[ANN] [XMG] MAGI | CPU mining | mPoW | mPoS | [MagiPay] - page 1040.

Wolf0

member

Activity: 81

Merit: 1002

It was only the wind.

Quote from: Spexx on January 26, 2015, 10:15:05 AM

Quote from: The Frisian on January 26, 2015, 06:40:08 AM

Quote from: halfnode on January 26, 2015, 04:59:52 AM

didn't expect a qns for 32 bit miner to turn into a debate if using 32 bit are botnet operators. I'm just stuck with a pc that's 32bit and too lazy to upgrade it to 64 bit since it's going to last just a few more months but that's still a few more months of cpu cycles i can use for MAGI.

Thanks Spexx for the 32 bit miner!

Totally agreed, thanks Spexx!

You are very welcome and 32 bit is not gonna die anytime soon. Just think of the number of ATMs and EPOS terminals currently running XP and the cost of upgrading it all.

Fine - can we get rid of 16-bit real mode, at least?

111magic

legendary

Activity: 1750

Merit: 1005

IRC is back online!! Grin

jawitech

full member

Activity: 196

Merit: 100

Great to see a lot of new members and miners.

Please take care not to join only 1 pool. We need a better balance of the hashrate. Maxminer's pool needs more miners, while nonce-pool has too much.

Btw, this overview was made by ex33s, Donation address

XMG: 9Hd61fvNvQTVZby6wECQmq2yg2nHxT9w8u

111magic

legendary

Activity: 1750

Merit: 1005

https://www.cryptocoins-dice.com/

Somebody did try this one already?

jawitech

full member

Activity: 196

Merit: 100

Quote from: JasonXtreme on January 27, 2015, 03:28:18 PM

On a separate note, Joe also deserves some kind of reward, working on pretty much everything else XMG related Wink

I'm a lazy ass low class user interface programmer, so I'll kindly ask all three of you to post your XMG addresses again, because the 90 second search limit on this thread is killing me - and I'll send over a bit of what I've mined so far

I'm willing to bet I'm not the only one grateful for all the great work you're doing either Cheesy

Anyway, keep it up!

For all the "lazy asses" Tongue

Magi Donations:
XMG: 95V9eZnrghtEriGUhBwwEuqMbDm1HBJ58u (marketing)
BTC: 188AmugttD1jfy2xYNy6muTzVzYha1JEuq (development)
LTC: Lba3T9NUWcTi2VrKWxtXAT4ypnFGV5ojLC (development)

Spexx:
9EQ342ssXSxmpDURs6XNxAajB14DQzJDNX

Wolf0:
99WoLF8NyL9QukPj9ZjrBUXYYo74RMb5iB

Edited.

jawitech

full member

Activity: 196

Merit: 100

Quote from: prfagun1 on January 27, 2015, 03:56:57 PM

Quote from: jawitech on January 26, 2015, 08:24:36 PM

Quote from: prfagun1 on January 26, 2015, 08:05:26 PM

I hope so.
I have a hash rate of 720.68 in http://magi.nonce-pool.com Grin

If you want to make me happy and do a favor, would it be possible to switch your miner to maxminer's pool? There's an inbalance in the pool's hashrate and we need much more hashpower at maxminers. Would be awesome if you could do.

Thanks a lot...
Of course, I am in the maxminer now.

Great, very appreciated :-)

ex33s

sr. member

Activity: 476

Merit: 250

Quote from: 111magic on January 27, 2015, 03:19:44 PM

Magi back online on www.litepaid.com
7 new shops/services accepting Magi.
Grin

Working for more!!

Very nice to hear!!

Wolf0

member

Activity: 81

Merit: 1002

It was only the wind.

Quote from: Singman33 on January 26, 2015, 03:00:25 AM

Quote from: Wolf0 on January 25, 2015, 07:36:17 PM

Quote from: Spexx on January 25, 2015, 07:21:39 PM

Quote from: Wolf0 on January 25, 2015, 06:59:20 PM

Why? You realize 32-bit is pretty much dead, and 99.9999% of people asking for 32-bit CPU miners want to run them on botnets, right?

Wrong. I would have thought that anybody with the nous to run a botnet would also be able to compile their own minerd from the source in next to no time anyway. I also still use old 32 bit machines myself for various applications. They make very good XMG wallet hosts too. I told you about my XMG sausage machine on a Celeron didn't I Wolf0? Wink

They really don't, believe me. It's rather funny, they're computer-stupid, most of them. However, 32-bit IS dead for most machines - old toys kept around don't count - no one will run an application that requires CPU performance, like a miner, on a 32-bit machine.

Wolf, really, if so many computers are bots with Windows 32 bits, it's because lots of them can't be upgraded to 64 bits version. I've a few with custom applications that can't be rewritten and use old components hardly working on XP 32 bits. Upgrading to 64 bits will cost me a few weeks of dev and money, but theses machines have a lot of CPU cycles to spare for Magi...

For Magi, this isn't as applicable, but if you're running a CPU miner that can be helped by 64-bit on a 32-bit OS running on a 64-bit machine, you're just crippling it. I see your point, occasionally you have old crap tying you to 32-bit, but dear god, x86 needs to stop with the backward compatibility. We still boot up in 16-bit real mode. When doing operating systems dev, I was tearing my hair out over the ridiculous amount of work it takes to get the system into a modern state. Can we please let 32-bit die? Tongue

prfagun1

full member

Activity: 170

Merit: 100

Quote from: jawitech on January 26, 2015, 08:24:36 PM

Quote from: prfagun1 on January 26, 2015, 08:05:26 PM

I hope so.
I have a hash rate of 720.68 in http://magi.nonce-pool.com Grin

If you want to make me happy and do a favor, would it be possible to switch your miner to maxminer's pool? There's an inbalance in the pool's hashrate and we need much more hashpower at maxminers. Would be awesome if you could do.

Thanks a lot...

Of course, I am in the maxminer now.

Crypto_Lobbyist

newbie

Activity: 10

Merit: 0

Quote from: 111magic on January 27, 2015, 03:19:44 PM

Magi back online on www.litepaid.com
7 new shops/services accepting Magi.
Grin

Working for more!!

Like that!

DevTeam still hard working. Good to see that, motivated to further steps.

JasonXtreme

newbie

Activity: 28

Merit: 0

Well then... my Windows laptop used to dish out about 25Khash/s, and I had some virtual pcs on free trials, coming together at about 75-80Khash/s according to the suprnova pool. With the recent development and optimizations by spexx and Wolf0, the total adds up to...

Wait for it...

220Khash/s Cheesy

Yup, 220 is not an error, It's been stable like that ever since I upgraded.

I'd say the boys should post some XMG addresses. Even if the speed boost does effect the network negatively a bit, these guys are working hard and this stuff isn't easy. I know I'll donate, even if it isn't a fortune Cheesy

On a separate note, Joe also deserves some kind of reward, working on pretty much everything else XMG related Wink

I'm a lazy ass low class user interface programmer, so I'll kindly ask all three of you to post your XMG addresses again, because the 90 second search limit on this thread is killing me - and I'll send over a bit of what I've mined so far

I'm willing to bet I'm not the only one grateful for all the great work you're doing either Cheesy

Anyway, keep it up!

111magic

legendary

Activity: 1750

Merit: 1005

Magi back online on www.litepaid.com
7 new shops/services accepting Magi.
Grin

Working for more!!

Wolf0

member

Activity: 81

Merit: 1002

It was only the wind.

Quote from: joelao95 on January 25, 2015, 11:46:01 PM

Quote from: Wolf0 on January 25, 2015, 11:38:39 PM

Quote from: Spexx on January 25, 2015, 11:35:29 PM

Quote from: Wolf0 on January 25, 2015, 11:31:48 PM

Quote from: Spexx on January 25, 2015, 11:01:55 PM

Quote from: Wolf0 on January 25, 2015, 10:44:17 PM

I enjoy debates. And you probably could be.

Lol. I was thinking that the instructions for compiling the miner with Cygwin were published on here yonks ago and if they are followed to the letter then you will get a working minerd.exe in next to no time, though it will not be the fastest. Anyone who can use a keyboard and mouse and has just a bit of computer-savvy can do it. "It isn't rocket science" and surely a botnet operator could do it.

I've met many. Have you?

Do you know for certain that I am not a botnet operator?

Clever. However, even if you were, this would not guarantee you knew many others - this is necessary to get a good sample size when gauging their general intelligence as a group.

My question is, how these guys who know nothing of computer stuffs are able to create / operate botnet.

Simple tools. Money talks - they invest a little in bots, and they get to run stuff on them, or get full control of it. Really point-and-click simple - but they tend to do stupid things, like run miners at 100% unconditionally on bots...

halfnode

newbie

Activity: 39

Merit: 0

hope with all the improved speed, people remember that higher hashrate doesn't mean more XMG but lesser

go6ooo1212

legendary

Activity: 1512

Merit: 1000

quarkchain.io

Quote from: 111magic on January 27, 2015, 02:54:33 PM

IRC offline? Can not connect!

same..

111magic

legendary

Activity: 1750

Merit: 1005

IRC offline? Can not connect!

JasonXtreme

newbie

Activity: 28

Merit: 0

Quote from: Wolf0 on January 27, 2015, 06:43:37 AM

Quote from: Singman33 on January 27, 2015, 06:36:22 AM

Won't compile on Linux Ubuntu (and never got a problem before) :

Code:

gcc -std=gnu99  -march=native -O3 -pthread -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -Ofast  -o minerd minerd-cpu-miner.o minerd-util.o minerd-sha2.o minerd-scrypt.o minerd-m7mhash.o  minerd-sha2-x64.o minerd-scrypt-x64.o  -L/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu -lcurl -ljansson -lpthread  m7/libm7m.a -lgmp -lcurl -lm -lgmp
/tmp/ccAUbsYX.ltrans9.ltrans.o: dans la fonction « scanhash_m7m_hash »:
ccAUbsYX.ltrans9.o:(.text+0xd2): référence indéfinie vers « sph_sha256_init »
ccAUbsYX.ltrans9.o:(.text+0xde): référence indéfinie vers « sph_sha256_init »
ccAUbsYX.ltrans9.o:(.text+0xf6): référence indéfinie vers « sph_sha224 »
ccAUbsYX.ltrans9.o:(.text+0x102): référence indéfinie vers « sph_sha512_init »
ccAUbsYX.ltrans9.o:(.text+0x11a): référence indéfinie vers « sph_sha384 »
ccAUbsYX.ltrans9.o:(.text+0x126): référence indéfinie vers « sph_keccak512_init »
ccAUbsYX.ltrans9.o:(.text+0x13e): référence indéfinie vers « sph_keccak512 »
ccAUbsYX.ltrans9.o:(.text+0x14a): référence indéfinie vers « sph_whirlpool_init »
ccAUbsYX.ltrans9.o:(.text+0x162): référence indéfinie vers « sph_whirlpool »
ccAUbsYX.ltrans9.o:(.text+0x16e): référence indéfinie vers « sph_haval256_5_init »
ccAUbsYX.ltrans9.o:(.text+0x186): référence indéfinie vers « sph_haval256_5 »
ccAUbsYX.ltrans9.o:(.text+0x192): référence indéfinie vers « sph_tiger_init »
ccAUbsYX.ltrans9.o:(.text+0x1aa): référence indéfinie vers « sph_tiger »
ccAUbsYX.ltrans9.o:(.text+0x1b6): référence indéfinie vers « sph_ripemd160_init »
ccAUbsYX.ltrans9.o:(.text+0x1ce): référence indéfinie vers « sph_ripemd160 »
ccAUbsYX.ltrans9.o:(.text+0x3e1): référence indéfinie vers « sph_sha224 »
ccAUbsYX.ltrans9.o:(.text+0x3f4): référence indéfinie vers « sph_sha256_close »
ccAUbsYX.ltrans9.o:(.text+0x420): référence indéfinie vers « sph_sha384 »
ccAUbsYX.ltrans9.o:(.text+0x43a): référence indéfinie vers « sph_sha512_close »
ccAUbsYX.ltrans9.o:(.text+0x466): référence indéfinie vers « sph_keccak512 »
ccAUbsYX.ltrans9.o:(.text+0x480): référence indéfinie vers « sph_keccak512_close »
ccAUbsYX.ltrans9.o:(.text+0x4ac): référence indéfinie vers « sph_whirlpool »
ccAUbsYX.ltrans9.o:(.text+0x4c6): référence indéfinie vers « sph_whirlpool_close »
ccAUbsYX.ltrans9.o:(.text+0x4f2): référence indéfinie vers « sph_haval256_5 »
ccAUbsYX.ltrans9.o:(.text+0x50c): référence indéfinie vers « sph_haval256_5_close »
ccAUbsYX.ltrans9.o:(.text+0x5c8): référence indéfinie vers « sph_tiger »
ccAUbsYX.ltrans9.o:(.text+0x5e2): référence indéfinie vers « sph_tiger_close »
ccAUbsYX.ltrans9.o:(.text+0x69e): référence indéfinie vers « sph_ripemd160 »
ccAUbsYX.ltrans9.o:(.text+0x6b8): référence indéfinie vers « sph_ripemd160_close »
ccAUbsYX.ltrans9.o:(.text+0x821): référence indéfinie vers « sph_sha224 »
ccAUbsYX.ltrans9.o:(.text+0x830): référence indéfinie vers « sph_sha256_close »
ccAUbsYX.ltrans9.o:(.text+0xe1a): référence indéfinie vers « sph_sha224 »
ccAUbsYX.ltrans9.o:(.text+0xe29): référence indéfinie vers « sph_sha256_close »
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status

Try "make distclean", then "AR=gcc-ar RANLIB=gcc-ranlib ./configure", then "make".

Tnx, solved my problem too

bobben2

full member

Activity: 279

Merit: 104

Quote from: Wolf0 on January 27, 2015, 01:52:24 PM

Quote from: Sollozzo on January 27, 2015, 01:47:27 PM

Quote from: goldlabel on January 27, 2015, 01:25:15 PM

wow nice work, respect Cool

I would like to test thise one also, but i dont know how to use https://github.com/magi-project/m-cpuminer-legacy-v2 so someone can explane to be how it works thx ahead.
Again respect for Wolf0 and joe Cool

Damn much respect!...... I have an old CoreDuo doing 5.32!!!! an I5 pumping out 25.80 and various New 2 core Celerons pumping out 4-5kh..

You guys took my CPUs to another level.

Any recommendations for a nice CPU without breaking the bank? I assume i7 but which ones?

Yesterday, I bought an i7-5930k, an ASRock X99 WS, 32GB of DDR4 at 2666Mhz, and a liquid cooler for the CPU with BTC at Newegg - she's gonna be my new main system. I'm pretty sure that should hash well.

Looks like you are building for the future Grin

If I were to build a similar system in my country (Norway), I would have had to fork out the equivalent of $1759USD for those parts, plus
a bit for a cooler on top of that.
An i7-5930K alone costs $700 over here.
A more modest i7-4790K costs $400.
Anyways, If one is looking to buy new gear, the only game in town for serious CPU mining seems be Has(h)well-based chips,
from any I5 and upwards.

Wolf0

member

Activity: 81

Merit: 1002

It was only the wind.

Quote from: Spexx on January 25, 2015, 11:35:29 PM

Quote from: Wolf0 on January 25, 2015, 11:31:48 PM

Quote from: Spexx on January 25, 2015, 11:01:55 PM

Quote from: Wolf0 on January 25, 2015, 10:44:17 PM

I enjoy debates. And you probably could be.

Lol. I was thinking that the instructions for compiling the miner with Cygwin were published on here yonks ago and if they are followed to the letter then you will get a working minerd.exe in next to no time, though it will not be the fastest. Anyone who can use a keyboard and mouse and has just a bit of computer-savvy can do it. "It isn't rocket science" and surely a botnet operator could do it.

I've met many. Have you?

Do you know for certain that I am not a botnet operator?

Clever. However, even if you were, this would not guarantee you knew many others - this is necessary to get a good sample size when gauging their general intelligence as a group.

goldlabel

hero member

Activity: 575

Merit: 502

Im using a amd 8350 liquid cooled and doing about 65 kh with wolf-m7m-cpuminer-x64-0122-corei7 is this the same program then the v2 or is the v2 even newer?

Topic: [ANN] [XMG] MAGI | CPU mining | mPoW | mPoS | [MagiPay] - page 1040. (Read 2375939 times)