Author

Topic: [ANN] [XSH] TOR/i2p, Quantum proof, MN, PoS/PoW, Fully ano, SHIELD - page 173. (Read 154389 times)

full member
Activity: 756
Merit: 103
Dev could you confirm us this is the right wallet to use on pools 2.1.0.0-4e6c77c-bet (it's the one from the MASTER branch of your sources). We didn't have the right block height the first time, if UMINE built on the dev branch, did they forked again ? They don't seem to work with the same version.
full member
Activity: 253
Merit: 100
SafeCoin-SAFE
What's going on with the chain ?  Huh Huh Huh
And we need a stable QT wallet pls dev..
full member
Activity: 252
Merit: 100
How do I see what nodes to use to make sure I connect to umine chain?

And again, +1 to everyone saying spread the hash.  This project has a ton of potential, let's focus on execution now and price later.
full member
Activity: 756
Merit: 103
We close SHIELD in out pool. He not working.

We find a solution, but in the end the decision is always different? Except for the umine, not one branch of the chain will be correct.

Blocks on our pools are the same, but any of our found solutions do not fall into the chain. Developers need to intervene. You have got the CENTRALIZED network.

And further...

For dev
You specifically did that when you restart the purse logs are stricken?

Hey

We don't really understand what you mean with that,  can you send me a PM about your problems, we'll solve them as soon as possible!

The SHIELD team.

We're reinstalling the wallet from scratch, rebuilding everything from the last sources (MASTER BRANCH). Dev, we'll need you here to be sure we're on the right chain. Nobody want this coin to fail because of a centralized network. Please, pm me your Skype if you have one, or make a Discord so we can fix this issue as soon as we can.
member
Activity: 293
Merit: 10
Hey everyone,

we, first of all, want to advice everyone to spread the hash as keeping most miners on one or two pools could be dangerous for the chain, this is also why we are working very hard on our own pool. We're also announcing an article about our PoS article that will be uploaded to our Medium tomorrow (we'll link it here and on our twitter, don't worry.) The exact time is still unknown but it'll be there!

The SHIELD team.
newbie
Activity: 52
Merit: 0
We close SHIELD in out pool. He not working.

We find a solution, but in the end the decision is always different? Except for the umine, not one branch of the chain will be correct.

Blocks on our pools are the same, but any of our found solutions do not fall into the chain. Developers need to intervene. You have got the CENTRALIZED network.

And further...

For dev
You specifically did that when you restart the purse logs are stricken?

Hey

We don't really understand what you mean with that,  can you send me a PM about your problems, we'll solve them as soon as possible!

The SHIELD team.

check pm
member
Activity: 293
Merit: 10
We close SHIELD in out pool. He not working.

We find a solution, but in the end the decision is always different? Except for the umine, not one branch of the chain will be correct.

Blocks on our pools are the same, but any of our found solutions do not fall into the chain. Developers need to intervene. You have got the CENTRALIZED network.

And further...

For dev
You specifically did that when you restart the purse logs are stricken?

Hey

We don't really understand what you mean with that,  can you send me a PM about your problems, we'll solve them as soon as possible!

The SHIELD team.
newbie
Activity: 52
Merit: 0
We close SHIELD in out pool. He not working.

We find a solution, but in the end the decision is always different? Except for the umine, not one branch of the chain will be correct.

Blocks on our pools are the same, but any of our found solutions do not fall into the chain. Developers need to intervene. You have got the CENTRALIZED network.

And further...

For dev
You specifically did that when you restart the purse logs are stricken?
sls
member
Activity: 110
Merit: 10
We just lowered our fee to 0.1% guys, come  Roll Eyes It's not a good thing to have 80% of the hash centralized, one error or late update from the hash holder and the chain break. Fortunately, it's solved now. To secure the network, please, spread the hash.

https://bigmine.org

Code:
-a myr-gr -o stratum+tcp://bigmine.org:5433 -u YOUR_WALLET -p stats,c=XSH
make Lyra2 algo
full member
Activity: 252
Merit: 100
We just lowered our fee to 0.1% guys, come  Roll Eyes It's not a good thing to have 80% of the hash centralized, one error or late update from the hash holder and the chain break. Fortunately, it's solved now. To secure the network, please, spread the hash.

https://bigmine.org

Code:
-a myr-gr -o stratum+tcp://bigmine.org:5433 -u YOUR_WALLET -p stats,c=XSH

+1.  I am not mining on umine because it is bad for the network. Please do the same.  This is not a knock against umine, which is a good pool (in my opinion), but they should also want the hash spread out.  Concentrated hash is bad for umine and bad for the coin.

This coin could actually be very valuable soon once initial dumping is over, because the supply growth will grind to a halt (good scheme to prevent deflation).  Let's not ruin it for ourselves with carelessness over where we mine Smiley
newbie
Activity: 52
Merit: 0
We just lowered our fee to 0.1% guys, come  Roll Eyes It's not a good thing to have 80% of the hash centralized, one error or late update from the hash holder and the chain break. Fortunately, it's solved now. To secure the network, please, spread the hash.

https://bigmine.org

Code:
-a myr-gr -o stratum+tcp://bigmine.org:5433 -u YOUR_WALLET -p stats,c=XSH
full member
Activity: 252
Merit: 100
too bad this coin isnt a masternode coin, that way would have  100 sats, people are crazy only after PoS/masternode coins, which is sad.

My thoughts are:

1) This project is 9 days old.  There is a money supply of over 200 million coins.  This means the market cap at 3 sats (not 4) is US$30,000.  This is actually quite good for such a young coin.  Plus this is a low volume exchange, which suppresses prices a little.
2) The supply growth has way slowed with block halvings.  So after any initial dumps, it will be very hard for miners to flood the market with sales.

I think these are encouraging signs.  Plus, the full roadmap is not unveiled, so we may see masternodes in the future.  At the very least we will see PoS, which will encourage holding too.
newbie
Activity: 66
Merit: 0
too bad this coin isnt a masternode coin, that way would have  100 sats, people are crazy only after PoS/masternode coins, which is sad.
full member
Activity: 253
Merit: 100
SafeCoin-SAFE
Coin price is 4 sats !! .. damn . i should stop mining and start buying lol. no way for a good profit Tongue
full member
Activity: 798
Merit: 116
ok now work...

not really sometime the transaction was send immediatly sometimes the wallet it's blocked on broadcasting transaction
member
Activity: 293
Merit: 10
when electrum is connect to 188.226 etc i can see my balance if change the peer for example 172.19.16 my balance is 0

This is because 172.19.16.117 is not ours, you should always use 188.226.178.216
The network page will be fixed in the next update

- The SHIELD team
full member
Activity: 798
Merit: 116
full member
Activity: 798
Merit: 116
when electrum is connect to 188.226 etc i can see my balance if change the peer for example 172.19.16 my balance is 0
full member
Activity: 798
Merit: 116
for some reason i am unable to send XSH from the electrum wallet, "exceptions must be old style classes or derived from not BaseException, not NoneType".

EDIT: updated shield wallet for the new one and it works.

i have the last one but i cant send my xsh

Hey, do you get the "exceptions must be old style classes or derived from not BaseException, not NoneType" error or is it something else? Are you also synchronised?

The SHIELD team.

I figured this out i had the older version of  electrum wallet, downloaded the new 2.4.2 and its OK.

please read message before talk .. thanks
Jump to: