ICANN taking away a domain name is not entirely possible, Not unless your domain is associate with scams or spreading viruses and malware they can suspend your domain anytime.
Maybe what happen here is their domain registrar from New Zealand sold their domain to other customers that why i always stick to the known registrar when it comes to domain.
The domain register can’t just sell the domain to other clients. Universa net in USA had sue universa blockchain for infringement. You can read the law suits on the net, it’s not the first time lawsuit has been brought forward in connection to universa or Alexander Borodich. The effect of this can be seen on the price and the partnerships that had been made almost made 2 years ago don’t exist today . Everyone including John Mcafee went on theirs own way. Stuck here with this useless tokens.
Not their fault that the court decided to take away their domain. Universa registered it earlier but since it was in the US and the company is also of US origin, the decision was made not in their favor. But who cares if that didn't affect the project in any negative way. On the contrary, it turned out to be beneficial for the project because they no longer depend on ICANN.
No problem at all with it. Did blockchain start malfunction because of that? No. Did it impact it in any negative way? No. Moreover, it only improved - no more dependencies on third parties. So what on earth is a problem then? There is none. The only negative is that price hurt but since that's not caused by any real problems but rather by market inadequate valuation, I couldn't care less. It will bounce back.
Valuation of Universa is completely adequate, it's fair market price is reasonably right around 1-3 cent at time of writing. Team has lost so much ground in the past year, due to mis-management and lack of nurturing a core audience. What Universa is trying to accomplish for the next 1-3 years, isn't even good enough to compete with the top 100 cryptos today.
In short, Universa doesn't care if you're an investor. They operate on the basis of only being a "company," who works with other companies. That's it, nothing else matters to them, even then they fail miserably with B2B negotiations.
The best piece of news that's coming for Universa (in over 1.5 years) is their publicly (yes publicly) funded hardware wallet, set to launch at the end of this year. Users don't even have a usable software wallet and yet the team is trying to create the next ledger.
They claim price will increase again because of all the pressure from the few community members that remain, but based on what? Based on Bitcoin going back to 20k? If Universa's price increase, it will be pumped and dumped, because it's based only on momentary hype bursts from useless, non-functioning partnership.
Don't invest in this coin, there are many, many other projects that have gone above and beyond what the Universa team has done or is trying to do, with greater efficiency, transparency and technological capabilities, while caring about their community dearly. Because they know, a good crypto doesn't derive value on false promises, missed deadlines, lack of transparency, inadequate development and non-existent marketing.
Markets are the ultimate gauge for the health of any project and Universa is a sick, old and dying man.
In short, Universa doesn't care if you're an investor. They operate on the basis of only being a "company," who works with other companies. That's it, nothing else matters to them, even then they fail miserably with B2B negotiations.
Universa does care about their investors. That's why we are present on all social media and answer the questions you may have. As for negotiations, we already have many partnerships and pilots.
The best piece of news that's coming for Universa (in over 1.5 years) is their publicly (yes publicly) funded hardware wallet, set to launch at the end of this year. Users don't even have a usable software wallet and yet the team is trying to create the next ledger.
We expect the wallet to be ready in September. We also plan to launch a software wallet but after the launch of the hardware wallet.
They claim price will increase again because of all the pressure from the few community members that remain, but based on what? Based on Bitcoin going back to 20k? If Universa's price increase, it will be pumped and dumped, because it's based only on momentary hype bursts from useless, non-functioning partnership.
You must be mistaken because the team doesn't comment on the price. Again, the negotiations are in place and we will share the details after we have final results. We have also mentioned many times that UTN(-P) is not a coin, it is a token, which price is related not only to the market, but also to it's demand. And demand itself is going to increase by multiple factors.
Don't invest in this coin, there are many, many other projects that have gone above and beyond what the Universa team has done or is trying to do, with greater efficiency, transparency and technological capabilities, while caring about their community dearly. Because they know, a good crypto doesn't derive value on false promises, missed deadlines, lack of transparency, inadequate development and non-existent marketing.
You may have a wrong perception about our technology. It seems that you were concerned about the fact that the recipient has to confirm the receipt of the tokens. But as I mentioned in our past discussion, that is no longer a case. We always add new materials to our
https://kb.universablockchain.com and publish updates in our web client chat. Feel free to read it be up-to-date on our development.