Topic: [ANN] XENIX [POW/POS][X11] - page 4. (Read 25285 times)

the first main.cpp

int64_t GetProofOfWorkReward(int64_t nFees)
{
    int64_t nSubsidy = 0 * COIN;
 
    if(pindexBest->nHeight+1 == 1)
    {
        nSubsidy = 10000000 * COIN;
    }
       else if(pindexBest->nHeight+1 >= 2 && pindexBest->nHeight+1 <= 100)
    {
        nSubsidy = 0 * COIN;
    }
        else if(pindexBest->nHeight+1 >= 101 && pindexBest->nHeight+1 <= 3000000)
    {
        nSubsidy = 19 * COIN;
    }
   
    if (fDebug && GetBoolArg("-printcreation"))
        printf("GetProofOfWorkReward() : create=%s nSubsidy=%"PRId64"\n", FormatMoney(nSubsidy).c_str(), nSubsidy);
   
    return nSubsidy + nFees;

after

int64_t GetProofOfWorkReward(int64_t nFees)
{
    int64_t nSubsidy = 0 * COIN;
 
    if(pindexBest->nHeight+1 == 1)
    {
        nSubsidy = 10000000 * COIN;
    }
       else if(pindexBest->nHeight+1 >= 2 && pindexBest->nHeight+1 <= 100)
    {
        nSubsidy = 0 * COIN;
    }
        else if(pindexBest->nHeight+1 >= 101 && pindexBest->nHeight+1 <= 575)
    {
        nSubsidy = 19 * COIN;
    }
       else if(pindexBest->nHeight+1 >= 576 && pindexBest->nHeight+1 <= 3000000)
    {
        nSubsidy = 0.084 * COIN;
    }

    if (fDebug && GetBoolArg("-printcreation"))
        printf("GetProofOfWorkReward() : create=%s nSubsidy=%"PRId64"\n", FormatMoney(nSubsidy).c_str(), nSubsidy);
   
    return nSubsidy + nFees;

Whats taking so long for a quick fix? This should have been fixxed moments after it was realized.

NO no no, support of C-cex said they had sent coins and does not answer ticket anymore. No one responsible for the loss.

Yes 0.08 coin from block 576
The dev has to change the block reward

The first block generates 10000000 currency (premine)
From 2 to 100 block 0 currency
From 101 to 575 block 19 currency
From 576 to 3000000 block 0.084 currency

block reward: 0.08  not  19 XEN  is scam

but sadly lost coin 
six o'clock of mining X11 Baikal Quadruple Mini Miner vainly...
I'm disappointed.

http://s018.radikal.ru/i510/1612/13/37be1387ea05.jpg

http://s020.radikal.ru/i700/1612/ca/faf36f9bc564.jpg

http://s018.radikal.ru/i502/1612/29/ec66269acd28.jpg

This is an old theme
Miningpoolhub uses the same but a little edit.I believe

the name is MPOS theme

Did you get that theme for your pool custom made? i went to check out what themes they had and there well I couldn't find anything for mpos themes.

In any case it is a problem currency.
This is the reason why I remove it from my pool

it is already been recompiled on my pool and restart

compiling and running the source from dev's repo previously worked until he released this commit (https://github.com/xenixcoin/xenixcoin/commit/a65b401d2011fbddfd2dc0e0827e17c8a22efb53).

i fork'd a copy of his repository before this change was made, and additionally added this commit (https://github.com/barrystyle/xenixcoin/commit/a9c30ec9a37ee738fc3d20605fd271fedfb8979f); which adds a few known 'honest' nodes.

why you continue to support this chain, where you've literally admitted to removing validatory checks just to sync, is beyond me. it is not a valid chain, you know this, i know this, the whole thread knows this?

just suck it up - recompile your code, sync and start your pool again.

There is the windows wallet that I can not syncro. I have nothing to compile

I do not joke. There is a problem on blocks. Comment on his passes and then handed the original And recompile the source
Its done at least 10 to 15 days that I'm syncro on my pool and the payments are done correctly


Check on the official explorer
address on my pool
adresse =   XH4QVr6vrkp4wCyATU8yropWTbs6KQ94sj

http://xenixexplorer.com

you're kidding right?
you mean 'oh, just uncomment the code that verifies each block as it comes through'.

c-cex's chain verifies the entire way through. i'm done with this thread, unwatching.

I was still going to tell you. Anyway I remove the coin of my pool at the end of the month

You must comment on lines 2149 and 2150 in main.cpp
And recompile.
Once syncro decomment the lines and recompile again
And even to watch that its does not happen again

no. just describe the changes to the code you've made.
the fact that you're being hush about it (instead of just forking the original github repo and adding your changes) is a worry.

or y'know, just saying what the changes are.

I have done it privately in ccex. On the forum it's not the same. I also have a small pool to work

feel free to share the change, i'm interested to see what it is for sure.

The dev does not answer and does nothing
I made the change on my pool for a long time and since I'm sync on the official explorer as well as on nova

Has the source been updated to reflect the fix? don't think ccex will do any mod's unless source is updated. But who knows now days.