1) Alright, i mean we have goldfish memory here. I'm going to reference the question that sparked this one more time. So everyone can make their own determination.
Context - Referring to Malay Partnership
User: "Rather, they wanted to launch this project. But they did not launch it. As far as I understand, apart from this loud statement, nothing was done on this progect over the year."
Admins: "Why do you make such a statement? Please give any proof of it or don't make speculate."
What are you even talking about evidence for? I'm fucking confused. What evidence do you want, we aren't running this shitcoin? lol. We stated a remark, and you are asking evidence for the remark, without refuting it with your own evidence. I'm really am just confused by your logic here.
2) Text companies? What? These companies where not funded through ICO or a community of investors, they weren't funded by us, they have no obligation to me, you or anyone. What a fucking silly argument/statement. I would never text AB, simply because we've been hearing his bullshit for over a year, the same old useless statements about what blockchain can do. I don't think i've ever heard him talk about Universa and what he is doing with Universa to achieve that. (feel free to cite me with a video, other than the Q&A). AB is just like the admins, talk talk talk talk.
3) Unfortunately, you would of been correct if this were the case. Telegram is a useless source, admins are just like you, as much in the dark about everything. Again, they even commented here with their silly remarks, attacking me and defending their garbage.
4) Correct, you have a reasonable point here. But, that's speculation. We do not know the contents of any of the deals, hence the discussion.
5) Universa is a shitcoin for all the reasons i've stated, and sharing information is one piece of the pie. I remember a time when we got meaningful updates, 100-day plans and etc. Not going to waste my time repeating the rest of it.
What a fucking mockery Universa has become. And yes, Universa is a shitcoin giftcard crypto as it stands.
I'll be back in 6 months boys, and we'll see if if the team still looking for more useless partners then too.
(1) Thank you for mentioning 'goldfish memory'. Loved it.
>Again, it's a simple question, is the blockchain being utilized by the business or is it not. That's not NDA breaking, as information wither something is being utilized or not is never apart of NDA, it's only apart of the team's willingness to admit failure. I'm not asking to view the NDA, do not get these things confused. I'm asking for transparency behind Universa's blockchain, and what it's being used for (by users or businesses). // You did not inquire about evidences here, yet I was referring to that as well.
>Where's the proof to refute what we argued? Where's the implementation? Where's the evidence of use?
>This is not evidence of use, this is word of mouth promotions tied to some obscure NDA. Again, this is not evidence of their use of Universa, just because you have pictures of businesses and who they are.
(in chronological order)
Although one of the admins may have asked you for some proofs or whatsoever, you were talking about some evidences too, weren't you? Again, you were talking about some evidences of use. In order not to get confused, looking what post of yours I was relating to seems to be enough.
(2) It was no argument, no statement. A kind offering rather. Silly one? Well, I suggested you a method of acquiring details (or evidences?
). If you do not like it, then I have got nothing left to offer.
>I don't think i've ever heard him talk about Universa and what he is doing with Universa to achieve that. (feel free to cite me with a video, other than the Q&A). AB is just like the admins, talk talk talk talk. Just a simple question. What is 'that' is referring to? Otherwise, the two sentences seem quite queer to me.
Hence,
- I don't think i've ever heard him talk about Universa
- AB is just like the admins, talk talk talk talk.Did not mean to speculate here though, I just failed to get the meaning of 'that' in the sentence. Sorry, my bad.
(3) This one made no sense to me. Sorry, my bad again, I guess.
(4) The content of the deals.
Many users raise the same questions. 'What is this partnership and that contract is all about?' Undoubtedly, it is one of the most reasonable ones. In fact, me or other admins have got virtually nothing to share with our users. Indeed, there is a lack of information and relatively low level of transparency. Yes, you were correct here. My point was (my personal apologies if I happened to miss it) that we know this, but it is just the way it is at this moment. We took the opinion of yours as well as of many other users, and will attempt to fix it later. For now, all the updates and pieces of news are all reasourses we can get relevant information from.
(5) It seems I answered about that.
By the way, are you being stereotypical, racist or what?
>Constantly obscuring and manipulating. The Russian way.
>The only 2 projects that made contracts, where the 2 scamcoins above, run by Russians ironically.>I'll be back in 6 months boys, and we'll see if if the team still looking for more useless partners then too. Looking forward, I believe that we had a nice discussion over here (no sarcasm!). See you soon.
Keep cool. You are in a big game. You want all the info but you can't get it. It is really your problem but not the problem of community. We can understand why Universa has NDA. But you can not. Interesting question why do you pretend that do not understand nothing?