Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN] [WORLD FIRST] TiPS - built-in coin mixing/anonymity service just launched! - page 2. (Read 16332 times)

sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
Mummy! I've got a domain name now! fargusson.eth
uhmmmmm ..

I have checkout the source and I have not found any sign of properly mixing . It seems like if just the command info had been implemented  Huh
 
Code:
Value sendtoaddress(const Array& params, const CRPCContext& ctx, bool fHelp)
{    if (fHelp || params.size() < 2 || params.size() > 4)
        throw runtime_error(
            "sendtoaddress [:mixed] [comment] [comment-to]\n"
            " is a real and is rounded to the nearest 0.00000001\n"
            "coins can be mixed by appending :mixed to the destination address, which will conceal the address you sent them from."
            + HelpRequiringPassphrase(ctx));

    string strAddress = params[0].get_str();
    size_t iSeperator = strAddress.find_last_of(":");
  bool bMixCoins = false;
    if (iSeperator != std::string::npos)
    {
        string action = strAddress.substr(iSeperator+1);
        strAddress = strAddress.substr(0, iSeperator);
        bMixCoins = boost::iequals(action, "mixed");
    }

    CBitcoinAddress address(strAddress);
    if (!address.IsValid())
        throw JSONRPCError(RPC_INVALID_ADDRESS_OR_KEY, "Invalid FedoraCoin address");

    // Amount
    uint64 nAmount = AmountFromValue(params[1]);

    // Wallet comments
    CWalletTx wtx;
    if (params.size() > 2 && params[2].type() != null_type && !params[2].get_str().empty())
        wtx.mapValue["comment"] = params[2].get_str();
    if (params.size() > 3 && params[3].type() != null_type && !params[3].get_str().empty())
        wtx.mapValue["to"]      = params[3].get_str();

    if (ctx.wallet->IsLocked())
        throw JSONRPCError(RPC_WALLET_UNLOCK_NEEDED, "Error: Please enter the wallet passphrase with walletpassphrase first.");

    string strError = ctx.wallet->SendMoneyToDestination(address.Get(), nAmount, wtx, bMixCoins);
    if (strError != "")
        throw JSONRPCError(RPC_WALLET_ERROR, strError);

    return wtx.GetHash().GetHex();
}


Lines 598-638 https://github.com/fedoracoin/fedoracoin/blob/master/src/rpcwallet.cpp#L598-L638


If you analize the code, it checks the trailing mixing param, updates  bMixCoins ... and that is all  Roll Eyes

It is the same case for all RPC methods, it seems like an mimic stub which displays param info, but lacks of implementation. I suppose it need more work.

REally the system not does implement any mixing feature yet.



And we all thank johnnycoiner for this whole new trollworthy topic  Wink
newbie
Activity: 20
Merit: 0
uhmmmmm ..

I have checkout the source and I have not found any sign of properly mixing . It seems like if just the command info had been implemented  Huh
 
Code:
Value sendtoaddress(const Array& params, const CRPCContext& ctx, bool fHelp)
{    if (fHelp || params.size() < 2 || params.size() > 4)
        throw runtime_error(
            "sendtoaddress [:mixed] [comment] [comment-to]\n"
            " is a real and is rounded to the nearest 0.00000001\n"
            "coins can be mixed by appending :mixed to the destination address, which will conceal the address you sent them from."
            + HelpRequiringPassphrase(ctx));

    string strAddress = params[0].get_str();
    size_t iSeperator = strAddress.find_last_of(":");
  bool bMixCoins = false;
    if (iSeperator != std::string::npos)
    {
        string action = strAddress.substr(iSeperator+1);
        strAddress = strAddress.substr(0, iSeperator);
        bMixCoins = boost::iequals(action, "mixed");
    }

    CBitcoinAddress address(strAddress);
    if (!address.IsValid())
        throw JSONRPCError(RPC_INVALID_ADDRESS_OR_KEY, "Invalid FedoraCoin address");

    // Amount
    uint64 nAmount = AmountFromValue(params[1]);

    // Wallet comments
    CWalletTx wtx;
    if (params.size() > 2 && params[2].type() != null_type && !params[2].get_str().empty())
        wtx.mapValue["comment"] = params[2].get_str();
    if (params.size() > 3 && params[3].type() != null_type && !params[3].get_str().empty())
        wtx.mapValue["to"]      = params[3].get_str();

    if (ctx.wallet->IsLocked())
        throw JSONRPCError(RPC_WALLET_UNLOCK_NEEDED, "Error: Please enter the wallet passphrase with walletpassphrase first.");

    string strError = ctx.wallet->SendMoneyToDestination(address.Get(), nAmount, wtx, bMixCoins);
    if (strError != "")
        throw JSONRPCError(RPC_WALLET_ERROR, strError);

    return wtx.GetHash().GetHex();
}


Lines 598-638 https://github.com/fedoracoin/fedoracoin/blob/master/src/rpcwallet.cpp#L598-L638


If you analize the code, it checks the trailing mixing param, updates  bMixCoins ... and that is all  Roll Eyes

It is the same case for all RPC methods, it seems like an mimic stub which displays param info, but lacks of implementation. I suppose it need more work.

REally the system not does implement any mixing feature yet.

full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
newbie
Activity: 26
Merit: 0
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
Mummy! I've got a domain name now! fargusson.eth
Start spreading the news

I'm leaving today

I wanna be a part of it

New TIIIIIPS
newbie
Activity: 19
Merit: 0
This is great! Lookin good  Smiley
newbie
Activity: 33
Merit: 0
This is great news, keep up the good work.
hero member
Activity: 658
Merit: 534
TIPS thats it, the fedora got lost, admit, accept, GROW!!!!

WoW... Tips just KILLED it. This feature just made TIPS a top coin.
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
TIPS thats it, the fedora got lost, admit, accept, GROW!!!!
member
Activity: 97
Merit: 10
Comparing to Darkcoin anonymous technology, what is the difference between the two?
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
2% is way to much for coin mixing.

2% for using world's first mixing service that give you 100% anonymity and endless freedom when spending your coins,
or doing as you wish with them.

"Much" you say? Well usually this kind of service with fiat currencies is quite a shady business, and usually
fee ranges between 50-80%. Looks like you only spend on ice cream and aroma candles and towels. Good citizen.
hero member
Activity: 644
Merit: 500
P2P The Planet!
2% is way to much for coin mixing.
sr. member
Activity: 359
Merit: 250
Nice job invisibel!! Beat darkcoin and everyone else to the punch - we need to get the word out!
member
Activity: 82
Merit: 10
We're happy to report that w/ Fedoracoin supports accepting mixed coins!

Go to http://example.withfedoraco.in/ to check out the example app and to see for yourself.
sr. member
Activity: 266
Merit: 250
I want free lunch, i'm gonna go with this guy.
interesting concept, i'll check this out.
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10


we are launching fast!

what? if multipools is on it then it means it can NOT rise at all because multipools does not care about any features of the coin, just if its profitable. Implement KGW and this coin will skyrocket.

We have KGW bro.
Price is stable as rock, and huge community supports it.

PAST THE MOON!!!  TIPS ROCKS
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100


we are launching fast!

what? if multipools is on it then it means it can NOT rise at all because multipools does not care about any features of the coin, just if its profitable. Implement KGW and this coin will skyrocket.

We have KGW bro.
Price is stable as rock, and huge community supports it.
hero member
Activity: 602
Merit: 500


we are launching fast!

what? if multipools is on it then it means it can NOT rise at all because multipools does not care about any features of the coin, just if its profitable. Implement KGW and this coin will skyrocket.
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
Gentlemen, behold:


Thats good to see
But TIPS is still in same position,
I am loosing lots of LTC because of TIPS?
Why its not rising?

will rise to .01 cents tomorrow!

DOGE dropped 0,00000200 since Fedora 0.60 launched (1 hr)
Pages:
Jump to: