[ANN] [VERSA] Universal storage BLA and much more BLA BLA BLA - Deleting posts - page 4.

hunterwolf

legendary

Activity: 1108

Merit: 1002

Quote from: ocminer on July 20, 2015, 02:19:09 PM

Quote from: godda04 on July 20, 2015, 02:04:22 PM

Quote from: ocminer on July 20, 2015, 11:00:02 AM

Quote from: ocminer on July 20, 2015, 10:42:34 AM

OK for my understanding of this 50% wall..

Lets say you start an ICO for 100 BTC on the exchange S-Scam

You know all you need to provide is a working altcoin wallet to S-Scam's "Dev's" to get at least 50% of the (sold) ICO funds.
So 50 BTC here because there will be a buyback-wall set up at the same price the coins where sold during ICO after ICO finishes.

During ICO or after ICO you notice that you're such a bad developer that you cannot integrate the features you promised and you remain silent.

You still get the 50% of the ICO, right ?

bumping my question

The only question that needs answering, isnt the whole wallet cloned from another aswell?

Sure it is.. But are'nt those ICO's literally a "money printing machine" if my above statement is correct ?

looks like is correct. You see thats post:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.11927048

i dont understand people, why show reaction for scams.

andyatcrux

legendary

Activity: 938

Merit: 1000

Well I have a feeling this wallet is gonna be under some stress testing to say the least.

ocminer

legendary

Activity: 2688

Merit: 1240

Quote from: godda04 on July 20, 2015, 02:04:22 PM

Quote from: ocminer on July 20, 2015, 11:00:02 AM

Quote from: ocminer on July 20, 2015, 10:42:34 AM

OK for my understanding of this 50% wall..

Lets say you start an ICO for 100 BTC on the exchange S-Scam

You know all you need to provide is a working altcoin wallet to S-Scam's "Dev's" to get at least 50% of the (sold) ICO funds.
So 50 BTC here because there will be a buyback-wall set up at the same price the coins where sold during ICO after ICO finishes.

During ICO or after ICO you notice that you're such a bad developer that you cannot integrate the features you promised and you remain silent.

You still get the 50% of the ICO, right ?

bumping my question

The only question that needs answering, isnt the whole wallet cloned from another aswell?

Sure it is.. But are'nt those ICO's literally a "money printing machine" if my above statement is correct ?

godda04

sr. member

Activity: 476

Merit: 500

Quote from: ocminer on July 20, 2015, 11:00:02 AM

Quote from: ocminer on July 20, 2015, 10:42:34 AM

OK for my understanding of this 50% wall..

Lets say you start an ICO for 100 BTC on the exchange S-Scam

You know all you need to provide is a working altcoin wallet to S-Scam's "Dev's" to get at least 50% of the (sold) ICO funds.
So 50 BTC here because there will be a buyback-wall set up at the same price the coins where sold during ICO after ICO finishes.

During ICO or after ICO you notice that you're such a bad developer that you cannot integrate the features you promised and you remain silent.

You still get the 50% of the ICO, right ?

bumping my question

The only question that needs answering, isnt the whole wallet cloned from another aswell?

hunterwolf

legendary

Activity: 1108

Merit: 1002

i think someone really Pathetic.
And someone doing cringe there.

andyatcrux

legendary

Activity: 938

Merit: 1000

Quote from: Wolf Rainer on July 20, 2015, 11:02:45 AM

Lol, one of the mods acussing Yuriy (C-cex OWNER) of scammer:

This says it all really. Not that this was needed to infer the same conclusion, but damning nonetheless.

cryptowest

sr. member

Activity: 437

Merit: 250

Quote from: EmilioMann on July 20, 2015, 11:15:11 AM

cryptowest, are you the dev of this c-cex shit scam too? LOL

hell no. i bought a bit of what was obviously a sketchy ICO to try and profit on the DPOS phase but I didn't think the exchange/dev would dump all its own self bought coins on the buywall within seconds.

hunterwolf

legendary

Activity: 1108

Merit: 1002

Quote from: hunterwolf on July 20, 2015, 10:13:16 AM

Quote from: ocminer on July 20, 2015, 10:05:52 AM

I'm wondering why everyone seems so upset/stunned ...

This is clearly not the first time this happened on C-Cex...

EDIT: And it was clear to see this would happen .. At least with this coin

its first time for me. nobody unfairly banned me with my own money. i'm not stupid. i dont spam, i dont trolling. i ask a question.
İf people think itself foll, i dont know than.
i say before today for me, tomorrow for you.

people must show response to scammers.

to up.
please show your reaction for SPAM. if nobody use thats scammers, they are should try respect customers.

TheStuhlman

legendary

Activity: 1059

Merit: 1020

https://twitter.com/JStuhlman

Quote from: ocminer on July 20, 2015, 11:22:31 AM

Almost forgot:

lol epic

ocminer

legendary

Activity: 2688

Merit: 1240

Almost forgot:

EmilioMann

legendary

Activity: 2184

Merit: 1028

#mitandopelomundo

cryptowest, are you the dev of this c-cex shit scam too? LOL

Battareus

hero member

Activity: 826

Merit: 501

I suspect that the Exchange sold, it is on its last legs.

ocminer

legendary

Activity: 2688

Merit: 1240

Quote from: cryptowest on July 20, 2015, 11:04:59 AM

Quote from: ocminer on July 20, 2015, 10:50:35 AM

True:

Should be at least 0.001:

https://github.com/VersaCrypto/Versa/blob/master/src/main.h#L37

And BTW:
https://github.com/VersaCrypto/Versa/blob/master/src/main.cpp#L48

Fixme :-)

6666 hours diff retarget ?! huh ? POW is enabled, so this allows for a 51% attack if you generate enough blocks in enough time on enough nodes...

https://github.com/VersaCrypto/Versa/blob/master/src/main.cpp#L1008

only 13 blocks too Undecided

very easy to takeover the chain and the premine...

set up three nodes, ban the "main chain's" ip - mine like 1000 blocks, then unban the main chain's ip and voilla - your chain is the winning one since its longer and has more nodes...

cryptowest

sr. member

Activity: 437

Merit: 250

Quote from: ocminer on July 20, 2015, 10:50:35 AM

True:

Should be at least 0.001:

https://github.com/VersaCrypto/Versa/blob/master/src/main.h#L37

And BTW:
https://github.com/VersaCrypto/Versa/blob/master/src/main.cpp#L48

Fixme :-)

6666 hours diff retarget ?! huh ? POW is enabled, so this allows for a 51% attack if you generate enough blocks in enough time on enough nodes...

https://github.com/VersaCrypto/Versa/blob/master/src/main.cpp#L1008

only 13 blocks too Undecided

Wolf Rainer

legendary

Activity: 1960

Merit: 1022

Lol, one of the mods acussing Yuriy (C-cex OWNER) of scammer:

ocminer

legendary

Activity: 2688

Merit: 1240

Quote from: ocminer on July 20, 2015, 10:42:34 AM

OK for my understanding of this 50% wall..

Lets say you start an ICO for 100 BTC on the exchange S-Scam

You know all you need to provide is a working altcoin wallet to S-Scam's "Dev's" to get at least 50% of the (sold) ICO funds.
So 50 BTC here because there will be a buyback-wall set up at the same price the coins where sold during ICO after ICO finishes.

During ICO or after ICO you notice that you're such a bad developer that you cannot integrate the features you promised and you remain silent.

You still get the 50% of the ICO, right ?

bumping my question

ocminer

legendary

Activity: 2688

Merit: 1240

True:

Should be at least 0.001:

https://github.com/VersaCrypto/Versa/blob/master/src/main.h#L37

And BTW:
https://github.com/VersaCrypto/Versa/blob/master/src/main.cpp#L48

Fixme :-)

6666 hours diff retarget ?! huh ? POW is enabled, so this allows for a 51% attack if you generate enough blocks in enough time on enough nodes...

https://github.com/VersaCrypto/Versa/blob/master/src/main.cpp#L1008

TheStuhlman

legendary

Activity: 1059

Merit: 1020

https://twitter.com/JStuhlman

Versa dev is so incompetent he released a new wallet with 0 TX fees, you can send 100's of spam 0.00000001 TX's and bloat the chain for free.
This means the chain can not be stable and violates CCex rules

edit: already tested, will make an auto spam script later today

ocminer

legendary

Activity: 2688

Merit: 1240

OK for my understanding of this 50% wall..

Lets say you start an ICO for 100 BTC on the exchange S-Scam

You know all you need to provide is a working altcoin wallet to S-Scam's "Dev's" to get at least 50% of the (sold) ICO funds.
So 50 BTC here because there will be a buyback-wall set up at the same price the coins where sold during ICO after ICO finishes.

During ICO or after ICO you notice that you're such a bad developer that you cannot integrate the features you promised and you remain silent.

You still get the 50% of the ICO, right ?

chesthing

legendary

Activity: 1414

Merit: 1000

Quote from: ocminer on July 20, 2015, 10:23:28 AM

Quote from: chesthing on July 20, 2015, 10:17:36 AM

Quote from: ocminer on July 20, 2015, 10:16:31 AM

Ah I thought the buy wall was already dumped into..

DUDE - they took it away from us by extending the end indefinately, so that we had no chance to use it. C'mon, this isn't fucking rocket science. When they ended the ico the C-cex admin/Versa dev dumped it out in 1 sell - no legit buyer got out of this alive.

Sorry I never buy ICO's.. Especially not on C-Cex, so I did not follow all that drama, I just had a look at the source when notsofast asked me to and I saw it was literally just a big mess... Far from any promise they made concerning their "functions"... It wasn't even close

I don't give 2 shits about the Versa coin. I can't even remember the last time a coin came out that was worth a $1 mkt cap, they are all worthless tokens of betting - like roulette wheel spins.
The only story of mention is C-cex has officially crossed the line into direct scamming - they have basically become a scammer developer. I can't imagine somebody trusting their coins on this exchange after this.

Topic: [ANN] [VERSA] Universal storage BLA and much more BLA BLA BLA - Deleting posts - page 4. (Read 10273 times)