Topic: [ANN] VAULT | NIST5 POW/POS | PARABOLIC MINING | 8/12/14 STATUS UPDATE - page 24. (Read 49554 times)
August 07, 2014, 07:22:25 AM
i trust ocminer more than anybody else on this forum
August 07, 2014, 07:22:20 AM
Tbh i would have even helped fixing things if they just asked.. (for free)
August 07, 2014, 07:17:50 AM
You guys need to know a little more about the community before actually opening your mouth.
ocminer is trusted in this community and as soon as you put out a post like that, you really lost any credibility. Then come to find out there is something totally wrong.
It didn't dawn on you as quite a big clue, when you had all kinds of people mining their own forks at launch? It didn't raise a red flag there?
ocminer is trusted in this community and as soon as you put out a post like that, you really lost any credibility. Then come to find out there is something totally wrong.
It didn't dawn on you as quite a big clue, when you had all kinds of people mining their own forks at launch? It didn't raise a red flag there?
August 07, 2014, 07:16:16 AM
^^^ Agreed. There's is absolutely nothing wrong with apologizing, it doesn't happen enough around here.
August 07, 2014, 07:02:38 AM
So there are 2 or 3 forks on the network right now , look at dedicate pool and pool.mn and suprnova , my pool was on other fork to , i resync the wallet with pool.mn so we need dev to tell us which is the right fork
EDIT: The block explorer from op is down
EDIT: The block explorer from op is down
Thank you for making us aware of this, we're working to restore the network. The pool.mn fork is the correct one, please use this.
We're hoping to put another block explorer online as the developer for the current one is having hosting issues.
I'm not wondering that this is correct fork.. Since this coin started everything was "pool.mn"...
We're investigating the issue now. Your pool is synchronised with the seed node and our dedicated pool though so, as far as we're concerned, it is on the "correct" fork.
As for the issues ocminer raised, we believe these to be FUD. As you can see, suprnova rented a large NIST5 mining rig at launch (https://www.miningrigrentals.com/rigs/7086/) and we believe they are trying to get a large percentage of the second half of the mining parabola by spreading distrust. This is further called into question when you look at the praise he has given Vaultcoin initially, it seems like he's trying to establish a large holding to profit. Our PoW checking code is identical to the most recent version of PPCoin and currently we're not running in "hybrid mode", there is a 3-day pure PoW period before PoS begins. Please treat his claims with caution.
Had to quote this as it is so ridiculous..
August 07, 2014, 06:54:33 AM
We have found an issue with our PoW checking code that results in an incorrect fork getting stuck when trying to re-organise to a longer chain. We are rebuilding fixed binaries and hope to hard fork effective from a few hours time at block 1150.
I dont See any Apologies yet.
August 07, 2014, 06:53:42 AM
We have found an issue with our PoW checking code that results in an incorrect fork getting stuck when trying to re-organise to a longer chain. We are rebuilding fixed binaries and hope to hard fork effective from a few hours time at block 1150.
Right now i'm updating with the new updates , i hope this will fix the problem
, the pool will be back online in 10 minPlease do not build until we post a release on GitHub. The code is not final until this point. We'll be committing a checkpoint shortly too, to prevent forking and the correct chain. The binaries will follow shortly.
OK , i'm waiting until you finish updating
Thanks for your co-operation, we're trying to get this resolved as quickly as possible.
August 07, 2014, 06:49:16 AM
We have found an issue with our PoW checking code that results in an incorrect fork getting stuck when trying to re-organise to a longer chain. We are rebuilding fixed binaries and hope to hard fork effective from a few hours time at block 1150.
Right now i'm updating with the new updates , i hope this will fix the problem
, the pool will be back online in 10 minPlease do not build until we post a release on GitHub. The code is not final until this point. We'll be committing a checkpoint shortly too, to prevent forking and the correct chain. The binaries will follow shortly.
OK , i'm waiting until you finish updating
August 07, 2014, 06:41:22 AM
We have found an issue with our PoW checking code that results in an incorrect fork getting stuck when trying to re-organise to a longer chain. We are rebuilding fixed binaries and hope to hard fork effective from a few hours time at block 1150.
Right now i'm updating with the new updates , i hope this will fix the problem
, the pool will be back online in 10 minPlease do not build until we post a release on GitHub. The code is not final until this point. We'll be committing a checkpoint shortly too, to prevent forking and the correct chain. The binaries will follow shortly.
August 07, 2014, 06:33:27 AM
We have found an issue with our PoW checking code that results in an incorrect fork getting stuck when trying to re-organise to a longer chain. We are rebuilding fixed binaries and hope to hard fork effective from a few hours time at block 1150.
i hope this will fix the problem
, just let us know whe you finish updating the wallet August 07, 2014, 06:25:26 AM
We have found an issue with our PoW checking code that results in an incorrect fork getting stuck when trying to re-organise to a longer chain. We are rebuilding fixed binaries and hope to hard fork effective from a few hours time at block 1150.
August 07, 2014, 06:12:28 AM
Thank you for your comment, we're investigating the issue with this in mind. In the event that ocminers claims are correct an apology is in order!
Please bear with us
Please bear with us
August 07, 2014, 06:08:27 AM
So there are 2 or 3 forks on the network right now , look at dedicate pool and pool.mn and suprnova , my pool was on other fork to , i resync the wallet with pool.mn so we need dev to tell us which is the right fork
EDIT: The block explorer from op is down
EDIT: The block explorer from op is down
Thank you for making us aware of this, we're working to restore the network. The pool.mn fork is the correct one, please use this.
We're hoping to put another block explorer online as the developer for the current one is having hosting issues.
I'm not wondering that this is correct fork.. Since this coin started everything was "pool.mn"...
We're investigating the issue now. Your pool is synchronised with the seed node and our dedicated pool though so, as far as we're concerned, it is on the "correct" fork.
As for the issues ocminer raised, we believe these to be FUD. As you can see, suprnova rented a large NIST5 mining rig at launch (https://www.miningrigrentals.com/rigs/7086/) and we believe they are trying to get a large percentage of the second half of the mining parabola by spreading distrust. This is further called into question when you look at the praise he has given Vaultcoin initially, it seems like he's trying to establish a large holding to profit. Our PoW checking code is identical to the most recent version of PPCoin and currently we're not running in "hybrid mode", there is a 3-day pure PoW period before PoS begins. Please treat his claims with caution.
Secondly, dedicatedpool.com is usually the largest pool and we are on two different forks. This should be resolved asap.
August 07, 2014, 06:04:49 AM
So there are 2 or 3 forks on the network right now , look at dedicate pool and pool.mn and suprnova , my pool was on other fork to , i resync the wallet with pool.mn so we need dev to tell us which is the right fork
EDIT: The block explorer from op is down
EDIT: The block explorer from op is down
Thank you for making us aware of this, we're working to restore the network. The pool.mn fork is the correct one, please use this.
We're hoping to put another block explorer online as the developer for the current one is having hosting issues.
I'm not wondering that this is correct fork.. Since this coin started everything was "pool.mn"...
We're investigating the issue now. Your pool is synchronised with the seed node and our dedicated pool though so, as far as we're concerned, it is on the "correct" fork.
As for the issues ocminer raised, we believe these to be FUD. As you can see, suprnova rented a large NIST5 mining rig at launch (https://www.miningrigrentals.com/rigs/7086/) and we believe they are trying to get a large percentage of the second half of the mining parabola by spreading distrust. This is further called into question when you look at the praise he has given Vaultcoin initially, it seems like he's trying to establish a large holding to profit. Our PoW checking code is identical to the most recent version of PPCoin and currently we're not running in "hybrid mode", there is a 3-day pure PoW period before PoS begins. Please treat his claims with caution.
August 07, 2014, 05:53:07 AM
So there are 2 or 3 forks on the network right now , look at dedicate pool and pool.mn and suprnova , my pool was on other fork to , i resync the wallet with pool.mn so we need dev to tell us which is the right fork
EDIT: The block explorer from op is down
EDIT: The block explorer from op is down
Thank you for making us aware of this, we're working to restore the network. The pool.mn fork is the correct one, please use this.
We're hoping to put another block explorer online as the developer for the current one is having hosting issues.
I'm not wondering that this is correct fork.. Since this coin started everything was "pool.mn"...
August 07, 2014, 05:49:08 AM
hey guys, What is the normal hashrate for a 7950 and a 6950 in this Alg?
I am getting 10mhs for 7950 and 6.75 mhs for the 6950
7950 ~4.1 MHash (4 Threads / intensity 15)I am getting 10mhs for 7950 and 6.75 mhs for the 6950
How do you get 10 MHash
August 07, 2014, 05:44:16 AM
I did some reviewing of the code - its simply a big mess - looks like a scrypt clone with replaced hashing function. Probably a very old ppcoin fork or so..
It will probably fork ever again as PoW/PoS is flawed in this version(s).
Simple checks are missing/modified (Coinbase pays too much etc.)
I'll put a notice on my pool and shut it down shortly - Dev will recommend to move to pool.mn anyway ;-)
It will probably fork ever again as PoW/PoS is flawed in this version(s).
Simple checks are missing/modified (Coinbase pays too much etc.)
I'll put a notice on my pool and shut it down shortly - Dev will recommend to move to pool.mn anyway ;-)
I just put a warning message on my pool , is still up but i warn users that they mine on they own risk
I've just shut my down.
I will copy the message from your pool and put on my pool to and i will shut down mine to
Maybe you should wait until the next fork occurs.. Not sure..
If i'm not on the pc when the fork occurs i will lose again coins , 3 blocks i deleted and my pool got on the wrong fork.
Right now there ar 2 forks on the network , pool.mn one and second dedicate
August 07, 2014, 05:41:24 AM
I did some reviewing of the code - its simply a big mess - looks like a scrypt clone with replaced hashing function. Probably a very old ppcoin fork or so..
It will probably fork ever again as PoW/PoS is flawed in this version(s).
Simple checks are missing/modified (Coinbase pays too much etc.)
I'll put a notice on my pool and shut it down shortly - Dev will recommend to move to pool.mn anyway ;-)
It will probably fork ever again as PoW/PoS is flawed in this version(s).
Simple checks are missing/modified (Coinbase pays too much etc.)
I'll put a notice on my pool and shut it down shortly - Dev will recommend to move to pool.mn anyway ;-)
I just put a warning message on my pool , is still up but i warn users that they mine on they own risk
I've just shut my down.
I will copy the message from your pool and put on my pool to and i will shut down mine to
Maybe you should wait until the next fork occurs.. Not sure..
August 07, 2014, 05:40:27 AM
I did some reviewing of the code - its simply a big mess - looks like a scrypt clone with replaced hashing function. Probably a very old ppcoin fork or so..
It will probably fork ever again as PoW/PoS is flawed in this version(s).
Simple checks are missing/modified (Coinbase pays too much etc.)
I'll put a notice on my pool and shut it down shortly - Dev will recommend to move to pool.mn anyway ;-)
It will probably fork ever again as PoW/PoS is flawed in this version(s).
Simple checks are missing/modified (Coinbase pays too much etc.)
I'll put a notice on my pool and shut it down shortly - Dev will recommend to move to pool.mn anyway ;-)
I just put a warning message on my pool , is still up but i warn users that they mine on they own risk
I've just shut my down.
I will copy the message from your pool and put on my pool to and i will shut down mine to
August 07, 2014, 05:37:54 AM
I did some reviewing of the code - its simply a big mess - looks like a scrypt clone with replaced hashing function. Probably a very old ppcoin fork or so..
It will probably fork ever again as PoW/PoS is flawed in this version(s).
Simple checks are missing/modified (Coinbase pays too much etc.)
I'll put a notice on my pool and shut it down shortly - Dev will recommend to move to pool.mn anyway ;-)
It will probably fork ever again as PoW/PoS is flawed in this version(s).
Simple checks are missing/modified (Coinbase pays too much etc.)
I'll put a notice on my pool and shut it down shortly - Dev will recommend to move to pool.mn anyway ;-)
I just put a warning message on my pool , is still up but i warn users that they mine on they own risk
I've just shut my down.
Jump to: