Good idea, but at the moment it's mostly gibberish for the common people. If the goal is to convince the Average Joe, there should be more simple facts without technical terms. Sadly this might be quite difficult to achieve.
I'm hoping they might follow the citation links. But yeah, it's a tad technical. The idea is to answer questions like, "It's only worth anything because people think it's worth anything, but there's nothing actually backing it." This list is why Bitcoin itself would be worth something, and be a huge contribution to the world, even if it had no value as money.
