What exchange do you like?
cryptsy
poloniex
Topic: [ANN] [XMG] MAGI | CPU mining | mPoW | mPoS | [MagiPay] - page 1122. (Read 2375926 times)
What exchange do you like?
Bittrex
The minimum order size is .00050000 btc
Slickers
and found out about it after receiving unsaleable balance
I was caught again
The minimum order size is .00050000 btc
Slickers
and found out about it after receiving unsaleable balance
I was caught again
Still like Cryptoine!
https://cryptoine.com/static/terms
...
bla bla
...
Other
We reserve the right to change this Terms of Service without notice.
desire to sell does not make me an idiot
Video Magi now in China!
http://v.youku.com/v_show/id_XODAzMDU3NjEy.html
http://v.youku.com/v_show/id_XODAzMDU3NjEy.html
Bittrex
The minimum order size is .00050000 btc
Slickers
and found out about it after receiving unsaleable balance
I was caught again
The minimum order size is .00050000 btc
Slickers
and found out about it after receiving unsaleable balance
I was caught again
Still like Cryptoine!
Please spread the hashrate as much as possible, particularly give SuchPool a support, thx: http://suchpool.pw/xmg/index.php
Okay. I think we can bring in more people. That pool though is getting lower results than my suprnova rig and its the same hashrate. Are they having issues?
Basically there won't be very much difference. If the pool can easily find blocks (so people get payout more often), that means the pool has a number of miners and higher hash. This also means one will have less shares. In the other case, SuchPool has less people and less hashrate but one will have the higher share.
need a business proposal miners.
for example, increase the award for the block for one week
Ideology should not replace economics ))
uh, some magic blocks something?
Well nag day 8 hours blocks with a reward of 3 xmg
and then it does not sell it on the stock exchange ...
that's really funny
Please spread the hashrate as much as possible, particularly give SuchPool a support, thx: http://suchpool.pw/xmg/index.php
Okay. I think we can bring in more people. That pool though is getting lower results than my suprnova rig and its the same hashrate. Are they having issues?
Basically there won't be very much difference. If the pool can easily find blocks (so people get payout more often), that means the pool has a number of miners and higher hash. This also means one will have less shares. In the other case, SuchPool has less people and less hashrate but one will have the higher share.
need a business proposal miners.
for example, increase the award for the block for one week
Ideology should not replace economics ))
uh, some magic blocks something?
Bittrex
The minimum order size is .00050000 btc
Slickers
and found out about it after receiving unsaleable balance
I was caught again
The minimum order size is .00050000 btc
Slickers
and found out about it after receiving unsaleable balance
I was caught again
I know, I have about ten coins this way,
including coins who are already delisted.
Like I said bittrex f*cks!
Bittrex
The minimum order size is .00050000 btc
Slickers
and found out about it after receiving unsaleable balance
I was caught again
The minimum order size is .00050000 btc
Slickers
and found out about it after receiving unsaleable balance
I was caught again
Please spread the hashrate as much as possible, particularly give SuchPool a support, thx: http://suchpool.pw/xmg/index.php
Okay. I think we can bring in more people. That pool though is getting lower results than my suprnova rig and its the same hashrate. Are they having issues?
Basically there won't be very much difference. If the pool can easily find blocks (so people get payout more often), that means the pool has a number of miners and higher hash. This also means one will have less shares. In the other case, SuchPool has less people and less hashrate but one will have the higher share.
need a business proposal miners.
for example, increase the award for the block for one week
Ideology should not replace economics ))
Please spread the hashrate as much as possible, particularly give SuchPool a support, thx: http://suchpool.pw/xmg/index.php
Okay. I think we can bring in more people. That pool though is getting lower results than my suprnova rig and its the same hashrate. Are they having issues?
Basically there won't be very much difference. If the pool can easily find blocks (so people get payout more often), that means the pool has a number of miners and higher hash. This also means one will have less shares. In the other case, SuchPool has less people and less hashrate but one will have the higher share.
Think the miners should get optimization by running from Spexx's package. The following package is purely for simplicity. I didn't yet compare the hash rate, so it may not give you the best result, but the interface is pretty straightforward. It's not a re-compilation of the source code, but rather a collection of a few minerds, to allow one to choose from a menu. The basic running is the same as using command line parameters; I will do some optimizations later on.
http://coinmagi.org/files/magi-minerd/Magi-miner.zip
Let me know if you run into any problems.
http://coinmagi.org/files/magi-minerd/Magi-miner.zip
Let me know if you run into any problems.
Nice
Magi (XMG) almost two months old.
Original thread is going to get the 200 pages here this week.
Original thread is going to get the 200 pages here this week.
Please spread the hashrate as much as possible, particularly give SuchPool a support, thx: http://suchpool.pw/xmg/index.php
Okay. I think we can bring in more people. That pool though is getting lower results than my suprnova rig and its the same hashrate. Are they having issues?
nice release! you guys are amazing devs wow.
This good to simplify.. But stop button doesn't work at all.
Think the miners should get optimization by running from Spexx's package. The following package is purely for simplicity. I didn't yet compare the hash rate, so it may not give you the best result, but the interface is pretty straightforward. It's not a re-compilation of the source code, but rather a collection of a few minerds, to allow one to choose from a menu. The basic running is the same as using command line parameters; I will do some optimizations later on.
http://coinmagi.org/files/magi-minerd/Magi-miner.zip
Let me know if you run into any problems.
http://coinmagi.org/files/magi-minerd/Magi-miner.zip
Let me know if you run into any problems.
This good to simplify.. But stop button doesn't work at all.
The new windows 1.1.0.1 wallet crashes. Will the old 1.0.0.2 wallet still stake?
Think the miners should get optimization by running from Spexx's package. The following package is purely for simplicity. I didn't yet compare the hash rate, so it may not give you the best result, but the interface is pretty straightforward. It's not a re-compilation of the source code, but rather a collection of a few minerds, to allow one to choose from a menu. The basic running is the same as using command line parameters; I will do some optimizations later on.
http://coinmagi.org/files/magi-minerd/Magi-miner.zip
http://coinmagi.org/misc/images/magi-thread/Magi-miner-01.png
Let me know if you run into any problems.
http://coinmagi.org/files/magi-minerd/Magi-miner.zip
http://coinmagi.org/misc/images/magi-thread/Magi-miner-01.png
Let me know if you run into any problems.
This good to simplify.. But stop button doesn't work at all.
Please spread the hashrate as much as possible, particularly give SuchPool a support, thx: http://suchpool.pw/xmg/index.php
Think the miners should get optimization by running from Spexx's package. The following package is purely for simplicity. I didn't yet compare the hash rate, so it may not give you the best result, but the interface is pretty straightforward. It's not a re-compilation of the source code, but rather a collection of a few minerds, to allow one to choose from a menu. The basic running is the same as using command line parameters; I will do some optimizations later on.
http://coinmagi.org/files/magi-minerd/Magi-miner.zip
Let me know if you run into any problems.
http://coinmagi.org/files/magi-minerd/Magi-miner.zip
Let me know if you run into any problems.
Yea, I would set it up that way. Cause different workers get different difficulty.
In my case I'm running on 5 different cpu types and the pool gives different difficulty depending on my cpu and you can also track if 1 miner goes down.
In my case I'm running on 5 different cpu types and the pool gives different difficulty depending on my cpu and you can also track if 1 miner goes down.
So its a good idea to make multiple workers for each rented rig?
Welcome MiningRigRentals! I was waiting for this to happen! Now we can rent out hash power. Someone make a tutorial how to rent it out!
Welcome MiningRigRentals! I was waiting for this to happen! Now we can rent out hash power. Someone make a tutorial how to rent it out!
Jump to: