on by Tuesday morning we will have screenshots of our new wallet.
Topic: [ANN] [XCLD] XCloudcoin 2.0 | File uploads from Wallet QT | 575k coins Ready! - page 19. (Read 72751 times)
September 19, 2014, 06:23:02 PM
on by Tuesday morning we will have screenshots of our new wallet.
September 19, 2014, 09:03:10 AM
Mother of sweet god @ this coin. This is going into the bottom drawer. My first pick that I'm letting go. I'll not sell, hope it's. Success and I return sometime. Meanwhile RIP hard earned BTC
September 18, 2014, 07:55:34 PM
1 million coins Total?
Blockchain is on 5 mill, am I missing something?
Blockchain is on 5 mill, am I missing something?
3.85 mill coins destroyed by bittrex https://chainz.cryptoid.info/cld/address.dws?34.htm
Hmm, looks fishy how the dev find something that Coinstreet is missing after destruction??? .
How do you destroyed coins if they are still in the blockchain
I seriously just lol'd and spit my water out when reading that coming from you.
September 18, 2014, 07:20:54 PM
The price isn't great but it's nice to see some different people posting on here anyway. I've been following and accumulating on dips for a while. It seemed there were only a handful of people posting here for the last few weeks. I admit I wasn't a fan of having Iconic Expert around since he's fu__ed me over in the past, along with many others. But regardless, having more people involved in the discussion is generally a good thing. The dev is active and that's the most important thing. Next is community support so let's get some positive action going on around here.
I, for one, support the coin halving.
I, for one, support the coin halving.
September 18, 2014, 05:36:15 PM
Nobody cares the dev didn't make the online wallet or the android wallet, or jacked the code from raxe.io possibly being that he deletes my post on this?
What's the deal anyway? The wallet isn't a Picasso, it's a utility. Isn't this coin about more than a gimiky wallet like so many other coins? Can't a fancy wallet be a later focus ? As long as it works right... Meh
September 18, 2014, 09:40:47 AM
Tnx Dminer69! This post confirms the detroyed coins.
I would suggest making it more clear in the ann that bittrex confirmed the destroyed coins.
At the moment it's unclear to new investors what exactly happened.
Again, not trying to troll or fud. Just looking for info.
I would suggest making it more clear in the ann that bittrex confirmed the destroyed coins.
At the moment it's unclear to new investors what exactly happened.
Again, not trying to troll or fud. Just looking for info.
September 18, 2014, 09:20:50 AM
I can't seem to find anything on the destruction of these coins by Bittrex.
Not on the Bittrex website, not on bittrex twitter account.... no where?
I've sent Bittrex an e-mail requesting confirmation on the destroyed coins.
Let's wait and see what Bittrex has to say....
Not on the Bittrex website, not on bittrex twitter account.... no where?
I've sent Bittrex an e-mail requesting confirmation on the destroyed coins.
Let's wait and see what Bittrex has to say....
Nice detective work. Destruction of coins required high degree of fire to melt those 3.85 million coins.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.8287103 that would do the work, thanks for stopping by coinstreet!
September 18, 2014, 09:00:00 AM
Bittrex usually destroyed unsold coins in the ICO. The private key to the address is usually not generated so it's gone forever just like burning btc in Counterparty. Stop trolling. Dminer69 is a great dev 
September 18, 2014, 08:54:29 AM
I can't seem to find anything on the destruction of these coins by Bittrex.
Not on the Bittrex website, not on bittrex twitter account.... no where?
I've sent Bittrex an e-mail requesting confirmation on the destroyed coins.
Let's wait and see what Bittrex has to say....
Not on the Bittrex website, not on bittrex twitter account.... no where?
I've sent Bittrex an e-mail requesting confirmation on the destroyed coins.
Let's wait and see what Bittrex has to say....
Nice detective work. Destruction of coins required high degree of fire to melt those 3.85 million coins.
September 18, 2014, 08:52:04 AM
I can't seem to find anything on the destruction of these coins by Bittrex.
Not on the Bittrex website, not on bittrex twitter account.... no where?
I've sent Bittrex an e-mail requesting confirmation on the destroyed coins.
Let's wait and see what Bittrex has to say....
Not on the Bittrex website, not on bittrex twitter account.... no where?
I've sent Bittrex an e-mail requesting confirmation on the destroyed coins.
Let's wait and see what Bittrex has to say....
September 18, 2014, 08:50:14 AM
1 million coins Total?
Blockchain is on 5 mill, am I missing something?
Blockchain is on 5 mill, am I missing something?
3.85 mill coins destroyed by bittrex https://chainz.cryptoid.info/cld/address.dws?34.htm
Hmm, looks fishy how the dev find something that Coinstreet is missing after destruction??? .
How do you destroyed coins if they are still in the blockchain
since it was done by bittrex and if you look at their zero balance feature im sure it works the same when it comes to coin destruction.
Zero Balance
Use Caution
This will zero (0) the balance of your wallet and cannot be reversed. This is not a withdrawal function. Only use this to get rid of dust or throw away coins you do not want.
Please be absolutely sure you want to do this before you confirm.
Sounds good. Show me the hashes of the burnt cons
September 18, 2014, 08:29:25 AM
1 million coins Total?
Blockchain is on 5 mill, am I missing something?
Blockchain is on 5 mill, am I missing something?
3.85 mill coins destroyed by bittrex https://chainz.cryptoid.info/cld/address.dws?34.htm
Hmm, looks fishy how the dev find something that Coinstreet is missing after destruction??? .
How do you destroyed coins if they are still in the blockchain
since it was done by bittrex and if you look at their zero balance feature im sure it works the same when it comes to coin destruction.
Zero Balance
Use Caution
This will zero (0) the balance of your wallet and cannot be reversed. This is not a withdrawal function. Only use this to get rid of dust or throw away coins you do not want.
Please be absolutely sure you want to do this before you confirm.
September 18, 2014, 08:25:14 AM
1 million coins Total?
Blockchain is on 5 mill, am I missing something?
Blockchain is on 5 mill, am I missing something?
3.85 mill coins destroyed by bittrex https://chainz.cryptoid.info/cld/address.dws?34.htm
Hmm, looks fishy how the dev find something that Coinstreet is missing after destruction??? .
How do you destroyed coins if they are still in the blockchain
September 18, 2014, 08:20:48 AM
1 million coins Total?
Blockchain is on 5 mill, am I missing something?
Blockchain is on 5 mill, am I missing something?
3.85 mill coins destroyed by bittrex https://chainz.cryptoid.info/cld/address.dws?34.htm
September 18, 2014, 08:17:05 AM
1 million coins Total?
Blockchain is on 5 mill, am I missing something?
Blockchain is on 5 mill, am I missing something?
September 18, 2014, 06:40:48 AM
September 18, 2014, 04:18:24 AM
Great work Dev, as I said earlier I didnt think there was a premine dump. This coin has a great concept behind it and a Dev that actually takes steps when people are trying to manipulate it. The community needs to start getting behind him.
September 18, 2014, 03:54:41 AM
These efforts from dev make clear we have a great active dev and a less great community who just wait for a pump on exchanges, who don't stake, whine about anything the Dev is proposing.
It is not because the dev is very active and responsive that he should ask permissions to the community for whatever. It is the best way to make the coin fail, fresh money don't want this kind of mess.
If you want to actively take part in any dev choice (especially when having less than 0.1% of coins...), with no dev to "interfere" or decide, please invest in a takeover.
"CLD 2.0" don't need to be revolutionary to reach x20, at least a 500 K$ market cap, in the 50 first coins.
It needs :
- an active dev, releasing constantly new features (exactly what we have now)
- a backing community, furthering the dev choices, not blocking them with subjective argument.
Else, don't invest and leave. It is darwinism and natural selection for the rest of us.
It is not because the dev is very active and responsive that he should ask permissions to the community for whatever. It is the best way to make the coin fail, fresh money don't want this kind of mess.
If you want to actively take part in any dev choice (especially when having less than 0.1% of coins...), with no dev to "interfere" or decide, please invest in a takeover.
"CLD 2.0" don't need to be revolutionary to reach x20, at least a 500 K$ market cap, in the 50 first coins.
It needs :
- an active dev, releasing constantly new features (exactly what we have now)
- a backing community, furthering the dev choices, not blocking them with subjective argument.
Else, don't invest and leave. It is darwinism and natural selection for the rest of us.
September 17, 2014, 10:32:49 PM
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/cld/address.dws?XTYS8sUMW1CuAFGCCzEe7iPrRXoyD1wMmR.htm
Quit bothering the dev with silly requests when you can answer the question yourself looking through the blockchain. Earlier he stated 2 addresses and the other one is the one containing over 100k, if they aren't, then come back and complain.
Quit bothering the dev with silly requests when you can answer the question yourself looking through the blockchain. Earlier he stated 2 addresses and the other one is the one containing over 100k, if they aren't, then come back and complain.
Googled the latest address he provided for the premine storage - the address has been used to enter a Lottery under the twitter handle 'Radiandome'.
https://twitter.com/Radiandome
Care to explain why you think its OK to enter lottery's with the premine - effectively treating them as your own personal coins?
Also - who is this twitter identity - what is his connection to the coin? He holds 121,893 CLD. If this is the premine like you say then there are a lot of questions that need to be asked about your conduct.
Explain to me just how deep this developer (I assume it must be a developer of CLD or else what the hell is he doing with the premine..) is in with IconicExpert and SocialxBot? - This is not a good look.
EDIT: Want to add that I really want this coin to do well - I'm holding a large amount nowadays and that tends to mean I am more 'weary' than others who maybe hold a few hundred at most.
I won't make a judgement until the dev/s have had their chance to explain the things I have pointed out - If we get a fair and reasonable explanation then that will be the end of it.
i did gave you 3 address correct, at the point this address was enter in the lotto it didnt had 120k, go a lil deeper next time!
oh i own that twitter account last time i check everyone is free to use twitter, make sure you look a the block explorer the next time under show all transactions.
if you think im the one dumping the cld your are looking at the wrong person.
Sorry but this is getting just a little bit too tricky. You have made a unilateral decision out of no consultation with the community here to effectively end the coin and start a new CLD 2.0 with half the total supply but 45% inflation in the first year.
This is not the way a professional developer team should conduct themselves and I think most here will agree with me on that.
I really am curious as to why the quality of this coin's development and upkeep has dropped so much since its initial launch - it looked very well done and nicely presented and now it is nothing of the sort.
This SocialxBot coin popped up after the pump n dump of xCloudCoin with an ICO for 1 Million coins as well. What is your involvement with this coin? How long have you been involved with them?
This whole thing stinks.
I understand how you feel, why wasn't this announce before b/c we have consulted quite a few professionals and just by looking at the order book and the coins staking almost everyone has their coins in the market, just waiting for a pump, we want to give a big reward to those who are willing to make the network stronger that's being a part of the community.
"then again if you read the statement is a possible solution" if someone comes with a better solution to end the dumping and the low price manipulation we are here to take suggestion.
by cutting down the supply and adding a big reward for the first year that would almost guarantee a stronger network from those willing to earn the staking reward, a higher price target with in the next few months and not the current situation where all the coins are in a exchange.
socialxbot has a cool project, they pop out just like other coins pops out, just b/c they did an ico has nothing to do with cld, im not here telling you why your the only one talking about the premine and you and clearly supporting burst, is it b/c im renting space to mine burst?? or selling the burst i mine to buy cld??, anyways i have talked to the xbot dev a few times like i have talk to quite a few others, i dont have any involvement with their coin, but they are willing to help cld.
I see. You are right about people waiting for a pump, that's a fair observation.
Good to hear - would be good to get a poll up an running 'for' or 'against' creating a new CLD 2.0.
That's true - but 45% is crazy. 10% return per annum might be more advisable but all of this needs to be decided by the community.
Don't see what my mining BURST has to do with anything here. I mine burst - just like you, and I have bought more CLD - the more hash power you throw at Burst the better as far as im concerned, the value of both will go up over time
Like I said earlier, I wouldn't give a damn if I didn't have a fairly substantial ammount of USD invested in CLD and want to see this thing develop into the coin it promised to be at launch. Any questioning or discontent I voice here is because I care about my investment and obviously with all the scamming ripping through the entire Crytpo community I have to be extra vigilant.
If we could get the SocialxBot dev to make some posts on the matter to clarify the situation that would be a great first step.
Yea i get you, why i said 45% then again i did stated it could be 25, 30 or 45% we want to offer back part of the original amount of coins going from 1 million to 500k is a heavy cut. long term investors will gain that from a high stake reward.
i wouldn't like to do a poll here b/c everyone could vote and we want cld supporters to vote, i ratter have cld supporters send me an inbox like a lot of them do.
now the main reason for cld 2.0 is not the total coins is our code we cant get cloudsend fully working on it like is stated on the ann about it.
September 17, 2014, 10:11:10 PM
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/cld/address.dws?XTYS8sUMW1CuAFGCCzEe7iPrRXoyD1wMmR.htm
Quit bothering the dev with silly requests when you can answer the question yourself looking through the blockchain. Earlier he stated 2 addresses and the other one is the one containing over 100k, if they aren't, then come back and complain.
Quit bothering the dev with silly requests when you can answer the question yourself looking through the blockchain. Earlier he stated 2 addresses and the other one is the one containing over 100k, if they aren't, then come back and complain.
Googled the latest address he provided for the premine storage - the address has been used to enter a Lottery under the twitter handle 'Radiandome'.
https://twitter.com/Radiandome
Care to explain why you think its OK to enter lottery's with the premine - effectively treating them as your own personal coins?
Also - who is this twitter identity - what is his connection to the coin? He holds 121,893 CLD. If this is the premine like you say then there are a lot of questions that need to be asked about your conduct.
Explain to me just how deep this developer (I assume it must be a developer of CLD or else what the hell is he doing with the premine..) is in with IconicExpert and SocialxBot? - This is not a good look.
EDIT: Want to add that I really want this coin to do well - I'm holding a large amount nowadays and that tends to mean I am more 'weary' than others who maybe hold a few hundred at most.
I won't make a judgement until the dev/s have had their chance to explain the things I have pointed out - If we get a fair and reasonable explanation then that will be the end of it.
i did gave you 3 address correct, at the point this address was enter in the lotto it didnt had 120k, go a lil deeper next time!
oh i own that twitter account last time i check everyone is free to use twitter, make sure you look a the block explorer the next time under show all transactions.
if you think im the one dumping the cld your are looking at the wrong person.
Sorry but this is getting just a little bit too tricky. You have made a unilateral decision out of no consultation with the community here to effectively end the coin and start a new CLD 2.0 with half the total supply but 45% inflation in the first year.
This is not the way a professional developer team should conduct themselves and I think most here will agree with me on that.
I really am curious as to why the quality of this coin's development and upkeep has dropped so much since its initial launch - it looked very well done and nicely presented and now it is nothing of the sort.
This SocialxBot coin popped up after the pump n dump of xCloudCoin with an ICO for 1 Million coins as well. What is your involvement with this coin? How long have you been involved with them?
This whole thing stinks.
I understand how you feel, why wasn't this announce before b/c we have consulted quite a few professionals and just by looking at the order book and the coins staking almost everyone has their coins in the market, just waiting for a pump, we want to give a big reward to those who are willing to make the network stronger that's being a part of the community.
"then again if you read the statement is a possible solution" if someone comes with a better solution to end the dumping and the low price manipulation we are here to take suggestion.
by cutting down the supply and adding a big reward for the first year that would almost guarantee a stronger network from those willing to earn the staking reward, a higher price target with in the next few months and not the current situation where all the coins are in a exchange.
socialxbot has a cool project, they pop out just like other coins pops out, just b/c they did an ico has nothing to do with cld, im not here telling you why your the only one talking about the premine and you and clearly supporting burst, is it b/c im renting space to mine burst?? or selling the burst i mine to buy cld??, anyways i have talked to the xbot dev a few times like i have talk to quite a few others, i dont have any involvement with their coin, but they are willing to help cld.
I see. You are right about people waiting for a pump, that's a fair observation.
Good to hear - would be good to get a poll up an running 'for' or 'against' creating a new CLD 2.0.
That's true - but 45% is crazy. 10% return per annum might be more advisable but all of this needs to be decided by the community.
Don't see what my mining BURST has to do with anything here. I mine burst - just like you, and I have bought more CLD - the more hash power you throw at Burst the better as far as im concerned, the value of both will go up over time
Like I said earlier, I wouldn't give a damn if I didn't have a fairly substantial ammount of USD invested in CLD and want to see this thing develop into the coin it promised to be at launch. Any questioning or discontent I voice here is because I care about my investment and obviously with all the scamming ripping through the entire Crytpo community I have to be extra vigilant.
If we could get the SocialxBot dev to make some posts on the matter to clarify the situation that would be a great first step.
Jump to: