Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN] xxxxx - page 30. (Read 175984 times)

full member
Activity: 252
Merit: 103
October 03, 2017, 05:04:11 AM
wcxofficial, can you please disclose how many active users are using beta now, and when there will be beta updates that are in your roadmap ? Thank you beforehand.
full member
Activity: 1274
Merit: 100
October 03, 2017, 03:21:06 AM
Great exchange it will and no doubt the WCX coin will hold the major market and as its beta version is started and coin pre-sale also in progress and huge community had joined the WCX wish you the best.
full member
Activity: 700
Merit: 108
October 03, 2017, 01:35:53 AM
So many noobs lol. I especially like the ones who come in and say 'scam" because they think the tokens are not hard capped, although the hard cap was announced long ago at 1 billion tokens.

WCX is currently one of the only ICO with a clear business model and path to profitability. I can be a dumb ass and invest like a dumb ass in ICOs who make shit promises like 99% of ICOs, who by the way will never see the light of day, they will just take investor money.

Or I can invest like a RATIONAL investor and look at the NUMBERS, the business, etc. WCX is entering a MASSIVE market (digital currency trading) that is growing so fast. Even if it's #10 exchange in the world it will still make $50K per day. This is a business to invest in, not a shit ICO who made with fancy videos but NO PATH to the product, income, or profit!

At the end of the day investing is about the numbers, the numbers are KING, and WCX has all the HARD REAL numbers on their side, 600K users sign up, 20K followers on Twitter, beta exchange, etc. And ICO has not even started! Please name one other ICO with so much base of user? If trend continue 1Million users by the time ICO is starting on WCX. You know how much power you have in 1 million emails in a business?

I'm just saying - use your mind my folks. A lot of ICOs out there are complete BS, the proof is there: not a single ICO from past 2 years that has a functioning successful product, because 99% of them are actually scams - they raise, they take your money, and they never deliver, or they deliver so badly, or they have something and nobody uses it.

WCX has
1) product (proven - beta exchange, and further improvements)
2) market (proven - crypto trading is massive)
3) users (proven - 600K sign ups and counting)

These = successful business, which in the end is all I care about as ICO investor - not some shit videos, hype, "advisors" or Fake hyped Linkedins.



well, regarding the user (proven - 600k registered) a part of them can be the same person with multi refferral to own registration only to get the 50 wcx bonus. i don't know what is the process to prevent this (checksum of computer parts, hard coded hdd signature, only IP check ...) but sure there is some method to bypass

member
Activity: 63
Merit: 10
PosToken
October 02, 2017, 09:17:29 PM
What is the total amount of coins?

Hardcap is 1 billion WCX tokens. Unsold coins will be destroyed.

I think almost traders not completely believe in this coin, but I still Smiley
newbie
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
October 02, 2017, 09:13:03 PM
flattail is a useless troll. probably same account as bejismarket. look at flattail post history, he is promoting and linking to shit ICOs that he's "invested" in.

Ah, HamnChess, if nothing else I can pop in every few days for some amusement.  Grin If you look at my history you will see that in my first post I worked out the math of how many tokens would be issued, before any official word was given. I also told everyone I had made contact with the escrow and confirmed his involvement. I commented "I love the clear mission and the generous profit-sharing program." In my second post I revealed that I had made an investment, and said, "I too would like more details regarding the team and how they will execute their plan, but am willing to take the risk at this point in spite of sparse details." In my third post I confirmed that the exchange was working, expressed my enthusiasm, and shared a link to their roadmap (which had not been shared). 
{Regarding the WCX roadmap (https://trello.com/b/596LMpPZ/wcx-product-roadmap), it's nice to see a list of things they are working on. I could express a concern that only one person is listed for doing the work (John Reyes), but maybe he is a one-man wonder. I might mention a concern that the last logged activity is Sept 12, but if I did that you would have to come up with a new way to insult me and I don't want to tax your vocabulary.}
In my 4th post I shared the email regarding refund of investment. In my 5th post I confirmed that I had received my refund. I also said, "Although I would like more transparency regarding team members and the company overall, to this point they have done as they said they would do." But I did start to express some concerns about the potential for success, saying "there are a lot of unknown variables" . . . In my 6th post I wrote to @wcxofficial, thanking them and wishing for their success, but also asking for either a multi-sig wallet or an escrow before reinvesting. However, it was not until my 7th post that I became one of your targets! My transformation into a "useless troll" was when I said, "What I love about this project is the profit-sharing model--I think that is just brilliant! I also love that they want to become the world's leading exchange. I think with the right team they could reach this goal. But there is the Achilles's heel--we simply do not know the team! We don't know how many people are working on reaching their goals, what problems they are running into, or anything else." So, yes, I'm very clearly trolling! I even raised it up a notch and became a "bloody schmuck" when I listed some potential competitors!! And for me to give responsible disclosure by listing which of these companies I did or did not have a stake in, I became a shill as well. You, on the other hand, have not disclosed your financial incentives that could affect your judgment. I can only assume you have a large stake in WCX; otherwise why spend so much energy knocking down anyone who presents a concern?

By the way, to my knowledge I do not have an alter-ego who publishes under the name of @benjismarket--but for me to deny any connection to him probably just makes me more suspicious. Besides, (s)he does seem to understand rational argumentation so there could in fact be a connection between us. Here is another intriguing possibility: Have you considered that @benjismarket and @wcxofficial could be one and the same?? They both are starting exchanges, they are both anonymous, they are both trying to address the problems with existing exchanges and promising better user experience, . . . if they are not the same person, then one should hire the other and work together rather than compete!
 


I dont know what happened. I dont wanna talk too much. Just thanks for your contributions in this topic. Hope u can provide us more further information.
I like this project also. But many things need to be considered too....
newbie
Activity: 15
Merit: 0
October 02, 2017, 04:57:09 PM
flattail is a useless troll. probably same account as bejismarket. look at flattail post history, he is promoting and linking to shit ICOs that he's "invested" in.

Ah, HamnChess, if nothing else I can pop in every few days for some amusement.  Grin If you look at my history you will see that in my first post I worked out the math of how many tokens would be issued, before any official word was given. I also told everyone I had made contact with the escrow and confirmed his involvement. I commented "I love the clear mission and the generous profit-sharing program." In my second post I revealed that I had made an investment, and said, "I too would like more details regarding the team and how they will execute their plan, but am willing to take the risk at this point in spite of sparse details." In my third post I confirmed that the exchange was working, expressed my enthusiasm, and shared a link to their roadmap (which had not been shared). 
{Regarding the WCX roadmap (https://trello.com/b/596LMpPZ/wcx-product-roadmap), it's nice to see a list of things they are working on. I could express a concern that only one person is listed for doing the work (John Reyes), but maybe he is a one-man wonder. I might mention a concern that the last logged activity is Sept 12, but if I did that you would have to come up with a new way to insult me and I don't want to tax your vocabulary.}
In my 4th post I shared the email regarding refund of investment. In my 5th post I confirmed that I had received my refund. I also said, "Although I would like more transparency regarding team members and the company overall, to this point they have done as they said they would do." But I did start to express some concerns about the potential for success, saying "there are a lot of unknown variables" . . . In my 6th post I wrote to @wcxofficial, thanking them and wishing for their success, but also asking for either a multi-sig wallet or an escrow before reinvesting. However, it was not until my 7th post that I became one of your targets! My transformation into a "useless troll" was when I said, "What I love about this project is the profit-sharing model--I think that is just brilliant! I also love that they want to become the world's leading exchange. I think with the right team they could reach this goal. But there is the Achilles's heel--we simply do not know the team! We don't know how many people are working on reaching their goals, what problems they are running into, or anything else." So, yes, I'm very clearly trolling! I even raised it up a notch and became a "bloody schmuck" when I listed some potential competitors!! And for me to give responsible disclosure by listing which of these companies I did or did not have a stake in, I became a shill as well. You, on the other hand, have not disclosed your financial incentives that could affect your judgment. I can only assume you have a large stake in WCX; otherwise why spend so much energy knocking down anyone who presents a concern?

By the way, to my knowledge I do not have an alter-ego who publishes under the name of @benjismarket--but for me to deny any connection to him probably just makes me more suspicious. Besides, (s)he does seem to understand rational argumentation so there could in fact be a connection between us. Here is another intriguing possibility: Have you considered that @benjismarket and @wcxofficial could be one and the same?? They both are starting exchanges, they are both anonymous, they are both trying to address the problems with existing exchanges and promising better user experience, . . . if they are not the same person, then one should hire the other and work together rather than compete!
 

full member
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
Proof-of-Asset Protocol
October 02, 2017, 03:53:41 PM
Whats the purpose of giving us a reffer link when theres an IP block that prevents people from joining?
newbie
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
October 02, 2017, 03:30:10 PM
Hum, did anyone get the extra-tokens when their referrals signed up? Several friends of mine got already verified after using my code and I'm not getting any change in my 'wallet' (i.e.: that field where the number of tokens is displayed)  Huh

Pretty suspicious everything...

Suspicious? What's suspicious if you have an issue and everyone else's is working? Goddamn noobs.

Haha, excuse me Mr. Experience!!!

I believe this is a legitimate question, as I've received messages from some other people suffering exactly the same issue.
hero member
Activity: 910
Merit: 500
October 02, 2017, 01:05:23 PM
We have confirmed: the hard cap on the ICO is 1 Billion tokens (WCXT).
What about softcap? Is there?
What is price for 1 WCXT token?
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
October 02, 2017, 11:54:44 AM
Hum, did anyone get the extra-tokens when their referrals signed up? Several friends of mine got already verified after using my code and I'm not getting any change in my 'wallet' (i.e.: that field where the number of tokens is displayed)  Huh

Pretty suspicious everything...

Suspicious? What's suspicious if you have an issue and everyone else's is working? Goddamn noobs.
newbie
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
October 02, 2017, 11:34:36 AM
Hum, did anyone get the extra-tokens when their referrals signed up? Several friends of mine got already verified after using my code and I'm not getting any change in my 'wallet' (i.e.: that field where the number of tokens is displayed)  Huh

Pretty suspicious everything...
member
Activity: 294
Merit: 10
October 02, 2017, 10:38:13 AM
Hello,

ZenCash team would like Zen to be listed on wcex.co

https://zensystem.io/
https://www.bittrex.com/Market/Index?MarketName=BTC-ZEN
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/annzen-horizen-unbounded-by-design-2047435

Please inform us about your decision. We would like to cooperate with you.

Thanks!
Very good news. Now even those who did not believe in the project must believe
yes you are right but also news really helps in a project such as this one.i am just wondering when we will be able to transfer our coins to the exchange?
member
Activity: 294
Merit: 10
October 02, 2017, 10:32:51 AM
Why is this thread remarkably full of Newbie and Jr. Member accounts? Doesn't seem natural.
maybe for the same problem as i have had to make new profile for there where quite a few that got hacked or lost profiles and taking some time to retrieve.so when you do a temp profile that is where you start
full member
Activity: 406
Merit: 106
October 02, 2017, 07:58:41 AM
Hello,

ZenCash team would like Zen to be listed on wcex.co

https://zensystem.io/
https://www.bittrex.com/Market/Index?MarketName=BTC-ZEN
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/annzen-horizen-unbounded-by-design-2047435

Please inform us about your decision. We would like to cooperate with you.

Thanks!
Very good news. Now even those who did not believe in the project must believe
member
Activity: 211
Merit: 20
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
October 02, 2017, 06:54:25 AM
We have confirmed: the hard cap on the ICO is 1 Billion tokens (WCXT).
1Billion WCXT: 1WCXT = $0.10 TOTAL $100 Million  Shocked
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 102
October 02, 2017, 06:37:14 AM
We have confirmed: the hard cap on the ICO is 1 Billion tokens (WCXT).

Where have you publicised this information apart from here?


You might wanna check the meaning of "publicized" again.

Quote
Is there any access available so we can see the product functioning, and the trades executing in real time? I have heard it is already functional but not yet had the chance to see this for myself.

[-- snip --]


Then you should spend more time reading the previous posts rather than asking already answered questions like you're adding anything of value. They've literally posted links to the video of the beta at least 3 times but no, for you it's the same "they haven't made it public like I want!".
full member
Activity: 700
Merit: 110
Helios Protocol https://discord.gg/cpzAEMB
October 02, 2017, 06:03:06 AM
We have confirmed: the hard cap on the ICO is 1 Billion tokens (WCXT).

Where have you publicised this information apart from here?

Is there any access available so we can see the product functioning, and the trades executing in real time? I have heard it is already functional but not yet had the chance to see this for myself. I think exchanges will be a great source of revenue growing fast in the next 1 - 3 years, but in current markets want to see what is on offer before committing ETH.
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
October 02, 2017, 02:20:56 AM
Why cap is hidden? And why we can't see how many have funds are collected so far?

hard cap is 1 billion tokens, already announced
full member
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
October 01, 2017, 07:08:12 PM
Why cap is hidden? And why we can't see how many have funds are collected so far?
sr. member
Activity: 518
Merit: 261
October 01, 2017, 02:29:44 PM
Hello,

ZenCash team would like Zen to be listed on wcex.co

https://zensystem.io/
https://www.bittrex.com/Market/Index?MarketName=BTC-ZEN
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/annzen-horizen-unbounded-by-design-2047435

Please inform us about your decision. We would like to cooperate with you.

Thanks!

very very good news
Pages:
Jump to: