEX website. Pride had told everyone that ICOs MUST submit a video. Now we find out you DID NOT submit a video and the C-CEX rules have changed.
Is C-CEX that is running this ICO? C-CEX has just lost a lot of respect IMO. I will be withdrawing my funds. C-CEX has lied to us and that's a fact.
Don't get equinoxed by an anonymous ICO guys.
Why do you think people will invest in an anomymous ICO? You have got to be crazy.
We felt it was redundant to force all devs when hosting an ICO to do the video if PoD/Coinsource was already in progress, it is not a conspiracy I can assure you.
November 07, 2014, 01:22:49 PM
Why not post the video you submitted to C-CEX?
Quote
Create a short video introducing yourself and your coin and explain the basic ideas behind it and why it could be successful (optional if POD or CS verification done or in progress).
HUGE RED FLAG
This was literally just changed on the C-CEX website. Pride had told everyone that ICOs MUST submit a video. Now we find out you DID NOT submit a video and the C-CEX rules have changed.
Is C-CEX that is running this ICO? C-CEX has just lost a lot of respect IMO. I will be withdrawing my funds. C-CEX has lied to us and that's a fact.
Don't get equinoxed by an anonymous ICO guys.
Why do you think people will invest in an anomymous ICO? You have got to be crazy.
November 06, 2014, 06:14:16 PM
I will vouch for this dev, he has helped me many times with android apps and is an excellent coder. I remember him starting work on Ucoin months ago so his intentions DO appear to be long term.
Still, premine is to much
November 06, 2014, 03:39:17 PM
I will vouch for this dev, he has helped me many times with android apps and is an excellent coder. I remember him starting work on Ucoin months ago so his intentions DO appear to be long term.
November 06, 2014, 03:11:31 PM
Hi !
Translation into Russian is necessary?
Hi,Translation into Russian is necessary?
It would be good. Reserve for you?
November 06, 2014, 02:54:47 PM
UWallet 1.1 Beta for iOS is ready(will be available after release).
Features:
Screenshots:
Proof-Of-Code:
P.S.: If anyone has ideas to improve the wallet, it is ready to listen.
Good luck
Features:
- Trade through wallet.
- News feed in wallet.
Screenshots:
- http://ucoin.name/pics/uwallet-v2/1.png
- http://ucoin.name/pics/uwallet-v2/2.png
- http://ucoin.name/pics/uwallet-v2/3.png
- http://ucoin.name/pics/uwallet-v2/4.png
- http://ucoin.name/pics/uwallet-v2/5.png
Proof-Of-Code:
P.S.: If anyone has ideas to improve the wallet, it is ready to listen.
Good luck
November 06, 2014, 09:18:06 AM
Hi !
Translation into Russian is necessary?
Translation into Russian is necessary?
November 06, 2014, 08:26:57 AM
November 06, 2014, 08:12:13 AM
Looks interesting. I'll keep an eye on it
November 06, 2014, 07:57:46 AM
Doing Spanish translation.
November 05, 2014, 03:56:13 PM
Anonymous stranger running an ICO
PoD Coming soon. I wrote to CryptoAsian a minute ago. P.S.: We have officially declared that after the end of ICO, we will publish sources and working Qt Wallets, web wallet, UWallet for iOS and Android. If we don't, then C-CEX just don't give us bitcoins.
No one asked for CryptoAsian POD. We the public need to know who your team is in order to invest. What we need is a video of you talking about your coin and who you are.
Why not post the video you submitted to C-CEX?
Why not post the video you submitted to C-CEX?
November 05, 2014, 02:45:30 PM
People are understandably wary of ICO and Crowd funded coins.
I propose from now on that any Dev wishing to launch such a coin should make their real name and contact details publicly available, If they have nothing to hide and don't intend ripping people off then there is no reason for them to stay anonymous.
Their coin may well fail, but if they've done the right thing in the first place then it drastically reduces the chance of it being a scam.
I'm sick and tired of peopling losing money here to greedy Dev's, personally I never have and never will invest in any ICO coin, but that's just because I preferred the old method of actually mining coins
I propose from now on that any Dev wishing to launch such a coin should make their real name and contact details publicly available, If they have nothing to hide and don't intend ripping people off then there is no reason for them to stay anonymous.
Their coin may well fail, but if they've done the right thing in the first place then it drastically reduces the chance of it being a scam.
I'm sick and tired of peopling losing money here to greedy Dev's, personally I never have and never will invest in any ICO coin, but that's just because I preferred the old method of actually mining coins
+1
Dev. Can you contact coinsource and provide legit proof?
Keep in mind they're more strict now after that EQX crap happened but I'm sure it'll get you more investors if you do it proper way and make everyone feel safe.
November 05, 2014, 02:41:44 PM
People are understandably wary of ICO and Crowd funded coins.
I propose from now on that any Dev wishing to launch such a coin should make their real name and contact details publicly available, If they have nothing to hide and don't intend ripping people off then there is no reason for them to stay anonymous.
Their coin may well fail, but if they've done the right thing in the first place then it drastically reduces the chance of it being a scam.
I'm sick and tired of peopling losing money here to greedy Dev's, personally I never have and never will invest in any ICO coin, but that's just because I preferred the old method of actually mining coins
I propose from now on that any Dev wishing to launch such a coin should make their real name and contact details publicly available, If they have nothing to hide and don't intend ripping people off then there is no reason for them to stay anonymous.
Their coin may well fail, but if they've done the right thing in the first place then it drastically reduces the chance of it being a scam.
I'm sick and tired of peopling losing money here to greedy Dev's, personally I never have and never will invest in any ICO coin, but that's just because I preferred the old method of actually mining coins
Jump to: