hello, i stopped by since someone i know who spends a lot of time and research investing in alt coins suggested to me that I should look at this coin.
a few thoughts not in any particular order or even any value but some considerations....
1) normally when i see proof of developer it is a pass for me on a coin but since not everyone feels as I do.... i looked a bit more
2) i agree that when a coin is launched there should not be major changes to the coin production schedule nor the money supply since (i won't name names here) often people release coins with 50 million supply ect...., then 3 hard forks later the supply is 5 million.... large swings like this are not healthy for a coin and tend to create 'pyramid scheme' scenarios. Nice to see that there are some people running coins who have enough integrity to keep thier code intact to what was originally stated.
3) I could not find a link to the source code on github in the op only on the coins website is this source
https://github.com/jimblasko/UnbreakableCoin-master on github available by link
4) I certainly respect developers who keep promises and do not fork the code of the coin every few weeks or continue to discuss 'proposals to change the coin' ...ect..... This aside since your difficulty retarget is every two weeks when blocks are being produced at a 10 minute clip. With higher difficulty a lot of mining hash power is necessary to continue to solve blocks so coins can be slowly moved about your network right now. Still since it is moving quite slowly now you may want to reconsider for the future (thinking long term) of lowering this to every 50-100 blocks. I have never been a fan of the kimoto gravity well or other quick retarget methods but to help people move coins around and encourage people to mine the coin... I would consider it if it were my coin. (in theory the current slower than normal movement of the blockchain could allow someone with enough hash power to start building their own little chain more easily than if it was moving at normal speed) (no i have no plans to attack your coin lol)
5) May i suggest you read this research paper from a few years ago (you may have read it before but never hurts to re read this every so often)
Analysis of hashrate-based double-spending
https://bitcoil.co.il/Doublespend.pdf#page=1&zoom=auto,-93,798 Normally higher difficulty is certainly a good thing to have since the higher the difficulty the more resources someone needs to mount any attack. I believe in theory at least that when a block chain is moving much slower than normal the points/methods/data in this research is something to consider.
Some believe that 6 confirmations is some type of 'constant' or 'magic number' when actually it was probably chosen as a balance point just as you need not control 51% of a coins hash power to double spend or attack a network. Smaller amounts of hash power can actually attack a network although with less chance of success.
This all aside i did not post these opinions of mine and other information to 'troll' your coin thread.
Your development team as the people running the project should have control over how it is run.
My purpose in posting here was to just kick a few ideas around .......
I hope you find the data in the paper I referenced in number 5 above useful (assuming you have never read the paper)
As bitcoin mining grows and faster and larger quantities of miners become availabe to more people it is still hard to predict what impact this will have on alt coins using sha 2.
Regards and best wishes --
difficulty with difficulty, i guess someone parked it out pretty high and no coins can be sent since the block chain is not moving,
if coin warz is accurate at 100 terra hash a block will be solved in just over 12 days
if 500 terra hash block in about 60 hours
obviously my figures are subject to luck but 500 ths should probably fix it up pretty fast
Cinnamon_Carter - Welcome to UnbreakableCoin's forum, glad to have you stop by